Friday, April 30th 2021

AMD Earnings Call: GPU Production is Ramping and Mobile GPUs are Set to Arrive Later This Quarter

The current supply of graphics cards has been very tight all over the world. Starting with the launch of the latest Radeon RX 6000 series of GPUs based on RDNA 2 architecture, AMD has found itself in big trouble when it comes to supply of the silicon, compared to the demand that exists for these new GPUs. We have discussed that many times in the past and saw that it represents a problem spanning everyone involved in getting the silicon chips to the hands of consumers. On Tuesday, April 27th, AMD held its Q1 2021 earnings call and webcast, where the company executives talked about the company's future, underlying problems, and ways of addressing them.

Among many topics covered in the call, AMD's President and CEO, Dr. Lisa Su, has talked about the GPU supply. According to Dr. Su, the company is ramping the production of its Radeon graphics cards, adding that the mobile Radeon GPU lineup is lurking. Here is a full quote from the earnings call.
Dr. Lisa Su—AMD Q1 2021 Earning CallAnd we're well-positioned for further growth as we have tripled our commercial notebook design wins with the largest OEMs this year. In graphics, revenue increased by a strong double-digit percentage year over year and sequentially, led by channel sales growth as revenue from our high-end Radeon 6000 GPUs more than doubled from the prior quarter. We introduced our Radeon 6700 XT desktop GPU with leadership 1440p gaming performance in March and are on track for the first notebooks featuring our leading-edge mobile RDNA 2 architecture to launch later this quarter. We expect Radeon 6000 Series GPU sales to grow significantly over the coming quarters as we ramp production.
Source: AMD Q1 2021 Earnings Call Transcript
Add your own comment

34 Comments on AMD Earnings Call: GPU Production is Ramping and Mobile GPUs are Set to Arrive Later This Quarter

#1
JAB Creations
Currently the largest impediment for AMD is Apple still sucking up a large portion of 7nm. What Apple is still using 7nm at TSMC for though I don't know other than probably more worthless mobile junk.
Posted on Reply
#2
Chomiq
Even if apple will switch to 5nm you're still dealing with the lack of silicone substrate.
Posted on Reply
#3
R0H1T
From what I recall AMD will get 2x the 7nm allocation towards the second half of this year? As Apple moves move of their chips to 5nm it will free up a lot of capacity!
Posted on Reply
#4
evernessince
JAB CreationsCurrently the largest impediment for AMD is Apple still sucking up a large portion of 7nm. What Apple is still using 7nm at TSMC for though I don't know other than probably more worthless mobile junk.
That's really not how it works. Companies book wafer allotments years in advance. TSMC then builds out production according to those needs. Apple can't take allotment from AMD, TSMC is contractually required to give AMD what it paid for. The real problem is the massive spike in demand, not Apple.
Posted on Reply
#5
docnorth
Unfortunately the ramp is almost horizontal.
Posted on Reply
#6
olymind1
When will they release cheaper (200-300€) cards?
Posted on Reply
#7
Vayra86
You know what happens after exiting a ramp?

Free fall.
Posted on Reply
#8
Legacy-ZA
I am no longer optimistic. All I see is a lot of waffle.
Posted on Reply
#9
1d10t
Last year 5500M already in limited availability without pandemic, how would 6700M fare any better?
Posted on Reply
#10
Luminescent
As far as I'm concerned there is no longer a problem of stock, most PC components stores have 6700 XT's in stock and in big numbers but NO ONE WANTS THEM AT 1000$ A PIECE !!!
Most people already lost interest in this, GPU's have become an expensive component that makes sense only for professionals and miners.
Posted on Reply
#11
Solid State Soul ( SSS )
Its very impressive with how AMD, despite the massive exodus of veteran members from the Radeon group, managed to leapfrog Nvidia this generation being competitive in the high end AND most importantly being more efficient !!!

Seems like the issue was them not having enough money for R&D, but with the massive success of Ryzen they sorted that out
1d10tLast year 5500M already in limited availability without pandemic, how would 6700M fare any better?
750 Ti from early 2014 is selling for more than its launch MSRP right now :p
Posted on Reply
#12
Raendor
Solid State Soul ( SSS )Its very impressive with how AMD, despite the massive exodus of veteran members from the Radeon group, managed to leapfrog Nvidia this generation being competitive in the high end AND most importantly being more efficient !!!

Seems like the issue was them not having enough money for R&D, but with the massive success of Ryzen they sorted that out


750 Ti from early 2014 is selling for more than its MSRP right now :p
Dunno, I certainly don't enjoy Radeon software and they're lacking in terms of the features compared to nvidia. I'd jump off 6800xt and would've sttled even for 3070 if I could catch one for normal price in a heartbeat.
Posted on Reply
#13
ymbaja
olymind1When will they release cheaper (200-300€) cards?
Took me a minute... at first I thought you were serious :roll:
Posted on Reply
#14
Steevo
Solid State Soul ( SSS )Its very impressive with how AMD, despite the massive exodus of veteran members from the Radeon group, managed to leapfrog Nvidia this generation being competitive in the high end AND most importantly being more efficient !!!

Seems like the issue was them not having enough money for R&D, but with the massive success of Ryzen they sorted that out


750 Ti from early 2014 is selling for more than its launch MSRP right now :p
They lost the fat, the master of smoke and mirrors left to practice his tricks at Intel while leaving behind a team that may have been forced to create Vega.

AMD still needs to be bought out through and with a influx of a few hundred Billion to bring them to complete fruition, they have some great products that are overtly competitive but a lack of capital to push their tech beyond the market share they have clawed into. It sucks for them honestly, so many unprofitable years and lack of resources that a great management team and awesome core staff have managed to make work, but a lack of capital to push the pendulum to the other side. Imagine if they had all the 7nm and production room they could handle, they could sink two whole production runs of Intel hardware and a single one of Nvidia. They could become market dominant for once in the last decade.

If they keep up their hard work for another few years with winning products they might be close enough.
Posted on Reply
#15
evernessince
RaendorDunno, I certainly don't enjoy Radeon software and they're lacking in terms of the features compared to nvidia. I'd jump off 6800xt and would've sttled even for 3070 if I could catch one for normal price in a heartbeat.
I'm not sure lacking in features is the right word, lacking in polish perhaps. Sure they don't have a DLSS competitor but if their alternative turns out better I'd rather wait. DLSS isn't even in enough games right now to be a factor anyways. I really don't think a proprietary feature in the GPU space that has to be implemented on a per game basis has historically made it long term either.

Architecturally though, AMD has indeed made large strides.

I personally wouldn't touch a 3070 with a ten foot pole. 8GB of VRAM is not enough. In case anyone is unaware, Windows 10 shows actual VRAM usage (not allocation) in the task manager and has done so for a year now.
Posted on Reply
#16
Frank_100
Given the way Apple has treated their customer base for the last 25 years, it is hard to believe this company is still in business.

Nobody drops support for existing hardware the way Apple does.

Nobody spends a decade and a half delivering under-powered hardware the is not upgrade-able the way Apple does.

Nobody redesigns software with disregard to current user workflow the way Apple does.


Apple - a fashion statement for non-users
Posted on Reply
#17
Raendor
evernessinceI'm not sure lacking in features is the right word, lacking in polish perhaps. Sure they don't have a DLSS competitor but if their alternative turns out better I'd rather wait. DLSS isn't even in enough games right now to be a factor anyways. I really don't think a proprietary feature in the GPU space that has to be implemented on a per game basis has historically made it long term either.

Architecturally though, AMD has indeed made large strides.

I personally wouldn't touch a 3070 with a ten foot pole. 8GB of VRAM is not enough. In case anyone is unaware, Windows 10 shows actual VRAM usage (not allocation) in the task manager and has done so for a year now.
You might be right. Polish is correct word. raw power is great, but I’m still on a fence on whether to keep it relax or still try to catch/trade for 3080.
Posted on Reply
#18
Vayra86
LuminescentAs far as I'm concerned there is no longer a problem of stock, most PC components stores have 6700 XT's in stock and in big numbers but NO ONE WANTS THEM AT 1000$ A PIECE !!!
Most people already lost interest in this, GPU's have become an expensive component that makes sense only for professionals and miners.
The gen is ageing already, its past halfway until the next releases are going to get press.

This is fast going to Turing Super timing: when it gets a bit more acceptable, its already old news. Part of that is due to limited VRAM.
Frank_100Given the way Apple has treated their customer base for the last 25 years, it is hard to believe this company is still in business.

Nobody drops support for existing hardware the way Apple does.

Nobody spends a decade and a half delivering under-powered hardware the is not upgrade-able the way Apple does.

Nobody redesigns software with disregard to current user workflow the way Apple does.


Apple - a fashion statement for non-users
Apple found a way to set itself apart and still apparently does. Software/hardware integration is the key word. Using the stuff, I can see both its merit and the drawbacks/limitations. Its good there is actual choice in the matter. I like Windows for its flexibility too. But this is a topic on none of that, right?

Did you mistake the A in AMD for fruit?
Posted on Reply
#19
olymind1
ymbajaTook me a minute... at first I thought you were serious :roll:
Sadly i was, just current situation and lately AMD's pricing is the joke.
Posted on Reply
#20
1d10t
Solid State Soul ( SSS )750 Ti from early 2014 is selling for more than its launch MSRP right now :p
Yeah, blame AMD for that lacks of competition.
Frank_100Given the way Apple has treated their customer base for the last 25 years, it is hard to believe this company is still in business.

Nobody drops support for existing hardware the way Apple does.

Nobody spends a decade and a half delivering under-powered hardware the is not upgrade-able the way Apple does.

Nobody redesigns software with disregard to current user workflow the way Apple does.


Apple - a fashion statement for non-users
Frank, are you ok?
olymind1Sadly i was, just current situation and lately AMD's pricing is the joke.
I think they price it accordingly.



Outperforms 8 cores and close to 10 cores , sure you don't want to charge your product the same $ 320 as the Intel 10700K?
Posted on Reply
#21
ymbaja
1d10tOutperforms 8 cores and close to 10 cores , sure you don't want to charge your product the same $ 320 as the Intel 10700K?
OP mentioned “cards” so GPUs (not cpus - which I would also argue are overpriced. But that is using my measuring stick from the “before times”).
Posted on Reply
#22
1d10t
ymbajaOP mentioned “cards” so GPUs (not cpus - which I would also argue are overpriced. But that is using my measuring stick from the “before times”).
Yes, I saw that. Just wondering where he got the idea blaming a certain company in such a situation. MSRP means nothing since last year. The other keyword is "lately," so I'm expecting it has something to do with recent hardware launch, in this case Rocket Lake.
Posted on Reply
#23
Unregistered
RaendorDunno, I certainly don't enjoy Radeon software and they're lacking in terms of the features compared to nvidia. I'd jump off 6800xt and would've sttled even for 3070 if I could catch one for normal price in a heartbeat.
I'd rather have the sane amount of VRAM on the RX 6800, was forced to go with 3070 because no 6800 stock & they were all over 1000 EUR. Don't care about Nvidia's shiny features.
#24
Frank_100
Vayra86The gen is ageing already, its past halfway until the next releases are going to get press.

This is fast going to Turing Super timing: when it gets a bit more acceptable, its already old news. Part of that is due to limited VRAM.


Apple found a way to set itself apart and still apparently does. Software/hardware integration is the key word. Using the stuff, I can see both its merit and the drawbacks/limitations. Its good there is actual choice in the matter. I like Windows for its flexibility too. But this is a topic on none of that, right?

Did you mistake the A in AMD for fruit?
No, I was replying to the apple comments above. Hit the wrong reply button. oops.
Posted on Reply
#25
spnidel
"gpu production is ramping up" that's what they said like 3 or 4 months ago
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:25 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts