Monday, July 3rd 2023

NVIDIA Proposes that AI Will Accelerate Climate Research Innovation

AI and accelerated computing will help climate researchers achieve the miracles they need to achieve breakthroughs in climate research, NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang said during a keynote Monday at the Berlin Summit for the Earth Virtualization Engines initiative. "Richard Feynman once said that "what I can't create, I don't understand" and that's the reason why climate modeling is so important," Huang told 180 attendees at the Harnack House in Berlin, a storied gathering place for the region's scientific and research community. "And so the work that you do is vitally important to policymakers to researchers to the industry," he added.

To advance this work, the Berlin Summit brings together participants from around the globe to harness AI and high-performance computing for climate prediction. In his talk, Huang outlined three miracles that will have to happen for climate researchers to achieve their goals, and touched on NVIDIA's own efforts to collaborate with climate researchers and policymakers with its Earth-2 efforts. The first miracle required will be to simulate the climate fast enough, and with a high enough resolution - on the order of just a couple of square kilometers.
The second miracle needed will be the ability to pre-compute vast quantities of data. The third miracle needed is the ability to visualize all this data interactively with NVIDIA Omniverse to "put it in the hands of policymakers, businesses, companies, and researchers."

The Next Wave of Climate and Weather Innovation
The Earth Virtualization Engines initiative, known as EVE, is an international collaboration that brings together digital infrastructure focused on climate science, HPC and AI aiming to provide, for the first time, easily accessible kilometer-scale climate information to sustainably manage the planet. "The reason why Earth-2 and EVE found each other at the perfect time is because Earth-2 was based on 3 fundamental breakthroughs," Huang said.

The initiative promises to accelerate the pace of advances, advocating coordinated climate projections at 2.5-km resolution. It's an enormous challenge, but it's one that builds on a huge base of advancements over the past 25 years. A sprawling suite of applications already benefits from accelerated computing, including ICON, IFS, NEMO, MPAS, WRF-G and more—and much more computing power for such applications is coming.

The NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip is a breakthrough accelerated CPU designed from the ground up for giant-scale AI and high-performance computing applications. It delivers up to 10x higher performance for applications running terabytes of data. It's built to scale, and by connecting large numbers of these chips together, NVIDIA can offer systems with the power efficiency to accelerate the work of researchers at the cutting edge of climate research. "To the software it looks like one giant processor," Huang said.

To help researchers put vast quantities of data to work, quickly, to unlock understanding, Huang spoke about NVIDIA Modulus, an open-source framework for building training and fine-tuning physics-based machine learning model, and FourCastNet, a global, data-driven weather forecasting model, and how the latest AI-driven models can learn physics from real-world data. Using raw data alone, FourCastNet is able to learn the principles governing complex weather patterns. Huang showed how FourCastNet was able to accurately predict the path of Hurricane Harvey by modeling the Coriolis force, the effect of the Earth's rotation, on the storm.


Such models, when tethered to regular "checkpoints" created by traditional simulation, allow for more detailed, long-range forecasts. Huang then demonstrated how some of the FourCastNet ensemble's models, running on NVIDIA GPUs, anticipated an unprecedented North African heatwave. By running FourCastNet in Modulus, NVIDIA was able to generate 21-day weather trajectories of 1,000 ensemble members in one-tenth the time it previously took to do a single ensemble—and with 1,000x less energy consumption.

Lastly, NVIDIA technologies promise to help all this knowledge become more accessible with digital twins able to create interactive models of increasingly complex systems - from Amazon warehouses to the way 5G signals propagate in dense urban environments. Huang then showed a stunning, high-resolution interactive visualization of global-scale climate data in the cloud, zooming in from a view of the globe to a detailed view of Berlin. This approach can work to predict climate and weather in locations as diverse as Berlin, Tokyo and Buenos Aires, Huang said.


Earth: The Final Frontier
To help meet challenges such as these, Huang outlined how NVIDIA is building more powerful systems for training AI models, simulating physical problems and interactive visualization. "These new types of supercomputers are just coming online," Huang said. "This is as fresh a computing technology as you can imagine."

Huang ended his talk by thanking key researchers from across the field and playfully suggesting a mission statement for EVE. "Earth, the final frontier, these are the voyages of EVE," Huang said. Its "mission is to push the limits of computing in service of climate modeling, to seek out new methods and technologies to study the global-to-local state of the climate to inform today the impact of mitigation and adaptation to Earth's tomorrow, to boldly go where no one has gone before."

For more on Earth-2, visit www.nvidia.com/en-us/high-performance-computing/earth-2/
Source: NVIDIA Blog
Add your own comment

31 Comments on NVIDIA Proposes that AI Will Accelerate Climate Research Innovation

#1
Dristun
Should've used the AI to design a better power connector
Posted on Reply
#2
ZoneDymo
research shows that doing a ton of research into climate change affects climate change
Posted on Reply
#3
csendesmark
Cool, now they can generate more invalid climate models!
BUT FASTER!!!
Posted on Reply
#4
ixi
Perfect climat control is where is only nvidia. What a joke.
Posted on Reply
#5
[h+]³
ZoneDymoresearch shows that doing a ton of research into climate change affects climate change
clAImate change?
Posted on Reply
#6
R-T-B
csendesmarkCool, now they can generate more invalid climate models!
BUT FASTER!!!
It took three posts...

tl:"I didn't exist the past 5 years"; man made climate change is very real and we are all suffering from it now.

Man, if only we'd known about this since the friggin 80s, maybe we could've done something. Oh wait, we did.

mods, just close this. This thread is gonna burn up faster than any climate model could anticipate.
Posted on Reply
#7
trsttte
R-T-BIt took three posts...

tl:"I didn't exist the past 5 years"; man made climate change is very real and we are all suffering from it now.

Man, if only we'd known about this since the friggin 80s, maybe we could've done something. Oh wait, we did.

mods, just close this. This thread is gonna burn up faster than any climate model could anticipate.
I took it as all models always underestimate the damage and impacts because they usually do but maybe you're right
Posted on Reply
#8
Scrizz
R-T-BIt took three posts...

tl:"I didn't exist the past 5 years"; man made climate change is very real and we are all suffering from it now.

Man, if only we'd known about this since the friggin 80s, maybe we could've done something. Oh wait, we did.

mods, just close this. This thread is gonna burn up faster than any climate model could anticipate.
Posted on Reply
#9
claes
ixiPerfect climat control is where is only nvidia. What a joke.
Huh?
Posted on Reply
#10
SOAREVERSOR
R-T-BIt took three posts...

tl:"I didn't exist the past 5 years"; man made climate change is very real and we are all suffering from it now.

Man, if only we'd known about this since the friggin 80s, maybe we could've done something. Oh wait, we did.

mods, just close this. This thread is gonna burn up faster than any climate model could anticipate.
Exxon new about it in the 70s but then did what the smoking companies did and gulled the rubes into thinking it wasn't real. The rubes are the real problem. But idiots will always be with us. In the future though we can all point and laugh at them and have them go down in the history books as some of the stupidest morons to ever exist.
Posted on Reply
#11
claes
You mean when we’re all dead? :(
Posted on Reply
#12
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
If they truly wanted to affect climate change their gpus wouldnt be failing within 1-3 years, they would also recycle the pcbs, precious metals instead of ewasting them. Also their powerdraw would be under 65 watts.

Climate change=money scam
Posted on Reply
#13
kondamin
claesYou mean when we’re all dead? :(
We’re doing everything except trying to mitigate all the problems it’s causing.
Posted on Reply
#14
claes
eidairaman1If they truly wanted to affect climate change their gpus wouldnt be failing within 1-3 years, they would also recycle the pcbs, precious metals instead of ewasting them. Also their powerdraw would be under 65 watts.

Climate change=money scam
I still have two 470’s and a 970 that are fully functional? I sold a 280 a few years ago and it had been working. I have a GeForce 4 somewhere at my parents house that was working last I checked.
Posted on Reply
#15
yannus1
R-T-BIt took three posts...

tl:"I didn't exist the past 5 years"; man made climate change is very real and we are all suffering from it now.

Man, if only we'd known about this since the friggin 80s, maybe we could've done something. Oh wait, we did.

mods, just close this. This thread is gonna burn up faster than any climate model could anticipate.
Fear is real. Climate change narrative promoters are all linked to massive pollution and never target the real problem... billionaires and corporations.
Posted on Reply
#16
R0H1T
ZoneDymoresearch shows that doing a ton of research into climate change affects climate change
Or making up your own currency coins :shadedshu:
SOAREVERSORExxon new about it in the 70s but then did what the smoking companies did and gulled the rubes into thinking it wasn't real. The rubes are the real problem. But idiots will always be with us. In the future though we can all point and laugh at them and have them go down in the history books as some of the stupidest morons to ever exist.
Posted on Reply
#17
claes
yannus1Fear is real. Climate change narrative promoters are all linked to massive pollution and never target the real problem... billionaires and corporations.
They don’t? News to me, seems like huge oil corporations and banks are the primary targets of their ire

People really showing their hand in terms of where they get their “news” from in this thread
Posted on Reply
#18
bonehead123
ZoneDymoresearch shows that doing a ton of research into climate change affects climate change
reminds me of the old gov't catch all statement:

"lets do a feasibility study to see if it's gonna be feasible to do a feasibility study on the feasibility of studying whatever subject you wanna debate/fund/scrutinize etc"...

I'm from the gov't, I'm here to help ..:roll:..:kookoo:..:fear:
Posted on Reply
#19
R0H1T
yannus1Climate change narrative promoters are all linked to massive pollution and never target the real problem... billionaires and corporations.
They are but so is everyone gaming on a freaking RTX 4090, or mining on it, then someone buying a 1000 pair of clothes/shoes on Amazon/Shein & returning half of them! Let's not absolve individuals contributing, to whatever extent, of their responsibility :ohwell:
Posted on Reply
#20
AusWolf
R-T-BIt took three posts...

tl:"I didn't exist the past 5 years"; man made climate change is very real and we are all suffering from it now.

Man, if only we'd known about this since the friggin 80s, maybe we could've done something. Oh wait, we did.

mods, just close this. This thread is gonna burn up faster than any climate model could anticipate.
I was positively surprised to see barely any mention of climate change (man-made or otherwise) in the article. If I understand it right, it's more about AI predicting the weather with greater accuracy and resolution than anything before, which I think is cool. It's a much better use of the technology than stupid chatbots or resolution upscaling, imo. :)
Posted on Reply
#21
nguyen
Seeing cloud formation at 2.5-km resolution would be fantastic for airlines too :D
Posted on Reply
#22
TheinsanegamerN
Ingenious. Push the AI buzzword in with climate alarmist and you unlock infinite money.
R-T-BIt took three posts...

tl:"I didn't exist the past 5 years"; man made climate change is very real and we are all suffering from it now.

Man, if only we'd known about this since the friggin 80s, maybe we could've done something. Oh wait, we did.
It took 4 posts....

In the 80s we "knew" that the arctic would be gone, Florida would be underwater, we'd be seeing mass starvation and there would be no freshwater left. In 1990 we only had "5 years" to stop permanent damage to the planet and mass human fatalities and blah blah blah.

30 years later we're still hearing the same arguments, often by the same alarmists. Meteorologists are better at predicting the future then climate scientists. Meanwhile the billionaires and politicians that bovate about this impending disaster continue to jet around the world in private luxury planes and absorbing whole families worth of resources to build their beachfront mansions, posing with freezers full of ice cream while telling us about buckling down our economic and social futures.

:its all so tiresome meme:
R-T-Bmods, just close this. This thread is gonna burn up faster than any climate model could anticipate.
It'd be the first time any of their models actually predicted something correctly.
AusWolfI was positively surprised to see barely any mention of climate change (man-made or otherwise) in the article. If I understand it right, it's more about AI predicting the weather with greater accuracy and resolution than anything before, which I think is cool. It's a much better use of the technology than stupid chatbots or resolution upscaling, imo. :)
If it actually predicts when its gonna rain I'd be over the moon. If I listened to weather channels I'd have gotten about 2 feet more rain this year then weve actually gotten so far.
Posted on Reply
#23
claes
It’s so weird that we can’t talk politics on this forum but people are free to peddle politically motivated conspiracy theories with no scientific foundation

Sorry to say, the vast majority of meteorologists agree with climatologists about climate change.
And yes, much of the damage done by climate change is irreversible, which is what those timeframes were about. Try reading the studies instead of headlines
Posted on Reply
#24
evernessince
While this is nice, the world has been aware of the dangers of climate change for awhile now. The problem has always been translating that knowledge into concrete action, which is difficult as politicians are in the pockets of these large companies.
TheinsanegamerNIngenious. Push the AI buzzword in with climate alarmist and you unlock infinite money.

It took 4 posts....

In the 80s we "knew" that the arctic would be gone, Florida would be underwater, we'd be seeing mass starvation and there would be no freshwater left. In 1990 we only had "5 years" to stop permanent damage to the planet and mass human fatalities and blah blah blah.

30 years later we're still hearing the same arguments, often by the same alarmists. Meteorologists are better at predicting the future then climate scientists.

It'd be the first time any of their models actually predicted something correctly.


If it actually predicts when its gonna rain I'd be over the moon. If I listened to weather channels I'd have gotten about 2 feet more rain this year then weve actually gotten so far.
Relevant reading:

www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/why-didnt-first-earth-days-predictions-come-true-its-complicated-180958820/

"The truth is more complicated. Climate change won’t destroy the planet, although it will change the environment we’re accustomed to, in ways we can't predict and with possibly dire consequences. And weaponizing “failed predictions” of the past to justify leaving the climate problem to the market is deceptive. If we don't act because a previous prediction "failed," we face an array of human suffering, which will hit the poorest and disadvantaged the hardest."

Pointing to the past failures of early climate models and calling it a hoax merely based on that ignores the fact that the concrete actions we have taken have certainly made an impact. Even if you don't believe in any of the outcomes of climate change models, everyone should want clear air, less pollution, and healthy biodiversity. You don't need to believe in climate change to want those, the benefit is obvious and happens to almost always coincide with helping offset greenhouse gas output. Just as an example, if the US were to invest 384 million per year for 5 years in upgrading transmission lines, it would allow green energy to be built at scale in locations that are best suited for it and that energy could then be sold around the country. This would create a ton of jobs, go a long way to de-carbonizing the grid, decrease the cost of electricity by vastly increasing the energy market suppliers could sell to / reducing transmission losses, decrease pollution, and increase the reliability of the electric grid.

Also, it's a common misconception that weather forecasts predict the percentage chance of rain. The percentage they give isn't the chance of you having rain, it's the rain coverage (0.1" or more) in the projected area. So if there's a 40% chance of rain, 40% of the area will receive 0.1" or greater of rainfall. Even if there's a 90% chance of rain, for 10% of the area there will be no rain. People often assume that the weather forecast is inaccurate as a result but it's more a lack of general education that many people have on the subject. Earth science was always the lesser popular course when compared to chemistry.
Posted on Reply
#25
AusWolf
claesIt’s so weird that we can’t talk politics on this forum but people are free to peddle politically motivated conspiracy theories with no scientific foundation

Sorry to say, the vast majority of meteorologists agree with climatologists about climate change.
And yes, much of the damage done by climate change is irreversible, which is what those timeframes were about. Try reading the studies instead of headlines
People aren't tired of the topic because climate change doesn't exist. People are tired because the blame gets shifted onto them, when they have no choice but to buy and use the energy-hungry pieces of crap pushed out by megacorporations that actually have the power to do something. Most people just want to live a normal life without being blamed for the world's problems, that's all.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 24th, 2024 13:49 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts