Friday, February 7th 2025

Intel "Nova Lake" to Appear with up to 52 Cores: 16P+32E+4LPE Configuration

Intel's upcoming "Nova Lake" desktop processors are taking shape slowly, featuring a three-tier core design that could reach 52 total cores. Set for 2026, the flagship SKU combines 16 "Coyote Cove" P-cores with 32 "Arctic Wolf" E-cores, supplemented by 4 LPE-cores for background task management. Intel is reportedly also considering 28-core (8P + 16E + 4LPE), and 16-core (4P + 8E + 4LPE) SKUs too. The architectural design choice centers on Intel's hybrid manufacturing approach, leveraging both its internal 14A node and TSMC's 2 nm process technology. This strategic decision addresses supply chain resilience while potentially enabling higher yields for critical compute tiles. Intel's interim co-CEO Michelle Johnston Holthaus noted that Intel Foundry will need to earn Intel Product's trust with each new node, so if a node is not the best for their in-house IP, Intel will move to TSMC for production.

Initial engineering samples are already circulating among developers, according to shipping documentation from NBD, suggesting the validation phase is proceeding on schedule. Some specifications point to significant cache improvements, with documentation suggesting a 144 MB L3 cache implementation. However, the cache topology—whether unified or segmented—remains unspecified. The platform is expected to support PCIe Gen 6.0, though Intel has yet to confirm socket compatibility or memory specifications. However, we need to hold our expectations low. Previously unrealized configurations in Intel's roadmaps, like 40-core "Arrow Lake," never materialized, and instead, we got an eight-P-core version with 16 E-cores, totaling 24 cores. Final specifications may evolve as the platform progresses through development phases.
Sources: @jaykihn0 on X, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

15 Comments on Intel "Nova Lake" to Appear with up to 52 Cores: 16P+32E+4LPE Configuration

#1
john_
Intel will sell cores the same way Nvidia sells frames.
Posted on Reply
#2
DemonicRyzen666
john_Intel will sell cores the same way Nvidia sells frames.
Well, you're not wrong there it is a type of "Performance" it's "Throughput" performance though
Posted on Reply
#3
N/A
eight-P-core version with 16 E-cores, totaling 32 cores
There must be a mistake. Fixed
off-die memory controller,
Please No.
Posted on Reply
#4
Arco
N/AThere must be a mistake.
Introducing our new multi-core generation tech using state-of-the-art AI to make stunning new fake cores. :roll:
Posted on Reply
#5
TumbleGeorge
Don't be mistaken. AMD also will increase core count. I hope that next series continuing with SMT.
Posted on Reply
#6
Wirko
AleksandarKIntel's interim co-Ceo Michael J. Holantus
Who?
Posted on Reply
#7
Bobaganoosh
I don't know that there'd be a big reason to complain about all those e-cores, but I just feel like they're totally unnecessary for most people. I'd rather see something like 12-16 P-cores and 4-8 e-cores. Also, with improvements to the memory latency re: Arrow Lake issues.
Posted on Reply
#8
_roman_
I wonder how the software will deal with that. Good vs crap vs crappy cores in regards of power consumption, cpu features, speed.

High benchmark numbers in nonsense benchmarks which can utilise all cores vs real life scenario which needs performance cores with all cpu instructions with high ipc.
Posted on Reply
#10
watzupken
While it will be nice to see Intel go all in on the core count war, I do think it may not be feasible to produce a retail chip with this many cores. For 1, the power requirement will be very high and likely very difficult to cool. To offset the power requirements, clock speed will likely be impacted, which will somewhat dull the single core performance advantage. And to be honest, do away with that many redundant e-cores. The "E" meaning has changed from Efficient, to Excessive.
Posted on Reply
#11
kondamin
So both Intel and tsmc have a running 14a/2nm line up and running?

that high a number of e cores is silly, 8 is plenty
4 is good 16 p cores and full avx please
Posted on Reply
#12
TumbleGeorge
kondaminSo both Intel and tsmc have a running 14a/2nm line up and running?

that high a number of e cores is silly, 8 is plenty
4 is good 16 p cores and full avx please
Do you have enough dual channel memory bandwidth to set 16p cores on full throttle?
Posted on Reply
#13
Prima.Vera
Too many E cores.... Just make 16P, 12P and 8P Core CPUs, with maximum 8E Cores. Nobody cares about shitty E-Cores, which creates more trouble than they are worth it.
Posted on Reply
#14
kondamin
TumbleGeorgeDo you have enough dual channel memory bandwidth to set 16p cores on full throttle?
It’s no issue on zen 5 which is about as wide as a p core
so that shouldn’t be a problem.
and since it if it ever were to come to market is going to be 2027 product memory clocks are going to be nearer the 10k mark
Posted on Reply
#15
Nostras
Prima.VeraToo many E cores.... Just make 16P, 12P and 8P Core CPUs, with maximum 8E Cores. Nobody cares about shitty E-Cores, which creates more trouble than they are worth it.
I think what Intel is doing is actually right. In cases where single-core performance is really important nothing really scales beyond 8 cores. Inverse applies as well.
8+32 would make for an excellent productivity GPU with very competent gaming. Assuming the new gen at least beats Raptor Lake in games.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 8th, 2025 07:11 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts