Friday, August 9th 2024

Intel Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Amid Financial Turmoil and Layoffs, Company Misled Investors

According to a recent report from Reuters, tech giant Intel is facing a significant legal challenge as shareholders file a lawsuit following a dramatic plunge in the company's stock price. The legal action comes from Intel's recent announcement of dividend suspensions and plans to lay off over 15,000 employees. The semiconductor behemoth saw its market value plummet by a staggering $32 billion in a single day, leaving investors reeling. The Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis has initiated a proposed class action suit, naming Intel, CEO Pat Gelsinger, and CFO David Zinsner as defendants. The plaintiffs allege that the company made misleading statements about its business operations and manufacturing capabilities, artificially inflating its stock price between January 25 and August 1.

Intel's financial woes stem from underperforming contract foundry operations and 1% drop in revenue during the second quarter of 2024. While it may seem miniscule, declining revenue is paired with a negative 15.3% operating margin, resulting in a net loss of $1.61 billion. The company's August 1 announcement caught many shareholders off guard, prompting accusations of inadequate disclosure and transparency. This lawsuit is just one of several legal battles Intel is currently strangled in. The company is also locked in a patent dispute with R2 Semiconductor across multiple European countries, centering on voltage regulation technology. While Intel has secured a victory in the UK, it faces ongoing litigation in Germany, France, and Italy. Adding to Intel's troubles, a separate class action lawsuit is being explored on behalf of customers who purchased potentially faulty 13th and 14th-generation processors. The company also canceled its September 2024 Innovation event, citing poor financials, without any words on Arrow Lake or Lunar Lake. While the cancelation of events is sad, it is necessary to get financials back on track, and product launches should continue as usual.
Sources: Reuters, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

56 Comments on Intel Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Amid Financial Turmoil and Layoffs, Company Misled Investors

#51
Steevo
Dr. Dro

I'm just waiting for the all-time low to buy. It's not there yet, close. Keep up the bad press, I need these papers to be cheap to make a lot of dough when they bounce back. - such a shame I was a broke teenager when $AMD was $1.40



www.reuters.com/legal/intel-is-sued-by-shareholders-alleging-securities-fraud-2024-08-07/

The source article says revenue fell 1%. No clue where the 99% number came from.
I agree, probably going to shift at least 10K to Intel on the low, but it’s not going to happen until they get their hands smacked in the US and EU for their shenanigans.
TumbleGeorgeAll right. Intel did not force shareholders to buy their shares. The free market is a risk that shareholders take on themselves. Why should Intel be held responsible for the unreasonable buying and selling of shareholders?
Cause the relationship of a shareholder is that of an investor, and investors shouldn’t be blatantly lied to about the status of their company/investment, otherwise no one would invest in anything and companies and ideas couldn’t grow
Posted on Reply
#52
TumbleGeorge
In all companies marketing has false.
SteevoCause the relationship of a shareholder is that of an investor, and investors shouldn’t be blatantly lied to about the status of their company/investment, otherwise no one would invest in anything and companies and ideas couldn’t grow
Intel investors, even the big ones, don't seem to have any inside information on the real state of affairs? In addition, they read and remembered from the Internet only the positive reviews about Intel products, mistakenly passing by their ears all the negative information, which is constantly there, although with a lower intensity, compared to after the scandal broke out.
Posted on Reply
#53
thesmokingman
SteevoCause the relationship of a shareholder is that of an investor, and investors shouldn’t be blatantly lied to about the status of their company/investment, otherwise no one would invest in anything and companies and ideas couldn’t grow
Dude, Intel has been lying for the last decade man. In a perfect world they'd have your actual interests at heart but this is the real world. You can hope for it but cannot expect it. And when it goes pear shaped, there are shareholder lawsuits like the ones coming out now.

And George is right that the into from analysts on WS is generally BS and superficial. Very few of these analysts actually know wtf the industry is like. None of them saw AMD coming till it smacked Intel, too big to fail they said. I bought into AMD when it was $2 bux and change. I saw the writing on the wall with Mantle... and many others on forums like this saw it coming too. But Wallstreet, sheesh the ignored the facts, Intel is a juggernaut, ain't never going to happen. Some of these clowns were still pushing INTC on CNBS last month.
Posted on Reply
#54
Wirko
thesmokingmanAnd George is right that the into from analysts on WS is generally BS and superficial. Very few of these analysts actually know wtf the industry is like. None of them saw AMD coming till it smacked Intel, too big to fail they said. I bought into AMD when it was $2 bux and change. I saw the writing on the wall with Mantle... and many others on forums like this saw it coming too. But Wallstreet, sheesh the ignored the facts, Intel is a juggernaut, ain't never going to happen. Some of these clowns were still pushing INTC on CNBS last month.
Those analysts have their paying customers too. On their public blogs, they write alarming posts following the pattern: "Stocks gonna fall! Deep! If!" But no, don't assume they are stupid and ignorant, or they wouldn't stay in business. I'm confident that they have, and sell, informed and detailed predictions. First of all, some time dynamics. Stocks gonna fall when? Recover in a matter of days or stay low? Probability estimates? etc.
Posted on Reply
#55
HiDrag
These law suits happen literally ALL the TIME. The Lawyers are nothing more than Corporate versions of ambulance chasers. Once in thousand they hit pay dirt.

Trust me on this, in the Annual Report and proxies the risks Intel faces and now face were disclosed to shareholders. Their lawyers and accountants made damn sure of this. How do I know this - first hand experience in two public companies.

Wall Street functions as a marketplace for stocks and bonds. It is the gazillion analysts that post clickbait "buy this now by the bucket load" that mislead people because they are just after clicks. Prudent investors knew Intel was in for some heartaches, in particular with their Foundry plans.

I owned Intel stock for a long time - but sold it 2022. I'm not bragging but really guys the writing was on the wall.
Posted on Reply
#56
lemonadesoda
My view is this is driven by investment fund trading that have decided to consider international geopolitical risks and see the billions of dollar fab investments in israel as no longer deserving valuation multipliers. An analyst makes a coefficient change in a valuation spreadsheet and suddenly they program the autotrading bots from buy to sell.

MV = [ fn (revenue streams from IP, growth) + fn (profit streams from assets, growth) + fn (asset values) + fn (hype) ] x fn (industry specific belle vs. dog factor)

i see shifts in asset values, which assets can make profits, hype, belle factors. Nothing to do with profits last quarter. A decent defence lawyer can stop these vultures and countersue for defamation

*******

Notwithstanding, Intel cannot produce cheap-as-chips microprocessors. They need to produce cheaper cpus but can't. Their overheads and production costs are too high. And someone changed their "g" growth predictions and whoosh, 50% MV disappears.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 4th, 2025 18:43 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts