Tuesday, January 2nd 2024

Steam Ends Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1 Support

As of January 1st, 2024, Steam has officially stopped supporting the Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1 operating systems. After that date, existing Steam Client installations on these operating systems will no longer receive any updates, including critical security updates. Steam Support will be unable to offer technical assistance to users still on these older operating systems. Steam also cannot guarantee the continued functionality or security of the Steam client and games purchased through Steam on unsupported Windows versions. Users are strongly encouraged to update to a newer Windows 10 or 11 version to ensure Steam and its games continue functioning properly beyond the January 1st cutoff date.

This change is necessary because core Steam features rely on an embedded version of Google Chrome that no longer functions on older Windows. Future Steam versions will also require Windows features and security updates only present in Windows 10 and later. With Microsoft having ended security updates and technical support for Windows 7 in 2020 and Windows 8.1 in 2023, these older operating systems are increasingly vulnerable to new malware exploits when connected to the internet. This malware can negatively impact PC performance, cause Steam and games to crash, or be used to steal Steam account credentials. Updating to a supported Windows version is highly recommended for all Windows 7/8/8.1 users to continue securely running Steam.
Source: Steam FAQ
Add your own comment

89 Comments on Steam Ends Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1 Support

#76
maxli86
64KI'm not clear about what it meant that Steam would no longer support Win 7 and Win 8. There are still some gamers using those OS there according to their survey. Granted it's about 1/2 of 1% but that still possibly represents several hundreds of thousands of gamers. Also, why is Steam even still reporting these OS in their survey?
For myself I still have working Windows 7 and 8.1, Steam still can run only certain newer game won't be able to launch.
I mainly use old PC to play old games for example Crysis, Fallout 3 and New Vegas etc.
There's a retrospective feeling when playing old games on older PC.
Posted on Reply
#77
chrcoluk
It may not be broken now, but ending support might mean they just stop making an effort and validating builds on 7, so one day if it breaks they have already covered their back.
Posted on Reply
#78
darksf
Funny thing is that Thorium browser managed to make Chromium 122 engine work on both XP and Windows 7. Tested on Thinkpad T60 W7/32bit works perfect. So why is Steam mongering about dropping support do not know. They could just leave 1-2 devs to support backporting the Chromium to W7 but officially to refuse any responsibility for you running it and that is all.
Posted on Reply
#79
nageme
darksfFunny thing is that Thorium browser managed to make Chromium 122 engine work on both XP and Windows 7.
Thanks for the pointer. Maybe Vivaldi should be notified...

More specific links:
thorium.rocks/win7
github.com/win32ss/supermium
64KGranted it's about 1/2 of 1% but that still possibly represents several hundreds of thousands of gamers.
No support for same reason as most companies, I guess: the market share is too small for them to bother.
64KAlso, why is Steam even still reporting these OS in their survey?
Don't give them ideas... As long as people can connect, with any Steam version, and report their OS, it should be there.
64KGranted it's about 1/2 of 1%
0.5 x 1 = 0.5. :)
Posted on Reply
#80
64K
nageme0.5 x 1 = 0.5. :)
Nope

0.5 * 0.01 = 0.005
Posted on Reply
#81
remixedcat
qlumAs much as I like using Linux (arch btw) I don't think the average person hard-stuck on windows 7 or 8 would know how to work with Linux.

Besides the bigger concern is old games, one may want to run on old hardware on a retro system.
For that retro use-case switching to linux doesn't really cut it. Even if end of the day the games can run in Wine on more modern hardware.
Linux Mint is very much like windows 7 UI and feel. It's very polished and easy to use!
Posted on Reply
#82
TheFighterJetDude
darksfFunny thing is that Thorium browser managed to make Chromium 122 engine work on both XP and Windows 7. Tested on Thinkpad T60 W7/32bit works perfect. So why is Steam mongering about dropping support do not know. They could just leave 1-2 devs to support backporting the Chromium to W7 but officially to refuse any responsibility for you running it and that is all.
What about 2000.
Posted on Reply
#83
nageme
nageme0.5 x 1 = 0.5. :)
64KNope
0.5 * 0.01 = 0.005
? You're restating the same thing. Half of one percent is half a percent.

Hence, the original quote is funny:
Granted it's about 1/2 of 1%
Posted on Reply
#84
64K
nageme? You're restating the same thing. Half of one percent is half a percent.

Hence, the original quote is funny:
Yes, we agree on the percentage but to state percentage in decimal form you have to divide by 100 so 1% in decimal form is 0.01

I could have said 0.5 of 1% or 1/2 of 1/100 but it's more elegant mathematically to say 1/2 of 1%
Posted on Reply
#85
Imouto
chrcolukIt may not be broken now, but ending support might mean they just stop making an effort and validating builds on 7, so one day if it breaks they have already covered their back.
It's exactly what it means.
Posted on Reply
#86
Jacky_BEL
nagemeThanks for the pointer. Maybe Vivaldi should be notified...

More specific links:
thorium.rocks/win7
github.com/win32ss/supermium


No support for same reason as most companies, I guess: the market share is too small for them to bother.


Don't give them ideas... As long as people can connect, with any Steam version, and report their OS, it should be there.


0.5 x 1 = 0.5. :)
On a side note , security scan of Supermium gives me a trojan warning:

Trojan:Win32/Malgent!MTB

Posted on Reply
#87
nageme
@Jacky_BEL
That's odd. Mostly the x86 version.
Flagged by half of the VirusTotal scanners, including Microsoft, Symantec, McAfee, Avast, AVG, but not NOD32, Kaspersky.

The x64 version is mostly unflagged.
Posted on Reply
#88
darksf
TheFighterJetDudeWhat about 2000.
Well you should be able to install it if you install KernelEx. I doubt it will run on vanilla win2k.I don't have currently machine with win2k only w98se,xp64sp3,w7-32,w7-64,w8.1,w11 and Clear Linux. You might be joking but some of us on this forum support some retro gear either for fun or because it just works for specific tasks.
Posted on Reply
#89
TheFighterJetDude
darksfWell you should be able to install it if you install KernelEx. I doubt it will run on vanilla win2k.I don't have currently machine with win2k only w98se,xp64sp3,w7-32,w7-64,w8.1,w11 and Clear Linux. You might be joking but some of us on this forum support some retro gear either for fun or because it just works for specific tasks.
I currently daily drive 7 but no joke I would love to daily drive 2000 again. The only thing is without the extended kernel. If I am going to use the extended kernel I might as well use XP. And I don't like XP as much. I am just waiting for some good solid browser to be ported to vanilla 2000, sadly I may have to wait a bit because everyone is so focused on XP but no one seems to care about vanilla 2000. But if I am going to go older than 7 it is going to be 2000.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 07:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts