Friday, August 25th 2023

AMD Announces FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3) Fluid Motion Rivaling DLSS 3, Broad Hardware Support

In addition to the Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT graphics cards, AMD announced FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 Fluid Motion (FSR 3 Fluid Motion), the company's performance enhancement that's designed to rival NVIDIA DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The biggest piece of news here, is that unlike DLSS 3, which is restricted to GeForce RTX 40-series "Ada," FSR 3 enjoys the same kind of cross-brand hardware support as FSR 2. It works on the latest Radeon RX 7000 series, as well as previous-generation RX 6000 series RDNA2 graphics cards, as well as NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40-series, RTX 30-series, and RTX 20-series. It might even be possible to use FSR 3 with Arc A-series, although AMD wouldn't confirm it.

FSR 3 Fluid Motion is a frame-rate doubling technology that generates alternate frames by estimating an intermediate between two frames rendered by the GPU (which is essentially what DLSS 3 is). The company did not detail the underlying technology behind FSR 3 in its pre-briefing, but showed an example of FSR 3 implemented on "Forspoken," where the game puts out 36 FPS at 4K native resolution, is able to run at 122 FPS with FSR 3 "performance" preset (upscaling + Fluid Motion + Anti-Lag). At 1440p native, with ultra-high RT, "Forspoken" puts out 64 FPS, which nearly doubles to 106 FPS without upscaling (native resolution) + Fluid Motion frames + Anti-Lag. The Maximum Fidelity preset of FSR 3 is essentially AMD's version of DLAA (to use the detail regeneration and AA features of FSR without dropping down resolution).
AMD announced just two title debuts for FSR 3 Fluid Motion, the already released "Forspoken," and "Immortals of Aveum" that released earlier this week. The company announced that it is working with game developers to bring FSR 3 support to "Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora," "Cyberpunk 2077," "Warhammer II: Space Marine," "Frostpunk 2," "Alters," "Squad," "Starship Troopers: Extermination," "Black Myth: Wukong," "Crimson Desert," and "Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth." The company is working with nearly all leading game publishers and game engine developers to add FSR 3 support, including Ascendant, Square Enix, Ubisoft, CD Projekt Red, Saber Interactive, Focus Entertainment, 11-bit Studios, Unreal Engine, Sega, and Bandai Namco Reflector.
AMD is also working to get FSR 3 Fluid Motion frames part of the AMD Hyper-RX feature that the company is launching soon. This is big, as pretty much any DirectX 11 or DirectX 12 game will get Fluid Motion frames, launching in Q1-2024.

Both "Forspoken" and "Immortals of Aveum" will get FSR 3 patches this Fall.
Add your own comment

362 Comments on AMD Announces FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3) Fluid Motion Rivaling DLSS 3, Broad Hardware Support

#176
R0H1T
fevgatosI don't, but there is no reason to believe it would.
So just speculation then?
fevgatosThat's something you literally just made up.
Nope when you add a "feature" to any software, or game, there's every chance it could bork something else.

Admittedly it's a bit of a reach since I don't follow much of this.
Posted on Reply
#177
AusWolf
fevgatosBoundary. The game was in early access and had DLSS. Then AMD sponsored it. I mean it's a UE4 game, adding DLSS is basically a checkbox, the work is already done by epic.

nvidia/comments/125b0tswww.dsogaming.com/news/boundary-will-no-longer-feature-ray-tracing-ditches-dlss-over-fsr-xess/
Well, fair enough. If it's really because of AMD, it's a shady move... but it's not like Nvidia or Intel hasn't done anything like this in the past, so I still don't see the point here.
R0H1TWell if you want 1 (fake) fps for every frame in the render pipeline are you really playing a game at that point?
Exactly my point.
Posted on Reply
#178
Kabouter Plop
Some people have some crazy fantasy without having any proof, sometimes it just does not work the devs decide using it is not worth it and they find something else.
Posted on Reply
#179
fevgatos
R0H1TSo just speculation then?
You are the one speculating. How do you know the world isn't going to end tomorrow? You don't. That doesn't mean you are "speculating" by not believing it will. There is no reason to think dlss doesnt work fine with FSR.
AusWolfWell, fair enough. If it's really because of AMD, it's a shady move... but it's not like Nvidia or Intel hasn't done anything like this in the past, so I still don't see the point here.
In fact, nvidia hasn't done anything like that in the past, but doesn't matter. We are in agreement that both companies are equally bad, which was my point all along. So we good.
Posted on Reply
#180
Dr. Dro
Honestly, I think it's all been covered pretty nicely at this point. It's not like we're against AMD users enjoying frame generation capabilities, just wish that customers were given the final choice and addressing the fan base, that idk maybe next time don't trash talk it, guys. It might end up being your next favorite feature :D
Posted on Reply
#181
Legacy-ZA
AnotherReaderFSR3 being able to run on all relatively recent GPUs makes it far more likely that DLSS3 frame generation was locked to Ada for non-technical reasons.
As I said, long ago. Remember G-Sync? ehehe, so many examples of nVidia saying, it's not possible and bam, next driver when AMD does something, they unlock it. nVidia is a scumbag of a company.
Posted on Reply
#182
Vya Domus
fevgatosAMD paid the developers
If we are speculating on these conspiracies might as well throw in my own speculation here and assume Nvidia has to be paying you to litter this forum with your fanboy garbage, no way anyone would be doing this for free.
Posted on Reply
#183
fevgatos
Vya DomusIf we are speculating on these conspiracies might as well throw in my own speculation here and assume Nvidia has to be paying you to litter this forum with your fanboy garbage, no way anyone would be doing this for free.
There is no conspiracy. The game had DLSS. AMD sponsored it. The devs removed DLSS.

If you can't see it when it's so obvious then I have to assume you are the one being paid here, nobody would sprout forth this garbage for free.
Posted on Reply
#184
Vya Domus
fevgatosThere is no conspiracy.
Really dude ? Show me your evidence that "AMD paid the developers to do extra work to remove a feature".

You got their receipts or something ? Bank statements ? Tell us how you did it, we need to know, this is top tier investigative journalism.
Posted on Reply
#185
Kabouter Plop
Plot twist they had DLSS2 but it caused crashes and could not fix it then removed it, anyway if NVIDIA makes no mention about it being blocked there is no block, also NVIDIA has standards for how well their tech should work, so they might be the one's blocking it them self due issues with it running up to their standards.
Posted on Reply
#186
apoklyps3
Wow, some nvidia fanboys really acting mad now.
The stuff they'll make up to picture nvidia as Saint and amd as the devil is insane.
Posted on Reply
#187
fevgatos
Vya DomusReally dude ? Show me your evidence that "AMD paid the developers to do extra work to remove a feature".

You got their receipts or something ? Bank statements ? Tell us how you did it, we need to know, this is top tier investigative journalism.
That's the problem with you cultists. The only way for you to admit amd messed up is by asking people to provide you evidence that...literally cannot be provided.

The writing is on the wall. Game had DLSS, AMD sponsored it, game doesn't have DLSS. How much more obvious can it get, lol
Posted on Reply
#188
Vya Domus
fevgatosThat's the problem with you cultists. The only way for you to admit amd messed up is by asking people to provide you evidence that...literally cannot be provided.
Are you dense or something ?

You said "AMD paid them to do X", whatever, show us the proof that they did that. What do you mean the evidence "cannot be provided" ? Of course it can't if it's made up garbage like 99% of the stuff you say on here.
Posted on Reply
#189
fevgatos
apoklyps3Wow, some nvidia fanboys really acting made now.
The stuff they'll make up to picture nvidia as Saint and amd as the devil is insane.
That's what an actual fanboy would say. They are both companies trying to make money off of you.
Posted on Reply
#190
Kabouter Plop
AMD is better off paying their own driver team more hiring more people for their driver and software team, i doubt they are paying developers to remove NVIDIA features.
Posted on Reply
#191
apoklyps3
fevgatosThat's what an actual fanboy would say. They are both companies trying to make money off of you.
I'm a life time nvidia GPU user. Try again
Posted on Reply
#192
fevgatos
Vya DomusAre you dense or something ?

You said "AMD paid them to do X", whatever, show us the proof that they did that. What do you mean the evidence "cannot be provided". Of course it can't if it's made up garbage like 99% of the stuff you say on this forum.
There is no amount of evidence that will convince you lad. Even the bank statements you asked for wouldn't convince you.

Game had DLSS. AMD sponsored them. Game removed DLSS. I guess it's just coincidence.
apoklyps3I'm a life time nvidia GPU user. Try again
Try what again?
Posted on Reply
#193
apoklyps3
Waking up from the Stockholm syndrome
Posted on Reply
#194
Vya Domus
fevgatosThere is no amount of evidence that will convince you
Bro you have ZERO evidence. You said they paid them to do it, go ahead and show one single piece of evidence that they received money from AMD to do that. Just one.
fevgatosEven the bank statements you asked for wouldn't convince you.
Hey if you have them feel free to prove me wrong. Do you ? You got a man on the inside, how did you do it, come on bro don't let us waiting this is really big.
Posted on Reply
#195
fevgatos
apoklyps3Waking up from the Stockholm syndrome
From buying AMD? Yeah, I need to stop it at some point. Can't even play divine divinity on my laptop cause AMD drivers are horrible, have to play it on the desktop that has nvidia. Next time I won't make the same mistake bro, don't worry
Posted on Reply
#196
apoklyps3
Vya DomusBro you have ZERO evidence. You said they paid them to do it, go ahead and show one single piece of evidence that they received money from AMD to do that. Just one.


Hey if you have them feel free to prove me wrong. Did you ? You got a man on the inside, who did you do it, come on bro don't let us waiting this is really big.
He has less than 0 evidence.
fevgatosFrom buying AMD? Yeah, I need to stop it at some point. Can't even play divine divinity on my laptop cause AMD drivers are horrible, have to play it on the desktop that has nvidia. Next time I won't make the same mistake bro, don't worry
So you are comparing deskop gpus with laptop gpus now.
Lord have mercy
Posted on Reply
#197
fevgatos
Vya DomusBro you have ZERO evidence. You said they paid them to do it, go ahead and show one single piece of evidence that they received money from AMD to do that. Just one.


Hey if you have them feel free to prove me wrong. Do you ? You got a man on the inside, who did you do it, come on bro don't let us waiting this is really big.
How could a bank statement convince you? Even if AMD came out and admitted that sponsored games have to not support DLSS you still wouldn't be convinced. They might be lying after all.

Again, for the last time, the facts are that the game had DLSS before amd sponsored it, and then they went through the effort of REMOVING dlss after amd sponsored them. Im sure there can be 50 explanations for that, but the most reasonable one is that it has something to do with the sponsorship. Whoever argues otherwise is just doing it on bad faith. And you are full of that when it comes to amd so..
apoklyps3So you are comparing deskop gpus with laptop gpus now.
Lord have mercy
Im comparing drivers. The game is from 2002, every gpu has the horsepower to run it. Unless it's an AMD one of course and the drivers cause flickers and blackscreen and all kind of stuff :D
Posted on Reply
#198
Vya Domus
fevgatosHow
Dude do you have even one piece of evidence to support the claim that AMD paid them do it ?

Yes or no, spare me the block of text.
Posted on Reply
#199
apoklyps3
At this point in time nvidia femboys would compare rtx 4090 to some amd apu from 2015 and say: loook, it's no good.
Also the apu robbed a bank, but I have no proof
Posted on Reply
#200
Vya Domus
apoklyps3nvidia femboys
That's really funny. Finally something worthy of a signature.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 15th, 2024 20:20 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts