Saturday, June 22nd 2024
Legendary Overclocker KINGPIN Leaves EVGA and Joins PNY to Develop Next-Generation GPUs for Extreme OC
Legendary overclocker Vince Lucido, aka KINGPIN, has reportedly partnered with PNY to develop next-generation GPUs for extreme overclocking. KINGPIN, known for his unparalleled expertise in pushing hardware to its limits, revealed the partnership during a recent interview with Gamers Nexus at Computex 2024. The move comes as welcome news to enthusiasts who have been eagerly awaiting KINGPIN's next venture since EVGA's departure left a noticeable gap in the high-end GPU segment. Previously, he was the leading engineer of EVGA's high-end KINGPIN designs aimed at pushing the GPU to its limits. However, since EVGA decided to leave the GPU business, KINGPIN was looking for a new company to work on the next-generation GPU designs.
This time, the company of choice for KINGPIN is now PNY. While he has been in contact with many companies like GALAX and ASUS, he claims that it would be very crowded to work there as there are "too many cooks in the kitchen" with these companies already having in-house overclockers. He has also been talking with MSI, but the company wasn't interested in making GPUs for extreme overclocking. However, PNY has been very interested in shaking up the high-end GPU market. KINGPIN claims that there is a massive hole in the high-end GPU market, and he hopes to fill it with a collaboration with PNY. Next-generation GPU designs assisted by KINGPIN will reportedly arrive for the upcoming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50 series of GPUs when we hope to see the legacy EVGA left to continue at PNY.Below, you can see the full video interview by Gamers Nexus.
This time, the company of choice for KINGPIN is now PNY. While he has been in contact with many companies like GALAX and ASUS, he claims that it would be very crowded to work there as there are "too many cooks in the kitchen" with these companies already having in-house overclockers. He has also been talking with MSI, but the company wasn't interested in making GPUs for extreme overclocking. However, PNY has been very interested in shaking up the high-end GPU market. KINGPIN claims that there is a massive hole in the high-end GPU market, and he hopes to fill it with a collaboration with PNY. Next-generation GPU designs assisted by KINGPIN will reportedly arrive for the upcoming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50 series of GPUs when we hope to see the legacy EVGA left to continue at PNY.Below, you can see the full video interview by Gamers Nexus.
196 Comments on Legendary Overclocker KINGPIN Leaves EVGA and Joins PNY to Develop Next-Generation GPUs for Extreme OC
Other brands like Asus, Gigabyte, and MSI can get profit margins from things like motherboards, monitors, or SSD's.
Anything else is guesswork.
It's just the reality the CEO guy doesn't care anymore. That's all there is to it. It's way easier to point fingers and blame a scapegoat that is hierarchically much higher - yes, paint Nvidia as the devil... I'm waiting on the other AIBs complaining, or at least going bankrupt.
What of their motherboards? Excellent audio cards? PSUs? Peripherals? Come on. It's just not Nvidia's fault. Everyone knows this. They didn't put enough effort, lost ground and were eventually left behind. Maybe Radeon cards are not the wonder that some people on tech forums seem to believe they are and fail to maintain a meager 10% market share. Who would want a Radeon when they don't have a brand bias? They don't offer anything that stands out against the competition.
AMD's own failure to captivate the market and earn the trust of big AIBs cannot be attributed to Nvidia. They realize they have to release better products with a matching feature set. This takes time, and requires correct execution. Give AMD some time, but they'll never really catch up.
I take back my original thoughts on being no place for Kingpin, I quite like the idea of a Kingpin AIO, then later it becomes standardised on other cards.
GN has done several videos on EVGA exiting the business, it is both EVGA not being profitable making graphics cards, and CEO wanting to step down, according to GN the CEO was also tired of dealing with Nvidia.
EVGA did invest in making AMD motherboards, peripherals, and sound cards, although no one seemed to be interested in anything except their gpu's and power supplies. Motherboards were already a niche for them so there isn't much else for EVGA to be profitable on besides power supplies.
Presenting the facts isn't finger pointing, Nvidia is a anti-competitive company which has tight control over all their AIB's down to how they design cards, Kingpin even hints at that in the GN video. And it isn't some coincidence Asus and Gigabyte aren't making any high end AMD cards or that MSI dropped them altogether.
Profit margins for AIB partners were becoming abysmal while Nvidia's profits continued to soar. Ripe ground for resentments to grow.
arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/09/gpu-manufacturer-evga-splits-with-longtime-partner-nvidia-exiting-gpu-market/
If there was a shred of truth about these GPP allegations (really, you AMD guys can NEVER let a grudge go, it's been almost ten years and you are still harping about it), don't you think the FTC, money grubbing lawyers and at this $3.5T valuation, even NGOs wouldn't be rushing to get a check and spread as much negative publicity as possible? Come on.
Their investments failed - each and every one of EVGA's peripheral businesses have failed. Will you tell me that Nvidia is at fault for them to giving up on the NU Audio after the Asahi Kasei fire? Or is Nvidia at fault that they started to pump out junk tier power supplies that relied on their "world-class RMA, sure, our product is junk but if it blows up, we'll cover it!"? Is it Nvidia's fault that they stopped releasing new keyboards and mice after the last few they released received lukewarm at best reviews? That they abandoned most of their former ventures such as their network cards a loong time ago? Sure, just put it all on Uncle Jensen's tab!
Here's the reality outside of the red bubble: no one wants Radeons, especially at the high-end where people are actually willing to spend money on a better product, so why on Earth would any brand spend the R&D to develop a premium board based on an AMD chip unless they are exclusive to AMD? In that case, since you insist on a niche within a niche, Sapphire and TUL got you covered, and I haven't seen a XOC "Atomic" board from them in the past few generations either. TUL at least released those PowerColor Liquid Devil cards, which are probably the closest to a super-high-end AMD design we've had in years.
This might hurt AMD fans' feelings, but the truth is, until AMD itself stops releasing these awful product lineups one after another, nobody will take them seriously. The graph even shows that the market at large cares not one bit for this AMD v. NV squabble, every time AMD released a product that the market wanted, the market share had a direct response.
Is this exclusive to GeForce or does this account for first-party enterprise hardware that did not previously exist as well? That's an extreme caveat to the point that it would completely invalidate the argument otherwise.
I get labeled an NVIDIA fanboy or an EVGA hater all the time when I point out these things that seem rather obvious to me, but I felt EVGA's exit from the market a ton, I really liked their products, especially the NU Audio - homerun of a product, can't imagine my PC without it.
Its one area I am starting to dislike around PC component manufacturers is how they want to pen us into the Console/Apple sort of mentality where they tell us what our hardware can do and go no further. All to please the beancounters so that when people do stupid stuff they may get granted an RMA cause they cant prove they were being stupid. I like the though of how Kingpin is going around GPU boost etc. He realises that for the average consumer its a good thing because it removes a lot of the guess work/crashing of yesteryear. He has also worked out how to work around it to get the most out of a card and what that takes. That means that if/when we get a Kingpin 5090 etc I suspect it may be the fastest or it may actually not be. But the Boost clock it advertises will be something it hits the majority if not all the time vs now where those boost clocks on some of the more extreme cards are hit in "ideal" circumstances.
In regards to AIO/Air cooling he has said that he understands with Air there is real limitations with high wattage cards getting them to clock high, and that just slapping most slots worth of cooler isnt going to get you great gains. Hence him moving to AIOs on his card for the last few gens of products.
EVGA was Nvidia's most ardent partner and Nvidia tossed them aside like trash just like they did BFG and XFX. Like Linus Torvalds said:
A company so terrible to work with that even your partners who signed on to exclusively make products for you decide it isn't worth it anymore.
But sure, despite all the evidence let's just pretend it's everyone else's fault. /s No one is on the forums claiming that AMD cards are wonders. That's a load of nonsense. Typically AMD has lower prices and more VRAM, two very important things for most folks. They do have a good driver interface and a few features Nvidia doesn't have like built in OC and better power management options. Obviously Nvidia has more exclusive features of course but AMD's 10% marketshare isn't proportionate to how competitive their products are. AMD had 19.4% marketshare with Bulldozer CPUs so why is a vastly more competitive RDNA architecture only netting a mere 10% after 3 generations? Software lock-in and mindshare. Trust has nothing to do with as Nvidia has thoroughly demonstrated with the way it treats AIBs. AMD has litteraly been releasing products with a matching feature set, that clearly hasn't worked either. Could they release better products? Yes, RDNA3 for example could have been more power efficient but TBH I believe the software-lock in is more problematic. That doesn't mean it only deserved 10% marketshare though. It's probably why AMD is going after the AI market aside from the huge margins, aside from ROCm making it easier to move to AMD the ecosystem is young and AMD has a change to get in realitively early, hopefully pushing for open source solutions. That's a rather dour prediction. Not sure I'd want to see GPU pricing in a market where AMD never catches up, aside from the obvious impact that could have on innovation. Nvidia has continued to innovate despite being in the lead for awhile but there's no guarante that will continue ad infinitum.
Anyway, regarding EVGA & NVidia, you can rest assured EVGA was losing money or they wouldn't have discontinued the graphics cards.
It is still alive an well, we call it tuning these days, and everyone is doing it.
Some people are better at it than others, it has always been that way.
Or the hard way, watercooling + Dry Ice (which will require shielding components from condensation)