Tuesday, August 20th 2024

ASUS Republic of Gamers Unveils Three Premium 1440p Gaming Monitors

ASUS Republic of Gamers (ROG) today announced the groundbreaking ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP, the ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG and the ROG Swift 360 Hz PG27AQNR gaming monitors at Gamescom 2024.

The Swift OLED PG27AQDP is the world's first 1440p 480 Hz monitor, and it features an anti-glare WOLED panel. Meanwhile, the 26.5-inch Strix OLED XG27ACDNG boasts an impressive 360 Hz refresh rate and a QHD QD-OLED panel with an anti-reflection. Both monitors feature ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur (ELMB) and OLED Anti-Flicker technologies. ROG is the only gaming monitor brand to offer QD-OLED and WOLED offerings to cater to different needs. Each display offers unparalleled visuals and unprecedented refresh rates to redefine gaming performance for gamers worldwide. Also launched was the 360 Hz ROG Swift 360 Hz PG27AQNR, with a QHD Ultrafast IPS display and G-SYNC Pulsar that make it a superior choice for esports and competitive gaming.
In addition to the premium three-year ROG warranty, both OLED monitors feature new OLED Care+ with a suite of features designed to protect the panel. OLED Care+ settings can be easily managed through ASUS DisplayWidget Center software. In addition to all the features provided by the original OLED CARE, the new OLED Care+ enables Taskbar Detection, Outer Dimming Control, and Global Dimming Control. Lastly, adjustable HDR settings provide the flexibility to tailor onscreen visuals according to preference. These new features will soon be available in other ROG gaming monitors.

ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP
The ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP is the world's first OLED gaming monitor that offers 1440p visuals at an ultrasmooth 480 Hz. It features a 26.5-inch WOLED panel with an anti-glare coating, 0.03 ms response time, and a new RWGB subpixel layout for clearer text. The Swift OLED PG27AQDP includes AI Assistant, which boasts a suite of features such as AI Visual, AI Crosshair, AI Sniper, AI ShadowBoost, and the MOBA Map Helper to enhance gaming experiences. It retails at MSRP $999.
ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
The ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG has a 26.5-inch, 2560 x 1440 QD-OLED panel that features an anti-reflection coating, 360 Hz refresh rate, and 0.03 ms response time. It includes a new heatsink design that allows for effective heat dissipation and thermal management. The compact monitor base frees up desk space and it has a mobile phone slot. Additionally, the Strix OLED XG27ACDNG includes the Dynamic Brightness Boost feature that dials up luminance levels at low APL window sizes, as well as AI Visual that automatically detects what's onscreen and adjusts to provide the best default or user-preset monitor settings. A USB-C port with 90-watt Power Delivery enables versatile connections. The Strix OLED XG27ACDNG will be available on shelves in early Q4, 2024.
ROG Swift 360 Hz PG27AQNR
The ROG Swift 360 Hz PG27AQNR heralds a new wave of LCD gaming monitors and is specifically designed to meet the needs of esports and competitive gamers. The monitor features a 27-inch QHD 360 Hz Ultrafast IPS panel and offers G-SYNC including new Pulsar technology for the ultimate motion clarity together with variable refresh rate (VRR) enabling supersmooth visuals and next-level gameplay. It has built-in DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC, two HDMI 2.1 ports, and a USB port for firmware updates. This exciting new gaming monitor will be available in Q4, 2024.
Source: ASUS
Add your own comment

26 Comments on ASUS Republic of Gamers Unveils Three Premium 1440p Gaming Monitors

#1
The Quim Reaper
These must be the new monitors with the Mediatek chip where no seperate G-Sync module is required to get the full suite of features on Monitors with the 'G-Sync Ultimate' branding.
Posted on Reply
#2
ViperXZ
Just buy the same monitor directly from LG (they make the displays) and avoid Asus tax. W + profit
Posted on Reply
#3
cvaldes
The Quim ReaperThese must be the new monitors with the Mediatek chip where no seperate G-Sync module is required to get the full suite of features on Monitors with the 'G-Sync Ultimate' branding.
The latter (model PG27AQNR) is one of the units with the new combination Mediatek chip. This article from PCGamer explains it better:

www.pcgamer.com/hardware/gaming-monitors/nvidias-new-partnership-with-mediatek-has-just-killed-the-module-which-made-g-sync-monitors-so-damned-expensive/

Basically there's a slow rollout of this new Mediatek all-in-one G-Sync chip from various monitor manufacturers. Assuming it works well, it's likely that the chip will be included in other monitors in other sizes at a later date.
ViperXZJust buy the same monitor directly from LG (they make the displays) and avoid Asus tax. W + profit
LG manufactures display panels as well as some monitors and television sets.

Display performance and quality is not solely determined by the panel. There are other components inside these devices that influence performance just as the display engine chip and other electronics such as the G-Sync circuitry which is separate from the display panel part.

LG does not do final assembly of all monitors and television sets based on their display panel parts. One very obvious example are LG OLED panels for Apple iPhones. LG just ships display panel parts to Apple's manufacturing partners (Foxconn, etc.). There are other components in smartphones that affect display quality as well.
Posted on Reply
#4
ViperXZ
cvaldesDisplay performance and quality is not solely determined by the panel.
Nobody here said so, and LG has more experience about that kind of stuff than Asus will have in 100 years.
Posted on Reply
#5
cvaldes
ViperXZNobody here said so, and LG has more experience about that kind of stuff than Asus will have in 100 years.
You said, "just buy the same monitor at LG". LG doesn't have any competing products yet with this combo G-Sync chip. When they do, they would definitely be a consideration but right now there are only three companies who have announced upcoming models with the new Mediatek silicon.

Everyone here knows there are a lot of companies that make monitors with differing capabilities. There is no company that is the best at everything. Certainly not LG. It's worth pointing out that LG frequently features piss-poor warranty durations.

There's a lot more than just display panel specs that influence the desirability of an given monitor or television set. Maybe it's the presence of USB-C power delivery. Maybe it's the support of new HDMI and DisplayPort standards. Maybe it's the presence of built-in speakers. Maybe it's the price. Maybe it's a combination of one or more of these other features.

Just keep that in mind, thanks!

:):p:D
Posted on Reply
#6
Battler624
cvaldesYou said, "just buy the same monitor at LG". LG doesn't have any competing products yet with this combo G-Sync chip. When they do, they would definitely be a consideration but right now there are only three companies who have announced upcoming models with the new Mediatek silicon.

Everyone here knows there are a lot of companies that make monitors with differing capabilities. There is no company that is the best at everything. Certainly not LG. It's worth pointing out that LG frequently features piss-poor warranty durations.

There's a lot more than just display panel specs that influence the desirability of an given monitor or television set.

Just keep that in mind, thanks!

:):p:D
Pretty sure the guy is talking about the OLED monitors, in which case they are all the same. You think G-Sync Pulsar exists for OLED?
But I agree with you, other features can entice (I was looking for DV but alas :( )
Posted on Reply
#7
dir_d
480hz with ELMB sounds really nice. I really want a review of this. I may come down from my LG C1 48" 4k 120hz to this if its perfect.
Posted on Reply
#8
ViperXZ
cvaldesWhen they do, they would definitely be a consideration but right now
People who can’t wait will always be punished in life. Asus tax is as high as 300-500$, definitely not worth it. Any other brand with the same panel will be better.

And sorry I’m not reading wall of texts about simple matters as these. :) I skip 90% of your posts.
Posted on Reply
#9
cvaldes
ViperXZPeople who can’t wait will always be punished in life. Asus tax is as high as 300-500$, definitely not worth it. Any other brand with the same panel will be better.

And sorry I’m not reading wall of texts about simple matters as these. :) I skip 90% of your posts.
Well, thank you very much for reading this particular one! It's people like you who make TPU such a, er, "special" place!

:lovetpu:
Posted on Reply
#10
ViperXZ
cvaldesWell, thank you very much for reading this particular one! It's people like you who make TPU such a, er, "special" place!

:lovetpu:
Maybe don’t think the worst about your fellow members such as they don’t know basic stuff about tech, maybe people respect / care more then? Just a thought. :) Life is simple, be nice and be treated nice. Maybe expect others to know a lot instead of thinking the opposite - this is baseline decent human behavior btw .
Posted on Reply
#11
Onasi
Meh, wake me up when 240Hz WQHD OLEDs drop to 500 or less. So far it’s just a parade of one flagship replacing the previous one at roughly the same price point. And, as much ad I enjoy higher refreshes, I don’t see a use for 360 and especially 480Hz for myself, personally. I am too old to play at being a cyber athlete.
Posted on Reply
#12
kapone32
27" is so 2012. Even if the refresh rate is high.
Posted on Reply
#13
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
PG27AQDP can do ELMB (BFI) at 240 Hz.

Might have to cop this one.
dir_d480hz with ELMB sounds really nice. I really want a review of this. I may come down from my LG C1 48" 4k 120hz to this if its perfect.
If you use ELMB it will be 240 Hz, which is expected since the 2nd frame would be the black frame.
Posted on Reply
#14
dir_d
CheeseballPG27AQDP can do ELMB (BFI) at 240 Hz.

Might have to cop this one.


If you use ELMB it will be 240 Hz, which is expected since the 2nd frame would be the black frame.
Exactly... With OLED and 240hz strobe on a calibrated screen it should be perfect!
Posted on Reply
#15
oxrufiioxo
dir_dExactly... With OLED and 240hz strobe on a calibrated screen it should be perfect!
Assuming the brightness doesn't take a nose dive. My C1 has 120hz BFI and while it looks fantastic the brightness hit is massive.
Posted on Reply
#16
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
dir_dExactly... With OLED and 240hz strobe on a calibrated screen it should be perfect!
The best part is that this is not limited to a GSync Ultimate module, so that means I should be able to use it with a 7900 XTX. 1440p 240Hz BFI is easier to run as well.
Posted on Reply
#17
oxrufiioxo
CheeseballThe best part is that this is not limited to a GSync Ultimate module, so that means I should be able to use it with a 7900 XTX. 1440p 240Hz BFI is easier to push run as well.
Maybe I'm confused but I thought the more recent Gsync modules already supported adaptive sync on AMD cards....
Posted on Reply
#18
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
oxrufiioxoMaybe I'm confused but I thought the more recent Gsync modules already supported adaptive sync on AMD cards....
Thats for Adaptive Sync (VRR) dude, not BFI (which NVIDIA's GSync module uses it as ULMB and ULMB2, which sometimes ELMB gets tied to). It's very rare to have VRR and BFI enabled at the same time, but it has been done in IPS-land (the Gigabyte M27Q X/M32U did them) but they were not perfect, even with stable high framerate. I think only your 48" C1 (I had one but I gave it to my brother) allowed VRR and BFI can do it at the same time (I think, I'm not sure anymore) at the expense of brightness.

But yes, the newer GSync modules allow VRR to be used on Radeons, which is cool because GSync allows the full range from 1Hz to whatever the max is for the panel. But I believe ULMB/ULMB2 is still limited to NVIDIA cards.
Posted on Reply
#19
dir_d
oxrufiioxoAssuming the brightness doesn't take a nose dive. My C1 has 120hz BFI and while it looks fantastic the brightness hit is massive.
That why i need the review first. if it can stay around 150nits in SDR ill be ok.
Posted on Reply
#20
xSneak
Is anyone going to make a 360hz 4k panel at 27" ? I think 32" is way too big for gaming.
Posted on Reply
#21
_roman_
The Quim ReaperMediatek chip where no seperate G-Sync module
I do not want to buy any Mediatek based device. Based on my previous read data and information from different sources.

Both designs need extra hardware for Nvidia only G-Sync. G-Sync - I think it is not compatible to every graphic cards - so it is an useless feature to myself. I think freesync works on more different graphic cards. I think it is bad to buy a product which locks you in to one brand. E.g. Apple only / Nvidia only / Windows only.

If it is e.g. AMD compatible, the manufacturer should be smart enough to market it as "Freesync". If I do not see Freesync in the datasheet I assume the device can not function properly. I'm not willing to be a beta tester for an overpriced product.
Posted on Reply
#22
Vayra86
I love this design, so thoughtful. Why don't you put your mobile in there huh. Oh, yeah, woops.

Posted on Reply
#23
SN2716057
Vayra86I love this design, so thoughtful. Why don't you put your mobile in there huh. Oh, yeah, woops.

You regularly flip your monitor? Like a steering wheel or 360 like a heli? :D
Posted on Reply
#24
Vayra86
SN2716057You regularly flip your monitor? Like a steering wheel or 360 like a heli? :D
Everything for immersion man. I also tilt my whole body to the left when I go left in a racing game! :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#25
Tomorrow
ViperXZJust buy the same monitor directly from LG (they make the displays) and avoid Asus tax. W + profit
Except thus far LG models have all been without heatsinks and significantly dimmer.
kapone3227" is so 2012. Even if the refresh rate is high.
What's the problem with 27"? It's in the sweet spot diagonal: 24-27-32-34. Below 24 is too small. Above 34 starts to get too big for desktop use.
It all depends on the resolution the display is paired with and the users own eyesight. Those with better eyesight wish 24" or 27" 4K while those with average or below eyesight are perfectly fine with 27" 1440p. I can run this at 100% with no need for scaling. 27" 4K i would need to enable scaling and even 32" 4K is still too small at 100%. Im glad they're pushing 27" 1440p refresh rates up. Now we need pure RGB pixel layout and DP 2.1 UHBR20 start being included. 1440p 480Hz barely fits inside DSC 3.0 compression limit.
xSneakIs anyone going to make a 360hz 4k panel at 27" ? I think 32" is way too big for gaming.
There will be 360Hz 32" 4K panels next year but i very much doubt there will be 27" 4K panels.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Aug 21st, 2024 16:14 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts