Tuesday, July 4th 2023

Intel Developing Efficient Solution for Path Tracing on Integrated GPUs

Intel's software engineers are working on path-traced light simulation and conducting neural graphics research, as documented in a recent company news article, with an ambition to create a more efficient solution for integrated graphics cards. The company's Graphics Research Organization is set to present their path-traced optimizations at SIGGRAPH 2023. Their papers have been showcased at recent EGSR and HPG events. The team is aiming to get iGPUs running path-tracing in real time, by reducing the number of calculations required to simulate light bounces.

The article covers three different techniques, all designed to improve GPU performance: "Across the process of path tracing, the research presented in these papers demonstrates improvements in efficiency in path tracing's main building blocks, namely ray tracing, shading, and sampling. These are important components to make photorealistic rendering with path tracing available on more affordable GPUs, such as Intel Arc GPUs, and a step toward real-time performance on integrated GPUs." Although there is an emphasis on in-house products in the article, Intel's "open source-first mindset" hints that their R&D could be shared with others—NVIDIA and AMD are likely still struggling to make ray tracing practical on their modest graphics card models.

The articles concludes: "We're excited to keep pushing these efforts for more efficiency in a talk in Advances in Real-time Rendering, SIGGRAPH's most attended course. During this talk, titled Path Tracing a Trillion Triangles, we demonstrate that with efficient algorithms, real-time path tracing requires a much less powerful GPU, and can be practical even on mid-range and integrated GPUs in the future. In the spirit of Intel's open ecosystem software mindset, we will make this cross-vendor framework open source as a sample and a test-bed for developers and practitioners."
Sources: Tom's Hardware, Intel Dev Blog
Add your own comment

25 Comments on Intel Developing Efficient Solution for Path Tracing on Integrated GPUs

#1
TumbleGeorge
I didn't recognise formula on the image. My science is very bad. Eyes too.
Posted on Reply
#2
Denver
If I understand correctly, it's only 3-7% improvement? To make (limited)RT possible on iGPUs the improvement would have to be in the order of 300-700% lol

I liked the part where it says it's Open Source, I hope it doesn't have a huge hidden "but"
Posted on Reply
#3
Assimilator
DenverIf I understand correctly, it's only 3-7% improvement? To make (limited)RT possible on iGPUs the improvement would have to be in the order of 300-700% lol
True, but the optimisation may very well be applicable to more powerful GPUs, and those might be able to better scale the effect.
Posted on Reply
#4
HisDivineOrder
I am convinced Nvidia does not want great ray tracing on lower end products. They prefer people wanting their high end products because they are increasingly moving away from the mass produced lower cost products. I wouldn't expect them to be happy about anything that makes their gimmick easier on lower end products because that would devalue what they want you paying $900+ for.
Posted on Reply
#5
Vayra86
DenverIf I understand correctly, it's only 3-7% improvement? To make (limited)RT possible on iGPUs the improvement would have to be in the order of 300-700% lol

I liked the part where it says it's Open Source, I hope it doesn't have a huge hidden "but"
Well... 'but' its a single digit percent effort.

I'm pretty unimpressed :D
May it scale well...
HisDivineOrderI am convinced Nvidia does not want great ray tracing on lower end products. They prefer people wanting their high end products because they are increasingly moving away from the mass produced lower cost products. I wouldn't expect them to be happy about anything that makes their gimmick easier on lower end products because that would devalue what they want you paying $900+ for.
They are going to feel the squeeze of the market then...

What they want to sell is not what the majority buys, and if RT wants to survive/become a real thing, they need mass adoption.
Posted on Reply
#6
Vya Domus
Man, things are rough when 7% improvement is some kind of breakthrough.
Posted on Reply
#7
LabRat 891
Vya DomusMan, things are rough when 7% improvement is some kind of breakthrough.
Yeah, it's a lil overblown (it's Marketing/PR *shrug*).
But, don't discount improvements. Often, tiny improvements are indicative of 'mastering' a new technology, and can be instrumental in future 'leaps'.

IMO, we need a game w/ very 'simple' (read: low-cost) visuals and fantastic gameplay, that centers around Ray-Tracing. Even better if it was DXR, but vendor-specific implementations were also supported.
-a 'killer app' to really drive attention and development while demonstrating exactly why and how RT is so 'neat'.
Posted on Reply
#8
wolf
Better Than Native
Good news, Intel taking this next leap in rendering technology seriously.
Posted on Reply
#9
Fluffmeister
HisDivineOrderI am convinced Nvidia does not want great ray tracing on lower end products. They prefer people wanting their high end products because they are increasingly moving away from the mass produced lower cost products. I wouldn't expect them to be happy about anything that makes their gimmick easier on lower end products because that would devalue what they want you paying $900+ for.
Luckily the AMD RX 7600 is a ray tracing monster, and being AMD is comes with more than 8GB of... oh wait.
Posted on Reply
#10
kondamin
HisDivineOrderI am convinced Nvidia does not want great ray tracing on lower end products. They prefer people wanting their high end products because they are increasingly moving away from the mass produced lower cost products. I wouldn't expect them to be happy about anything that makes their gimmick easier on lower end products because that would devalue what they want you paying $900+ for.
Even if the low end starts becoming better trough tweaks the higher end will benefit from that two.
Even the 4090 needs to do tricks like upscaling and fake frames
Posted on Reply
#11
Minus Infinity
AssimilatorTrue, but the optimisation may very well be applicable to more powerful GPUs, and those might be able to better scale the effect.
AMD patent just surfaced that might indicate RDNA4 is getting dedicated hardware specifically for path/ray tracing acceleration. RDNA3/2 do not have hardware acceleration for doing the BVH and intersections etc.
Posted on Reply
#12
LabRat 891
Minus InfinityAMD patent just surfaced that might indicate RDNA4 is getting dedicated hardware specifically for path/ray tracing acceleration. RDNA3/2 do not have hardware acceleration for doing the BVH and intersections etc.
[joke]Here, I was hoping we'd get to see a dedicated RT accelerator card; ala Ageia PhysX[/joke]
Posted on Reply
#13
GoldenX
LabRat 891Yeah, it's a lil overblown (it's Marketing/PR *shrug*).
But, don't discount improvements. Often, tiny improvements are indicative of 'mastering' a new technology, and can be instrumental in future 'leaps'.

IMO, we need a game w/ very 'simple' (read: low-cost) visuals and fantastic gameplay, that centers around Ray-Tracing. Even better if it was DXR, but vendor-specific implementations were also supported.
-a 'killer app' to really drive attention and development while demonstrating exactly why and how RT is so 'neat'.
So we wait for Nintendo to use it for something is what you're saying.
Posted on Reply
#14
DemonicRyzen666
Vya DomusMan, things are rough when 7% improvement is some kind of breakthrough.
How so?
Nvidia clearly has only been gaining +6% increase in the efficiency is their entire RT features each generation, when compared to any card with same ROP's, TMU & RT cores, Tensor cores, shaders/compute units, for the last generation.
That's without using D.L.S.S Or Frame Generation.

without increasing rasterization, that is the total increase in Nvidia's RT efficiency overall.
Posted on Reply
#15
Thorsthimble
Not holding my breath waiting for some massive breakthrough, but I do wish them luck in what they're doing. RT is neat and impressive in its own rights, but in most cases the relatively minor upgrade to visuals just isn't worth absolutely annihilating your framerates.
Posted on Reply
#16
R0H1T
Fluffmeistermore than 8GB of
Of what, cache? The suspense is almost killing me o_O
Posted on Reply
#17
wolf
Better Than Native
R0H1TOf what
VRAM, obviously. Well, it was obvious to me anyway.
Posted on Reply
#18
R0H1T
Of course but wouldn't it be nice if we had 8GB of something like Crystal Well on a GPU? They already got 1GB+ cache on CPU, getting big amounts of cache on GPU is probably up next even if it's only for enterprise or HPC clients!
Posted on Reply
#19
Vya Domus
DemonicRyzen666Nvidia clearly has only been gaining +6% increase in the efficiency is their entire RT features each generation
That doesn't make it any better.
Posted on Reply
#20
Unregistered
ThorsthimbleNot holding my breath waiting for some massive breakthrough, but I do wish them luck in what they're doing. RT is neat and impressive in its own rights, but in most cases the relatively minor upgrade to visuals just isn't worth absolutely annihilating your framerates.
I always considered RT to be a niche thing, not all games need it, and those that have very poor graphics to begin with like CP2077 or Control with their PS1 geometry, in order for RT to make sense games should be photorealistic hence perfect textures and geometry.
#21
InVasMani
wolfGood news, Intel taking this next leap in rendering technology seriously.
Me: putting on my 7% seriously cool glasses.
Posted on Reply
#22
Kn0xxPT
RT is for some games, and mostly a markting stunt to sell GPU's, ( thanks Nvidia but no thanks). Intel should focus more R&D on optimizing rastering/performance/watt.
AMD and Intel going after Nvidia markting stunts just because it sells, its a trap.
on the other hand, DLSS and alikes, should bet more R&D on that also, because its expands the GPU lifecycle.
A proper game studio should be capable of making great looking games without use of RT... Gran Turismo for example.
its like playing eSports with RT ... its dumb.
The FPS sacrifice just for a more realistic light reflection that doesnt gets noticed only if you look for it.
Posted on Reply
#23
Tahagomizer
To the naysayers: 7% seems like not so much, but that's because we're used to companies shouting about massive improvements with an asterisk of them being only applicable to very niche, borderline situations. Actual progress is made in small steps.
Personally, I don't care about ray tracing in games. Maybe because I enjoyed games in times when the whole scene had less polygons than one character's buttocks nowadays - that's actually true, Lady Dmitrescu's butt has more polygons than the whole scene in Resident Evil 1 had - and I'd rather play a good game than a good looking game, maybe because I'm not willing to sacrifice performance for a marginal improvement in how well defined the puddles look.
Posted on Reply
#24
TumbleGeorge
TahagomizerTo the naysayers: 7% seems like not so much, but that's because we're used to companies shouting about massive improvements with an asterisk of them being only applicable to very niche, borderline situations. Actual progress is made in small steps.
Personally, I don't care about ray tracing in games. Maybe because I enjoyed games in times when the whole scene had less polygons than one character's buttocks nowadays - that's actually true, Lady Dmitrescu's butt has more polygons than the whole scene in Resident Evil 1 had - and I'd rather play a good game than a good looking game, maybe because I'm not willing to sacrifice performance for a marginal improvement in how well defined the puddles look.
How is related ray tracing and number of polygons in the your try to looking on situation?
Posted on Reply
#25
Tahagomizer
TumbleGeorgeHow is related ray tracing and number of polygons in the your try to looking on situation?
They both pertain to a perceived quality of the scene a player is viewing, in my example I tried to underline that improvement of visual fidelity might not translate to a better overall quality of the product.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 12:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts