Tuesday, July 16th 2024

Intel Planning P-core Only "Bartlett" LGA1700 Processor for 2025

In a surprising development, Intel plans to extend the longevity of its Socket LGA1700 platform even as the newer LGA1851 platform led by the Core Ultra 200 "Arrow Lake" remains on track for a late-Q3/early-Q4 2024 debut. This, according to a sensational leak by Jaykihn. It plans to do this with a brand-new silicon for LGA1700, codenamed "Bartlett." This should particularly interest gamers for what's on offer. Imagine the "Raptor Lake-S" die, but with four additional P-cores replacing the four E-core clusters, making a 12-core pure P-core processor—that's "Bartlett." At this point we're not sure which P-core is in use—whether it's the current "Raptor Cove," or whether an attempt will be made by Intel to backport a variant of "Lion Cove" to LGA1700.

This wouldn't be the first pure P-core client processor from Intel after its pivot to heterogeneous multicore—the "Alder Lake" H0 die has six "Golden Cove" P-cores, and lacks any E-core clusters. Intel is planning to give launch an entire new "generation" of processor SKUs for LGA1700 which use the newer client processor nomenclature by Intel, which is Core 200-series, but without the "Ultra" brand extension. There will be SKUs in the Core 3, Core 5, Core 7, and Core 9 brand extensions. Some of these will be Hybrid, and based on the rehashed "Raptor Lake-S" 8P+16E silicon, and some "Alder Lake-S" 8P+8E; but "Bartlett" will be distinctly branded within the series, probably using a letter next to the numerical portion of the processor model number. There will not be any Core 3 series chips based on "Bartlett," but Core 5, Core 7, and Core 9.
The Core 5 "Bartlett" series will feature an 8-core configuration. That's 8 P-cores, and no E-cores. The Core 7 "Bartlett" will be 10-core, no E-core. The Core 9 "Bartlett" will draw the most attention, as being 12-core. If Intel is using "Raptor Cove" P-cores, these should be 8-core/16-thread, 10-core/20-thread, and 12-core/24-thread, respectively. Depending on the K- or non-K SKUs, these chips feature a processor base power value of 125 W, or 65 W, or even 45 W.

Intel is planning to launch these non-Ultra Core Socket LGA1700 processors in Q1-2025, but the "Bartlett" silicon won't arrive before Q3-2025.
Source: Jaykihn (Twitter)
Add your own comment

140 Comments on Intel Planning P-core Only "Bartlett" LGA1700 Processor for 2025

#126
Wolverine2349
FoulOnWhiteI wonder if Bartlett will end up coming before 25. After the 13/14th gen troubles as a kinda look at the hand thing
I wonder too. Would be great if they release the 12 P core version soon. Only if it can be stable and not degrade. I will be happy with 5GHz all core and ring 4.6GHz and 7000 DDR5 rock stable all work loads no degradation and lasts a long time continuing to be rock stable if they can do that and release it in 2024?
Posted on Reply
#127
Wolverine2349
fevgatosOh you absolutely do need more than 8 for gaming. Check the new game once human for example, it absolutely hammers 8core chips
Is that really true in any areas of that game Human?

Its weird given Once Human only minimum requires an i5 4460 and recommends an i7-7700 both of which are only 4 cores one with better IPC and HT being the 7700. So it really struggles with 8 and HT??

What about other games. Any need or big benefit from more than 8 cores even in 4K?

I have heard so many conflicting stories on this?
Posted on Reply
#128
Wolverine2349
NostrasBased on some very surface level googling it appears that the game has a problem with real-time rendering of shaders. That would, aside being a massive fail for the devs, work just as fine on the E-cores.
I think fevgatos was just making a general assumption that you need more than 8 cores for gaming. Someone stating they did not know what the point of the chips were. I mean yes the e-cores can handle games that need more cores and do not have the scheduling issues just fine.

But many gamers do not want hybrid or dual CCD setups so stick to 8 P core only models with SMT/HT (7800X3D, 7700X, 5800X3D) or Intel 12th to 14th Gen with e-cores disabled) and if a 12 P core came about, many gamers who want no scheduling or heterogenous or dual CCD would jump on it with such a game example of desiring more than 8 cores.

But I have not heard anything since about this Bartlett Lake so not sure how much legs this rumor has.
Posted on Reply
#129
OneSorcerer
FoulOnWhiteI wonder if Bartlett will end up coming before 25. After the 13/14th gen troubles as a kinda look at the hand thing
10 p core would be a nice uplift from my 12600kf *.*
Posted on Reply
#130
iameatingjam
Sunny and 75Now if they release BTL with at least 48MB L3 Cache, they're aiming at the upcoming 9800X3D.

They might wanna increase that amount to 64MB if they'd rather be safe than sorry, although they've always acted skimpy when it comes to the Cache capacity. They needed AMD for the push!
I... Don't see how that would be possible. Don't forget... This is the same node. There's even variants with ecores that use that same die (b0) at least according to the rumours ( So essentially another refresh). In all likelihood they are just switching out the ecore clusters for pcores as they are about the same size. How are they gonna double the l3 cache? I mean hardware unboxed even showed that with Intel's architecture, cache isn't even the bottleneck in games.
Posted on Reply
#131
OneSorcerer
iameatingjamI... Don't see how that would be possible. Don't forget... This is the same node. There's even variants with ecores that use that same die (b0) at least according to the rumours ( So essentially another refresh). In all likelihood they are just switching out the ecore clusters for pcores as they are about the same size. How are they gonna double the l3 cache? I mean hardware unboxed even showed that with Intel's architecture, cache isn't even the bottleneck in games.
Any room for cache increase/improvements?
Posted on Reply
#132
Dr. Dro
OneSorcererAny room for cache increase/improvements?
Looks like it's based on Raptor Cove (improved Golden Cove design, so very unlikely. The extra four P-cores occupy a space similar to the sixteen E-cores on the current i9's, so there is not much room for improvement there.

Still, if Intel releases a 12P CPU with all AVX-512 extensions enabled, it'll make for a fine Core non-Ultra Series 2 processor line.
Posted on Reply
#133
OneSorcerer
Dr. DroLooks like it's based on Raptor Cove (improved Golden Cove design, so very unlikely. The extra four P-cores occupy a space similar to the sixteen E-cores on the current i9's, so there is not much room for improvement there.

Still, if Intel releases a 12P CPU with all AVX-512 extensions enabled, it'll make for a fine Core non-Ultra Series 2 processor line.
ty, it will still be a worthy upgrade
Posted on Reply
#134
iameatingjam
Dr. DroLooks like it's based on Raptor Cove (improved Golden Cove design, so very unlikely. The extra four P-cores occupy a space similar to the sixteen E-cores on the current i9's, so there is not much room for improvement there.

Still, if Intel releases a 12P CPU with all AVX-512 extensions enabled, it'll make for a fine Core non-Ultra Series 2 processor line.
I totally didn't even think about that. Maybe this will end up rocketing to the top of the RPCS3 cpu tier list.
Posted on Reply
#135
Wolverine2349
Is there any confirmed report that a 12 P core variant on a ring bus and/or Bartlett Lake in general is actually even coming. There has been like no news at all since this. Its so quiet??
Posted on Reply
#136
Wirko
Wolverine2349Is there any confirmed report that a 12 P core variant on a ring bus and/or Bartlett Lake in general is actually even coming. There has been like no news at all since this. Its so quiet??
Intel isn't going to develop a new chip just for a small part of the DIY market, it's not profitable enough. But... Maybe they see a market niche in low end servers and think they can fill it with a 12 P-core CPU. They send the chip to enthusiasts first as a Core (packaged in black) for a few months of field testing, then if everything is OK, launch it as a Xeon too.
Posted on Reply
#137
Wolverine2349
WirkoIntel isn't going to develop a new chip just for a small part of the DIY market, it's not profitable enough. But... Maybe they see a market niche in low end servers and think they can fill it with a 12 P-core CPU. They send the chip to enthusiasts first as a Core (packaged in black) for a few months of field testing, then if everything is OK, launch it as a Xeon too.
Is that why we are not hearing more news on it. Is it that they do not intend to do it. It was only rumor.

Or maybe the small server segment that wants a ring bus and AVX512 than package it as enthusiast :LGA 1700 chip as a beta test run for us gamers niche who want more than 8 P cores and all such cores on one die of homogenous arch and if it works good produce more for small server and network edge market.

Maybe they intend to use us as a beta test run which could mean even worse problems when they milk us as we run out to buy it the chip we so waited for that never was made and they scrap it and hang up on our RMA requests when it degrades like a paper tiger and has stability issues like the current 8 + 16 chips do. And I am skeptical even of the microcode update.

But a new 12 + 0 die on a ring bus maybe its good. I may be wiling to take that risk.
Posted on Reply
#138
Dr. Dro
WirkoIntel isn't going to develop a new chip just for a small part of the DIY market, it's not profitable enough. But... Maybe they see a market niche in low end servers and think they can fill it with a 12 P-core CPU. They send the chip to enthusiasts first as a Core (packaged in black) for a few months of field testing, then if everything is OK, launch it as a Xeon too.
Bartlett is supposed to be a chip meant for edge computing, developed by Intel NEX - but since there is clearly interest in LGA 1700, I believe Intel should make the effort to release Bartlett - particularly considering they could use the profits from shifting more chips and as long as that is executed right - they'll be very easily pardoned by the Raptor blunders
Posted on Reply
#139
64K
My take is that Intel is scrambling to recover right now. This is just another thing that's up in the air. It would be interesting to me at least to see how these CPUs could perform in gaming but I admit my faith in Intel is a bit shaken right now and the 7800X3D is a great CPU for gaming anyway if nothing comes from this all P-core chip in the end.
Posted on Reply
#140
iameatingjam
64KMy take is that Intel is scrambling to recover right now. This is just another thing that's up in the air. It would be interesting to me at least to see how these CPUs could perform in gaming but I admit my faith in Intel is a bit shaken right now and the 7800X3D is a great CPU for gaming anyway if nothing comes from this all P-core chip in the end.
I don't even get why it would be beneficial for gaming, I mean maybe a little in some cases where the game scales really well with cores.

But we know most games are made for consoles with 8 cores and the best PC gaming cpu has 8 cores. It will certainly do worse in multi-threaded performance. Still... A lot of people seem to really not like ecores so that alone might sell a good amount of chips.

I'm sure there's some niche use cases where it would be beneficial, otherwise why would they make it? I heard networking, but not sure about that.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:33 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts