Friday, November 22nd 2024

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Specs Leak: Same Die as RTX 5080, 300 W TDP

Recent leaks have unveiled specifications for NVIDIA's upcoming RTX 5070 Ti graphics card, suggesting an increase in power consumption. According to industry leaker Kopite7kimi, the RTX 5070 Ti will feature 8,960 CUDA cores and operate at a 300 W TDP. In a departure from previous generations, the RTX 5070 Ti will reportedly share the same GB203 die with its higher-tier sibling, the RTX 5080. This architectural decision differs from the RTX 40-series lineup, where the 4070 Ti and 4080 utilized different dies (AD104 and AD103, respectively). This shared die approach could potentially keep NVIDIA's manufacturing costs lower. Performance-wise, the RTX 5070 Ti shows promising improvements over its predecessor. The leaked specifications indicate a 16% increase in CUDA cores compared to the RTX 4070 Ti, though this advantage shrinks to 6% when measured against the RTX 4070 Ti Super.

Power consumption sees a modest 5% increase to 300 W, suggesting improved efficiency despite the enhanced capabilities. Memory configurations remain unconfirmed, but speculations about the card indicate that it could feature 16 GB of memory on a 256-bit interface, distinguishing it from the RTX 5080's rumored 24 GB configuration. The positioning across the 50-series GPU stack of this RTX 5070 Ti appears carefully calculated, with its 8,960 CUDA cores sitting approximately 20% below the RTX 5080's 10,752 cores. This larger performance gap between tiers contrasts with the previous generation's approach, potentially indicating a more defined product hierarchy in the Blackwell lineup. NVIDIA is expected to unveil its Blackwell gaming graphics cards at CES 2025, with the RTX 5090, 5080, and 5070 series leading the announcement.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

80 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Specs Leak: Same Die as RTX 5080, 300 W TDP

#76
Craptacular
TechBuyingHavocI expect both to suck as well. AMD is distracted with AI and not focused on gaming, despite what they are saying, and Intel may *wish* to gain market share with Battlemage but they have no money left and Celestial looks dead in the water.
How are you coming to the conclusion that Celestial is dead in the water?
Posted on Reply
#77
tugrul_SIMD
People should count power budget too. RTX5070 is said to have 250Watts. This is 25% higher than 4070 and more cores. So it can be way better than 4070, not an exact same thing. Also number of cores is multiple of 64. This makes it exactly match some calculations that do the work in chunks of 64 items. For example, 1440p has 40 times 64 pixels on each scanline. I guess 5070 will have some other architectural bonuses too. Something like lower cache latency, bigger cache, etc. In the end, it may even have 30% more performance compared to a 4070 that is limited to 200W like the ventus 2x.

There's also the 5070 ti vs 5080: 33% more power budget with only 15% more cores. So the power limit will give it an edge over 5070ti on per-core performance when algorithm is compute-bottlenecked and not bandwidth bottlenecked.

Even against 5090, the 5080 has 50% less cores but only 33% less power budget.

RTX5080 has the most power budget per CUDA core. <---- I think Nvidia is counting on RTX5080 most. It's cheaper than 5090, more power per cuda core, possibly with optimum memory size and perhaps with just enough memory bandwidth to balance with the compute performance (not unbalanced like a 660ti / etc).
Posted on Reply
#78
close
3valatzyThere is no such consensus. There is too much sponsorship paid by Nvidia in the reviews which are misleading and lack true data.



Was more a matter of luck that they got the right man in the right place - his name is Jim Keller who designed the Zen architecture which for now saves AMD.
The thing is that Nvidia is focused in a market which made them a multi-trillion company, while AMD is nowhere near, especially with the today's threat to exit the GPU competition all together. One or two weak Radeon GPUs generations and AMD will be out of the business.
Which will be fatal for the company.
Keller was also at Intel and Tesla without managing the same miraculous turnaround for either of them. So I think it's uncharitable to say the success was just the result of luck and randomness, or even just one person (Zen wasn't a one person effort, nor relied *only* on Keller's genius for everything that mattered), putting AMD on an upward trend in the CPU business. Also Nvidia is 'almost' tied with Apple for the most valuable public company in the world. No other silicon related company is even close, not just AMD. But that's exactly my point, AMD chose a battle they had a better shot at fighting, not even talking about winning. I doubt Radeon failing would sink AMD, they'd most likely cut those losses and keep going with the CPU+APU business (so whatever integrated portfolio they need to keep going).
Posted on Reply
#79
Draconis
close(Zen wasn't a one person effort, nor relied *only* on Keller's genius for everything that mattered), putting AMD on an upward trend in the CPU business.
Agreed. It was a group effort but Mike Clark is acknowledged as the "Father of Zen". Quote from Jim Keller interview with Ian Cutress, link below.
I found people inside the company, such as Mike Clark, Leslie Barnes, Jay Fleischman, and others
3valatzyhis name is Jim Keller who designed the Zen architecture which for now saves AMD.
Keller's role was more managerial but he did have architecture input, interview hereif you are interested.
Posted on Reply
#80
Random_User
3valatzyAMD had dual-GPU solutions back then to combat Nvidia's cards.
And they were absolute atrocity and hot garbage, much like Crossfire, which worked only half of the time (gaming). I've learned that the hard way.
DavenSo you are saying there will be a 100% increase in IPC going from Ada to Blackwell? That would mean the 5090 would be almost three times the performance of 4090.

By the way, the 4070Ti has over 50% clock increase over the 3090 which was possible going from Samsung 8LPP to TSMC 4N. Blackwell is the same node as Ada.

Just multiple CUDA cores times max clocks:

3090Ti: 10.7k cores times 1.86 Ghz = 19.44
4070Ti: 7.7k cores times 2.6 Ghz = 20.22

That’s why those two GPUs have the same performance. It was the node change. We don’t have that this time.

But just for fun, the 5070Ti would need 4.6 Ghz to match the 4090 at the same IPC. That’s not happening at 300W TSMC 4N.
Lol, so true. Even Ada had less than declared 30%, as native non-frame generated performance gains.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 26th, 2024 22:44 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts