Thursday, March 23rd 2023

Microsoft Believes That Sony is Capable of Creating its Own Alternative to Call of Duty

Microsoft is still deep into its negotiations with several international regulatory bodies regarding the buyout of Activision Blizzard, with a deadline looming it seems that tensions are rising. The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) needs a lot of convincing since it regards the proposed takeover as a serious threat to Sony's ability to compete with Microsoft, with the ownership of the Call of Duty series being a main focus. Sony has expressed concern about the blockbuster franchise becoming a potential Xbox console exclusive in the future - Microsoft has pledged to continue development on PlayStation platforms for a proposed 10-year period, with no technological compromises and a promise to release all versions simultaneously on launch days.

In its latest testimony given to the UK's CMA, Microsoft has made a (slightly odd) suggestion that Sony should figure out a way to make its own answer to the Call of Duty series: "Microsoft considers that a period of 10 years is sufficient for Sony, as a leading publisher and console platform, to develop alternatives to Call of Duty.…The 10-year term will extend into the next console generation.… Moreover, the practical effect of the remedy will go beyond the 10-year period, since games downloaded in the final year of the remedy can continue to be played for the lifetime of that console (and beyond, with backwards compatibility)."
Sony has the budget to expand its first party development studio footprint, but it will take a lot of resources to form a multi-location operation that can operate at the same level as the ones that currently pump out Call of Duty titles on a regular basis. Sony purchased Destiny series developer Bungie mid-last year, which boasts an 800+ staff count, but the studio is an MMO specialist - albeit in first person shooter form. Dutch developer Guerrilla Games is well known for its production of PlayStation exclusives, and has pedigree in making first person shooters in a similar vein to CoD, in the shape of its Killzone series. The last entry, Shadow Fall, was released in 2013 and Guerrilla has moved onto developing the third-person Horizon action role-playing games.
The PlayStation FPS library is by and large shared with other platforms, with the Call of Duty series being a prime example, given that Microsoft is also proposing to expand the reach of the games onto Nintendo consoles. Deathloop was a console timed exclusive on PlayStation 5, but its developer is part of the larger Bethesda group that was purchased by Microsoft in the Spring of 2021. Sony Corporation has $5 billion to spend on new investments in 2023 - it will be interesting to see how much of it can be spent on growing their games development operations around the world. Microsoft has clearly been keeping tabs on their rival's financial strengths, and thinks that their rival has the means to start on a CoD-sized competitor.
Sources: CMA Documents, Video Game Chronicles
Add your own comment

33 Comments on Microsoft Believes That Sony is Capable of Creating its Own Alternative to Call of Duty

#1
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Sony should re-do Killzone series from the ground up. way better than CoD or Halo imo. or do another SOCOM US Navy Seals game, man those were fucking fun times. way better than today.

stop being lazy Sony, go back to your roots and kick ass with a new exclusive!
Posted on Reply
#2
sepheronx
That was the purpose of consoles - exclusives. The fact that they fight for franchises instead of trying to be creative themselves is rather telling.
Posted on Reply
#3
Space Lynx
Astronaut
sepheronxThat was the purpose of consoles - exclusives. The fact that they fight for franchises instead of trying to be creative themselves is rather telling.
Yep, Sony has lost its way. Exclusives shouldn't be frowned upon, at least not the way Sony has done them in the past. We have so many gems in the history of gaming because of Sony and I for one don't think they should apologize, adapt to other business models, or fight this lawsuit. They should instead see this as a chance to go back to their old roots. Give us ICO 2, and bundle it with the original ICO. Dark Cloud 3. The list goes on and on and on and on...

Remake the SOCOM games in Unreal Engine 5.2... holy fuck, that would be way funner than any CoD game.
Posted on Reply
#4
FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
Sony: "We have Call Of Duty At Home"

Sony Call Of Duty:


Posted on Reply
#5
rv8000
Conceptually a child or teenager could come up with a COD alternative at this point. This is definitely not news, but worth the laugh for the title.
Posted on Reply
#6
Hyderz
Ever since sony stepped into the console market, the titles that are fun and exclusive to PlayStation are not fps titles.. I can only think of one or two fps that are PlayStation exclusives.. people are more excited for other titles than call of duty.. give us blood borne 2, cool unique titles like katamari, infamous son, ghost of tsushima. You have plethora of titles on psp and psvita that you remake and titles like fear effect from original PlayStation
Posted on Reply
#7
BIGMicro
For me it's not about which company will buy Activision-Blizzard. The point here is that there are other companies able to buy a such big video game holding company (?!). Maybe Activision-Blizzard doesn't release dozens of games but it has very significant game brands, well-known titles and has big revenue. In general, its not good for players and the market for company like Activision-Blizzard to be taken over by giants, large corporations like MS.
Microsoft has own studios, bought a few others - they shouldn't get approval. They don't have enough staff in the gaming department? They can't come up with new game series themselves, don't they already have a dozens game brands?
Posted on Reply
#8
ZoneDymo
FreedomEclipseSony: "We have Call Of Duty At Home"

Sony Call Of Duty:


Joke all you want, Id play the heck out of that.

Also imagine if Sony actually did make a CoD alternative and it is better and becomes more populair
Posted on Reply
#9
EmerilLIVE
Space LynxYep, Sony has lost its way. Exclusives shouldn't be frowned upon, at least not the way Sony has done them in the past. We have so many gems in the history of gaming because of Sony and I for one don't think they should apologize, adapt to other business models, or fight this lawsuit. They should instead see this as a chance to go back to their old roots. Give us ICO 2, and bundle it with the original ICO. Dark Cloud 3. The list goes on and on and on and on...

Remake the SOCOM games in Unreal Engine 5.2... holy fuck, that would be way funner than any CoD game.
Sony shuttered Zipper Interactive over 10 years ago, who made the SOCOM games as well as Massive Action Game, a Battlefield competitor for PS3. It seems that at the time they were content with the Playstation being a platform for Call of Duty & Battlefield with no exclusive competition.
Posted on Reply
#10
Imouto
So can you, Microsoft. Stop buying shit and ruining it and try to come up with something by yourself. You can dump even more money than Sony into making a CoD alternative and yet you strong arm the market with your billions.
Posted on Reply
#11
Space Lynx
Astronaut
EmerilLIVESony shuttered Zipper Interactive over 10 years ago, who made the SOCOM games as well as Massive Action Game, a Battlefield competitor for PS3. It seems that at the time they were content with the Playstation being a platform for Call of Duty & Battlefield with no exclusive competition.
Yeah, they also refuse to let Level-5 have the Dark Cloud license, Sony is holding it close, but refusing to make a Dark Cloud 3... its a real shame. So many gems of games going to waste and collecting dust, all because of short term greed. Sony used to be all time favorite. They have fallen so far... much like Blizzard... nothing lasts forever I suppose.
Posted on Reply
#12
oobymach
ZoneDymoJoke all you want, Id play the heck out of that.

Also imagine if Sony actually did make a CoD alternative and it is better and becomes more populair
They Did, it was called Time Splitters and it pre-dates CoD. They also did with Resistance Fall Of Man, but nothing can compete with CoD. Every year a new game and 4 DLC's with new maps guaranteed for every game. Popularity only lasts until the new one comes out, that's the secret. If people want to compete they need to make games with more/better content that take longer to beat. A long game is not a bad thing.
Posted on Reply
#13
ThrashZone
Hi,
Hell ms couldn't even create it's version of candy crush but they're right about sony so 1 out of a million isn't bad :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#15
TheoneandonlyMrK
That the reason MS really really wants to buy cod then,. Because making it themselves is beyond them.

Scarcely even makes sense to say this shit, it's a self fail admission.
Posted on Reply
#16
ZoneDymo
oobymachThey Did, it was called Time Splitters and it pre-dates CoD. They also did with Resistance Fall Of Man, but nothing can compete with CoD. Every year a new game and 4 DLC's with new maps guaranteed for every game. Popularity only lasts until the new one comes out, that's the secret. If people want to compete they need to make games with more/better content that take longer to beat. A long game is not a bad thing.
Timesplitters was solid, especially 2, man I would like a game like that again.
Posted on Reply
#17
sLowEnd
Space LynxYep, Sony has lost its way. Exclusives shouldn't be frowned upon, at least not the way Sony has done them in the past. We have so many gems in the history of gaming because of Sony and I for one don't think they should apologize, adapt to other business models, or fight this lawsuit. They should instead see this as a chance to go back to their old roots. Give us ICO 2, and bundle it with the original ICO. Dark Cloud 3. The list goes on and on and on and on...

Remake the SOCOM games in Unreal Engine 5.2... holy fuck, that would be way funner than any CoD game.
SOCOM II was fun ;D
Posted on Reply
#18
trsttte
sepheronxThat was the purpose of consoles - exclusives. The fact that they fight for franchises instead of trying to be creative themselves is rather telling.
A multiplayer dependent game will have a hard time getting traction without being multiplatform and established names sell (brand recognition), hence the fight for CoD
ImoutoSo can you, Microsoft. Stop buying shit and ruining it and try to come up with something by yourself. You can dump even more money than Sony into making a CoD alternative and yet you strong arm the market with your billions.
Exactly!
Posted on Reply
#19
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
-create a FPS game
-release a new one every ear with little to no differences except its theme
-?
-profit
Posted on Reply
#20
HisDivineOrder
Imagine if instead of buying companies already making multi-billion dollar franchises Microsoft was actually using their billions of dollars to ADD another billion dollar franchise. I got Microsoft buying a bunch of indies halfway through the Xbox One generation because they killed off all their first party studios. I even got them buying Bethesda because that was a fairly solid set of developers that could give them a stable of new franchises.

But enough is enough. They're spending billions to basically buy premade franchises and developers they'll ultimately have to prune down to shadows of themselves because they'll never sustain the development cycle of all these developers and once-publishers. At this point, they're diminishing the entire gaming industry. They could be making new games and adding to it instead. They could be making new games, new franchises, and expanding the market. Instead, they're making it smaller. That's why the purchase should be blocked.

It's bad for everyone except ironically the one man we want gone: Bobby Kotick. He'll get a lot of money and go buy another publisher to ruin. Probably Ubisoft, which is already bad enough. It's definitely not going to improve the industry when Microsoft owns two major publishers of games. What happens when Microsoft goes through a tighter cycle and they start killing off entire devs and franchises people love because, well, they have too many?

They've done it before and they'll do it again. Sony's right this time. Microsoft should take its own advice. Make a Call of Duty competitor, especially since they're lecturing Sony on it being easy. I expect they'll have no problem what with all the success they've had at making Halo great, right?
Posted on Reply
#21
ir_cow
Honestly. Just need to make a clone of COD. Nothing more, nothing less. People play it for multiplayer. Call it like "Hero's to Arms"
Posted on Reply
#22
AnarchoPrimitiv
I think we should ALL be worried about consolidation and concentration in general, its had a negative effect on consumers in every industry effected....which IS every industry. Having all the games come from fewer and fewer entities will limit the types of games and especially HOW we get them...I'm sure a monthly pass ONLY is the preferred model where you don't really own anything.
Posted on Reply
#23
lexluthermiester
T0@stMicrosoft is still deep into its negotiations with several international regulatory bodies regarding the buyout of Activision Blizzard, with a deadline looming it seems that tensions are rising.
Needs to fail. The message to microsoft needs to be: "Stop buying up everything and just work out deals & partnerships."
AnarchoPrimitivI'm sure a monthly pass ONLY is the preferred model where you don't really own anything.
A business model most will NEVER subscribe too. Many would rather stop play games than spend money on a system where they have no rights to what they've spent money on. Such a business model so lacking in both respect for the consumer and merit that it doesn't deserve to exist.
Posted on Reply
#24
trsttte
lexluthermiesterNeeds to fail. The message to microsoft needs to be: "Stop buying up everything and just work out deals & partnerships."
Or rather "do something with the massive resources you already have! as you were saying to sony, it's not that hard"
Posted on Reply
#25
InVasMani
Git gud become a bigger monopoly like us in some other way if you don't like it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 03:02 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts