Monday, May 20th 2024

Intel's Next-Gen Falcon Shores GPU to Consume 1500 W, No Air-Cooled Variant Planned

Intel's upcoming Falcon Shores GPU is shaping up to be a powerhouse for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads, but it will also be an extreme power hog. The processor, combining Gaudi and Ponte Vecchio successors into a single GPU, is expected to consume an astonishing 1500 W of power - more than even Nvidia's beefy B200 accelerator, which draws 1000 W. This immense power consumption will require advanced cooling solutions to ensure the Falcon Shores GPU operates efficiently and safely. Intel's partners may turn to liquid cooling or even full immersion liquid cooling, a technology Intel has been promoting for power-hungry data center hardware. The high power draw is the cost of the Falcon Shores GPU's formidable performance promises. Intel claims it will deliver 5x higher performance per watt and 5x more memory capacity and bandwidth compared to its Ponte Vecchio products.

Intel may need to develop proprietary hardware modules or a new Open Accelerator Module (OAM) spec to support such extreme power levels, as the current OAM 2.0 tops out around 1000 W. Slated for release in 2025, the Falcon Shores GPU will be Intel's GPU IP based on its next-gen Xe graphics architecture. It aims to be a major player in the AI accelerator market, backed by Intel's robust oneAPI software development ecosystem. While the 1500 W power consumption is sure to raise eyebrows, Intel is betting that the Falcon Shores GPU's supposedly impressive performance will make it an enticing option for AI and HPC customers willing to invest in robust cooling infrastructure. The ultra-high-end accelerator market is heating up, and the HPC accelerator market needs a Ponte Vecchio successor.
Sources: ComputerBase.de, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Intel's Next-Gen Falcon Shores GPU to Consume 1500 W, No Air-Cooled Variant Planned

#26
Wirko
Courier 6better start building some fusion cores, ZPMs etc...
Exactly, fusion reactors will have to be integrated on processor dies, everything else would be too distant.
Posted on Reply
#27
FoulOnWhite
YukikazeThe Aurora supercomputer runs Ponte Veccio:
Aurora (supercomputer) - Wikipedia
Intel Xe - Wikipedia
So it does perform, but sheesh that power use.
AssimilatorThis isn't a GPU, it's a compute processor with no display outputs. Please stop with stupid clickbait headlines like these.
Maybe GPU- General Purpose Unit?

Makes no difference really, These are not for us, and super computers use sick amounts of power anyway, so will it really matter to them as uses them? Maybe/maybe not. For me, ambivalence is the feeling.
Posted on Reply
#28
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
64KWhat the actual hell !?!
Was not expecting that from Intel but I don't keep up with professional GPUs at all. I guess there is indeed a tremendous market for such a beast now that the AI craze is upon us.
From someone in the industry DCs are ramping up water cooled racks something fierce even with current gen stuff.
Posted on Reply
#29
Steevo
ncrsJust because it can't output graphics directly doesn't mean it can't process it and output via network. In case of Ponte Vecchio it can. It even supports ray-tracing.
Same with NVIDIA data center offerings supporting MIG and/or GRID to remotely share virtual instances for 3D applications.
To be fair a CPU can do it too. We have reached the point the branding is going to hurt the gaming community when the powers that be look at this absurd power consumption and the lot of us get more rules and regulations from it.

It's really a advanced math accelerator with dedicated memory.
Posted on Reply
#30
xorbe
Apparently we're going to need CARB for computers wrt AI energy usage.
Posted on Reply
#31
Minus Infinity
So it's using 4-5 14900KS's to power it then to merely hit 1.5kW!
Posted on Reply
#32
Chomiq
I wonder when countries will realize the impact of AI:
www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj5ll89dy2mo

and then consider their choices of putting massive data centers in countries where majority of electricity is generated using fossil fuels.
Posted on Reply
#33
Caring1
ChomiqI wonder when countries will realize the impact of AI:
www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj5ll89dy2mo

and then consider their choices of putting massive data centers in countries where majority of electricity is generated using fossil fuels.
They should be forced to be self sufficient for power generation.
Posted on Reply
#34
Wirko
Caring1They should be forced to be self sufficient for power generation.
Burning imported coal?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 15th, 2025 08:31 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts