Thursday, March 16th 2023

Intel Xeon W9-3495X Can Pull up to 1,900 Watts in Extreme OC Scenarios

Intel's latest Xeon processors based on Sapphire Rapids uArch have arrived in the hands of overclockers. Last week, we reported that the Intel Xeon W9-3495X is officially a world record holder for achieving the best scores in Cinebench R23 and R20, Y-Cruncher, 3DMark CPU test, and Geekbench 3. However, today we have another extreme overclocking attempt to beat the world record, with little more details about power consumption and what the new SKU is capable of. Elmor, an overclocker working with ASUS, has tried to break the world record and overclocked the Intel Xeon W9-3495X CPU to 5.5 GHz on all 56 cores. What is more impressive is the power that the processor can consume.

With a system powered by two Superflower Leadex 1,600 Watt power supply units, the CPU consumed almost 1,900 Watts of power from the wall. To manage to cool this heat output, liquid nitrogen was used, and the CPU stayed at a cool negative 95 degrees Celsius. The motherboard of choice for this attempt was ASUS Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE, paired with eight GSKILL Zeta R5 DDR5 R-DIMMs modules. And results were incredible, as the CPU achieved 132,220 points in Cinebench R23. However, the world record of the previous week has remained intact, as Elmor 's result is a bit behind last week's score of 132,484 points. Check the video below for more info.
Source: via HardwareLuxx.de
Add your own comment

60 Comments on Intel Xeon W9-3495X Can Pull up to 1,900 Watts in Extreme OC Scenarios

#51
Minus Infinity
kondaminWouldn't be much of an issue if it were powered by hydro wind or nuclear
Wish they never stopped building nuclear plants so energy efficient electrical outlet connected computers never became a thing.
And pigs might fly.
Posted on Reply
#52
Assimilator
john_That's a YES, not a NO. Thanks for clarifying it.

And no, that post wasn't to make Intel look bad. It just triggered your need to defend Intel, which is... the usual.
I will defend anyone or any entity, anywhere, at anytime from accusations that are blatantly false, unfair, or irrelevant.
john_Any company trying to be environmental friendly, will go bankrupt.
You really don't understand how any of this works, do you?
Posted on Reply
#53
john_
AssimilatorI will defend anyone or any entity, anywhere, at anytime from accusations that are blatantly false, unfair, or irrelevant.
Based on your wrong understand of what I wrote.
You really don't understand how any of this works, do you?
Oh, come on. This is the typical kind of reply "I know nothing, but I will post something that indicates I know better".
Feel free to enlighten us. But I bet you don't want to waste more time here. Right?
Posted on Reply
#54
lemonadesoda
Water cooling. PC in the yellow box. After each benchmark completes, you need to run a bath.

Posted on Reply
#55
lexluthermiester
john_Based on your wrong understand of what I wrote.


Oh, come on. This is the typical kind of reply "I know nothing, but I will post something that indicates I know better".
Feel free to enlighten us. But I bet you don't want to waste more time here. Right?
They're not wrong. You are clearly demonstrating a lack of understanding.
Posted on Reply
#56
john_
lexluthermiesterThey're not wrong. You are clearly demonstrating a lack of understanding.
Thank you, oh wise.
Maybe you can enlighten us, oh wise.
Posted on Reply
#57
unwind-protect
AnarchoPrimitivWho thinks the Zen4 Threadripper 64 core will beat this with similar overclocking? Obviously the 96 core will, but it'll be interesting to see....
If AMD makes one, and when. Zen3 threadripper hasn't been a hit with hobbyists since it was later and the Pro line only.

(I actually prefer Threadripper Pro because I want registered RAM, but the pricing of the 5xxx TR Pro is not to my liking)

But EPYC on DDR5 will beat Intel badly.
Posted on Reply
#58
lexluthermiester
unwind-protectBut EPYC on DDR5 will beat Intel badly.
DDR5 is not magic sauce. If Epyc has the stuff to beat Xeon now that it will do so with DDR5. If it doesn't then "beat Intel badly" is silly statement.
Posted on Reply
#59
unwind-protect
lexluthermiesterDDR5 is not magic sauce. If Epyc has the stuff to beat Xeon now that it will do so with DDR5. If it doesn't then "beat Intel badly" is silly statement.
It's not just DDR5, one generation of Zen is missing from EPYC right now.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 1st, 2025 19:28 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts