Tuesday, January 9th 2024

AMD Announces New Socket AM4 Desktop Processors—5700X3D and 5000GT APUs

AMD Socket AM4 continues to be relevant even in 2024, nearly seven years since its introduction, with the company announcing several new processor models at CES. AMD has extended Ryzen 5000 series "Zen 3" support across all three desktop chipset series, including the oldest AMD 300-series, and since all Socket AM4 motherboards feature USB BIOS Flashback, users have the full spread of Socket AM4 processors to upgrade to. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D continues to be a popular final upgrade destination for gamers on Socket AM4 who may have spent a pretty penny building a high-end gaming desktop in 2020-21. The 5800X3D offers gaming performance comparable to an Intel Core i9-12900K "Alder Lake," despite being based on the older "Zen 3" microarchitecture, since it enjoys a large 96 MB L3 cache, thanks to AMD's innovative 3D Vertical Cache technology. The 5800X3D commands a $360 street price, which may be a little steep for some users, and so AMD is increasing choice, with the introduction of the new Ryzen 7 5700X3D.

The Ryzen 7 5700X3D is an 8-core/16-thread Socket AM4 processor, which is practically the same silicon as the 5800X3D, but with lower clock speeds, and more importantly a 30% lower price. While the 5800X3D commands $360 in the market, the new 5700X3D is coming in at an attractive $250. The 5700X3D comes with a base frequency of 3.00 GHz, and maximum boost frequency of 4.10 GHz. In comparison the 5800X3D has a 3.40 GHz base frequency, and 4.50 GHz boost. Both chips enjoy the same power limits, with a TDP of 105 W. The 5700X3D gets the same 96 MB of L3 cache that includes 64 MB of 3D Vertical Cache; and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The I/O is identical, too, with a 24-lane PCI-Express Gen 4 interface, and dual-channel DDR4 memory, with DDR4-3600 being the sweetspot frequency.
Update Jan 9th: AMD clarified the specs of the Ryzen 5 5500GT in an updated slide. It is indeed a 6-core/12-thread processor.

AMD also introduced the Ryzen 7 5700. Much like the 5700X, 5700G, 5700X3D, 5800X, and 5800X3D; this is an 8-core/16-thread "Zen 3" based processor. It lacks integrated graphics, and so it is not an APU like the 5700G. However, it is based on the same 7 nm "Cezanne" monolithic silicon as the 5700G. Consider the 5700 to be the 5700G with its iGPU disabled. You get an 8-core/16-thread CPU based on "Zen 3," with 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB L3 cache shared among all 8 cores. The clock speeds of the 5700 are nearly identical to the 5700G—the base frequency is set at 3.70 GHz (in comparison to the 3.80 GHz of the 5700G), while the boost frequency is identical between the two, at 4.60 GHz. AMD is launching the Ryzen 7 5700 at a $175 price that's nearly half the launch price of the 5700G when it came out in 2021.
Winding things up, AMD introduced a pair of interesting new APUs that should really draw some crowds to Socket AM4 at the entry level. The Ryzen 5 5600GT is a slightly faster version of the 5600G. It packs a 6-core/12-thread CPU clocked at 3.60 GHz base frequency, which may be lower than the 3.90 GHz of the 5600G, but with a higher maximum boost frequency of 4.60 GHz, compared to 4.40 GHz of the 5600G. The best part? You also get the Radeon Vega iGPU with 7 CU (448 stream processors). The 5600GT features 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and the full 16 MB L3 cache available on the "Cezanne" silicon. AMD is pricing the 5600GT at a very attractive $140. The Ryzen 5 5500GT is a slightly lower clocked version of the 5600GT at an even lower $125!

All four new Socket AM4 processors announced today should be available in the retail market from January 31.
Add your own comment

46 Comments on AMD Announces New Socket AM4 Desktop Processors—5700X3D and 5000GT APUs

#1
theouto
AM4 just won't die, that is admirable
Posted on Reply
#2
HD64G
What a great finish for AM4. 5700X3D will be the must have CPU for gamers on a budget for years to come.
Posted on Reply
#3
R0H1T
btarunrAMD is launching the Ryzen 7 5700 at a $175 price that's nearly half the launch price of the 5700G when it came out in 2021.
What the not so actual eff :wtf:
btarunrthe new 5700X3D is coming in at an attractive $250
Also this, some of these chips should be flying off the shelf relatively speaking!
Posted on Reply
#4
Chry
7600X costs the same and is same or even faster in everything, including games, and is on a future-proof socket.

That being said, AM5 motherboards and DDR5 might cost a little more.

So all in all 5700X3D must still be the best $/performance CPU for gaming and a perfect pair for something like 6800XT. A powerful combo without breaking the budget!
Posted on Reply
#5
R0H1T
These are mostly for those still on AM4 with an inferior board/chip. Pretty sure lots of them out there who were looking for something like this! AM4's looking more & more like LGA 775 redux² & probably more :pimp:
Posted on Reply
#6
rv8000
Definitely tossing a 5700X3D in the living room gaming rig, the price is better than I expected.
Posted on Reply
#7
goldman
kinda sad the GT's don't have a newer iGPU, i would've loved to see a 5600 with a newer, navi-based iGUPU
Posted on Reply
#8
wNotyarD
US$250 for the 5700X3D? Holy Toledo, that's cheaper than I expected!
Reviews pending, it'll probably be an amazing slot-in for my 5600X as the 5800X3D stubbornly refuses to get cheaper around here (still around US$400).
Posted on Reply
#9
GoldenX
So sad to sell hardware with discontinued drivers...
Posted on Reply
#10
Wirko
Chry7600X costs the same and is same or even faster in everything, including games, and is on a future-proof socket.

That being said, AM5 motherboards and DDR5 might cost a little more.

So all in all 5700X3D must still be the best $/performance CPU for gaming and a perfect pair for something like 6800XT. A powerful combo without breaking the budget!
Well said, one is future-proof and the other is past-proof, and we can appreciate both.
Posted on Reply
#11
x4it3n
theoutoAM4 just won't die, that is admirable
It shows how great AM4 was and still is !
Posted on Reply
#12
trsttte
HD64GWhat a great finish for AM4. 5700X3D will be the must have CPU for gamers on a budget for years to come.
I'll wait for benchmarks but AMD using the 13600k doesn't inspire much confidence, I bet that clock reduction caused a massive difference against the 5800x3d. The price is not terrible but the 5800x3d is always on sale (unless they change that), for the future it will probably continue to be the better deal
Posted on Reply
#13
wNotyarD
trsttteI'll wait for benchmarks but AMD using the 13600k doesn't inspire much confidence, I bet that clock reduction caused a massive difference against the 5800x3d. The price is not terrible but the 5800x3d is always on sale (unless they change that), for the future it will probably continue to be the better deal
Why wouldn't the 13600K as a comparison goal be a good thing? It is a really good CPU for gaming on the cheap, exactly what the 5700X3D is set to do.
Posted on Reply
#14
SL2
Oh come on


Posted on Reply
#15
lilhasselhoffer
After reading back and forward through this...I have to ask something substantive. AMD allowed Microcenter in the US to sell this SKU before. It was the defective 5800x3D chips, where they were simply disabling the defective bits and selling as-is without guarantee for performance. At that point, the criticism was that they didn't overclock well, and they had some troubles meeting the promised specifications.

Are we going to be getting more underperforming 5800x3D chips until AMD clears out their entire inventory, or is this a genuinely newly produced SKU? I'm not asking because I want to spend money on this...because I have upgraded to the 5700x in most rigs that I have control over...and right now a 5700x can be had for less than $200. A 25% cost for a minor uplift in performance (with a huge uplift in TDP) isn't a huge driver for me personally...but people who bought into the 5600x and have been waiting for the 5800x3D to be more affordable might well see value here.


Thing is , I still don't get this generation. AMD and Intel seem to be dead set on making the hottest possible chips for that single digit comparative performance, and it's basically silly for consumers. I'm hoping that they give-up on this for the next generation and go back to chips that don't toast themselves...but I'm probably going to be on AM4 well into AM6 at this rate. Oh well.
Posted on Reply
#16
Tropick
This is getting bonkers. Here's my predictions for the 2025 AM4 releases:

The 5990X, which has a third chiplet crammed underneath the I/O die.
The 5710DEG, which can degrease your oven.
The X0065, packing 12 cores and 6 threads.
And the 5600GTO, which has a full 680M but the CPU cores are all disabled.

For real though it's nice to see the engineers having fun with the Zen 3 leftovers :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#17
john_
It's funny. 4 years ago there was a debate about AMD's promise to support AM4, because of older 300/400 series motherboards not supporting 5000 series CPUs. AMD finally changed it's mind and 4 years latter people with 300/400 series motherboards can play with the latest 5000 X3D CPUs, while getting more and more options year after year. Pity it is not financially logical for AMD to throw an RDNA2/3 GPU on a 5000 series APU and take over the budget market.
trstttebut AMD using the 13600k doesn't inspire much confidence
Yeah, sure they should have compared with a fully unlocked 300W 14900KFSZFAGTSOPMAPY SUPER Extreme Tech Press Golden Sample Edition CPU.
That would show some confidence.
Posted on Reply
#18
wickerman
lilhasselhofferAfter reading back and forward through this...I have to ask something substantive. AMD allowed Microcenter in the US to sell this SKU before. It was the defective 5800x3D chips, where they were simply disabling the defective bits and selling as-is without guarantee for performance. At that point, the criticism was that they didn't overclock well, and they had some troubles meeting the promised specifications.

Are we going to be getting more underperforming 5800x3D chips until AMD clears out their entire inventory, or is this a genuinely newly produced SKU? I'm not asking because I want to spend money on this...because I have upgraded to the 5700x in most rigs that I have control over...and right now a 5700x can be had for less than $200. A 25% cost for a minor uplift in performance (with a huge uplift in TDP) isn't a huge driver for me personally...but people who bought into the 5600x and have been waiting for the 5800x3D to be more affordable might well see value here.


Thing is , I still don't get this generation. AMD and Intel seem to be dead set on making the hottest possible chips for that single digit comparative performance, and it's basically silly for consumers. I'm hoping that they give-up on this for the next generation and go back to chips that don't toast themselves...but I'm probably going to be on AM4 well into AM6 at this rate. Oh well.
AMD and Intel go to some effort to prevent silicon from being wasted, and the process for that is binning. You test your die and the ones that require the lowest voltage tend to wind up in the most premium products because thats a desirable property in mobile or dense servers - remember the AMD Epyc 9004 series of chip use up to 12x of these die + a big io die, so having each die running a lower voltage in a narrow range that all the die on the chip can achieve is what makes them expensive products...well part of it anyway. If you're curious what kind of range exists between two otherwise identical cpus with the same name theres some good examples at Gamers Nexus and Derbauer, comparing just how different one Ryzen 7600 or 13600k differs from the rest.

x3d chips dont really overclock in the sense that non x3d ryzen chips do. There is a hard limit to protect the additional cache die from damage, so your really looking at the best version of the die landing on 5800x3d if its not suitable elsewhere. But any chip that pops out the test with no defects, but just cant quite reach those peak frequencies of a 5800x3d within its expected voltage, will become the 5700x3d. The ones with defective cores but otherwise functional became 5600x3d. The fact that that was such a limited product may indicate quite a decent yield of chips at the full 8 cores.

And I would argue that AMD expects these chips to be the choice of folks with older Ryzen cpus, if you have a 2700x or a 3600 right now the difference between it and a 5700x3d is going to be enormous in gaming and very much worth it if you have a board that gets bios support for these chips. If you have a 5600x today you'd probably be happy enough waiting until AM5 has a few generations of chips behind it and just make the leap then.
Posted on Reply
#19
trsttte
lilhasselhofferAre we going to be getting more underperforming 5800x3D chips until AMD clears out their entire inventory, or is this a genuinely newly produced SKU? I'm not asking because I want to spend money on this...because I have upgraded to the 5700x in most rigs that I have control over...and right now a 5700x can be had for less than $200. A 25% cost for a minor uplift in performance (with a huge uplift in TDP) isn't a huge driver for me personally...but people who bought into the 5600x and have been waiting for the 5800x3D to be more affordable might well see value here.
They're certainly not new, it's 5800x3d that didn't make the cut or that they didn't want to price cut further. After bending to demand keeping their promise of support for AM4 because of Alder Lake "over delivering" I think they realized this was their only way to have lower price offerings. The 3300x and 3100x were great but there was barely any supply and they couldn't even justify a 5300x or 5100x probably because yields were so good. My bet is the same is happening with zen4 with the added problem of higher platform cost so they don't have entry level options without using the backlog of AM4.

I'll be happy to be wrong but I doubt there will be value upgrading from 5600x to 5700x3d, it's end of road anyway but that clock reduction is too brutal, just wait a bit for further sales on the 5800x3d (i'm anecdotally noticing an attempt to raise the price it has been at for months but doubt it will last)
john_Yeah, sure they should have compared with a fully unlocked 300W 14900KFSZFAGTSOPMAPY SUPER Extreme Tech Press Golden Sample Edition CPU.
That would show some confidence.
Haha, of course not, but they could have compared with an 8 core part. Price point is a good metric for average consumer but I want to know more, I especially want to see how it stacks up against the 5800x3d and 5700x/5800x that have their clocks "intact". I believe those are the comparisons they'll most want to avoid ;)
Posted on Reply
#20
Scircura
john_people with 300/400 series motherboards can play with the latest 5000 X3D CPUs
I wish. My ASRock X470 Taichi can't handle any of the newer UEFI's that support 5000 series processors. The last two non-beta BIOS releases 5.10 (AGESA 1.2.0.7) and 10.10 (1.2.0.B) cause multiple crashes a day. Only 3.60 (1.0.0.3 ABB, from 2019) is stable.
Posted on Reply
#21
LabRat 891
I'm still running AM4 as my primary build, this is great news!
(I *knew* there were more AM4 products coming, after AM4 Embedded was announced)

'Missed out on the bargain 5800X3Ds, I'll happily take a 5700X3D to go with my X570 :D
Posted on Reply
#22
john_
trsttteHaha, of course not, but they could have compared with an 8 core part. Price point is a good metric for average consumer but I want to know more, I especially want to see how it stacks up against the 5800x3d and 5700x/5800x that have their clocks "intact". I believe those are the comparisons they'll most want to avoid ;)
The 13600K is advertised as a 14 core CPU with 20 threads, also coming at a higher price and higher wattage. This means that based on how 5700X3D and 13600K are advertised, the 5700X3D is in disadvantage against the 13600K. In fact it's probably more "apples to apples" if the 5700X3D was compared with the i5 12600K, the i5 13400, or the i5 14400, all three with 16 threads and 10 cores and probably closer to the price that the 5700X3D will be selling.
ScircuraI wish. My ASRock X470 Taichi can't handle any of the newer UEFI's that support 5000 series processors. The last two non-beta BIOS releases 5.10 (AGESA 1.2.0.7) and 10.10 (1.2.0.B) cause multiple crashes a day. Only 3.60 (1.0.0.3 ABB, from 2019) is stable.
Oh....! Having an MSI X470 maybe I could expect something similar if I was going the X3D root, except if it is just that ASRock model having these problems.
Posted on Reply
#23
wNotyarD
ScircuraI wish. My ASRock X470 Taichi can't handle any of the newer UEFI's that support 5000 series processors. The last two non-beta BIOS releases 5.10 (AGESA 1.2.0.7) and 10.10 (1.2.0.B) cause multiple crashes a day. Only 3.60 (1.0.0.3 ABB, from 2019) is stable.
john_Oh....! Having an MSI X470 maybe I could expect something similar if I was going the X3D root, except if it is just that ASRock model having these problems.
Indeed. I have nothing but stability on my GB X470. Don't even need a BIOS update, the CPU support list puts the March 2021 F60 version as the minimum to run a 5700X3D, same as the 5800X3D and almost every other Vermeer.
Posted on Reply
#24
SL2
ScircuraI wish. My ASRock X470 Taichi can't handle any of the newer UEFI's that support 5000 series processors. The last two non-beta BIOS releases 5.10 (AGESA 1.2.0.7) and 10.10 (1.2.0.B) cause multiple crashes a day. Only 3.60 (1.0.0.3 ABB, from 2019) is stable.
I've seen people who got it to work (last few posts). Did you reset BIOS after update, before changing?
Posted on Reply
#25
mechtech
BIOS updates incoming????????
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 3rd, 2024 12:40 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts