Thursday, May 7th 2020

AMD B550 Chipset Detailed, It's Ready for Zen 3, Older AM4 Motherboards not Compatible

In their briefing leading up to today's Ryzen 3 3100 and 3300X review embargo, AMD disclosed that its upcoming "Zen 3" 4th generation Ryzen desktop processors will only support AMD 500-series (or later) chipsets. The next-gen processors will not work with older 400-series or 300-series chipsets. This comes as a blow to those who bought premium X470 motherboards hoping for latest CPU compatibility running into 2020. At this time only B550 is available, but we expect more news on enthusiast chipsets as the Zen 3 launch date comes closer. AMD B550 is a fascinating new mid-range chipset by AMD. Launching today as a successor to the popular B450 chipset, B550 is a low-power silicon with roughly the same 5-7 W TDP as the older 400-series chipset. Although AMD won't confirm it, it's likely that the chipset is sourced from ASMedia. It brings a lot to the table that could draw buyers away from B450, but it also takes some away.

The AMD B550 currently only supports 3rd generation Ryzen "Matisse" processors. Ryzen 3000 "Picasso" APU are not supported. What's more, older Ryzen 2000 "Pinnacle Ridge," "Raven Ridge," and first gen Ryzen 1000 "Summit Ridge" aren't supported, either. The Athlon 200 and 3000 "Zen" based chips miss out, too. AMD argues that it ran into ROM size limitations when trying to cram AGESA microcode for all the older processors. We find that hard to believe because B450 motherboards with the latest ComboAM4 AGESA support 2nd gen and 3rd gen processors, including APUs and Athlon SKUs based on the two. On the bright side, AMD assured us (within its marketing slides for the B550), that the chipset will support upcoming processors based on the "Zen 3" microarchitecture. The company also came up with a new motherboard packaging label that clarifies that the processors won't work with the 3400G and 3200G.
AMD B550 chipset highlights AMD B550 processor support AMD B550 vs B450
AMD B550 motherboards will feature partial PCI-Express gen 4.0 support. The main PCI-Express x16 slot, and one of the M.2 NVMe slots that are wired to the "Matisse" processor will be PCI-Express gen 4.0, however, all downstream PCIe lanes put out by the B550 chipset are gen 3.0. This is still a step up from 400-series "Promontory" chipsets, which are limited to gen 2.0. B550 puts out eight PCIe gen 3.0 lanes, which combine with the 20 usable processor lanes from "Matisse" to take the platform's total PCIe budget to 28 lanes (x16 gen 4.0 + x4 gen 4.0 + x8 gen 3.0). The B550 chipset itself connects to the "Matisse" processor via a PCI-Express 3.0 x4 connection.

In terms of connectivity, AMD's B550 chipset puts out up to six SATA 6 Gbps ports with AHCI and RAID capability; two each of 10 Gbps USB 3.2 gen 2 and 5 Gbps USB 3.2 gen 1 ports; and six USB 2.0 ports. PCIe, SATA, and USB connectivity from the "Matisse" processor is unchanged: four 10 Gbps USB 3.2 gen 2 ports, and up to two SATA 6 Gbps ports.
AMD B550 platform layout
The processor includes a PCI-Express 4.0 x16 PEG connection that can be split between slots. AMD is allowing motherboard designers to have multi-GPU capability with the B550, where the x16 PEG link is split between two x16 slots (electrical x8). Previously this capability was limited to the top-tier X370 and X470 boards. The processor also puts out one PCI-Express 4.0 x4 link meant to drive one M.2 NVMe slot or U.2 NVMe port. Every B550 motherboard we've seen so far features one M.2 PCIe gen 4.0 x4 (64 Gbps) slot.
AMD B550 motherboards
As with both its predecessors, the B350 and B450, the new B550 chipset enables full multiplier-based CPU overclocking, along with broad memory overclocking support. Motherboard designers are at liberty to kit out the B550 with the most elaborate CPU VRM solutions. Expect some of the pricier B550 boards to match their X570 counterparts in overclocking capability.

Motherboards based on the AMD B550 chipset are expected to launch on June 16, 2020. Prices start at $100, according to AMD.
Add your own comment

434 Comments on AMD B550 Chipset Detailed, It's Ready for Zen 3, Older AM4 Motherboards not Compatible

#326
Gmr_Chick
Damn, y'all are STILL up in arms over this? AMD has only ever said that the AM4 SOCKET will be around through 2020. What's the problem?
Posted on Reply
#327
windwhirl
Gmr_ChickDamn, y'all are STILL up in arms over this? AMD has only ever said that the AM4 SOCKET will be around through 2020. What's the problem?
Don't restart this dumpster fire of a debate, please :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#328
Melvis
Im just not a fan of spending $800 on motherboards (X470+X570 of the same model) to get support for a CPU only a yr+ later, when there is no excuse not to be supported on the exact same socket.

This also applies to all my clients and the majority of AM4 users who all are running on B450 or abouts motherboards, AMD 4000 is basically now DOA for me and the majority of AMD/AM4 owners and my clients, its going to probably sell poorly because of the lack of support honestly, only new system builders will get these new CPU's, most AM4 owners from the past 2.5yrs wont spend the money just to get support for a CPU that is only going to be around for 1yr on a socket thats dead in the same time frame, its just simply not worth it.

If B550 came out last yr and at an affordable price it might be a bit different but its just to late to the market sadly, and X570 boards here in AUS are bloody expensive!
Posted on Reply
#329
Makaveli
MelvisIm just not a fan of spending $800 on motherboards (X470+X570 of the same model) to get support for a CPU only a yr+ later, when there is no excuse not to be supported on the exact same socket.

This also applies to all my clients and the majority of AM4 users who all are running on B450 or abouts motherboards, AMD 4000 is basically now DOA for me and the majority of AMD/AM4 owners and my clients, its going to probably sell poorly because of the lack of support honestly, only new system builders will get these new CPU's, most AM4 owners from the past 2.5yrs wont spend the money just to get support for a CPU that is only going to be around for 1yr on a socket thats dead in the same time frame, its just simply not worth it.

If B550 came out last yr and at an affordable price it might be a bit different but its just to late to the market sadly, and X570 boards here in AUS are bloody expensive!
Easy solution upgrade to Zen 2 or wait until Zen 4 which will be DDR5 and PCIe 5 and a new motherboard anyways.
oxrufiioxoI personally wish we were getting X670 boards also with similar to Z490 vrms and no chipset fan.... Maybe at the very least we will see Refreshed X570 boards.
I think the chipset fan thing is abit overblown.

My system is very quiet and i've yet to hear it once.
Posted on Reply
#330
Gmr_Chick
windwhirlDon't restart this dumpster fire of a debate, please :laugh:
Sorry about that, lol. Then again, I've been told I can be a bit of a shit disturber sometimes. Stirring the pot, baby! :roll::D
Posted on Reply
#331
oxrufiioxo
MakaveliI think the chipset fan thing is abit overblown.

My system is very quiet and i've yet to hear it once.
I agree neither my Aorus Master/Hero 8 are audible but I would still prefer not having one.
Posted on Reply
#332
Durvelle27
MelvisIm just not a fan of spending $800 on motherboards (X470+X570 of the same model) to get support for a CPU only a yr+ later, when there is no excuse not to be supported on the exact same socket.

This also applies to all my clients and the majority of AM4 users who all are running on B450 or abouts motherboards, AMD 4000 is basically now DOA for me and the majority of AMD/AM4 owners and my clients, its going to probably sell poorly because of the lack of support honestly, only new system builders will get these new CPU's, most AM4 owners from the past 2.5yrs wont spend the money just to get support for a CPU that is only going to be around for 1yr on a socket thats dead in the same time frame, its just simply not worth it.

If B550 came out last yr and at an affordable price it might be a bit different but its just to late to the market sadly, and X570 boards here in AUS are bloody expensive!
I'll definitely be spending money for a new board. $70-$100 for a new board is peanuts.


I'm positive AMD could care less about all these whiners after 3 years upset over a simple board change.
Posted on Reply
#333
Melvis
Durvelle27I'll definitely be spending money for a new board. $70-$100 for a new board is peanuts.


I'm positive AMD could care less about all these whiners after 3 years upset over a simple board change.
You clearly didnt see my other post did you? $70-100? ......you gotta be joking! The same board as mine but X570 is $450! How the heck is that classed as peanuts? even the lowest end X570 is $300......

Oh your probably right but when sales of the 4000 series are alot less then expected they might start caring more.
Posted on Reply
#334
Apocalypsee
Actually I kinda see this is coming since they did this during AM2+/AM3 time where some CPU compatible with some board and not the others. One of the reason why I sold off my 1600+B350 combo last year, if B350 is supported older CPU is going to be discarded from the BIOS just like they removed Bristol Ridge to support new CPU because of BIOS size limitation.

Thing is, this picture is wrong:


You know B350/X370 and even A320 supports Ryzen 3000 series, heck even some reported that X570 mobo supports Ryzen 1000 series. So without jumping to conclusions and argue to no end just wait and see how far this is true. If AMD don't lock it through AGESA I think mobo manufacturer can come out with something.
Posted on Reply
#335
Tsukiyomi91
the problem that AMD is having rn is BIOS ROM limitations. Sure, MSI remedied that with the MAX variant of older boards but even that won't be enough.
Posted on Reply
#336
specopsFI
Tsukiyomi91the problem that AMD is having rn is BIOS ROM limitations. Sure, MSI remedied that with the MAX variant of older boards but even that won't be enough.
That 32MB chip is plenty. In fact, that's as good as any X570 board. And there are even X570 boards with 16MB chips. So no, that definitely isn't the real reason. AMD just wanted a clear-cut problem for them and MB vendors to solve. In stead of doing the work to serve their current customers, they basically went "screw them, we'll concentrate on future customers in stead". I honestly hope that their current customers make them pay for that. Supporting four generations of CPUs on three generations of MBs is a difficult task for sure, but AMD set up that challenge for themselves so they need to take the flak on not seeing it through. It's all about opportunity costs.
Posted on Reply
#339
Countryside
Durvelle27I'll definitely be spending money for a new board. $70-$100 for a new board is peanuts.


I'm positive AMD could care less about all these whiners after 3 years upset over a simple board change.
Is it really hard to understand the problem here of people who bough an Zen+ which is an 2 year old cpu and now i would like to upgrade my motherboard, lets see the options avilabe at the moment if indeed Zen+ is not supported on b550 then my two options are buy new mobo+cpu or an expensive x570 motherboard.

And the price on good b550 boards will be at least 120+
Posted on Reply
#340
Makaveli
MelvisOh your probably right but when sales of the 4000 series are alot less then expected they might start caring more.
I do not believe the sales for these will be as slow as you think. Even if everyone in this thread complaining about it switched to intel builds its a drop in the bucket compared to overall numbers.
Posted on Reply
#341
Dyatlov A
It is unbeliavable. X470 meant to be compatible. I would have buy otherwise just a cheap motherboard last summer.
Posted on Reply
#342
Makaveli
Dyatlov AIt is unbeliavable. X470 meant to be compatible. I would have buy otherwise just a cheap motherboard last summer.
Unless you have an official source from AMD saying so then no.
Posted on Reply
#343
medi01
MakaveliYou are on an Intel build how is this even relevant to you?
So, it needs to touch me personally, for me to judge if something is right or wrong? (it's a rhetorical question)
PYRO1125TBH, now that AMD is pretty much back on top (for now) they should have done everything in their power to keep the loyal fan base, which means keeping support for all AM4 sockets.
They are on top only "product portfolio" wise.
It has had an effect in Desktop CPU DIY market, which is less than 20% of all desktop CPUs sold.

AMD is still ridiculously weak in anything that depends on OEM, which is where the money is, despite having disruptively better product.
Just imagine what happens to them, when that advantage is gone.
Posted on Reply
#344
Makaveli
medi01So, it needs to touch me personally, for me to judge if something is right or wrong? (it's a rhetorical question)
Correct why does your opinon matter when you don't even own a AM4 board. The decision made by AMD doesn't affect you at all.

The only users that have a legit bone to pick here are AM4 users on boards that are not supported.
Posted on Reply
#345
INFERNUS
medi01So, it needs to touch me personally, for me to judge if something is right or wrong? (it's a rhetorical question)


They are on top only "product portfolio" wise.
It has had an effect in Desktop CPU DIY market, which is less than 20% of all desktop CPUs sold.

AMD is still ridiculously weak in anything that depends on OEM, which is where the money is, despite having disruptively better product.
Just imagine what happens to them, when that advantage is gone.
Your right, I can imagine when that advantage is gone it will be like when Intel launched the core 2 duo after that AMD never recovered until the launch of the Ryzen 1000 series CPU's. That took over 10yrs.
Posted on Reply
#346
Pepamami
Dyatlov AIt is unbeliavable. X470 meant to be compatible. I would have buy otherwise just a cheap motherboard last summer.
Relax, its fake news (they dont know what to say about support yet), the slide say about ALL FEATURES OF PROCESSOR (like PCI-E 4.0) NOT processor itself. According to slide: u cant use 3900X with A320, or B350, but u CAN, I bet motherboard makers will add 4000 support.
Posted on Reply
#347
Melvis
MakaveliI do not believe the sales for these will be as slow as you think. Even if everyone in this thread complaining about it switched to intel builds its a drop in the bucket compared to overall numbers.
Im not to sure about that, im sure NEW system builders will jump onto it most likely or from Intel side if there running a 3-5yr old PC then yep but for the 2.5yrs of people that are already on the AM4 platform, no way, 90% will not bother at all to jump onto a new Motherboard with that added expensive cost ontop, its just simply not worth it and there are alot of people on AM4 300-400 series mobos out there.
Posted on Reply
#348
ValenOne
dyonoctisYou can, but what about the other ? My rog Strix B350 cannot. If motherboard makers decided to make it a standard, that wouldn't be an issue, but thats' not the case :mad:
Buy B550 with PCI-E 4.0 for PEG slot and NVMe. Next-generation game consoles are PCI-E 4.0 based systems.
Posted on Reply
#349
Melvis
This is exactly what I mean! Couldnt agree more with this video!

Posted on Reply
#350
bug
MelvisThis is exactly what I mean! Couldnt agree more with this video!

Once again: did it read "Ryzen 4000 supported" on the box when you bought it?
Non-existing products are unsupported by default, you cannot blame AMD for your wishful thinking (even if they sorta encouraged it).
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:26 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts