Thursday, April 11th 2024

Intel Discontinues 13th Generation "Raptor Lake" K-Series Overclockable CPU SKUs

Intel has decided to discontinue its entire 13th Gen Raptor Lake lineup of overclockable "K-series" CPU SKUs. According to an official product change notice, the company will stop accepting orders for chips like the Core i9-13900KS, Core i9-13900K, Core i9-13900KF, Core i7-13700K, Core i7-13700KF, Core i5-13600K, and Core i5-13600KF after May 24th, 2024. Final shipments to vendors are targeted for June 28th. After those dates, availability of the unlocked Raptor Lake processors will rapidly diminish as the remaining inventory gets sold off, possibly at inflated prices due to shortages. This discontinuation comes just over a year after Raptor Lake's launch in late 2022, which delivered additional performance improvements over the previous Alder Lake generation.

Raptor Lake brought higher clocks, more cache, additional efficiency cores, and enough muscle to compete with AMD's Ryzen 7000 CPUs in many workloads. Interestingly, Intel has not yet discontinued Alder Lake, suggesting those 12th-generation chips may still be available for some time. While the death of the overclockable Raptor Lake K-series CPUs is unfortunate for enthusiasts, there is an upside—it paves the way for Intel's current generation Raptor Lake refresh, 14th generation Core processors, to clear inventory before the next-generation processors arrive. The 15th generation "Arrow Lake" Core Ultra 2 series of processors could be teased at the upcoming Computex event in June.
Sources: Intel, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

43 Comments on Intel Discontinues 13th Generation "Raptor Lake" K-Series Overclockable CPU SKUs

#26
Macro Device
tpa-prI don't have a lot of knowledge of modern Intel chips: can you undervolt the non-K SKUs?
Possible. Not always a brilliant idea (my CPU can only undervolt by ~15 mV before being driven nuts; wattage decrease is negligible), yet possible.
Posted on Reply
#27
Wirko
Beginner Macro DeviceI bought my non-K i5 for a reason:
• Cheap.
• Fast enough.
• Energy efficient.
• No need to think about BIOS on my motherboard.
No regrets so far. Also own a 10600KF, also bought for the very reason it's ridiculously cheap ($80; cheaper than 11400F).

Intel CPU OC is dead for normal people. Only hardcore enthusiasts are OCing them nowadays. AMD CPUs can be tweaked via PBO tuning but it's also not much.
And it's a shame that the 13600 and 14600 are basically nonexistent, at least in retail.
Posted on Reply
#28
Dr. Dro
Beginner Macro DevicePossible. Not always a brilliant idea (my CPU can only undervolt by ~15 mV before being driven nuts; wattage decrease is negligible), yet possible.
Question, is this for the P-core domain only or did you also apply the undervolt to the E-cores? At least on Raptor this is independent (on my motherboard, it says E-core L2 cache voltage though). On both, this is 50 mV until it stops being stable on my i9-13900KS. The odd thing is that it actually increases the average clocks somewhat. It's beautiful to see a 6 GHz P-core at just ~1.375V.
Posted on Reply
#29
Macro Device
Dr. DroQuestion, is this for the P-core domain only or did you also apply the undervolt to the E-cores?
My CPU sports no E-cores so no idea. Must be possible but I'm unsure if it's that important.
Posted on Reply
#30
Dr. Dro
Beginner Macro DeviceMy CPU sports no E-cores so no idea. Must be possible but I'm unsure if it's that important.
Oh that's true, I forgot, only the 12600K and above has them. This reminded me though MSI finally released that "undervolt enhancing" BIOS with the ability to disable CEP they promised for the end of March, turns out they missed it by a couple of weeks, it was built on the 1st and released today. Just flashed, so far so good. Same settings that were previously stable, though.
Posted on Reply
#31
Bones
Beginner Macro DeviceI don't worry at all. It's just a dozen percent improvement at the very most. Mediocre.
I get that you aren't looking to push things too hard and that's fine, but you can get more than just 12% (Dozen) by the way I do things in the BIOS, the board used for it making a HUGE difference here.

Intels however are different than AMD's so a different approach has to be used to get it and I do agree Intel has made it harder to make it really "Go" vs what you'd get from previous generations. I know I can get it with some work and that (To me) is fine, I'm willing to take the time to figure it out but many aren't...... And that's fine too.

Whatever floats your boat or clocks your chip to whatever extent you want.
Posted on Reply
#32
Macro Device
Bonesbut you can get more than just 12% (Dozen) by the way I do things in the BIOS
Are you talking early Ryzen CPUs, those before COVID ones? These overclocked by a significant margin but squeezing more than 400 additional MHz from Ryzen 5000 or 7000 series is just too eccentric. Most of them, especially X3D chips, can't even do that.

What really improves things a lot is the RAM tuning. On both sides, Intel and AMD.

I just don't like wasting effort on tuning when I know I won't get significant improvements. You can call me a spoiled brat but OC less than by 30 percent isn't much for me. And getting 30+ percent more from your equipment basically for free is a pre-2010s thing. Now, I'm just spending no more than two evenings on a whole PC. Whatever best result I can achieve stays indefinitely after that.
Posted on Reply
#33
Broken Processor
They haven't discontinued them they slapped a 14 on them.
Beginner Macro DeviceAre you talking early Ryzen CPUs, those before COVID ones? These overclocked by a significant margin but squeezing more than 400 additional MHz from Ryzen 5000 or 7000 series is just too eccentric. Most of them, especially X3D chips,
You can get 5800x3d running at 4.74ghz stable. Mine has run it for over a year and a half and it could have went higher but other components couldn't take the bclk.
The new battlefield for over clocking is dealing with the default power settings on motherboard's they are scary and imo do more harm than good.
My x570 aorus master was pushing more voltage than AMD spec and my over clock, I'm running pbo+ and can't remember what because it's been so stable I've not had to look at in that time but it was enough to make me brick my pants at the time I can recollect.
Posted on Reply
#34
Outback Bronze
Dr. DroAll other Z690
Hmm, had a good mate of mine ring me needing help (and he was the one who taught me how to build PC's) because he bought a 13700K and Z690 combo from our local PC shop.

Turns out his Gigabyte Z690 wouldn't boot with the 13700K installed. We had to install my 12900K to flash the bios, but I told him he's better off buying my Z690 Strix-E that was previously running my 13900K that was already flashed to support 13th gen which he is now running : )
Posted on Reply
#35
stimpy88
... Because the 14th Gen K is the same CPU?
Posted on Reply
#36
Macro Device
Broken ProcessorYou can get 5800x3d running at 4.74ghz stable
This is what I'm talking about. It's under 300 MHz over the stock. A single digit percent improvement.

Speaking of LGA1700 CPUs, is their hybrid structure still unstable in some scenarios?
Posted on Reply
#37
Dr. Dro
Outback BronzeHmm, had a good mate of mine ring me needing help (and he was the one who taught me how to build PC's) because he bought a 13700K and Z690 combo from our local PC shop.

Turns out his Gigabyte Z690 wouldn't boot with the 13700K installed. We had to install my 12900K to flash the bios, but I told him he's better off buying my Z690 Strix-E that was previously running my 13900K that was already flashed to support 13th gen which he is now running : )
Oh yeah if the Z690 still has the BIOS from before Raptor Lake it'll need an update
Posted on Reply
#38
Sabotaged_Enigma
The real side of the news: Intel is to stop printing 13th Gen on their lid, and to start printing 14th Gen.
Ouch Intel :)
Posted on Reply
#39
Emwun Garand
Boxed product only. OEM's will still likely be able to order tray cpu's., so they'll probably be available on eBay and Amazon for a long time.
Posted on Reply
#40
Awwwyeahhhbaby
Essentially 13th and 14th gen are the same chips anyway, why sell you a 13900K at a discount to the 14900K? Just cannibalizing their own sales a this point.

I like Intel an AMD, but Intel sure has made more odd mistakes recently than AMD and it's hard to ignore.
Posted on Reply
#41
mechtech
Intel *no last gen deal for you*

or soup ;)
Posted on Reply
#42
SuperMacro
Beginner Macro DeviceI bought my non-K i5 for a reason:
• Cheap.
• Fast enough.
• Energy efficient.
• No need to think about BIOS on my motherboard.
No regrets so far. Also own a 10600KF, also bought for the very reason it's ridiculously cheap ($80; cheaper than 11400F).

Intel CPU OC is dead for normal people. Only hardcore enthusiasts are OCing them nowadays. AMD CPUs can be tweaked via PBO tuning but it's also not much.
With Intel giving you crazy stock clocks and unlocked TDP settings you don't need a K Sku, just tweak the cooling and bump the TDP.
Just built my 14700 non K with a Z690 and Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE (7-Pipe). Even with one fan on the tower (instead 2) for testing it's holding 250w and 5.3ghz/4.4ghz for CPU-Z, 5.2 for Blender. And total system cost under $700, including Antec ARGB case, Samsung SSD, Gold 610w PSU (Lenovo FSA034), RX6600 Swift210. 16GB Crucial 4800.
It's a decent starter gaming/render system honestly.

Yes, K is for hardcore, not 95% of users. Only if K is cheaper. But I figured 12 E cores will pull ahead of 13700K for render workloads.
Posted on Reply
#43
chrcoluk
kiddagoatThat’s a pretty quick turnaround for EOL a product. Don’t they usually go about 3 years before they are EOL’d??
It is quick, but its because they pushing out replacement products now at a rapid rate, doesnt make sense to keep making them, when they have a newer SKU that works on same chipset.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 21st, 2024 22:07 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts