Tuesday, August 20th 2024

Intel Targets 35% Cost Reduction in Sales and Marketing Group, Bracing for Tough Times Ahead

Intel's Sales and Marketing Group (SMG) has announced a 35% reduction in costs as the company looks to streamline operations and adapt to challenging market conditions. The cuts, revealed during an all-hands meeting on August 5th, will impact both jobs and marketing expenses within the SMG. Intel has directed the group to "simplify programs end-to-end" by the end of the year, a directive that comes on the heels of the company's announcement that it would lay off 15% of its global workforce to save $10 billion in operating expenses. "We are becoming a simpler, leaner, and more agile company that's easier for partners and customers to work with while ensuring we focus our investments on areas where we see the greatest opportunities for innovation and growth," Intel said in a statement to CRN. The company emphasized that this restructuring is about "building a stronger Intel for the future," with partners integral to its plans.

The job cuts within the SMG are expected to target overlapping responsibilities, such as account managers and industry-focused teams, which can confuse customers navigating Intel's complex organization. Additionally, the company plans to significantly reduce its marketing budget and simplify programs, aiming to save at least $100 million in the latter half of 2024 and an additional $300 million in the first half of 2025. The impact will also be felt in Intel's market development fund (MDF), a crucial tool for supporting OEMs and other partners through events, training, and more. An ex-Intel executive warned that the MDF had become vital as the company's product leadership waned, allowing it to maintain valuable relationships with partners. As Intel navigates these changes, its partners are bracing for the impact, with one CEO describing the situation as everyone "hunkering down and just waiting to hear something." Another partner executive expressed concerns about Intel's ability to maintain the level of service and support its customers have come to expect.
Sources: CRN, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

45 Comments on Intel Targets 35% Cost Reduction in Sales and Marketing Group, Bracing for Tough Times Ahead

#26
Vayra86
Now that's an Ultra-budget cut right there.
Posted on Reply
#27
thesmokingman
They should have been cutting back 5 years ago, smh.
Posted on Reply
#29
katzi
I love that their Hubris has finally gotten them knocked down a dozen pegs.
Posted on Reply
#30
Waldorf
no need to go back to "simpler times" (dont care for unpowered steering/brakes/doors/seats/windows/mirrors/trunk/gas doors ), az long as humans would drop the greedy part.
capitalism/socalism work, until ppl start to fill their pockets on the back of others.
i dont care if corp make money, but at least pay your part (taxes/wages/benefits etc), and counties like denmark (high taxes) show US companies like McD & co still make money when paying 20$/h plus benefits to flip burgers, while telling the US population they cant pay more than 8$/h..
Posted on Reply
#32
user556
How much sales and marketing does it take to lie about the product and cry about the engineering? It's not like Intel has to do much more than make the chips. They sell themselves.
Posted on Reply
#33
Daven
RimbowFishI think at the end, they will sell their foundry business like AMD did
It’s more likely they break into two companies like how HP became HPE and HPC. That’s a bit different in what you suggest in that executives are split between the two and no selling is involved.
Posted on Reply
#34
Sound_Card
My theory is that Nvidia will buy them. I give it less than 5 years.
Posted on Reply
#35
Daven
Vya DomusThis is quite fascinating because their revenue figures are still huge, twice as much as Nvidia or AMD for last year, this means all that money that their getting their hands on is grossly mismanaged.
This is a common misunderstanding. If I make a trillion dollars but it cost me a trillion to make it that’s worse than if I make a million dollars but it only cost me only $100k to make it.

Money that goes in one door and right out the other is a failing company.
Posted on Reply
#36
mechtech
kapone32The Govt should ask them back for the Money they gave them. This Company is like Chelsea FC in so many ways.
And Intel should cap all execs total/complete yearly remuneration at $1mill/yr.

Really, it's probably all just overshoot. I can't see them being in the red after a full year. More profits = more bonuses for those at the top.
Posted on Reply
#37
thesmokingman
DavenThis is a common misunderstanding. If I make a trillion dollars but it cost me a trillion to make it that’s worse than if I make a million dollars but it only cost me only $100k to make it.

Money that goes in one door and right out the other is a failing company.
Yeap, INTC has about twice the revenue cost that Nvidia has meaning Nvidia has over double the gross profits. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#38
ViperXZ
Hopefully they won’t cancel IEM CS tournaments (it’s part of their marketing), that’s the only thing I like from Intel right now and they have a long tradition.
Posted on Reply
#39
Lycanwolfen
Well when AMD is making Awesome Desktop Processors and Awesome Server Processors with none of this E core BS. What you think would happen.
Seriously Intel need to get back to it's roots. Also their naming conventions are Horrible Core 9 Ultra 285K Like what's that suppose to mean. How about Intel Cougar 9285K or something cool.
They need to drop this Core crap move too some cool name or something get better marketings or make some pure Desktop CPU's otherwise I see not a bright future for Intel.
Posted on Reply
#40
phanbuey
LycanwolfenWell when AMD is making Awesome Desktop Processors and Awesome Server Processors with none of this E core BS. What you think would happen.
Seriously Intel need to get back to it's roots. Also their naming conventions are Horrible Core 9 Ultra 285K Like what's that suppose to mean. How about Intel Cougar 9285K or something cool.
They need to drop this Core crap move too some cool name or something get better marketings or make some pure Desktop CPU's otherwise I see not a bright future for Intel.
they paid alot for that naming - lots of very highly paid people sat in a room and came up with that....

I think this is a positive change for them.
Posted on Reply
#41
ZeppMan217
Onasi“The impact will also be felt in Intel's market development fund (MDF), a crucial tool for supporting OEMs and other partners through events, training, and more. An ex-Intel executive warned that the MDF had become vital as the company's product leadership waned, allowing it to maintain valuable relationships with partners.”

Look, I understand this is a nature of business, but I just love how this reads like poetry, but describes, essentially, just good old fashioned bribes. Amusing, is all, don’t really have anything else to comment on here. And yes, I understand that this isn’t pure bribery… hopefully? Were those “incentives” people like to accuse Intel of providing to OEMs included under MDF?
It's not a bribe if you and your family are invited to an all inclusive resort for a week, or a private yacht, or a club. Just ask any Supreme Court justices.
Posted on Reply
#42
Chaitanya
kapone32Don't they have foundries like everywhere?
Not just everywhere but their CEO goes around begging for subsidies and a threat of leaving if handouts arent given.
RimbowFishI think at the end, they will sell their foundry business like AMD did
They already split their company back in Feb.
www.theregister.com/2024/02/22/gelsinger_intel_split/
Posted on Reply
#43
Waldorf
@phanbuey
after +40y working for a lot of different businesses in all kind of areas, i know new naming for anything means an arm chair director had to justify his/her position.
exceptions prove the rule..
Posted on Reply
#44
Daven
ChaitanyaThey already split their company back in Feb.
www.theregister.com/2024/02/22/gelsinger_intel_split/
There is only one Intel. That split announcement was a scam as no one in their right mind would send Intel their chip fab business so they pretended to split. Everyone knows they didn’t.

It’s like if parents said moving siblings to separate bedrooms makes two separate families. It doesn’t.

Believe me when Intel does actually split off its fabs it will be BIG news.
Posted on Reply
#45
Chaitanya
DavenThere is only one Intel. That split announcement was a scam as no one in their right mind would send Intel their chip fab business so they pretended to split. Everyone knows they didn’t.

It’s like if parents said moving siblings to separate bedrooms makes two separate families. It doesn’t.

Believe me when Intel does actually split off its fabs it will be BIG news.
There was this article on Digitimes as well, so I guess now Intel is forced to be serious about splitting their business.
www.digitimes.com/news/a20240816PD206/intel-foundry-intel-spin-off-wafer-amd.html
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Oct 7th, 2024 19:21 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts