Thursday, May 7th 2020

AMD B550 Chipset Detailed, It's Ready for Zen 3, Older AM4 Motherboards not Compatible

In their briefing leading up to today's Ryzen 3 3100 and 3300X review embargo, AMD disclosed that its upcoming "Zen 3" 4th generation Ryzen desktop processors will only support AMD 500-series (or later) chipsets. The next-gen processors will not work with older 400-series or 300-series chipsets. This comes as a blow to those who bought premium X470 motherboards hoping for latest CPU compatibility running into 2020. At this time only B550 is available, but we expect more news on enthusiast chipsets as the Zen 3 launch date comes closer. AMD B550 is a fascinating new mid-range chipset by AMD. Launching today as a successor to the popular B450 chipset, B550 is a low-power silicon with roughly the same 5-7 W TDP as the older 400-series chipset. Although AMD won't confirm it, it's likely that the chipset is sourced from ASMedia. It brings a lot to the table that could draw buyers away from B450, but it also takes some away.

The AMD B550 currently only supports 3rd generation Ryzen "Matisse" processors. Ryzen 3000 "Picasso" APU are not supported. What's more, older Ryzen 2000 "Pinnacle Ridge," "Raven Ridge," and first gen Ryzen 1000 "Summit Ridge" aren't supported, either. The Athlon 200 and 3000 "Zen" based chips miss out, too. AMD argues that it ran into ROM size limitations when trying to cram AGESA microcode for all the older processors. We find that hard to believe because B450 motherboards with the latest ComboAM4 AGESA support 2nd gen and 3rd gen processors, including APUs and Athlon SKUs based on the two. On the bright side, AMD assured us (within its marketing slides for the B550), that the chipset will support upcoming processors based on the "Zen 3" microarchitecture. The company also came up with a new motherboard packaging label that clarifies that the processors won't work with the 3400G and 3200G.
AMD B550 chipset highlights AMD B550 processor support AMD B550 vs B450
AMD B550 motherboards will feature partial PCI-Express gen 4.0 support. The main PCI-Express x16 slot, and one of the M.2 NVMe slots that are wired to the "Matisse" processor will be PCI-Express gen 4.0, however, all downstream PCIe lanes put out by the B550 chipset are gen 3.0. This is still a step up from 400-series "Promontory" chipsets, which are limited to gen 2.0. B550 puts out eight PCIe gen 3.0 lanes, which combine with the 20 usable processor lanes from "Matisse" to take the platform's total PCIe budget to 28 lanes (x16 gen 4.0 + x4 gen 4.0 + x8 gen 3.0). The B550 chipset itself connects to the "Matisse" processor via a PCI-Express 3.0 x4 connection.

In terms of connectivity, AMD's B550 chipset puts out up to six SATA 6 Gbps ports with AHCI and RAID capability; two each of 10 Gbps USB 3.2 gen 2 and 5 Gbps USB 3.2 gen 1 ports; and six USB 2.0 ports. PCIe, SATA, and USB connectivity from the "Matisse" processor is unchanged: four 10 Gbps USB 3.2 gen 2 ports, and up to two SATA 6 Gbps ports.
AMD B550 platform layout
The processor includes a PCI-Express 4.0 x16 PEG connection that can be split between slots. AMD is allowing motherboard designers to have multi-GPU capability with the B550, where the x16 PEG link is split between two x16 slots (electrical x8). Previously this capability was limited to the top-tier X370 and X470 boards. The processor also puts out one PCI-Express 4.0 x4 link meant to drive one M.2 NVMe slot or U.2 NVMe port. Every B550 motherboard we've seen so far features one M.2 PCIe gen 4.0 x4 (64 Gbps) slot.
AMD B550 motherboards
As with both its predecessors, the B350 and B450, the new B550 chipset enables full multiplier-based CPU overclocking, along with broad memory overclocking support. Motherboard designers are at liberty to kit out the B550 with the most elaborate CPU VRM solutions. Expect some of the pricier B550 boards to match their X570 counterparts in overclocking capability.

Motherboards based on the AMD B550 chipset are expected to launch on June 16, 2020. Prices start at $100, according to AMD.
Add your own comment

434 Comments on AMD B550 Chipset Detailed, It's Ready for Zen 3, Older AM4 Motherboards not Compatible

#276
TheLostSwede
News Editor
oxidizedI seriously hope you're wrong because that would be pretty bad for consumers and for AMD image. I saw that post too, but again AM4 compatibility means nothing if even 1 out of 4 series of CPU required you to swap motherboard, and it's not like writing "subject to modifications" is going to save you somehow, you're only partially covering your ass legally from class actions and such, but not from false advertisement even if you state that it could get modified at some point
Well, this is what I got from two people that I know. whom both work at motherboard makers. Take it for what it is at this point, early information, but it seems like AMD has decided to make a break here, as per their blog post.
Posted on Reply
#277
TheoneandonlyMrK
oxidizedI seriously hope you're wrong because that would be pretty bad for consumers and for AMD image. I saw that post too, but again AM4 compatibility means nothing if even 1 out of 4 series of CPU required you to swap motherboard, and it's not like writing "subject to modifications" is going to save you somehow, you're only partially covering your ass legally from class actions and such, but not from false advertisement even if you state that it could get modified at some point


AGAIN SOCKET COMPATIBILITY IS USELESS IF I NEED TO SWAP MY MOTHERBOARD ANYWAY

No i advised people correctly, because i AMD said "upgrade your processor without buying a new motherboard" and that's exactly my point, NOT needing to swap motherboards.
Then you based your advice on shit information.

If you're advising people to put Ryzen 4000 in anything below x570 they don't get all the features they paid for.

Making your advice shit regardless of anything else.

No one today is making a motherboard that will actually see three generations of CPU.

I see your point, it was always delusional, anyone working on and with PC these last 30 year's could have told you bios updates dry up after a year on most motherboards.

They could have also pointed to history where the same fucking socket has been used for years without inter chip support.

So this new paradigm you thought was happening, never was.

It was an interpretation error by you.

Deal with it.
Posted on Reply
#278
ARF
Tsukiyomi91Big news for me.
Pretty shocking and scandalous.
Might make people so frustrated, that the Intel sales explode.
Posted on Reply
#279
TheoneandonlyMrK
ARFPretty shocking and scandalous.
Might make people so frustrated, that the Intel sales explode.
Probably not those customers won't be blind to the price.
Posted on Reply
#280
bug
TurmaniaI do not mind if both AMD and Intel releases a new motherboard with every genaration of cpu released as long as the new cpu's are backwards compatible with the older in the same architecture family of motherboards.If they change the architecture of a cpu yeah i agree on new socket and compatibility changes. Both Intel and AMD are doing it. Intel for this tenth gen should not have done it as well or at least release it but let it be compatible with z390 and etc. In short, they so it and getaway with it.none of them are your friends,there is no need for brand royalty unless you are on their share holders.
And that's a reasonable expectation on the surface.
But when you really think about it, even adding a couple more cores, without changing the architecture, means different current requirements. You can artificially limit your new CPU a little so that it fits the existing socket/VRMs, but if you have to limit more than "a little", you're better off redesigning the motherboard.
Posted on Reply
#281
oxidized
TheLostSwedeWell, this is what I got from two people that I know. whom both work at motherboard makers. Take it for what it is at this point, early information, but it seems like AMD has decided to make a break here, as per their blog post.
Well that's pretty bad, but whatever, they decided to strong-arm their partners with the worst thing they could.
theoneandonlymrkThen you based your advice on shit information.

If you're advising people to put Ryzen 4000 in anything below x570 they don't get all the features they paid for.

Making your advice shit regardless of anything else.

No one today is making a motherboard that will actually see three generations of CPU.

I see your point, it was always delusional, anyone working on and with PC these last 30 year's could have told you bios updates dry up after a year on most motherboards.

They could have also pointed to history where the same fucking socket has been used for years without inter chip support.

So this new paradigm you thought was happening, never was.

It was an interpretation error by you.

Deal with it.
Information given by AMD itself, features such as? pcie 4? Useless for pretty much everyone as of now, and surely useless for those people i'm talking about.

So my information is shit but your
"No one today is making a motherboard that will actually see three generations of CPUs"
or
"I see your point, it was always delusional, anyone working on and with PC these last 30 year's could have told you bios updates dry up after a year on most motherboards."
or
"They could have also pointed to history where the same fucking socket has been used for years without inter chip support."


Is somehow good information and based on something solid, well then i guess i had it all wrong from the beginning :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#282
TheoneandonlyMrK
oxidizedWell that's pretty bad, but whatever, they decided to strong-arm their partners with the worst thing they could.



Information given by AMD itself, features such as? pcie 4? Useless for pretty much everyone as of now, and surely useless for those people i'm talking about.

So my information is shit but your
"No one today is making a motherboard that will actually see three generations of CPUs"
or
"I see your point, it was always delusional, anyone working on and with PC these last 30 year's could have told you bios updates dry up after a year on most motherboards."
or
"They could have also pointed to history where the same fucking socket has been used for years without inter chip support."


Is somehow good information and based on something solid, well then i guess i had it all wrong from the beginning :laugh:
Yes it's based on the reality the last 30 year's passed us not 10 letters on one slide with subject to change at the bottom like yours.

Incidentally every tech pr disclosure carries those same statements.

Subject to change.

It's not My fault your just fresh out the womb.

Love how you marginalised pciex4 to something no one needs yet everyone needs an upgrade path to something most keep for five years.

If I buy for five years I don't get something already out and two years old.

Oh and read the f up am5, socket 1700 ,pciex5 and ddr5.

Mean no one is getting three generations out of a board they buy now, simples.

Told ya it's about interpretation.
Posted on Reply
#283
Countryside
Please interpret this if i buy an B550 motherboard what do i do with my 2600x
Posted on Reply
#284
oxidized
theoneandonlymrkYes it's based on the reality the last 30 year's passed us not 10 letters on one slide with subject to change at the bottom like yours.

Incidentally every tech pr disclosure carries those same statements.

Subject to change.

It's not My fault your just fresh out the womb.

Love how you marginalised pciex4 to something no one needs yet everyone needs an upgrade path to something most keep for five years.

If I buy for five years I don't get something already out and two years old.

Oh and read the f up am5, socket 1700 ,pciex5 and ddr5.

Mean no one is getting three generations out of a board they buy now, simples.

Told ya it's about interpretation.
I might not be as experienced as you are, but i have my 15 years of experience, and what you're saying doesn't stand, because doesn't matter how it was before, what matters is what companies say, pcie 4 is kinda useless now yes because you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference between an nvme ssd running on pcie3 and one running on pcie4 as of now, since speeds are not that different on ssds at the moment, besides past a certain point i challenge you to see the difference anyway. There's no interpretation here, there's being backstabbed and not being backstabbed.
Posted on Reply
#285
deksman2
To be fair, Intel has been forcing users to upgrade their motherboards with practically every new CPU generation.

AMD on the other hand provided MUCH greater flexibility and upgrade paths - which is how it should be in the first place.
So, for the most part, users with B350/X370 mobos can still mostly upgrade to Zen 2... which is quite great.

That said, in the past, new CPU support was always up to the OEM's (mobo manufacturers)... that is to say, AMD would release the microcode update, but it was up to OEM's whether or not to implement it for their BIOS - so it was never a guarantee.

This time for some reason, its AMD itself that won't include support for Zen 3 on older motherboards... which quite honestly doesn't make much sense because Zen 3 is the last iteration supported by AM4.
Seems very odd to force users to upgrade to a X550/X570 mobo just for AM4 'end of life' - of course, there would be users who would buy the newest mobos even if older ones included BIOS updates for Zen 3, but it just seems very anti-AMD to do something like this.

Mind you, AMD is just a corporation that wants to make money, so from that point of view it DOES make sense, but they also repeatedly said that users won't have to bother with mobo replacements.

As I explained before, the ROM chip bios sizes 'excuse' doesn't really fly for AMD seeing how at least several X570 mobos come with also 16MB of ROM chip (and AMD said that ALL X570 and B550 will be supported).
That means that 16MB ROM chips (which most of the B350/X370 and B450/X470 come with) is not a barrier for Zen 3.
If there are limitations to how big the microcode is, then have mobo OEM's downgrade the UEFI graphics to something less space demanding like they did just before Zen 2 was released, and possibly remove Zen 1 microcode from the new bios (or just remove a few of them).
Posted on Reply
#286
TheoneandonlyMrK
oxidizedI might not be as experienced as you are, but i have my 15 years of experience, and what you're saying doesn't stand, because doesn't matter how it was before, what matters is what companies say, pcie 4 is kinda useless now yes because you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference between an nvme ssd running on pcie3 and one running on pcie4 as of now, since speeds are not that different on ssds at the moment, besides past a certain point i challenge you to see the difference anyway. There's no interpretation here, there's being backstabbed and not being backstabbed.
Does it not, give an example of a platform that mapped out it's support going forward.

Forget four years just show me any pc platform wherein on release they told you what and when you could upgrade and to what.

In the last 15 year's

Then try and find one with no subject to change notification.

That should keep you busy for the next 15 year's.

Backstabbing haha , your being dramatic.

It does matter what went before, it lead to this.
Technology evolves it rarely explodes into being.

Your picking and choosing what matters now you a guy with no coin in the debate believe that you know better than AMD.

Could AMD have been clearer, yes their pr team is a bit shit, like their marketing team.

Did they misslead, only if you glazed over the details and got consumed by your own wishes.

10 letters on a slide was enough for you to make up your mind, others will be similar, it will cause uppsett that I understand and agree with.

But regardless of how butt hurt I ,you and others feel ,We then were all mistaken not lied too or backstabbed just mistaken.
Posted on Reply
#287
oxidized
theoneandonlymrkDoes it not, give an example of a platform that mapped out it's support going forward.

Forget four years just show me any pc platform wherein on release they told you what and when you could upgrade and to what.

In the last 15 year's

Then try and find one with no subject to change notification.

That should keep you busy for the next 15 year's.

Backstabbing haha , your being dramatic.

It does matter what went before, it lead to this.
Technology evolves it rarely explodes into being.

Your picking and choosing what matters now you a guy with no coin in the debate believe that you know better than AMD.

Could AMD have been clearer, yes their pr team is a bit shit, like their marketing team.

Did they misslead, only if you glazed over the details and got consumed by your own wishes.

10 letters on a slide was enough for you to make up your mind, others will be similar, it will cause uppsett that I understand and agree with.

But regardless of how butt hurt I ,you and others feel ,We then were all mistaken not lied too or backstabbed just mistaken.
I don't care if nobody has done it before, they say they do it, i expect them to do it, end of story, it's as simple as that.

Mistaken because they mislead anyone with that touting, they could've been much clearer on the matter or just shut their mouth on AM4 compatibility. So yeah, still backstabbed
Posted on Reply
#288
Sunny and 75

Watch out, for the devil is in the detail. "Subject to future roadmap modifications". So they kept their promise, sort of! ;)
Posted on Reply
#289
oxidized
theoneandonlymrkSo your beyond reason.

Beyond finding proof to back your claims.

And beyond any convincing otherwise.

All while owning an Intel platform.

And suggesting this has affected you somehow.


You have no chance of convincing me your right to be butt hurt.


So based on that , crack on, goodbye, and if you keep pulling me out for quotes you will be on ignore before this day is done.
What more proof do you need besides AM4 support until 2020 (2021) and "upgrade your processor without buying a new motherboard", i don't want to convince you of anything really, i just enjoy pissing off fanboys at the point they either stop posting or worse block me, because that's anything any fanboy deserve. So please do block me i'll return the favor
Posted on Reply
#290
HD64G
lynx29huh? MSI Z490 mobo I just pre-ordered is $169.99 and the CPU will be around $400-500 which various version I get, hoping the non-integrated graphics variant is a touch cheaper.



that's shady as crap wording. lol intel and amd are the same, there is no point in brand loyalty its capitalism. neither of these companies care about you. so im picking the best performance for only 5% more money. later homies.
Since you have gone ultra provocative, let's see which vendors will dare not update their X470/B450 boards with Zen3 updated UEFIs (I predict none will refuse to do so) and talk again then. For now, have fun with your insecure nuclear reactor in the summer heat.
Posted on Reply
#291
bug
oxidizedWhat more proof do you need besides AM4 support until 2020 (2021) and "upgrade your processor without buying a new motherboard", i don't want to convince you of anything really, i just enjoy pissing off fanboys at the point they either stop posting or worse block me, because that's anything any fanboy deserve. So please do block me i'll return the favor
TBH AM4 is still with us into 2021. And AMD being unable to predict their every SKU 2-3 years ago was mostly expected. When they said they will keep forward compatibility, I understood that as a best effort. But in the absence of further clarification, I was sure some will take that as gospel (and that was the intended effect, otherwise AMD would have nuanced their statements then and there).

The real kicker for me is people clinging on minute differences to paint Intel as evil and AMD as a savior. Well, newsflash, they're both in the business of selling you products. That's what they'll do. When you're the underdog, of course you're all honey, open and stuff. And when you're top dog, you'll take some liberties. Case in point: AMD crushed Intel in HEDT. Did they make HEDT chips $200 and available to everyone? No, they priced Threadrippers well above what Intel ever charged for their HEDT chips. AMD gained some momentum on the desktop, they hit you with the pricey X570 and are now starting to limit support for some chips.

Is AMD evil for doing that? Hell, no. But if you don't wake up and smell the roses, you will keep being surprised by decisions like this one.

Take a step back and look at the big picture: you can buy a lot more CPU HP for $1 than you ever could, whether you are forced to upgrade the motherboard or not.
Posted on Reply
#292
ARF
Is AMD evil for doing that?
Evil is when you throw competition out of the market, like Intel and Nvidia did with the MOAP and Nvidia GeForce Partner Program.
Evil is when you intentionally mislead the market and confuse the consumers that your products are better when they have always been inferior.

It's like black magic and it's been working for decades, and no one has woken up yet.

What AMD does is just shooting itself in the feet :D
Posted on Reply
#293
JMccovery
PYRO1125AsRock x470:
------------------
- 16 Power Phase design
- Capable of providing extra 300W for CPU
- Supports ASRock Hyper BCLK Engine II
- 256Mb AMI UEFI Legal BIOS with GUI support


AsRock x570:
------------------
- 14 Power Phase design
- Capable of providing extra 300W for CPU
- Supports ASRock Hyper BCLK Engine II
- 256Mb AMI UEFI Legal BIOS with GUI support


Both have the same size BIOS and the x470 has a higher power phase design.
Something ain't right lol. This looks like to me that AMD wants to push their PCI-e 4.0 on the 500 series boards and now make up some BS that Zen3 won't support 400 or even 300 series.
Heres to hoping by the time Zen3 comes out the mobo vendors will have their own BIOS that will support Zen3 on 400 or maybe even 300 series mobo's.
You'd have a point if ASRock X570 boards had the exact same CPU support like their X470 ones.

More than likely the collective AGESA firmware for Ryzen 3000 and 4000 CPUs with full board features doesn't leave enough room for Ryzen 1000 and 2000 support.

As for power phases, you can have fewer, but more efficient phases.
Posted on Reply
#294
ERazer
lynx29Exactly, so I will pay 5% more and get max performance with z490 and ampere. and since navi 2 prob won't overclock stably similar to navi, once overclocked a 2070 super matches a 2080 super easily. ampere will prob oc very well as well, so i will oc a 3080 and obliterate navi 2. as history as shown this is almost every recent generation, i doubt it changes.
cmon now dont side track, its all about fps why not get 3080ti or new titan?
Posted on Reply
#295
B-Real
Last round only Coffee Lake was compatible with the latest mobo gen. Now for Comet Lake, you again need new mobos. And to quote from TPU's news:

"and in many cases, pricier than even AMD X570 chipset ones"
the54thvoidWait? No. So my planned 3 generation CPU path on one, original mobo is shafted? I'm pretty sure it was never promised but I'm certain future upgrade on the old X370 was spoken on for Zen 3?

If true, this sucks big time.
I think only the same socket was promised until 2020 and it's true. And if you check the charts, there is no Zen 2 compabitility with the B350 and X370 yet you can get BIOS updates for certain B350/X370 boards so it can run Zen2 CPUs. I'm quite sure this will be the same for Zen3: some B450/X470 will get updates to run Zen3 CPUs. And you will probably get series6 mobos for the Zen3 CPUs so at least 2 compatible mobo gens are guaranteed.
Posted on Reply
#296
kapone32
theoneandonlymrkIndividual issues are not the sole remit of AMD but you can if it makes you feel good imply that one equals everyone.

As for your friends they might want to take their pc to the shop for a proper setup:p :D.
Or use RAM on the QVL of their motherboard.
Posted on Reply
#297
Turmania
PR disaster for AMD just when they are about to do a coupe de grace on Intel, they shoot themselves in the foot.
Posted on Reply
#298
kapone32
klf:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: haha like my x399 and 2990WX-2500 usd become dead platform after just one year,,, when i complain on that, reddit amd ban me for this and all amd fans say me - " but ist different than new tr40 chipset" .... aaand now when they must eat salt from amd,, they sttart whinning ... :roll::roll:
Don't worry the 3960x will drop in price then you can upgrade to TRX40 and laugh at everyone else who won't have 88 lanes of PCIe 4.0 glory.
Posted on Reply
#299
windwhirl
kapone32Or use RAM on the QVL of their motherboard.
Depending on your location, finding RAM that is listed on the QVL sometimes is a pain... I'd know, I went through that.
Posted on Reply
#300
Durvelle27
I can't believe so many people are whining about this

I don't see anything wrong with upgrading boards

My B350 has served its time with a 1700X upto the 3900X no complaints

And people commenting about the 5 series using the same size BIOs chip yadada

It clearly states with the B550/X570 it will not support older Athlons or APUs and possibly won't even support Ryzen 1000 or 2000 to open room up for Ryzen 3000 and Ryzen 4000

Hell my B350 when i updated the BIOs for Ryzen 3000 literally lost support for Athlons and non ryzen APUs
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Sep 29th, 2024 13:27 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts