Friday, August 2nd 2024

Intel Extends Warranty by Two Years for 13th and 14th Generation Processors Amid Crashing Concerns

In a statement for Tom's Hardware, Intel has announced a two-year warranty extension for its 13th and 14th Generation Core processors. This decision comes in response to widespread reports of crashes and instability affecting a broad range of models, from high-end flagship chips to mid-range offerings. The extension effectively increases the standard warranty period from three to five years for most boxed processors, with even the limited-edition models seeing an increase from one to three years. This move aims to reassure customers and mitigate concerns about potential long-term damage to affected chips. Intel has identified excessive voltage as the root cause of the problem, which has led to unexpected system crashes and blue screens of death (BSODs), particularly during gaming and other demanding tasks.

The company plans to release a microcode update by mid-August to prevent further degradation in unaffected processors. However, this update will not resolve issues in chips that have already experienced problems, and users with malfunctioning processors will need to seek replacements. The tech giant has faced criticism for its delayed response to the issue, which has plagued users for months. In its statement, Intel also addressed concerns about Via Oxidation, clarifying that while this separate issue was discovered in 2022, it is not the cause of the current instability problems. The company claims to have implemented fixes and enhanced screening procedures for Via Oxidation by early 2023, with affected chips reportedly removed from the supply chain by early 2024.
As investigations for a potential class action lawsuit begin, Intel's warranty extension appears to be a proactive step to maintain customer trust. The company has advised users with OEM systems to contact their manufacturers directly, suggesting similar warranty extensions from system builders may be forthcoming. Below, you can see Intel's statements for Tom's Hardware, on the matter of two-year warranty extension.
Intel is committed to making sure all customers who have or are currently experiencing instability symptoms on their 13th and/or 14th Gen desktop processors are supported in the exchange process. We stand behind our products, and in the coming days we will be sharing more details on two-year extended warranty support for our boxed Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors.

In the meantime, if you are currently or previously experienced instability symptoms on your Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop system:
  • For users who purchased systems from OEM/System Integrators - please reach out to your system manufacturer's support team for further assistance.
  • For users who purchased a boxed CPU - please reach out to Intel Customer Support for further assistance.
Intel is also investigating options to easily identify affected processors on end user systems and will provide additional guidance as soon as possible. At the same time, we apologize for the delay in communications as this has been a challenging issue to unravel and definitively root cause.
Next, Intel also issued a statement for Tom's Hardware regarding the Via Oxidation issue.
The Via Oxidation issue currently reported in the press is a minor one that was addressed with manufacturing improvements and screens in early 2023.

The issue was identified in late 2022, and with the manufacturing improvements and additional screens implemented Intel was able to confirm full removal of impacted processors in our supply chain by early 2024. However, on-shelf inventory may have persisted into early 2024 as a result.

Minor manufacturing issues are an inescapable fact with all silicon products. Intel continuously works with customers to troubleshoot and remediate product failure reports and provides public communications on product issues when the customer risk exceeds Intel quality control thresholds.
Source: Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

70 Comments on Intel Extends Warranty by Two Years for 13th and 14th Generation Processors Amid Crashing Concerns

#51
Dr. Dro
decayoIn 20 years of building PCs, I've always stuck with the lower end of the i7 chips. (6700 for example) This was the first year I decided to go to the i9 series with the 14900k.

What a frigging debacle. I put the PC together in December and was having issues by Jan. I swapped components, I installed new OS instances in new partitions, I poured over log files. The Intel test app came back clean. Despite that, my computer just kept crashing and it got worse over time. Finally, I found a thread discussing the motherboard CPU limits not being properly set for these CPUs and potentially damaging the chips. After struggling through a lot of BIOS config permutations, I decided to say "F it" and I just ordered an I7 (the chip I should have just bought to start with). Swapped it out and it immediately solved my problem.

It was a kind of annoying process that took longer than it should have, but I was able to get the RMA done. I've now got a new i9-14900k in a box and I'm still using the i7. Maybe when they get their shit in order and release this update and folks find it actually works, I'll use this thing in a new storage/VM server. As of now, it kind of feels like wasted money.
You should RMA your 14900K. It's clearly damaged.
Posted on Reply
#52
Ayhamb99
Too late Intel, should have at least started off with this in response to all the reports of the failures instead of just informing via a forum post that they will be issuing a fix at a later time and also refusing to issue a recall.

You had the perfect opportunity to turn this around by showing customer/rma service in good fashion, but noooo you squandered it.
Posted on Reply
#53
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
I can’t help but think some of these “user reports” are done just for the attention. Maybe they aren’t giving the whole story. I run IDT I attach it to the email and I get a new CPU. Iv done this for several, and as an individual not a company or anything. It was always effortless. Its honestly probably one of the best RMA experiences iv ever had short of maybe Evga.
Posted on Reply
#54
tfp
Solaris17I can’t help but think some of these “user reports” are done just for the attention. Maybe they aren’t giving the whole story. I run IDT I attach it to the email and I get a new CPU. Iv done this for several, and as an individual not a company or anything. It was always effortless. Its honestly probably one of the best RMA experiences iv ever had short of maybe Evga.
About a year or two ago I experienced the same with a 9900k that was acting unstable nearing the end of the chips warranty. A buddy of mine bought it for me at his local micro center as I was a few states away from a micro center and I had the job for a few years when it started acting up all I had to do was explain what was going on to Intel support, ship the chip, then get my buddies ok because it was his receipt, and intel sent me a check. Maybe this has changed but if a processor is really unstable I expect they will honor the RMA.
Posted on Reply
#55
Dr. Dro
Solaris17I can’t help but think some of these “user reports” are done just for the attention. Maybe they aren’t giving the whole story. I run IDT I attach it to the email and I get a new CPU. Iv done this for several, and as an individual not a company or anything. It was always effortless. Its honestly probably one of the best RMA experiences iv ever had short of maybe Evga.
Only RMA I've ever done with Intel was of a Pentium G3258 (remember those unlocked Pentiums? lol fun times), the first one I got was a dud, the second one I still have here somewhere. It was about instant, no questions asked. That was almost 10 years ago now...
Posted on Reply
#56
trparky
I had an old 8700K chip that became unstable after about five years of using it. However, I simply chalked it up to how I overclocked the snot out of it. I pushed that chip to 5.4 GHz.
Posted on Reply
#57
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
Funny how they denied warranty now suddenly they change their mind, shame on them for denying it in the first place, hypocrites
Posted on Reply
#58
Dr. Dro
eidairaman1Funny how they denied warranty now suddenly they change their mind, shame on them for denying it in the first place, hypocrites
There is like, one report on Reddit of someone getting their RMA declined. Media picked up on it to blast Intel and AMD fanboys weaponized it. Bit too much to go all guns blazing on this
Posted on Reply
#59
thesmokingman
Dude, whatever Intel is smoking... must be some good stuff. Sure, ya extended the warranty, but... :laugh:

Intel customer bemoans CPU RMA process — furious owner says Intel claims brand new Core i9-14900K chips purchased from Amazon and Micro Center are fake

What good is a warranty if ya just gonna deny it? They just straight resorting to FRAUD.
When the Reddit poster sent clearer photos of the Amazon chip, Intel changed its stance, saying it was indeed a boxed processor. However, the company also noted that it wasn’t confident that the chip would pass muster with its fraud validation, suggesting that jerubedo return the chip to the merchant (Amazon) that sold them the chip instead.

The CPU giant said that jerubedo could push through with the RMA, but Intel threatened to keep the chip if it found it fake.

Intel’s alleged response to the Reddit user’s insistence on the return was: “We do not disclose our investigation practices. If you believe your products are valid and wish to proceed with a return merchandise authorization (RMA), we can create one. However, if the products fail the validation process, the units will be retained and confiscated, and no replacements or refunds will be provided.”
www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-customer-bemoans-cpu-rma-process
Posted on Reply
#60
JustBenching
thesmokingmanDude, whatever Intel is smoking... must be some good stuff. Sure, ya extended the warranty, but... :laugh:



What good is a warranty if ya just gonna deny it? They just straight resorting to FRAUD.



www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-customer-bemoans-cpu-rma-process
They didn't deny it. Read the reddit thread. This time more closely. The problem was the original pictures he took still had paste in them, so the AI recognition couldn't properly read the serial number. The guy then send 2 clear pictures and all is well

Now let's check failure rates from one of the biggest workstation retailers

Posted on Reply
#62
R0H1T
Dr. DroThat was almost 10 years ago now.
Yes when they had billions to burn & burn they did o_O
Posted on Reply
#63
Shtb
64KThis is good news for those that build their own PC but what about the vast majority that buy pre-builts? I think they come with a 1 year manufacturer warranty. So after a year when the PC starts borking where do they go? If they even know about the extended warranty on the CPU
support for our boxed Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors
I don't think pc builders use boxed versions of processors, most likely the vast majority use OEM versions.
Posted on Reply
#64
Dr. Dro
R0H1TYes when they had billions to burn & burn they did o_O
True, but mostly was thinking of how long it's been since then. 3258 was a fun chip, at the time people spoke of Celeron 300A vibes. Shame they didn't release a 3458, the Pentium G3400 series had more cache, and that helped a lot.
Posted on Reply
#65
R0H1T
I had that chip till last year when I sold it at a pawn shop, well for parts but these guys are almost iconic :pimp:

Posted on Reply
#66
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
Would be interesting that how expensive a huge recall/RMA will cost Intel.
Posted on Reply
#67
Dr. Dro
RuruWould be interesting that how expensive a huge recall/RMA will cost Intel.
At the scale of Raptor Lake silicon, my most educated guess would be in the high million to mid billion range. ~$500M to ~$1.25B
Posted on Reply
#68
b1k3rdude
Darmok N JaladNon-retail, OEM (tray) CPUs don’t have the same warranty coverage as retail (boxed) CPUs. For OEM, you go to the OEM, which is not Intel. The OEM manages the claim. This is why OEM chips are cheaper than retail, as the warranty coverage is usually less, or even non-existent. So if you do buy Retail, it’s not a bad idea to keep your original packaging.

So basically, Intel is really only extending the Intel warranty coverage for a small percentage of Raptor Lake owners, Pretty strategic, really, as that’s the portion of the population that’s going to hammer Intel online the hardest.
The price delta between non-retail and retail isnt as big as that though, in the Uk its something like £20-45. And regarding the packaging, I do this because it make selling parts on after the fact so much easier. But for warrant claims, thats what the receipt is for(details are on it), no box/packing is required.

The main issue and a lot of people/biz in this percentage coming down the pipe will have is, CPUs typically have lifespans that number in the 10+ year mark. And unlick you and I, arent aware of the sh*tstorm surrounding the 13/14th gen CPU's. The fact that a corp as large as intel isnt doing right by ALL of thier customers, is just a friendly reminder that intel are and always been a nasty money grabbing outfit with no scruples. And that these corporations dont give a flying f*ck about you as the customer. You as the customer need to be platform and product agnostick, with no brand loyalty.
Posted on Reply
#69
chrcoluk
This is good news and the right decision, I did call for this in a older post.

However they need to be doing something similar for OEM's, as tray processors I believe still have a 1 year warranty? and now boxed has 5 years.

For me, I have never purchased OEM as the price difference has always felt too low for the warranty you lose. Also risky if the retailer is binning out the best OEM chips.
Posted on Reply
#70
pressing on
chrcolukThis is good news and the right decision, I did call for this in a older post.

However they need to be doing something similar for OEM's, as tray processors I believe still have a 1 year warranty? and now boxed has 5 years.

For me, I have never purchased OEM as the price difference has always felt too low for the warranty you lose. Also risky if the retailer is binning out the best OEM chips.
Intel has now extended the warranty for OEM/System Integrator and Tray processors by two years as well.

This is what the Intel warranty page says

"...Starting with the 12th Generation Intel® Desktop tray processors, Intel’s limited warranty to direct customers (OEMs, and Intel authorized distributors) is extended to three years. The warranty is provided at your place of purchase. The three-year limited warranty does not apply to previous generations of the Desktop Intel Processors.

For resellers, integrators, and end users, the warranty is provided at your place of purchase."
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 10:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts