Tuesday, November 26th 2024

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Processor Leaks: 10 Cores, 4.9 GHz Boost, Without iGPU

Recent Geekbench results have surfaced for Intel's unreleased Core Ultra 5 225F processor without an integrated GPU, showcasing interesting performance improvements over its predecessors. The benchmark results, initially shared by Benchleaks on X, reveal that this new 10-core chip delivers performance comparable to the higher-core-count Core i5-13600. The Core Ultra 5 225F achieved a single-core score of 2,653 points and a multi-core score of 13,028 points. The processor combines six P-cores, four E-cores, and 20 MB of L3 cache. During testing, the chip reached a maximum frequency of 4.887 GHz. When compared to its direct predecessor, the Core i5-14400F, the new 225F demonstrates significant improvements with approximately 13% better performance in both single and multi-core tests.

More impressively, it manages to edge out the 14-core Core i5-13600 by 5% across both metrics despite having fewer cores and threads. However, the 225F falls behind its premium sibling with four more E-cores, the Core Ultra 5 245K, which outperforms it by 16% in single-core and 44% in multi-core operations. The Core Ultra 5 225F is expected to be part of Intel's new 65 W TDP lineup, targeting mainstream desktop systems with limited overclocking capabilities. This positions it as a more energy-efficient alternative to the current 125 W TDP Core Ultra 200 series processors. While we wait for more firmware updates to boost Arrow Lake performance, Intel could target the launch of the F-series SKUs for CES 2025, which is just a few weeks away now.
Sources: VideoCardz, Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

3 Comments on Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Processor Leaks: 10 Cores, 4.9 GHz Boost, Without iGPU

#1
N/A
Please be monolithic. oh why
Posted on Reply
#2
Darmok N Jalad
I would suspect that Intel should be able to beat its own previous lineup in the low and mid level, since it's all about binning and naming. It's probably about the only silver lining they have with this generation.
Posted on Reply
#3
GoldenX
Weren't these lower end parts supposed to be Meteor Lake renames?
Posted on Reply
Nov 26th, 2024 14:45 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts