Thursday, July 4th 2024

South Korean Research Team Develops Method to Grow Sub-Nanometer Transistors

A research team from the South Korean Institute for Basic Science (IBS) has developed a new method for growing 1D metallic materials less than 1 nm wide. They applied this technique to create a new structure for 2D semiconductor logic circuits, using the 1D metals as gate electrodes in very small transistors. However, creating very small transistors that can control electron movement within a few nanometers has been challenging. The size of semiconductor devices depends on the width and efficiency of the gate electrode. Current manufacturing processes can't make gate lengths below a few nanometers due to limitations in lithography. To address this, the team used the mirror twin boundary (MTB) of molybdenum disulfide, which is a 1D metal only 0.4 nm wide, as a gate electrode. The IBS team achieved the 1D MTB metallic phase by altering the crystal structure of a 2D semiconductor at the atomic level.

The International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS) predicts semiconductor technology to reach about 0.5 nm by 2037, with transistor gate lengths of 12 nm. The research team's transistor demonstrated a channel width as small as 3.9 nm, surpassing this prediction. The 1D MTB-based transistor also offers advantages in circuit performance. Unlike some current technologies (FinFETs or GAA) that face issues with parasitic capacitance in highly integrated circuits, this new transistor can minimize such problems due to its simple structure and narrow gate width.
Sources: ITHome, IBS
Add your own comment

18 Comments on South Korean Research Team Develops Method to Grow Sub-Nanometer Transistors

#1
TumbleGeorge
Ever since South Korean "scientists" spread the lk-99 hoax. I no longer trust anything from them
Posted on Reply
#2
maximumterror
TumbleGeorgeEver since South Korean "scientists" spread the lk-99 hoax. I no longer trust anything from them
genius, check who invented the MOSFET
Posted on Reply
#3
TumbleGeorge
maximumterrorgenius, check who invented the MOSFET
I don't want to argue, but transistors that are thinner than the molecules of the material used sounds pretty fantasy to me.
Posted on Reply
#4
maximumterror
TumbleGeorgeI don't want to argue, but transistors that are thinner than the molecules of the material used sounds pretty fantasy to me.
somehow I suspect you don't know how science works.?
TumbleGeorgeI don't want to argue, but transistors that are thinner than the molecules of the material used sounds pretty fantasy to me.
plus, probably a third of your computer is made in South Korea
Posted on Reply
#5
Caring1
maximumterrorplus, probably a third of your computer is made in South Korea
Mostly in Taiwan, and the rest made in China.
Yes I see them as two different nations. Bite me.
Posted on Reply
#6
maximumterror
Caring1Mostly in Taiwan, and the rest made in China.
Yes I see them as two different nations. Bite me.
I don't want to bite you, you can bite yourself if you want.
I'm just going to explain how science has worked for the last 200 years.
If you want to be a scientist, you have to make your research public so that other scientists can replicate your research and prove or disprove your research. Or as I said just publish to become a scientist. So every day people all over the world publish their researches. There is nothing wrong with LK-99. One proof can have 10 disprove, and these disprove after some time have 10 proofs.
But you already know that, you're a professional hoax sniffer
one nation... peace...
Posted on Reply
#7
DrCR
TumbleGeorgeEver since South Korean "scientists" spread the lk-99 hoax. I no longer trust anything from them
I just read up on that, and none of that appears to be related to South Korean Institute for Basic Science (IBS). Please let me know if otherwise.
Caring1Mostly in Taiwan, and the rest made in China.
Yes I see them as two different nations. Bite me.
China? You mean mainland Taiwan? ;p
Posted on Reply
#8
TumbleGeorge
DrCRI just read up on that, and none of that appears to be related to South Korean Institute for Basic Science (IBS). Please let me know if otherwise
Sorry, I didn't mention a specific institution, but a country of origin.
Posted on Reply
#9
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
Keep on track, folks. Stop bickering.
Posted on Reply
#10
Unregistered
the54thvoidKeep on track, folks. Stop bickering.
Yeah, let's not pay attention to the drunk at the end of the bar spewing racist nonsense. Utter madness to expect reasonable comments on here for sure. FFS.
#11
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
CptSoolYeah, let's not pay attention to the drunk at the end of the bar spewing racist nonsense. Utter madness to expect reasonable comments on here for sure. FFS.
The comment isn't racist. At worst it's a shoddy generalisation about the Korean science community.

Yes, it's short-sighted and dumb. But racist? No. Not how I see it.
Posted on Reply
#12
Unregistered
the54thvoidThe comment isn't racist. At worst it's a shoddy generalisation about the Korean science community.

Yes, it's short-sighted and dumb. But racist? No. Not how I see it.
would have been cute to justify removing comments before you hide behind "how you see it"

First comment is dead dumb and abusive of a country yet you leave it on and even ask us to stick to the topic. It's like you're desperate for some action on this thread yet you're stuck with your own moderation rules. Cool party under the hairdoo I see
#13
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
The more angry you become, the less sense you make. But to put it in simple terms, substitute 'South Korean' with Australian, Bulgarian, Russian, English, etc, etc. It's not racist. The poster made a comment based on a previous scientific 'revelation' which met a lot of resistance based on its lack of proof. That's why they say they don't trust them. The context is clear, if very narrow-minded. In the same manner, if you told me you'd never buy an Irish sports car because of the DeLorean failure, it wouldn't make you racist. Just narrow-minded.

As for me looking for action in the thread - I was reacting to a reported comment. I have way better things to do with my time, but I'll still gladly try to reason with people.

Hopefully, that provides a clearer narrative, and that the thread can continue on topic. Thanks.
Posted on Reply
#14
InVasMani
This is the pinball experience we deserve. Cool research and technology quiet a achievement to shrink things down to this degree. It's pretty fascinating how much research and methodologies go into this level of manufacturing.
Posted on Reply
#15
Veseleil
Plants are grown, transistors are manufactured.
Posted on Reply
#16
R-T-B
VeseleilPlants are grown, transistors are manufactured.
What about crystals?
Posted on Reply
#17
Veseleil
R-T-BWhat about crystals?
Depends. :pimp:
Posted on Reply
#18
A&P211
R-T-BWhat about crystals?
I will need some crystals for the warp core, you selling any. I can't see your for "sale" thread on TPU.
"Make it so", if you make it, I will buy it
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 10:37 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts