Friday, August 19th 2022

ASUS Announces New AMD X670E Motherboards at Canadian National Expo

ASUS today announced a new generation of AMD-based motherboards to accompany the ROG Crosshair X670E Extreme and support the latest Ryzen 7000 processors: the ROG Crosshair X670E Hero, the ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WiFi, and the TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi. Introducing the new generation of AMD ROG motherboards: the X670E series. Featuring support for DDR5 memory modules and PCIe 5.0 devices, the ROG Crosshair X670E Hero, ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WiFi, and TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi is equipped with improved bandwidth capabilities, stability, and overall connectivity.

All three boards feature the latest ASUS Q-Design innovations. The ROG Crosshair X670E Hero and ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WiFi includes the PCIe Q-Release button, a feature that lets users release their graphics card from the PCIe slot with one press. In addition, all three featured motherboards will include the single-sided Q-DIMM latching design to ensure ease of installation and allowing memory sticks to hold firmly in place. Lastly, the boards include the M.2 Q-latch, allowing users to secure or loosen an M.2 drive with just their fingertips.
ROG Crosshair X670E Hero
The flagship in the Crosshair X670E lineup, the ROG Crosshair X670E Hero bridges the gap between professional PC builders and everyday gamers, allowing all users to construct a high-performance showcase PC. With its 18+2 teamed power stages rated for 110 A and substantial integrated heatsinks, the X670E Hero delivers stable power at cooler temperatures.

The X670E Hero is equipped for the next generation, featuring a pair of PCIe 5.0x16 slots to support next-gen graphics cards, a PCIe 5.00 M.2 card, and WiFi 6E capability for unhindered wireless networking. ESS ES9218PQ Quad DAC provides pristine audio to the front-panel output.

Dark hues predominate the surface of the ROG Crosshair X670E Hero, providing an intense aesthetic for PC builds. Polymo lighting and a luminous RGB pattern across the integrated I/O shield delivers a microstructural array of light and color.
ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WiFi
The ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WiFi merges the best of form and function into balanced gaming performance. The board features 18+2 teamed power stages rated for 110 A and a large, bundled M.2 heatsink to deliver a stable stream of power and thermal performance to the AMD CPU.

In addition to the PCIe Slot Q-Release button, the ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WiFi also features an integrated power button on the motherboard and spare M.2 thermal pads to ensure optimal pre-testing and future replacements.

Angular accents sweep across the board's heatsinks alongside distinctive ROG iconography, accompanied by an illuminated acrylic display on the integrated I/O shield.
TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi
The TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi delivers performance in a durable and practical form. The board includes a PCIe Gen 5.0 x 16 slot, four M.2 slots

Featuring a simple, clean aesthetic and badges on the integrated I/O shield, the TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi also includes the latest ASUS Q-Design features, including an intuitive Q-LED agnostic array that gives users a quick glance on the status of their build.
Source: ASUS
Add your own comment

59 Comments on ASUS Announces New AMD X670E Motherboards at Canadian National Expo

#26
Chaitanya
So as usual too many castrations in terms of features. I would like to see retail prices but given its Shitsus fully expecting them to be stupidly expensive.

For example here is back IO of Gigabytes entry level X670 offering featuring 20Gbps Type-C port.
Posted on Reply
#27
TheLostSwede
News Editor
CallandorWoT@TheLostSwede the only thing I want to know about future Asus motherboards is if they will come with BIOS level forced software installs on clean installs of OS's. if my memory serves me correctly they did this in the past? I can't quite remember.
It's supposedly something you can disable in the UEFI now.
kapone32So does this mean that if I go to the Ex this year I will be abl[e to buy one? I wonder which pavilion they are in too. The Ex is absolutely huge.
Click the source link on the main site.
dj-electricAM5 platform openers will be expensive. If anyone hopes for a 150 dollar board and a 200 dollar CPU to go along with it, sheesh.... I've heard there are good deals for AM4 hardware for you.

The good part - connectivity on AM5 leapfrogs current LGA1700, so that's cool
There will be sub $150 B650 boards.
Posted on Reply
#29
john_
kapone32You can get high end X570 boards that have top 2 slots going to to the CPU. Even some B450 boards had that too. It's the reason I will always rank the Asus Strix B450-E over the B550-F.
And that's why I chose to never give money for an x570. I was refusing to pay over $200 for a feature that I could find in older boards costing less than $100.
Posted on Reply
#30
Dirt Chip
TheLostSwedeThere will be sub $150 B650 boards.
When?
Maybe next year..
Posted on Reply
#31
TheDeeGee
Do they ship with a smoke detector?
Posted on Reply
#32
john_
TheDeeGeeDo they ship with a smoke detector?
Only the Intel models.
Posted on Reply
#33
dj-electric
TheLostSwedeThere will be sub $150 B650 boards.
Yeah, kinda why I said "openers".
Posted on Reply
#34
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Dirt ChipWhen?
Maybe next year..
Supposedly as early as October.
dj-electricYeah, kinda why I said "openers".
You got cheaper option on Intel with comparable features?
Posted on Reply
#35
dj-electric
TheLostSwedeYou got cheaper option on Intel with comparable features?
That... has nothing to do with what I said. Its throwing the argument in a ring with Intel. All I stated is that AM5 openers will be relatively pricey. That's all.
Posted on Reply
#36
Assimilator
TheLostSwedeYou got cheaper option on Intel with comparable features?
Doesn't mean that we as consumers should accept shit. By that argument we should be happy with Intel's CPUs, right?
Posted on Reply
#37
tussinman
Dirt ChipWhen?
Maybe next year..
All the rumors are pointing towards 3 to 4 weeks after launch (so like mid October to early November range).

Almost all of the manufacturer have already announced there full B lineup so this shouldn't be surprising (next year for B boards was never a thing)
Posted on Reply
#38
TheLostSwede
News Editor
dj-electricThat... has nothing to do with what I said. Its throwing the argument in a ring with Intel. All I stated is that AM5 openers will be relatively pricey. That's all.
Well, people will buy AMD or Intel, so obviously it's a valid question. Not trying to start an argument, simply asking a question.
AssimilatorDoesn't mean that we as consumers should accept shit. By that argument we should be happy with Intel's CPUs, right?
Nope, not at all. It was simply a question.
Everything is getting more expensive, motherboards are at least to a degree getting more expensive because they are becoming more complex to manufacture, but we're obviously getting a lot more blingy and useless features for a large swath of PC users, because someone figured that RGB was important...
Posted on Reply
#39
Shou Miko
Why a TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi with 4 sata ports..... :fear:

Is the X670 gonna be a so bad no one is gonna use it so it will become the new budget chipset instead of the B650? :confused:
Posted on Reply
#40
dj-electric
puma99dk|Why a TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi with 4 sata ports..... :fear:
SATA connectors are sort of... dying in the consumer space. The move to 4 ports as standard has already began as a trend on Z690 and will probably continue into more boards, as the use of SATA drives keeps shrinking rapidly among the vast population of users.
Posted on Reply
#41
Shou Miko
dj-electricSATA connectors are sort of... dying in the consumer space. The move to 4 ports as standard has already began as a trend on Z690 and will probably continue into more boards, as the use of SATA drives keeps shrinking rapidly among the vast population of users.
That's true but I was more kinda shocked that even the TUF uses a X670E chipset and not the X670-nonE or what you will call it like X670-none :roll:

Because if all the X670 chipsets will be on budget and bad board then why even release that chipset and not just stick with the B650 :confused:
Posted on Reply
#42
dj-electric
puma99dk|Because if all the X670 chipsets will be on budget and bad board then why even release that chipset and not just stick with the B650 :confused:
TBH, I will be surprised if more than a few B650 or X670 boards above 150 or 200 dollars will be any "bad". These things are quite well built. This would mostly be the question of just decent vs really good.

Every motherboard generation usually comes with 2-3 very high value offerings for people who want certain features since that's how segmentation works along the stack of consumer options in this space.

Look out for boards like GIGABYTE X670 AORUS ELITE AX or MSI PRO X670-P WIFI as those kinds of boards typically represent the "powerful mid range" and their price tag should match that description. In terms of connectivity and BoM, they are similar to some of what of the higher end X570 boards used to offer, along with all the flashy new AM5 stuff
Posted on Reply
#43
Shou Miko
dj-electricTBH, I will be surprised if more than a few B650 or X670 boards above 150 or 200 dollars will be any "bad". These things are quite well built. This would mostly be the question of just decent vs really good.

Every motherboard generation usually comes with 2-3 very high value offerings for people who want certain features since that's how segmentation works along the stack of consumer options in this space.

Look out for boards like GIGABYTE X670 AORUS ELITE AX or MSI PRO X670-P WIFI as those kinds of boards typically represent the "powerful mid range" and their price tag should match that description. In terms of connectivity and BoM, they are similar to some of what of the higher end X570 boards used to offer, along with all the flashy new AM5 stuff
Well if MSI manage to make a AM5 board like the Z690-A with and without WiFi and call it like MSI X670-A or something I don't care about attached I/O shield and so on even it's a nice touch I rather want a solid good board.

MSI really nailed the Z690-A making 4 skus with and without wifi and DDR4 or DDR5 so do this for the X670 would be awesome.
Posted on Reply
#44
Dirt Chip
dj-electricSATA connectors are sort of... dying in the consumer space. The move to 4 ports as standard has already began as a trend on Z690 and will probably continue into more boards, as the use of SATA drives keeps shrinking rapidly among the vast population of users.
Not quite true.
As the 'gamer' community grow so on the 'contant creation' community and thay need that sata ports for data storing on HDD.
You can always add pci-e to sata ports but but 6 nativ sata should be minimum in any xxxZ or XxxxE motherboard.
Posted on Reply
#45
dj-electric
Dirt ChipNot quite true.
It is absolutely true, and the reason why Seagate and WD gradually shut down consumer grade manufecturing lines. The gamer community grow, and the price and availability of higher capacity M.2 drives changes accordingly.
Ask any local PC store how HDD sales for the consumer space is going. This stuff is on a sharp decline.
I can tell you that i've worked at a large retail store chain in 2015 and we have already seen the sharp decline in numbers then, and the stronghold of SSD-exclusive gaming machines. Today the situation is far more M.2 SSD storage tuned. Ask the motherboard and CPU manufecturers why they have decided to arm the new boards with 4-5 M.2 ports.
Posted on Reply
#46
TheLostSwede
News Editor
puma99dk|Why a TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WiFi with 4 sata ports..... :fear:

Is the X670 gonna be a so bad no one is gonna use it so it will become the new budget chipset instead of the B650? :confused:
Because AMD is now sharing PCIe lanes with SATA interfaces, so Asus bet on PCIe.
See:
www.techpowerup.com/295394/amd-zen-4-socket-am5-explained-pcie-lanes-chipsets-connectivity

Also, the only difference between the E and non E skuts is PCIe 5.0 support for the x16 slot.
dj-electricTBH, I will be surprised if more than a few B650 or X670 boards above 150 or 200 dollars will be any "bad". These things are quite well built. This would mostly be the question of just decent vs really good.
That's spot on I'd say. It really comes down to what extra features you want. There's the odd strange product in this segment though.
dj-electricEvery motherboard generation usually comes with 2-3 very high value offerings for people who want certain features since that's how segmentation works along the stack of consumer options in this space.
What we'll get this time around though, are some comparably high-end B650E boards that will be priced higher or at least similar to high-end X670E boards.
dj-electricLook out for boards like GIGABYTE X670 AORUS ELITE AX or MSI PRO X670-P WIFI as those kinds of boards typically represent the "powerful mid range" and their price tag should match that description. In terms of connectivity and BoM, they are similar to some of what of the higher end X570 boards used to offer, along with all the flashy new AM5 stuff
The Elite should be sub $300 if things goes according to what the plan was around Computex. It has a few weak spots though, which might even make similarly priced B650E boards more tempting.
Posted on Reply
#47
Animalpak
Also I am always amazed and happy with how they build and make them, as if they were to last at least 10 years of service, they are released every 2 years almost annually and I wonder all this study they do to make them resistant and performing and are changed every 2 years, because they have to keep up with the CPUs.

What a waste.
Posted on Reply
#48
Shou Miko
TheLostSwedeBecause AMD is now sharing PCIe lanes with SATA interfaces, so Asus bet on PCIe.
See:
www.techpowerup.com/295394/amd-zen-4-socket-am5-explained-pcie-lanes-chipsets-connectivity

Also, the only difference between the E and non E skuts is PCIe 5.0 support for the x16 slot.
Who needs PCI-E 5.0 as of now? Future GPU's might be able to handle it and support but backward compatibility to 4.0 might not be bad same for this generation 4.0 worked in 3.0 and not a lot of performance was lost.

Personally I don't really give a hick about PCI-E 5.0 NVME SSD's and their 10 or 12GB/s not like my games will start or run quicker like CSGO one click your the first in game it doesn't work like that :roll:
Posted on Reply
#49
Ravenmaster
Lets hope these ones have their chips the right way around so they don't burst into flames
Posted on Reply
#50
Assimilator
Dirt ChipYou can always add pci-e to sata ports but but 6 nativ sata should be minimum in any xxxZ or XxxxE motherboard.
Much as IDE was replaced by SATA, so SATA is being replaced by M.2 PCIe. I give it another 2 generations before M.2 drives have reached large enough capacities to mostly take over from mechanical spinners and boards thus no longer ship with any SATA ports.

And, much as you can still find PCIe-to-IDE cards, so PCIe-to-SATA cards will become the way to have SATA ports on a motherboard (and you can get up to 16 of them from a single x1 PCIe slot). Hell, you can already get cheap M.2 PCIe => SATA adapter cards that provide 5 ports which is more than some boards of this generation are offering.

My quibble with the M.2 encroachment is that the manufacturers haven't yet figured out how to make unpopulated M.2 PCIe slots not steal lanes from ordinary PCIe slots. So if you have four M.2 PCIe slots on a board, you're losing a full PCIe slot (16 lanes worth) of bandwidth... even if you never use any of those M.2 slots. Which is, pardon my French, fucking retarded. We already have bifurcation on PCIe slots, I don't understand why it can't be extended and enhanced to allow a sensible configuration.

E.g. a platform that exposes 32 PCIe lanes should be able to support the following configurations:
PCIe slot 1PCIe slot 2Enabled M.2 PCIe slot count
x16x160
x16x82
x16x43
x16x04
x8x84
x8x45


And even more esoteric and potentially useful configurations could be enabled:
PCIe slot 1PCIe slot 2Enabled M.2 PCIe slot count
x16x121
x12x122
x12x83
x12x44
x8x06
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 12th, 2024 00:38 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts