Friday, July 22nd 2022

Intel Xeon W9-3495 Sapphire Rapids HEDT CPU with 56 Cores and 112 Threads Appears

Intel's upcoming Sapphire Rapids processors will not only be present in the server sector but will also span the high-end desktop (HEDT) platform. Today, according to the findings of a Twitter user, @InstLatX64, we have an appearance of Intel's upcoming Sapphire Rapids HEDT SKU in Kernel.org boot logs. Named Intel Xeon W9-3495, this model features 56 cores and 112 threads. While there is no specific information about base and boost frequencies, we know that the SKU supports AVX-512 and AMX instructions. This is a welcome addition, as we have seen Intel disable AVX-512 on consumer chips altogether.

With a high core count and additional instructions for Deep Learning, this CPU will power workstations sometimes in the future. With the late arrival of Sapphire Rapids for servers, a HEDT variant should follow.
Sources: Kernel.org, via @InstLatX64 (Twitter)
Add your own comment

26 Comments on Intel Xeon W9-3495 Sapphire Rapids HEDT CPU with 56 Cores and 112 Threads Appears

#1
SOAREVERSOR
Isn't HEDT "dead"? AMD quit the game, and I doubt intel is going to continue it.
Posted on Reply
#2
DeathtoGnomes
SOAREVERSORIsn't HEDT "dead"? AMD quit the game, and I doubt intel is going to continue it.
No AMD didnt quit, they just refocused their target.
Posted on Reply
#3
Vya Domus
Wasn't this Sapphire Rapids announced like more than a year ago ? I just can't understand why it took them so long, it's crazy.
Posted on Reply
#4
bonehead123
Vya DomusWasn't this Sapphire Rapids announced like more than a year ago ? I just can't understand why it took them so long, it's crazy.
Typical vaporwarez launches...just like their still-in-absentia ARC GPU's, aside from a few mentions on PRC propo-sites :D
Posted on Reply
#6
The Von Matrices
DeathtoGnomesNo AMD didnt quit, they just refocused their target.
Right, and just like AMD, there is no way this specific SKU will sell for less than $6000.

Although that doesn't exclude Intel from introducing cheaper workstation CPUs with fewer cores/features.
Posted on Reply
#7
Jism
Vya DomusWasn't this Sapphire Rapids announced like more than a year ago ? I just can't understand why it took them so long, it's crazy.
Because the initial batch proberly "underperformed" compared to AMD's offering back then.

The same with ARC. It underperformed. They had to make changes and re-bake the chips again.
Posted on Reply
#8
DeathtoGnomes
The Von MatricesRight, and just like AMD, there is no way this specific SKU will sell for less than $6000.

Although that doesn't exclude Intel from introducing cheaper workstation CPUs with fewer cores/features.
I dont follow pricing all that much, but this has to compete directly with its AMD counterpart ($6250-ish), which means pricing as close to it as possible despite having an 8 core deficit. $6k is prolly as close as Intel can get and remain a justified value.
Posted on Reply
#9
SOAREVERSOR
JismBecause the initial batch proberly "underperformed" compared to AMD's offering back then.

The same with ARC. It underperformed. They had to make changes and re-bake the chips again.
This is idiotic. You buy into intel for the entire eco system. Chipstets, NICs, software support, RAID the works. AMD can throw benchmarks at the wall all it wants but that's just a monkey slinging shit. When you go pro you learn "nobody every got fired for buying intel" and that's the end all be all.
Posted on Reply
#10
DeathtoGnomes
SOAREVERSORYou buy into intel for the entire eco system. Chipstets, NICs, software support, RAID the works. AMD can throw benchmarks at the wall all it wants but that's just a monkey slinging shit. When you go pro you learn "nobody every got fired for buying intel" and that's the end all be all.
You buy into AMD for the entire eco system. Chipstets, NICs, software support, RAID the works. Intel can throw benchmarks at the wall all it wants but that's just a monkey slinging shit. When you go pro you learn "nobody every got fired for buying AMD" and that's the end all be all.

:D
Posted on Reply
#11
Crackong
SOAREVERSORThis is idiotic. You buy into intel for the entire eco system. Chipstets, NICs, software support, RAID the works. AMD can throw benchmarks at the wall all it wants but that's just a monkey slinging shit. When you go pro you learn "nobody every got fired for buying intel" and that's the end all be all.
Those who actually buy these CPU in volume custom ordered (even self-manufactured) their own eco system, Chipsets, NICs, software support, RAID support etc.

In the commerical world, everything is properly tested and validated to a point that a major part of the cost came from the validation process.
Those machines are garanteed to perform with the validated platform and customers already paid for the support service to "Make it work if it doesn't" .

Enterprise don't care about "Brand loyalty" and no one would get fired because of not following "The famous brand".
People do get fired if they made a stupid decision of using a less efficient less powerful more expensive platform based on "Brand loyalty" tho.

Intel SR was delayed like the 6th times already.
This is not typical Intel quality
Clearly there are some major problems there, stability or performance wise.
Posted on Reply
#12
kapone32
I hope that this chip forces AMD to re-apply Threadripper chips to the consumer market.
Posted on Reply
#13
ThrashZone
kapone32I hope that this chip forces AMD to re-apply Threadripper chips to the consumer market.
Hi,
The huge jump from TR 16 to 24 core and above was way to steep
Think amd said it best a while back nobody could afford them I'd change that to not many could afford them :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#14
Bones
kapone32I hope that this chip forces AMD to re-apply Threadripper chips to the consumer market.
Could happen but I woudn't hold my breath over it.
We'll have to wait and see.
Posted on Reply
#15
kapone32
ThrashZoneHi,
The huge jump from TR 16 to 24 core and above was way to steep
Think amd said it best a while back nobody could afford them I'd change that to not many could afford them :laugh:
Don't they have a 12 and 16 core chips in the channel right now? I can see them updating the 3945WRX to 5000 series. Those Enterprise chips could easily be repurposed to Consumer.
Posted on Reply
#16
ThrashZone
kapone32Don't they have a 12 and 16 core chips in the channel right now? I can see them updating the 3945WRX to 5000 series. Those Enterprise chips could easily be repurposed to Consumer.
Hi,
Yes but I was referring to 24 and up were out of reach for most people price wise
Otherwise I would of gotten a 24 core.
Posted on Reply
#17
DeathtoGnomes
ThrashZoneHi,
The huge jump from TR 16 to 24 core and above was way to steep
Think amd said it best a while back nobody could afford them I'd change that to not many could afford them :laugh:
plus the new socket.
Posted on Reply
#18
SOAREVERSOR
ThrashZoneHi,
The huge jump from TR 16 to 24 core and above was way to steep
Think amd said it best a while back nobody could afford them I'd change that to not many could afford them :laugh:
A big point of the true consumer HEDT platforms was also the extra PCI-E lanes. It's always been the case that the extra memory channels and cores didn't do all that much for most people, but the extra PCI-E lanes made the buyin worth it.
Posted on Reply
#19
aQi
@btarunr See I told you...if Intel sticks to 8 P-cores on 13900K then there will be a HEDT soon.
Posted on Reply
#20
Unregistered
aQi@btarunr See I told you...if Intel sticks to 8 P-cores on 13900K then there will be a HEDT soon.
Is that a good thing or bad?
#21
JustBenching
TiggerIs that a good thing or bad?
It will be good, since the hedt has been abandoned by both amd and intel. Generally speaking, amd not withstanding since they gave tr users the middle finger, the hedt platforms have long term support that you won't find in mainstream platforms. Wouldn't surprise me if we see 12 and 16 p core hedt parts from intel, with 5 or more years of platform support.
Posted on Reply
#22
zlobby
Do we still need to disable HT in order to prevent side-channel attacks?
Posted on Reply
#23
Vayra86
I love this typo @AleksandarK

"With a high core count and additional instructions for Deep Learning, this CPU will power workstations sometimes in the future"

I think you're right it won't happen all too often... :D
zlobbyDo we still need to disable HT in order to prevent side-channel attacks?
No.

...guarantees
Posted on Reply
#24
aQi
TiggerIs that a good thing or bad?
For a HEDT lover its good and for desktop consumer line its bad cause they will stuck to 8 P-cores
Posted on Reply
#25
Ellertis
aQiFor a HEDT lover its good and for desktop consumer line its bad cause they will stuck to 8 P-cores
I dont get the criticism of 'only 8p cores'. If you buy a high end cpu, and need a lot of multithread performance. Why do you care if you've p or e cores, besides e cores will provide more performance/die size/power
kapone32I hope that this chip forces AMD to re-apply Threadripper chips to the consumer market.
Isn't high end AM5 bassicaly it? You've twice the bandwidth of pcie lanes over zen2/3, more ram bandwidth, 16 faster cores, even more with latter zen archs, except big.little ushering in.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 25th, 2024 23:54 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts