Monday, July 3rd 2023

NVIDIA Proposes that AI Will Accelerate Climate Research Innovation

AI and accelerated computing will help climate researchers achieve the miracles they need to achieve breakthroughs in climate research, NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang said during a keynote Monday at the Berlin Summit for the Earth Virtualization Engines initiative. "Richard Feynman once said that "what I can't create, I don't understand" and that's the reason why climate modeling is so important," Huang told 180 attendees at the Harnack House in Berlin, a storied gathering place for the region's scientific and research community. "And so the work that you do is vitally important to policymakers to researchers to the industry," he added.

To advance this work, the Berlin Summit brings together participants from around the globe to harness AI and high-performance computing for climate prediction. In his talk, Huang outlined three miracles that will have to happen for climate researchers to achieve their goals, and touched on NVIDIA's own efforts to collaborate with climate researchers and policymakers with its Earth-2 efforts. The first miracle required will be to simulate the climate fast enough, and with a high enough resolution - on the order of just a couple of square kilometers.
The second miracle needed will be the ability to pre-compute vast quantities of data. The third miracle needed is the ability to visualize all this data interactively with NVIDIA Omniverse to "put it in the hands of policymakers, businesses, companies, and researchers."

The Next Wave of Climate and Weather Innovation
The Earth Virtualization Engines initiative, known as EVE, is an international collaboration that brings together digital infrastructure focused on climate science, HPC and AI aiming to provide, for the first time, easily accessible kilometer-scale climate information to sustainably manage the planet. "The reason why Earth-2 and EVE found each other at the perfect time is because Earth-2 was based on 3 fundamental breakthroughs," Huang said.

The initiative promises to accelerate the pace of advances, advocating coordinated climate projections at 2.5-km resolution. It's an enormous challenge, but it's one that builds on a huge base of advancements over the past 25 years. A sprawling suite of applications already benefits from accelerated computing, including ICON, IFS, NEMO, MPAS, WRF-G and more—and much more computing power for such applications is coming.

The NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip is a breakthrough accelerated CPU designed from the ground up for giant-scale AI and high-performance computing applications. It delivers up to 10x higher performance for applications running terabytes of data. It's built to scale, and by connecting large numbers of these chips together, NVIDIA can offer systems with the power efficiency to accelerate the work of researchers at the cutting edge of climate research. "To the software it looks like one giant processor," Huang said.

To help researchers put vast quantities of data to work, quickly, to unlock understanding, Huang spoke about NVIDIA Modulus, an open-source framework for building training and fine-tuning physics-based machine learning model, and FourCastNet, a global, data-driven weather forecasting model, and how the latest AI-driven models can learn physics from real-world data. Using raw data alone, FourCastNet is able to learn the principles governing complex weather patterns. Huang showed how FourCastNet was able to accurately predict the path of Hurricane Harvey by modeling the Coriolis force, the effect of the Earth's rotation, on the storm.


Such models, when tethered to regular "checkpoints" created by traditional simulation, allow for more detailed, long-range forecasts. Huang then demonstrated how some of the FourCastNet ensemble's models, running on NVIDIA GPUs, anticipated an unprecedented North African heatwave. By running FourCastNet in Modulus, NVIDIA was able to generate 21-day weather trajectories of 1,000 ensemble members in one-tenth the time it previously took to do a single ensemble—and with 1,000x less energy consumption.

Lastly, NVIDIA technologies promise to help all this knowledge become more accessible with digital twins able to create interactive models of increasingly complex systems - from Amazon warehouses to the way 5G signals propagate in dense urban environments. Huang then showed a stunning, high-resolution interactive visualization of global-scale climate data in the cloud, zooming in from a view of the globe to a detailed view of Berlin. This approach can work to predict climate and weather in locations as diverse as Berlin, Tokyo and Buenos Aires, Huang said.


Earth: The Final Frontier
To help meet challenges such as these, Huang outlined how NVIDIA is building more powerful systems for training AI models, simulating physical problems and interactive visualization. "These new types of supercomputers are just coming online," Huang said. "This is as fresh a computing technology as you can imagine."

Huang ended his talk by thanking key researchers from across the field and playfully suggesting a mission statement for EVE. "Earth, the final frontier, these are the voyages of EVE," Huang said. Its "mission is to push the limits of computing in service of climate modeling, to seek out new methods and technologies to study the global-to-local state of the climate to inform today the impact of mitigation and adaptation to Earth's tomorrow, to boldly go where no one has gone before."

For more on Earth-2, visit www.nvidia.com/en-us/high-performance-computing/earth-2/
Source: NVIDIA Blog
Add your own comment

31 Comments on NVIDIA Proposes that AI Will Accelerate Climate Research Innovation

#26
claes
That’s a poor reading of these skeptic’s posts and of whom the “alarmists” are targeting but ooookay

And I didn’t say anyone was tired. If anything, they obviously have tons of energy for skepticism
Posted on Reply
#27
AusWolf
claesThat’s a poor reading of these skeptic’s posts and of whom the “alarmists” are targeting but ooookay

And I didn’t say anyone was tired. If anything, they obviously have tons of energy for skepticism
Well, the "alarmists" have tons of energy to ring their bells, so it's only fair, I suppose.

In my book, "alarmist" means someone who craves an unwarranted and excessive amount of attention either for themselves, or for a topic by spreading negative news. I don't want to join either them, or the "skeptics". I'm one of those who just want to live a healthy life.
Posted on Reply
#28
TheinsanegamerN
evernessince"The truth is more complicated. Climate change won’t destroy the planet, although it will change the environment we’re accustomed to, in ways we can't predict and with possibly dire consequences. And weaponizing “failed predictions” of the past to justify leaving the climate problem to the market is deceptive. If we don't act because a previous prediction "failed," we face an array of human suffering, which will hit the poorest and disadvantaged the hardest."
Have you ever heard of "the boy who cried wolf"?

If your group has consistently foretold the horrors of the world ending for half a century, and these horrific events never come to pass despite 99% of these "climate goals" never being met, it may be time to question how these people are coming to these conclusions. It reminds me of the religious cults that are constantly preaching about the end of the world, then change the date to a later date when it turns out the rapture didnt happen. Much like those in the cult, every time climate "scientists " wildly miss the mark they simply move the date back 10 years with excuses of how their models were "inaccurate" but now we have "new data" to show the climate rapture will ABSOLUTELY happen this time. And now, we can add "muh disavdvantaged groups" for extra emotional manipulation, because peopel are starting to question how you can make a career out of constantly being wrong.
evernessincePointing to the past failures of early climate models and calling it a hoax merely based on that ignores the fact that the concrete actions we have taken have certainly made an impact.
Your "concrete actions" have resulted in total imperical output of CO2 globally increasing by over 100% since 1977. In 77 it was 18.5 billion tons of CO2. In 2022 it was 37.49 billion.

www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/

And yet, despite this being the "worst case scenario" for climate scientists in the 70s, 80s, 90,s, ece, none of their predictions of global annihilation came true. Florida was supposed to be underwater by 2000 2010 2020 if CO2 output didnt decrease. It has doubled, yet florida remains above water.

So what gives? Why should we have any stock in any current predictions when all the past ones have failed miserably despite a worst case scenario? Why is THIS time the truly accurate time that we have "5 years" before there is permanent damage (whatever that means)? This is why people question the entire movement.
evernessinceEven if you don't believe in any of the outcomes of climate change models, everyone should want clear air, less pollution, and healthy biodiversity. You don't need to believe in climate change to want those, the benefit is obvious and happens to almost always coincide with helping offset greenhouse gas output.
Yes, clean air and water is nice. You know what isnt nice? Torpedoing out entire power grid, transportation infrastructure, farming infrastructure, ece to achieve this, ruining the lives of the very billions we are supposed to be "saving". It would also be nice if, in the headlong attempts tp trust into the "clean" age, we didnt obliterate rivers in the congo and australia with cobalt and nickel poisoning, or pump billions of gallons of toxic waste into the pacific while making solar panels that we will cut down acre upon acre of wild territory for.

But those are not CO2, so we dont care about them right now. We're just trading a bad problem for a worse one. CO2 can be scrubbed via plants, CO2 scrubbers, ece. Heavy metal poisoning not so much.
evernessinceJust as an example, if the US were to invest 384 million per year for 5 years in upgrading transmission lines, it would allow green energy to be built at scale in locations that are best suited for it and that energy could then be sold around the country. This would create a ton of jobs, go a long way to de-carbonizing the grid, decrease the cost of electricity by vastly increasing the energy market suppliers could sell to / reducing transmission losses, decrease pollution, and increase the reliability of the electric grid.
Yes, it would be nice if we invested in our electric grid. Of course, that "green energy" will never be able to stabilize a grid without nuclear energy, which is constantly denied as a viable energy source, because the sun doesnt shine at night no matter how much you ask it to.
AusWolfPeople aren't tired of the topic because climate change doesn't exist. People are tired because the blame gets shifted onto them, when they have no choice but to buy and use the energy-hungry pieces of crap pushed out by megacorporations that actually have the power to do something. Most people just want to live a normal life without being blamed for the world's problems, that's all.
I'm tired of it being used as an excuse to rip apart parts of our lives with the claim of being benevolent. Yes, the climate is changing. No, it will not be the end of humanity. No, we do not need to rip our economy apart in 5 years to prevent the boogeyman of the rapture from taking us all. If environmentalists were pushing for more nuke plants to bring an end to natural gas and coal in our power grid, and advocating for a total grid rebuild alongside it to support things like EV mandates, I'd be a lot more supportive of their efforts.
Posted on Reply
#29
AusWolf
GarrusI studied climate change in university. I learned that how it is presented to people by politicians is false and anti-science. It is a little bemusing when the doomsayers try to preach to people like myself that know 1000 times as much about the subject than they do. I studied my masters of science, they joined a cult.

I usually start by asking "is it hotter where you live now than before" and then I prove that it is not. Then I talk about how the "average temperature" does not rise uniformly, more heat is felt at night time, and at the poles of the earth, not during your daytime maximum. At that point they usually show their ignorance by failing to understand such a simple explanation as that, because the media told them otherwise, it must be happening. Then I laugh.

I was laughing today at Microsoft's attempt to add green leaves to the "browser essentials" tab or to "save the earth with windows update". Then I laughed when I arrived at Heathrow Airport in England and saw giant signs about how my airport was carbon neutral. Ha.
Not to mention some airlines ask you to pay a small extra fee to make your flight more "carbon neutral". Sure, for an extra 30 quid, the plane will suddenly stop emitting CO2, and I'll totally believe it. :roll:

If that's how it works, everybody just give me a tenner, and I'll make sure the V-power I put in my 1.6 Turbo is as carbon neutral as any V-power can get. Pinky promise. :laugh:

This is what gaslights a sane person, not the topic of climate change.
Posted on Reply
#30
AusWolf
TheinsanegamerNI'm tired of it being used as an excuse to rip apart parts of our lives with the claim of being benevolent. Yes, the climate is changing. No, it will not be the end of humanity. No, we do not need to rip our economy apart in 5 years to prevent the boogeyman of the rapture from taking us all. If environmentalists were pushing for more nuke plants to bring an end to natural gas and coal in our power grid, and advocating for a total grid rebuild alongside it to support things like EV mandates, I'd be a lot more supportive of their efforts.
Agreed. As for me, I'm just tired of being used as a culprit of something I have little to no control over.

Yes, I have to drive a car to work, holidays, etc. No, I can't charge an EV at home, nor can I afford to buy one. I have a fridge, an oven and a gas boiler. They work with gas and electricity from the grid. How they're produced is not my problem. I won't freeze to death in the winter just because power companies can't be asked not to use coal.
Posted on Reply
#31
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
Go home folks. Locked.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 23rd, 2024 08:06 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts