Friday, October 4th 2024
Rumored Cinebench R23 Scores Shows Improved Performance for Upcoming AMD Ryzen 9000X3D CPUs
A new rumor circulating via VideoCardz reveals alleged Cinebench R23 rendering scores for the upcoming AMD Ryzen 9 9800X3D CPU series. The lineup supposedly includes 8-core, 12-core, and 16-core models, all featuring Zen5 architecture and 3D V-Cache technology. The leak consists of Cinebench R23 benchmark scores, however, there are no screenshots, so it should be treated with caution as it comes from CodeCommando, a relatively new source with only one verified leak to his name—the Ryzen 9000 slides that emerged shortly before AMD's official announcement.
Comparing the results posted from CodeCommando with TechPowerUp review data of the previous generation, the picture presents itself in a promising way for the upcoming AMD CPUs. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is around 10% faster in single-core and 17% faster in multi-core compared with Ryzen 9 7950X3D, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D seems to be 20% faster in single-core and 28% faster in multi-core than Ryzen 7 7800X3D. These initial benchmark results show notable performance gains for the 8-core SKU, with both X3D models demonstrating higher multi-core scores than their non-X3D counterparts. While the 9800X3D shows slightly lower single-core performance than the 8-core 9700X, it exceeds the 9700X in multi-core tests. This multi-core advantage likely comes from a higher TDP, though specific power specifications haven't been revealed yet.
Sources:
Videocardz, CodeCommander
Comparing the results posted from CodeCommando with TechPowerUp review data of the previous generation, the picture presents itself in a promising way for the upcoming AMD CPUs. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is around 10% faster in single-core and 17% faster in multi-core compared with Ryzen 9 7950X3D, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D seems to be 20% faster in single-core and 28% faster in multi-core than Ryzen 7 7800X3D. These initial benchmark results show notable performance gains for the 8-core SKU, with both X3D models demonstrating higher multi-core scores than their non-X3D counterparts. While the 9800X3D shows slightly lower single-core performance than the 8-core 9700X, it exceeds the 9700X in multi-core tests. This multi-core advantage likely comes from a higher TDP, though specific power specifications haven't been revealed yet.
31 Comments on Rumored Cinebench R23 Scores Shows Improved Performance for Upcoming AMD Ryzen 9000X3D CPUs
Same with 9950X.
No one cares if they increase the frequency or the cache or put ketchup in it as long as it delivers +15-20% more than the king.
If they deliver that, then I’m jumping to AM5.
am i going to upgrade my 7950x3d anyway? yes.
/s
I honestly don't understand this sheep mentality.
I said it it then and repeat it now, the reviewers using Linux showed us a way different scenario than Windows and after that, clearly, something with windows was just not working correctly with Zen 5.
That said, I have never seen the need to upgrade from one gen to another, I normally upgrade every 2 gens or so, like now, I currently have a 5600X (Zen 3), so I might upgrade.
And the reason why its not the gen uplift, but really because I need more ram and cores and makes no sense to do it on my current platform, so new "everything" its more reasonable.
It's the trade off we accept in order to gain an advantage in gaming conditions. And we are all happy with it. Even if it comes with one core/one thread, no one would care if it's 50% better than the king.
You look the wrong processor for productivity.
The 7900X3D, 7950X3D are the ones for you. A minimal trade off for both gaming and productivity but excellent in both.
Just a few apps are bringing down the average. A decision to buy should be made based on the ‘actual’ apps that you use and not the average of a bunch of apps some of which you never use.
Also what happened with Powerpoint? A 15% regression? Zen 4 and 5 have the same cores and clocks. Did AMD remove or add something that penalizes Powerpoint going from Zen 4 to 5? I don’t remember AMD saying that Zen 4 had Powerpoint accelerators that were removed in Zen 5. Right off the bat this result should have been questioned.
they are 100%, 7800X3d is stupid for productivity when comparing CPUs of THE SAME PRICE.
There are a quite a few benchmarks in reviews where the difference is small. That's not to say the 7800X3D is a better choice for productivity, just that it's not universally "100% stupid".
One cannot simply look at rendering as a universal benchmark for productivity as a whole. Sure, the 7950X is over 100% faster in rendering, but still only 36% faster overall.
Remove those rendering numbers from the average productivity score, since you're using a GPU for rendering anyway, and the lead gets even smaller.