Friday, May 17th 2024
LN2 Cooled Apple M4 Chip Surpasses Single-Core Performance of M3 Max and M2 Ultra
According to Geekerwan, Apple's latest M4 silicon has achieved a remarkable milestone by using liquid nitrogen to chill Apple's M4 iPad Pro. This unconventional approach unlocked great single-core performance, surpassing even the M3 Max and M2 Ultra processors in Geekbench v6 benchmark tests. The setup involved cooling the M4 iPad Pro, equipped with a 3+6 core configuration, using a Kingpin Cooling T-Rex Rev 4 CPU LN2 pot filled with liquid nitrogen. This extreme cooling allowed the M4 processor to operate at an astonishing 4.41 GHz during the benchmark run, resulting in a staggering single-core score of 4,001 points. This score represents a 28% increase over the M3 Max found in the 16-inch MacBook Pro and an impressive 44% improvement over the M2 Ultra powering the Mac Studio.
Notably, the M4's single-core performance is capable of reaching scores in the 3,000s. With liquid nitrogen cooling, it suprases the 4,000-point mark, making this achievement all the more remarkable. While the M4's multi-core performance did not match the lofty expectations set by its single-core power, it still managed to achieve a score of 13,595 points, outperforming both the M3 Max and M2 Ultra, which scored 20,957 and 21,330 points, respectively. This was done on the 3+6 core configuration with three P-cores and six E-cores, which is not the top-end M4 configuration. This shows that with adequate cooling, like MacBooks, the upcoming M4 Pro and M4 Max chips could achieve much higher performance than their predecessors.
Sources:
Geekerwan, via Tom's Hardware
Notably, the M4's single-core performance is capable of reaching scores in the 3,000s. With liquid nitrogen cooling, it suprases the 4,000-point mark, making this achievement all the more remarkable. While the M4's multi-core performance did not match the lofty expectations set by its single-core power, it still managed to achieve a score of 13,595 points, outperforming both the M3 Max and M2 Ultra, which scored 20,957 and 21,330 points, respectively. This was done on the 3+6 core configuration with three P-cores and six E-cores, which is not the top-end M4 configuration. This shows that with adequate cooling, like MacBooks, the upcoming M4 Pro and M4 Max chips could achieve much higher performance than their predecessors.
31 Comments on LN2 Cooled Apple M4 Chip Surpasses Single-Core Performance of M3 Max and M2 Ultra
But does it really?
How does a score of 13,500 outperform scores over 20,000?
“The M4's multi-core performance didn't impress, however. It was 54% slower than the M3 Max and fell behind the M2 Ultra by up to 57%. Geekerwan submitted various Geekbench 6 entries, with the highest multi-core result of 14,785 points, so the M4 still lies behind Apple's older silicon.”
Breaking news: "Ryzen 7600 stock is faster than 5950x in ST."
We could also do that exercise today...
It's still operating within spec, pre-set voltages and such.
Makes sense; I've seen several folks around the web water cool or Peltier cool their phones, and make huge gains (w/o touching a single setting/clock, unrooted, otherwise stock)
AFAIK, any 'automatic dynamic clocking' CPU/APU gets 'free performance' the cooler you can run it... :laugh:
NtM, Esp. w/ sub-zero cooling, the stock voltage profile (effectively) becomes an overvolt, given the extreme low temps.
www.compoundw.com/products/compound-w-freeze-off-wart-removal
Just include one of these, ya know for those rare extreme workloads :laugh:
One could easily reproduce this test with a modern x86 mobile CPU that has a similar behavior of thermal throttling. I bet the results would be similar, where the chip doesn’t reduce clocks because it’s not hitting a thermal limit. Battery life would obviously suffer, but it’s not really an issue since cooling is the weakest link in this scenario.
FWIW, if I put my passively cooled M2 MBA on an ice pack, I only get about 5% more performance in a CB run. The SOC still pegs 100C, so it’s just not sufficient cooling. LN2 is obviously going to overcome that issue.
[I can only imagine the condensation issues...]
It just shows that in fact when the newer chip it's not burning itself down, can archive better performance than the predecessors in ST, who would have thought...
Probably the MacBook Air will have the same issue if uses passive cooling, and those who want all the performance on the go will have to spend the extra on the MacBook Pro
What a shitty company, always proclaiming to be green and eco friendly while shortening the lifespan and performance of their devices and making repairs and upgrades almost impossible