Friday, August 25th 2023

AMD Unveils Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT Graphics Cards

AMD today at Gamescom unveiled the Radeon RX 7800 XT and Radeon RX 7700 XT performance-segment graphics cards. Designed for maxed out gaming at 1440p with ray tracing, the two are designed to square off against NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4070 series, offering competitive performance and pricing. The two are based on AMD's latest RDNA3 graphics architecture, and use the 5 nm foundry process where it matters. Both cards claim to offer not just superior performance to the specific NVIDIA RTX 40-series SKUs they're designed to compete with, but also better future-proofing, with more video memory on offer.

At the heart of the two is the new "Navi 32" GPU, AMD's second largest chip from this generation. It is a chiplet GPU, just like the "Navi 31" that powers the RX 7900 series, albeit slightly scaled down. The graphics compute die (GCD), the die with the main graphics rendering and compute machinery, is built on the 5 nm EUV foundry node. It is flanked by four memory cache dies (MCDs), each built on the 6 nm foundry node. These are the same MCDs found in the "Navi 31," but four in number instead of six, which gives the "Navi 32" a 256-bit wide GDDR6 memory interface.
The Radeon RX 7800 XT maxes out the "Navi 32," enabling all 60 compute units (CU) physically present, which works out to 3,840 stream processors, 120 AI accelerators, 60 Ray accelerators, 64 MB of Infinity Cache, and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory across the chip's full 256-bit memory interface. The GPU ticks at 2124 MHz Game clocks, and 2430 MHz boost; while its memory runs at 19.5 Gbps, resulting in 624 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The card is configured with 263 W of total board power, and its reference design comes with two 8-pin PCIe power connectors.
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is cut down from the same "Navi 32" silicon as the RX 7800 XT, and uses the same reference board design. The biggest change here, is that the memory size is reduced to 12 GB, the Infinity Cache to 48 MB, and the memory bus width to 192-bit. One of the four MCDs on the "Navi 32" silicon is disabled. Over on the GCD, the RX 7700 XT is configured with 54 CU, which works out to 3,456 stream processors, 108 AI accelerators, 54 Ray accelerators, and 180 TMUs. The GPU runs at higher clock speeds than the RX 7800 XT, with 2171 MHz Game clocks, and 2544 MHz boost. The memory speed, however, is lower, at 18 Gbps, which over the 192-bit memory interface, puts out 432 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7700 XT is configured with 245 W of total board power, and has the same dual 8-pin power input setup as the RX 7800 XT.
In terms of performance, AMD claims that the Radeon RX 7800 XT offers anywhere between 2% to 23% performance gains over the GeForce RTX 4070 in 13 of the 19 games they tested. Testing was done at 1440p with max settings for each game. AMD also claims that the extra 4 GB of memory should give you better future-proofing. The Radeon RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, is shown scoring anywhere between 1% and 31% higher than the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, in 16 out of 19 games that the two cards were compared in.

The reason AMD chose the RTX 4070 and RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB for comparisons, is because it intends to price the RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT competitively to them. The Radeon RX 7800 XT is priced at USD $499, while the RX 7700 XT is priced at $449. Both cards go on sale from September 6, 2023.
Add your own comment

104 Comments on AMD Unveils Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT Graphics Cards

#26
AusWolf
So far so good. Let's see the actual benchmarks now. :toast:
Posted on Reply
#27
Shou Miko
Is all the reference photo just RX 7700 XT or is the 7800 XT gonna be a 2 fan card o_O
Posted on Reply
#28
Luminescent
Prediction, very good in raster, very bad in ray tracing and consume a lot more power than direct competitor, rtx 4060 ti and rtx 4070.
There is one scenario reviewers should consider, if you plan to keep a gpu for a very long time, like those people who still use a gtx 1060 or rx 580, how realistic is you would still be able to enable ray tracing in games from 2025 or later and still have a reasonable playable experience, is it possible rtx 4060's and 4070's will mostly be used in raster mode and ray tracing will be reserved to future rtx 5090....etc. ?
Posted on Reply
#29
Daven
LuminescentPrediction, very good in raster, very bad in ray tracing and consume a lot more power than direct competitor, rtx 4060 ti and rtx 4070.
There is one scenario reviewers should consider, if you plan to keep a gpu for a very long time, like those people who still use a gtx 1060 or rx 580, how realistic is you would still be able to enable ray tracing in games from 2025 or later and still have a reasonable playable experience, is it possible rtx 4060's and 4070's will mostly be used in raster mode and ray tracing will be reserved to future rtx 5090....etc. ?
Don’t forget that only part of a scene is ray traced today. In the future, more parts will be ray traced until we have full path bringing all current GPUs down to zero frames per second. Nvidia’s only reasons for ray tracing were to get people to buy their tech over the competition to fund their GPGPU compute dreams and to get people to buy another GPU every year as new games become unplayable on current hardware. No GPU today will be playable with ray tracing in 2025 and beyond.

Do you really think a 4090 will work on a full path ray traced game in the Cyperpunk AAA category of games? No way!
Posted on Reply
#30
Squared
The 7800 XT seems like a successor to a 7-class card, which AMD seems to agree with by comparing it to the 4070 Ti. The $500 price tag is about $420 in 2019 dollars, which is similar to the $450 launch price of the GTX 1070 Ti. So prices seem to have roughly returned to normal.
Posted on Reply
#31
cvaldes
DavenDon’t forget that only part of a scene is ray traced today. In the future, more parts will be ray traced until we have full path bringing all current GPUs down to zero frames per second. Nvidia’s only reasons for ray tracing were to get people to buy their tech over the competition to fund their GPGPU compute dreams and to get people to buy another GPU every year as new games become unplayable on current hardware. No GPU today will be playable with ray tracing in 2025 and beyond.

Do you really think a 4090 will work on a full path ray traced game in the Cyperpunk AAA category of games? No way!
It’s not quite as dire as you claim.

Game developers are largely constrained by current console hardware. A game needs to run acceptably on the weakest specced device it’s supported on.

So 2023 that would be Xbox Series S or in some cases the Nintendo Switch. (Let’s ignore mid-range Android handsets to simplify this discussion.)

No games are only designed for the RTX 4090 class hardware. That market is insignificant.

Nintendo Switch? 130 million units and counting…
Posted on Reply
#32
tvshacker
TumbleGeorgeYou write street price of 4060 ti vs MSRP of 7800 XT. When seeing what will cost in real offers in EU... Maybe will be disappointed. I predict not less than MSRP+100€ or more.
IIRC the 16GB 4060TI MSRP on several EU countries was 559€ and they're already below that, so I cannot see why the 7800XT would cost that much more over MSRP with the exception of poor availability.
Posted on Reply
#33
wNotyarD
tvshackerIIRC the 16GB 4060TI MSRP on several EU countries was 559€ and they're already below that, so I cannot see why the 7800XT would cost that much more over MSRP with the exception of poor availability.
Radeons with poor availability? When has that ever happened?
Posted on Reply
#34
TumbleGeorge
tvshackerIIRC the 16GB 4060TI MSRP on several EU countries was 559€ and they're already below that, so I cannot see why the 7800XT would cost that much more over MSRP with the exception of poor availability.
MSRP is for reference. Every trademarks with non reference models with better and more expensive design will charge more.
Posted on Reply
#35
SunWukong
The 7700XT is a 6800 but with 12gb vram with a high price tag of $449. This should $400 max. 12gb should be reserve for 1080p. I'll just look for a used 6800 then.
Posted on Reply
#36
Chrispy_
The main reason to bite with these cards is FSR 3.0, how many games it applies to, and how soon we can expect to see games support it.

The 7800XT in particular would be a tough sell without FSR 3.0 and a free copy of Starfield, since it's looking worse than the 6800XT for more money. Unless a bunch of very marginal gains matter to you (efficiency, RT, AV1, FSR 3.0, slightly more bandwidth) this is basically a 80% of a 6800XT with 10% higher clocks. My prediction is that the fight between a 6800XT and 7800XT will be a wash at best, with feature support and other perks tipping the balance.
Posted on Reply
#37
N3M3515
ZoneDymokinda painful they are comparing to a 5700xt and not a 6700xt / 6800....

also 50 bucks price difference is ridiculous considering the specs, they dont want you to buy the 7700xt...

Inb4 a hardwareUnboxed video bashing the pricing, saying the 7700xt should be xxx Dollars and expecting it to fall to that price point in the coming months...and then it does.
Yeah, it seems the 7800XT is pretty close to the 6800XT. In an ideal world the 7800XT should be between 6900xt and 6950xt, but in reality i think it will be between 6800xt and 6900xt. That's like 5% higher than the 6800xt, almost nothing. At least it consumes less power and is somewhat cheaper.
Posted on Reply
#38
ModEl4
$499 is very competitive positioning for 7800XT imo, but $449 for 7700XT is a fail.
It should have been max $429 (and $399 in order to create the same impression as 7800XT price positioning)
It doesn't matter that the GCD is 200mm² , Navi 23 & 24 has small sizes also but AMD launched them (full vs cut-down version) with sufficient price difference.For example RX6600 and RX6600XT has the same die size and the same memory but 6600XT was +15% more expensive throughout the life of 6600XT (and 6650XT is 20%++ more expensive)
RX7700XT has one less MCD and 4GB less memory, that's around $30 less in retail for the MCD only (37mm² at 6nm, check RX6500XT pricing and extrapolate) and an additional $20 less in retail price just for the memory different, so $50 without even touching the performance difference and the fact the RX7700XT is a (slightly) cut-down Navi32...
So 7800XT at the same price and with the same memory as 4060Ti 16GB is going to be around +37% faster in QHD raster (based on AMD claims) but 7700XT with only +20% better QHD performance vs 4060Ti is asking $50 more?
In 4K 7800XT should match 6800XT or be close and at $499 is a better deal even now with the lower 6800XT prices, but 7700XT is going to be at best 25% faster than 6700XT and based on the low retail pricing of 6700XT should have been a $399 product if AMD wanted to create buzz and at the same time close somewhat the pricing gap with RX7600
Posted on Reply
#39
wNotyarD
Chrispy_The main reason to bite with these cards is FSR 3.0, how many games it applies to, and how soon we can expect to see games support it.

The 7800XT in particular would be a tough sell without FSR 3.0 and a free copy of Starfield, since it's looking worse than the 6800XT for more money. Unless a bunch of very marginal gains matter to you (efficiency, RT, AV1, FSR 3.0, slightly more bandwidth) this is basically a 80% of a 6800XT with 10% higher clocks. My prediction is that the fight between a 6800XT and 7800XT will be a wash at best, with feature support and other perks tipping the balance.
If FSR 3.0 works all the same on a 6800XT which also should come with a free copy of Starfield now, 7800XT still won't be worth over its older sibling unless those features in bold are crucial.
Posted on Reply
#40
Chrispy_
N3M3515Yeah, it seems the 7800XT is pretty close to the 6800XT. In an ideal world the 7800XT should be between 6900xt and 6950xt, but in reality i think it will be between 6800xt and 6900xt. That's like 5% higher than the 6800xt, almost nothing. At least it consumes less power and is somewhat cheaper.
They don't want you to buy the 7700XT because yields are great and they likely have to sell functional Navi32 dies that would likely be fine to sell as 7800XTs.

Navi 32's GCD is small by Monolithic die standards, thanks to the separate MCDs that a chiplet design allows, and on one of TSMCs higher-yielding processes - one which is considered mature by now as well.
Posted on Reply
#41
oxrufiioxo
ModEl4$499 is very competitive positioning for 7800XT imo, but $449 for 7700XT is a fail.
It should have been max $429 (and $399 in order to create the same impression as 7800XT price positioning)
It doesn't matter that the GCD is 200mm² , Navi 23 & 24 has small sizes also but AMD launched them (full vs cut-down version) with sufficient price difference.For example RX6600 and RX6600XT has the same die size and the same memory but 6600XT was +15% more expensive throughout the life of 6600XT (and 6650XT is 20%++ more expensive)
RX7700XT has one less MCD and 4GB less memory, that's around $30 less in retail for the MCD only (37mm² at 6nm, check RX6500XT pricing and extrapolate) and an additional $20 less in retail price just for the memory different, so $50 without even touching the performance difference and the fact the RX7700XT is a (slightly) cut-down Navi32...
So 7800XT at the same price and with the same memory as 4060Ti 16GB is going to be around +37% faster in QHD raster (based on AMD claims) but 7700XT with only +20% better performance vs 4060Ti is asking $50 more?
In 4K 7800XT should match 6800XT or be close and at $499 is a better deal even now with the lower 6800XT prices, but 7700XT is going to be at best 25% faster than 6700XT and based on the low retail pricing of 6700XT should have been a $399 product if AMD wanted to create buzz and close somewhat the pricing gap with RX7600
AMD is going with it's 7900 series game plan with these cards and will just let the market decide pricing.
Posted on Reply
#42
Chrispy_
wNotyarDIf FSR 3.0 works all the same on a 6800XT which also should come with a free copy of Starfield now, 7800XT still won't be worth over its older sibling unless those features in bold are crucial.
Yeah, I'm considering the sidegrade for the free copy of Starfield, alone - as a 6800XT owner.
I can either spend £60 on Starfield, or I can lose £60 selling my 6800XT and buying a 7800XT.
Posted on Reply
#43
N3M3515
SquaredThe 7800 XT seems like a successor to a 7-class card, which AMD seems to agree with by comparing it to the 4070 Ti. The $500 price tag is about $420 in 2019 dollars, which is similar to the $450 launch price of the GTX 1070 Ti. So prices seem to have roughly returned to normal.
They aren't even comparing it to a 4070 Ti, just the vanilla 4070. Since launch i said that the real 6800xt replacement was the 7900XTX, because it is a 100% match of the 4080 (remember 6800xt vs 3080).
This gen, amd brought nothing to compete with the 4090. They thought that by naming them 7900 they would automatically be tier 9. But no, you can name them whatever you want, they are 8 tier gpus.
Posted on Reply
#44
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
SunWukongThe 7700XT is a 6800 but with 12gb vram with a high price tag of $449. This should $400 max. 12gb should be reserve for 1080p. I'll just look for a used 6800 then.
For reference I play at 4K with an 8GB card (3060ti). I can't max out games obviously, but I couldn't do that anyway. 8GB is too little for midrange, I sort of agree with that, but 12GB is fine for a lot of things.
Posted on Reply
#45
Makaveli
wNotyarDIf FSR 3.0 works all the same on a 6800XT which also should come with a free copy of Starfield now, 7800XT still won't be worth over its older sibling unless those features in bold are crucial.
I have a feeling FSR 3.0 will be faster on RDNA 3 vs 2.

Just like XeSS works faster on Intel gpu's and it uses DP4a for all other gpu's.
Posted on Reply
#46
ModEl4
oxrufiioxoAMD is going with it's 7900 series game plan with these cards and will just let the market decide pricing.
Sure it was a plan, if the $900 RX7900XT plan was to miss an opportunity and create bad vibes in the community with their pricing strategy... (again, it wasn't the first time either that they did it, shooting themselves in the foot)
Posted on Reply
#47
oxrufiioxo
ModEl4Sure it was a plan, if the $900 RX7900XT plan was to miss an opportunity and create bad vibes in the community with their pricing strategy... (again, it wasn't the first time either that they did it, shooting themselves in the foot)
It was obviously a terrible plan.... Although in this price range they are only really competing with the garbage 4060ti and last gen cards so it may work a little better.
Posted on Reply
#48
ModEl4
oxrufiioxoIt was obviously a terrible plan.... Although in this price range they are only really competing with the garbage 4060ti and last gen cards so it may work a little better.
I guess, anyway let's focus on the positive side, 7800XT pricing is great and to me a surprise, I really was expecting a $549 SRP.
Still the gap with RX7600 is big, I wonder if we are going to see a 7600XT with a little bit higher GPU and memory clocks and higher TBP (but within 1x8pin territory for the reference) but with 16GB, at $299 it would be an interesting proposal for 1080p gaming with lower settings but with ultra textures for future games.
Posted on Reply
#49
oxrufiioxo
ModEl4I guess, anyway let's focus on the positive side, 7800XT pricing is great and to me a surprise, I really was expecting a $549 SRP.
Still the gap with RX7600 is big, I wonder if we are going to see a 7600XT with a little bit higher GPU and memory clocks and higher TBP (but within 1x8pin territory for the reference) but with 16GB, at $299 it would be an interesting proposal for 1080p gaming with lower settings but with ultra textures for future games.
Agree, given how the current generation has gone if AMDs slides are even close to accurate the 7800XT could be a real winner. The 7700XT will likely look good vs the 4060ti but bad vs the 7800XT so sorta in a no mans land.

I think both AMD/Nvidia feel gamers spending under 300 are lucky to even get a current generation gpu it's been like that for a while now.
Posted on Reply
#50
80-watt Hamster
SquaredThe 7800 XT seems like a successor to a 7-class card, which AMD seems to agree with by comparing it to the 4070 Ti. The $500 price tag is about $420 in 2019 dollars, which is similar to the $450 launch price of the GTX 1070 Ti. So prices seem to have roughly returned to normal.
1070 ti was very nearly a 1080. Vanilla 1070 launched at $380. Personally, I feel like the 7700 XT should cost $30-50 less and pull 30-50 fewer watts. As others have said, the deltas in both those metrics between it and the 7800 XT are small enough as to be nigh-irrelevant. Maybe a 7700 will show up to take that spot. If that and a 7600 XT launch, all $50 increments from $300-500 would be covered.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 02:47 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts