Friday, March 21st 2025

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti GPU "Full Specification" Leaks Out

A ramped up flow of early-to-mid March period leaks—regarding upcoming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and RTX 5060 graphics cards—suggested an official pre-GTC 2025 unveiling of lower-end Blackwell gaming GPUs. Speculative specifications appeared online earlier in the month, but some key technical talking points seemed to be missing. As reported yesterday, insiders believe that Team Green has adjusted its new product release schedule. Leaked roadmaps have outlined GeForce RTX 5060 Ti cards arriving by mid-April 2025, with less potent RTX 5060 models launching around the middle of May. Despite the alleged delay, VideoCardz has continued its investigation into pre-launch conditions. Their latest report points to full GeForce RTX 5060 Ti specifications being distributed to board partners, at least in the recent past.

Leaked details seemingly reconfirm the existence of 16 GB and 8 GB variants (on a 128-bit memory bus); both utilizing the same GB206-300-A1 GPU with 4608 CUDA cores. VideoCardz disclosed a couple of finer (new) details:"based on the specs we have, both models will ship with 28 Gbps memory. This means that the bandwidth is 448 GB/s, which is 55% higher than the last-gen model. Moving on to GPU clocks, NVIDIA has set a 2407 MHz base clock and a 2572 MHz boost clock for this GB206-based model. This means that the base clock is 97 MHz and the boost is 37 MHz higher than the RTX 4060 Ti." The fresh leak suggest that a few of Team Green's AIBs will be configuring their custom designs with 8-pin power connectors; sufficient for a reported 180 W TDP-rated product. VideoCardz anticipates that the vast majority of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti models will utilize 16-pin connectors. Unfortunately, finalized price guides were not discovered during recent sleuthing sessions.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

45 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti GPU "Full Specification" Leaks Out

#1
pavle
Toast indeed. A mild refresh.
Posted on Reply
#2
Vayra86
That's a much needed bandwidth increase. Compared to the absolutely gloriously shitty 4060(ti) this might even look like something. Going to be interesting seeing these benched against it.

Blackwell really spells out as Ada +GDDR7 doesn't it.
Posted on Reply
#3
freeagent
Vayra86Blackwell really spells out as Ada +GDDR7 doesn't it.
And the lack of PhysX :oops:
Posted on Reply
#4
Chrispy_
5060Ti 16GB is going to be great, hopefully it's not launching at $500 again but Nvidia will never skip an opportunity to extort.

Bandwidth was the achilles' heel of the 4060Ti, and GDDR7 solves that problem.

The only really annoying thing is the long gap between 40-series vanishing from shelves and the 50-series arriving to replace it. I've been struggling to buy 40-series cards since early January and their replacements are either unobtainium or not even launching for another 4 weeks!
Posted on Reply
#5
lexluthermiester
I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that this might be the positive thing about the 5000 series launch. As long as the benchmarks show a good performance for the price.
Posted on Reply
#6
freeagent
Like I said before, I would be open to the idea of a straight trade of my 4070Ti for a 5070Ti lol
Posted on Reply
#7
oxrufiioxo
freeagentLike I said before, I would be open to the idea of a straight trade of my 4070Ti for a 5070Ti lol
Ones a good card with a bad vram amount for its msrp ones a good card with a terrible msrp.....
Posted on Reply
#8
MCJAxolotl7
Vayra86That's a much needed bandwidth increase. Compared to the absolutely gloriously shitty 4060(ti) this might even look like something. Going to be interesting seeing these benched against it.

Blackwell really spells out as Ada +GDDR7 doesn't it.
Ada+GDDR7-x32cuda
Posted on Reply
#9
Hyderz
5060ti 8gb I think this is there to upsell to the 16gb
Posted on Reply
#10
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
1060 6 vs 3 anyone? The 3GB version was gimped on shaders, TMUs , ROPs.

Buyer beware, they might sneak crap by.
Posted on Reply
#11
Bobaganoosh
Calling it now, Nvidia claims msrp of 4060ti at $399, but the actual starting price is $599.
Posted on Reply
#12
randomTPUreader
BobaganooshCalling it now, Nvidia claims msrp of 4060ti at $399, but the actual starting price is $599.
I agree 100% with you. It could be a good value at MSRP but there's a snowball's chance in hell of that actually happening!
Posted on Reply
#13
scooze
Chrispy_Bandwidth was the achilles' heel of the 4060Ti, and GDDR7 solves that problem.
Main problem of 4060ti wasn't the throughput, but the pathetic 4352 cores. Even the controversial and not very good 4070 had a monstrous amount of them in comparison, almost 6K.
Chrispy_5060Ti 16GB is going to be great, hopefully it's not launching at $500 again but Nvidia will never skip an opportunity to extort.
Will be a complete bummer, because it will almost match the price of the absolute crappy 5070, which will be incredibly faster.
Posted on Reply
#14
Bomby569
300 more cuda cores on the 4060Ti :roll:

it will be 450$ for a 3060ti super that will cost irl 600$ :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#15
sLowEnd
That's a pretty substantial memory bandwidth bump over the 4060 Ti
Posted on Reply
#16
Legacy-ZA
freeagentLike I said before, I would be open to the idea of a straight trade of my 4070Ti for a 5070Ti lol
Yeah no; You have a great card, however the 5070Ti is 20-30% faster and will especially be so with with the upcoming DirectX features at the end of April from Microsoft.

You know, things like 2.5x RT performance (supposedly), the 5070Ti has way more TOPS and memory/bandwidth, then there is neural rendering and of course, Reflex 2.0 that could improve MFG to the point of being usable without that nasty input lag, I am sure nGreedia will improve MFG in the future, just as they have done with DLSS.
Posted on Reply
#17
ZoneDymo
behold, the new midrange, 500+ euro for a 60 class....from both amd and nvidia.

sigh pls Intel, shake these bastards up
Posted on Reply
#18
SilentPeace
sLowEndThat's a pretty substantial memory bandwidth bump over the 4060 Ti
It is, but I don't know how much and under what circumstances it will improve performance? I mean the 4060 Ti outperforms cards with much higher bandwidth so it apparently isn't always much of a factor.
Posted on Reply
#19
Rightness_1
Why would the more expensive 5070 have less VRAM than a 5060ti?
ZoneDymobehold, the new midrange, 500+ euro for a 60 class....from both amd and nvidia.

sigh pls Intel, shake these bastards up
They (AMD+NV) are colluding together. Intel is the outsider, and if they could release a faster card, they would be a real threat, but Intel is too incompetent.
Posted on Reply
#20
Quicks
Rightness_1Why would the more expensive 5070 have less VRAM than a 5060ti?
Forced obsolescence.

Nvidia just being Nvidia, but I guess you can blame all the sheep that keep buying Nvidia as well.
Posted on Reply
#21
SilentPeace
QuicksForced obsolescence.

Nvidia just being Nvidia, but I guess you can blame all the sheep that keep buying Nvidia as well.
AMD does the same, eg. the 7600 has 8GB and 16GB versions (more than the 7700 12GB). also the upcoming 9060.
Posted on Reply
#22
PaddieMayne
I think if AMD gets the 9070 non xt models in plenty of stock compelling aib,s and retailers to sell for msrp or even discounted prices then it has the chance of making the 5060ti 16gb card irrelevant. Apart from the nvidia die hards of course.
Posted on Reply
#23
SilentPeace
PaddieMayneI think if AMD gets the 9070 non xt models in plenty of stock compelling aib,s and retailers to sell for msrp or even discounted prices then it has the chance of making the 5060ti 16gb card irrelevant. Apart from the nvidia die hards of course.
The 9070 non-XT is ~50% more expensive than the 4060 Ti here, I expect the 5060 Ti price will be similar. The 5060 series will sell like hotcakes just like the 3060 and 4060 did.
Posted on Reply
#24
Chrispy_
scoozeMain problem of 4060ti wasn't the throughput, but the pathetic 4352 cores. Even the controversial and not very good 4070 had a monstrous amount of them in comparison, almost 6K.

Will be a complete bummer, because it will almost match the price of the absolute crappy 5070, which will be incredibly faster.
Pathetic?

The 4070 cost 50% more money and only had 35% more cores. The 4060Ti was way better value than the 4070 if you're looking at core counts or performance.

If anything, the 4070 was the pathetic card, pushing prices per core and overall prices for the "midrange" above $600 for the first time ever whilst also dropping the 70 series down to 192-bit from 256 for the first time since 2012.
Posted on Reply
#25
Arkz
Remember when the 3060 Ti came out and it was faster than the previous gen 2080 Super?

But then the 4060 Ti was slower than a 3070.

I bet this is slower than 4070 ha ha.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Mar 23rd, 2025 09:03 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts