Thursday, March 3rd 2016

Samsung Introduces World's Highest Capacity Enterprise SSD - 15.36 TB

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., the world leader in advanced memory technology, announced today that it is now shipping the industry's largest solid state drive (SSD) - the "PM1633a," a 15.36 terabyte (TB) drive. First revealed at the 2015 Flash Memory Summit in August, the 15.36TB SSD is based on a 12Gb/s Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) interface, for use in enterprise storage systems. Because the PM1633a comes in a 2.5-inch form factor, enterprise storage managers can fit twice as many of the drives in a standard 19-inch, 2U rack, compared to an equivalent 3.5-inch storage drive

"To satisfy an increasing market need for ultra-high-capacity SAS SSDs from leading enterprise storage system manufacturers, we are directing our best efforts toward meeting our customers' SSD requests," said Jung-bae Lee, Senior Vice President, Memory Product Planning and Application Engineering Team, Samsung Electronics. "We will continue to lead the industry with next-generation SSDs, using our advanced 3D V-NAND memory technology, in order to accelerate the growth of the premium memory market while delivering greater performance and efficiency to our customers."
The unprecedented 15.36TB of data storage on a single SSD is enabled by combining 512 of Samsung's 256Gb V-NAND memory chips. The 256Gb dies are stacked in 16 layers to form a single 512GB package, with a total of 32 NAND flash packages in the 15.36TB drive. Utilizing Samsung's 3rd generation, 256-gigabit (Gb) V-NAND technology which stacks cell-arrays in 48 layers, the PM1633a line-up provides significant performance and reliability upgrades from its predecessor, the PM1633, which used Samsung's 2nd generation, 32-layer, 128Gb V-NAND memory.

Samsung's new PM1633a SSD provides the opportunity for significant improvements in the efficiency of IT system investments through its high storage capacity and exceptional performance. These performance gains stem from Samsung's latest vertical NAND (V-NAND) flash technology, as well as the company's proprietary controller and firmware technology.

The PM1633a SSD sports random read and write speeds of up to 200,000 and 32,000 IOPS respectively, and delivers sequential read and write speeds of up to 1,200MB/s. The random read IOPS performance is approximately 1,000 times that of SAS-type hard disks, while the sequential read and write speeds are over twice those of a typical SATA SSD. Inside the new SSD lie Samsung's advanced controller units that support the 12Gb/s SAS interface, along with a total of 16GB of DRAM. Samsung also uses specially designed firmware that can access large amounts of high-density NAND flash concurrently.

The 15.36TB PM1633a drive supports 1 DWPD (drive writes per day), which means 15.36TB of data can be written every day on this single drive without failure, a level of reliability that will improve cost of ownership for enterprise storage systems. This drive can write from two to ten times as much data as typical SATA SSDs based on planar MLC and TLC NAND flash technologies.

Further, the drive boasts a highly dependable metadata protection mechanism in addition to featuring a data protection and restoration software tool in case of a momentary blackout, which make enterprise systems more stable and manageable.

Starting with the 15.36TB density, Samsung will provide a wide range of capacity options in its PM1633a SSD line-up - 7.68TB, 3.84TB, 1.92TB, 960-gigabyte (GB) and 480GB later this year. With more choices in storage capacity, Samsung is reinforcing the competitiveness in its SAS SSD line-up. The Samsung PM1633a SSD line-up is expected to rapidly become the overwhelming favorite over hard disks for enterprise storage systems.
Add your own comment

42 Comments on Samsung Introduces World's Highest Capacity Enterprise SSD - 15.36 TB

#26
Patriot
yogurt_21should note this is enterprise 2.5" spec and will not fit in laptops or anything like the nuc that uses the laptop 2.5" bays.
All of the high capacity enterprise drives are multi pcb... Truly awesome to take apart...
But they are also tanks and super thick.

Here is a PX03 Toshiba 1.6TB


And a 1200.2 Seagate. 3.2TB
Posted on Reply
#27
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
This got me moist. Sure its not consumer level, but how long before a 32TB variant surfances? 64TB?


SSD's are finally hitting the point they can completley surpass mechanical drives in capacity and reliability, only price is left.
Posted on Reply
#28
dados8756
so what will happen with our neighbours who offer his "helium" storage lol ???
Posted on Reply
#29
Breit
night.foxon a side note, very odd capacity. 15.36tb?
Why odd? This thing has probably a full 16TB flash, where (due to overprovisioning) only 15.36TB are usable.
Never wondered why there are all these 480GB SSDs when they should've 512GB? :rolleyes:

I actually wondered that this drive does come with only 4% overprovisioning. For an enterprise SSD something around 13% is typical.
Posted on Reply
#30
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
BreitWhy odd? This thing has probably a full 16TB flash, where (due to overprovisioning) only 15.36TB are usable.
Never wondered why there are all these 480GB SSDs when they should've 512GB? :rolleyes:

I actually wondered that this drive does come with only 4% overprovisioning. For an enterprise SSD something around 13% is typical.
google had that report recently that enterprise SLC SSD's were no more reliable than consumer MLC in the end, so i think they're settling on finalised numbers as the tech matures.
Posted on Reply
#31
Breit
Musselsgoogle had that report recently that enterprise SLC SSD's were no more reliable than consumer MLC in the end, so i think they're settling on finalised numbers as the tech matures.
The debate about SLC vs. MLC has nothing to do with this drive, 'cause it already uses MLC V-NAND and if there is a difference in overprovisioning needed between SLC and MLC, then it is SLC which probably need a little less for the same lifespan (TBW or DWPD over a certain amount of time).

The first SSDs I bought back in the days were SandForce 1500 drives which used 27% in overprovisioning. :eek:
The wear-leveling must've been evolved al lot since then. :toast:
Posted on Reply
#32
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
my point was about how the overprovisioning is shrinking over time, and seems unrelated to reliability.
Posted on Reply
#33
Breit
I'm not sure what that Google report really means. I've not read it, but I'm guessing the results are just an observation of failure rates for certain drives. I'm further guessing that the SLC drives they were using are probably older tech than the MLC ones in the report due to slower developement cycles for enterprise-class hardware. But most importantly: The drives from the report must have been a few years old to make statements about long term reliability. I'm not sure if this gives an unbiased picture over a still very young tech were major advancements happen on a daily basis.
Posted on Reply
#34
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
BreitI'm not sure what that Google report really means. I've not read it, but I'm guessing the results are just an observation of failure rates for certain drives.
It's more than mere observation. Google actively studies this, jist lime the extensive report they did a couple years ago on HDD failure rates.

Google has an invested interest in tracking and studying these things, because the massive number of drives they use and replace each year worldwide in their server farms is staggering.
Posted on Reply
#35
ypsylon
night.foxremarkable!!!!! samsung does push limits and set standards.in few years time, this will be on consumer level price.

on a side note, very odd capacity. 15.36tb?
Because it's calculated different. Based on standard HDD capacity, not with standard 2^x. It's the same with that 13TB drive from Fixstars. It's much bigger per se, but available space is only 13TB.
Posted on Reply
#36
AsRock
TPU addict
rtwjunkieIt's more than mere observation. Google actively studies this, jist lime the extensive report they did a couple years ago on HDD failure rates.

Google has an invested interest in tracking and studying these things, because the massive number of drives they use and replace each year worldwide in their server farms is staggering.
But you don't know how they did it they might of cherry picked what the out come was, kinda like voting LOL.

How ever i cannot think of hand why they would fix the results. but still don't they did or didn't, more on topic i would of liked they of shown more pics showing how it was built :P.
Posted on Reply
#37
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
AsRockBut you don't know how they did it they might of cherry picked what the out come was, kinda like voting LOL.

How ever i cannot think of hand why they would fix the results. but still don't they did or didn't, more on topic i would of liked they of shown more pics showing how it was built :p.
google want the results honest because their findings will push sales up for reliable drives/models (directly via their own purchases, indirectly via encouraging others to buy them), thus encouraging drive manufs to push drive reliability up
Posted on Reply
#38
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Eric_CartmanAnd we won't see a large shift to SSDs until SSDs are basically as cheap as HDDs so the major computer manufacturers like Dell and HP start putting SSDs in their large volume inexpensive products.
That already happened, quite a few sub $800 PC's come with a 128/256GB SSD for the OS and a 1/2TB storage drive. Quite a few customers ask for it specifically. The shit has started, 500GB drives are downright affordable right now.
Posted on Reply
#39
R-T-B
dados8756so what will happen with our neighbours who offer his "helium" storage lol ???
The price will drop.

...How long that can be sustained is anyones guess.
Posted on Reply
#40
Prima.Vera
BreitWhy odd? This thing has probably a full 16TB flash, where (due to overprovisioning) only 15.36TB are usable.
Never wondered why there are all these 480GB SSDs when they should've 512GB? :rolleyes:

I actually wondered that this drive does come with only 4% overprovisioning. For an enterprise SSD something around 13% is typical.
Just like a 2TB drive is actually 1.8TB due to the 1,024 thingy...
Posted on Reply
#41
felix_w
Prima.VeraJust like a 2TB drive is actually 1.8TB due to the 1,024 thingy...
Exactly, if you do the math, real vs. spec'd is about 93%, due to 1000^3/1024^3=0.9313...
Posted on Reply
#42
Breit
felix_wExactly, if you do the math, real vs. spec'd is about 93%, due to 1000^3/1024^3=0.9313...
It even says in the press release that this particular SSD is composed of Samsungs new 256GB (gigabit) VNAND flash chips (512 of them). These chips are then stacked over 16 layers forming packages of 512GiB in size (512 * 2^30 Byte). It further says there are 32 of these package giving a gross amount of 16384GiB of flash. If you substract 1024GiB for overprovisioning from that, you probably get 15360GiB or ~15.36TB. :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 23rd, 2024 11:21 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts