Friday, October 28th 2022
Intel Looking to Lay Off Meaningful Numbers of Staff, Can Some Products, After Profit Slump
Intel's third quarter financials that the company released yesterday, weren't exactly what you'd call stellar. This has put Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger in a bind, as he's been forced to announce cost cuts of US$3 billion annually, starting 2023, but that it'll grow to somewhere between US$8 to 10 billion by 2025. Although Gelsinger didn't reveal the specifics of what these cost cuts will entail, he did mention quite a few potentials, according to The Register. Gelisinger stated that Intel "need to balance increased investment in areas like leadership in [technology development], product, and capacity [at new plants under construction] in Ohio and Germany, with the efficiency measures elsewhere as we drive to have best in class structures."
Intel's CFO David Zinsner, told Barron's that the company will be cutting a "meaningful number" of employees from Intel's payroll. Zisner went on to say that Intel will also perform "portfolio cuts, right-sizing our support organizations, more stringent cost controls in all aspects of our spending, and improved sales and marketing efficiency". It sounds like almost no-one is safe at Intel, especially as portofolio cuts mean that some product lines will either be sold off, or simply just canned in favour of more profitable products. Intel is also betting hard on its IDM 2.0 strategy, where the company is decoupling its hardware and software design teams from its foundry business. Time will tell if this helps restart Intel as a business, but Gelsinger seems to believe that the changes he's implementing at Intel will help turn things around.
Sources:
The Register, Barrons
Intel's CFO David Zinsner, told Barron's that the company will be cutting a "meaningful number" of employees from Intel's payroll. Zisner went on to say that Intel will also perform "portfolio cuts, right-sizing our support organizations, more stringent cost controls in all aspects of our spending, and improved sales and marketing efficiency". It sounds like almost no-one is safe at Intel, especially as portofolio cuts mean that some product lines will either be sold off, or simply just canned in favour of more profitable products. Intel is also betting hard on its IDM 2.0 strategy, where the company is decoupling its hardware and software design teams from its foundry business. Time will tell if this helps restart Intel as a business, but Gelsinger seems to believe that the changes he's implementing at Intel will help turn things around.
81 Comments on Intel Looking to Lay Off Meaningful Numbers of Staff, Can Some Products, After Profit Slump
Just look at this, and pay attention to all the columns in the table, not only the total compensation.
www.equilar.com/reports/95-table-equilar-new-york-times-top-200-highest-paid-ceos-2022
And curiously huang and su gain around 8x less than gelsinger: lisa su with around 29 millions and huang around 23 millions
:)
Kinda Bs as others mentioned, share holders eh.
I hope the cuts are mere abrasions.
And those unlucky find greener pastures.
By leaving VMWare early he had to leave a lot of money in the form of bonus' and options. Intel had to reimburse him for that. IDK what your experience is, but as an engineer I make about the same as my boss. It's entirely possible, and in fact common, for an engineering manager to 'manage' someone who makes significantly more than them.
What you're describing is probably true of the next higher level and up, i.e. the people who 'manage managers', usually called Directors or Vice Presidents.
Hence, there are two paths, but the paths are to some degree equal in terms of pay, to a point. Management jobs in general, IMO based on my observations, are not very secure jobs. For every manager who makes it to director, there's like a bus load of failed unemployed managers.
I believe I can sum this up as "ya'll got fricked"
Edit: Do you think wanting to lead is a form of corruption on its own? (Rhetorical question) No we can't. We must follow the leader and complain about it all the way, like the sheep we are.
For rhetorical question, I guess it depends. It's all about motivation why and then means of exucution, oh and necessity perceived by others of needing a leader.
Just because you are an executive does not STOP a mind with ideas on innovation from solid innovators.
~ Innovating ~ engineers will always have great ideas.
A company can run without a CEO.
Yeah, mostly strategies - discussions, brain-storming but with bad decisions, etc.
They don't make analysis on what's most optimal and best, but most of the time it's about political decisions and what they want based on some type of fanboyism and perceptions (right or wrong)...
This type of political decisions which have zero economic logic and sense.
But there are protectionist "laws" between the EU, UK and US - trade agreements? which ignore the economic reality?