Friday, July 22nd 2022
Intel Xeon W9-3495 Sapphire Rapids HEDT CPU with 56 Cores and 112 Threads Appears
Intel's upcoming Sapphire Rapids processors will not only be present in the server sector but will also span the high-end desktop (HEDT) platform. Today, according to the findings of a Twitter user, @InstLatX64, we have an appearance of Intel's upcoming Sapphire Rapids HEDT SKU in Kernel.org boot logs. Named Intel Xeon W9-3495, this model features 56 cores and 112 threads. While there is no specific information about base and boost frequencies, we know that the SKU supports AVX-512 and AMX instructions. This is a welcome addition, as we have seen Intel disable AVX-512 on consumer chips altogether.
With a high core count and additional instructions for Deep Learning, this CPU will power workstations sometimes in the future. With the late arrival of Sapphire Rapids for servers, a HEDT variant should follow.
Sources:
Kernel.org, via @InstLatX64 (Twitter)
With a high core count and additional instructions for Deep Learning, this CPU will power workstations sometimes in the future. With the late arrival of Sapphire Rapids for servers, a HEDT variant should follow.
26 Comments on Intel Xeon W9-3495 Sapphire Rapids HEDT CPU with 56 Cores and 112 Threads Appears
Although that doesn't exclude Intel from introducing cheaper workstation CPUs with fewer cores/features.
The same with ARC. It underperformed. They had to make changes and re-bake the chips again.
:D
In the commerical world, everything is properly tested and validated to a point that a major part of the cost came from the validation process.
Those machines are garanteed to perform with the validated platform and customers already paid for the support service to "Make it work if it doesn't" .
Enterprise don't care about "Brand loyalty" and no one would get fired because of not following "The famous brand".
People do get fired if they made a stupid decision of using a less efficient less powerful more expensive platform based on "Brand loyalty" tho.
Intel SR was delayed like the 6th times already.
This is not typical Intel quality
Clearly there are some major problems there, stability or performance wise.
The huge jump from TR 16 to 24 core and above was way to steep
Think amd said it best a while back nobody could afford them I'd change that to not many could afford them :laugh:
We'll have to wait and see.
Yes but I was referring to 24 and up were out of reach for most people price wise
Otherwise I would of gotten a 24 core.
"With a high core count and additional instructions for Deep Learning, this CPU will power workstations sometimes in the future"
I think you're right it won't happen all too often... :D No.
...guarantees