Tuesday, November 26th 2024

Rumor: Ubisoft Wants Valve To Disable Steam Player Count API Fuelling SteamDB

Steam is highly valued by many gamers, not only for being a fairly inexpensive, easy way to buy and manage games, but also because it provides statistics on player count and play times, via tools like SteamDB, which are a neat way for gamers to see how the community is participating in games before buying them. According to a post on the FandomPulse Substack, however, Ubisoft has taken issue with Valve's player statistics.

The Substack post quotes Ubisoft insiders who claim that the game developer and "other companies" want Valve to disable or restrict the APIs used by tools like SteamDB and Steam Charts as a direct response to the disappointing performance of Star Wars Outlaws. This news also comes ahead of the early 2025 launch of Assassin's Creed Shadows, which has already caused significant apprehension as a result of game previews. The claims also mention that Ubisoft seeks to control the narrative of its games and potentially present a rosier image to its investors. If Ubisoft has its way, the gaming industry would lose even more transparency, since tools like SteamDB are often used by game journalists to evaluate the popularity and commercial success of games.
"Ubisoft and other companies want to pressure Steam to stop the tracker from giving out info they want to keep to themselves... They want to be able to present findings to investors so they can make it sound good."
It should be noted that, while this sort of behavior would not be surprising from a large corporation in the modern gaming landscape, the claims are also unverified, putting this squarely in rumor territory.

According to SteamDB, Star Wars Outlaws only managed to sell around 45,000 units on the PC platform, and other sources say that it only managed to sell around 1 million copies in its first month, falling well short of the profitability mark for a AAA game.
Sources: FandomPulse Substack, Star Wars News Net
Add your own comment

57 Comments on Rumor: Ubisoft Wants Valve To Disable Steam Player Count API Fuelling SteamDB

#26
Timbaloo
Space Lynxmaybe they could make a good game to get higher numbers...
Realistic suggestions only, please ;)
Posted on Reply
#27
Space Lynx
Astronaut
csendesmarkNothing wrong with their products, it is the gamers whom want too much :roll:

That is a good incentive to motivate one to make good games!

yes

That is the last game I have from them, AC4 Black Flag is awesome!!
well EA made some great star wars games recently, like Jedi Survivors, if you actually watch videos of Outlaws though, it is really badly designed... so I have both EA Jedi games in my steam library, but not giving my money to Outlaws... so again... make better games

Posted on Reply
#28
Konomi
Time for Valve to double down and provide access to yet more data. They probably have a ton that could be interesting that hasn't been shared yet.
Posted on Reply
#29
Athlonite
LOL Ubisoft sound a little butt hurt that their crappy game isn't doing very well and would not like others to know it too

Well Ubisoft the cure to that is to not make crappy games.

I really hope that Valve/Steam give Ubi the giant middle finger
Posted on Reply
#30
csendesmark
Space Lynxwell EA made some great star wars games recently
Well, LucasArts did much better games when they care
Never even care to try ea's Star Wars games...
Jedi Outcast and Jedi Academy are legendary, nothing compares to those from the current games .
Wish if been redone with modern game-engine with love and care, just like Black Mesa been made with Half-Life
AthloniteLOL Ubisoft sound a little butt hurt that their crappy game isn't doing very well and would not like others to know it too
Obviously they think they are entitled to our money.
Posted on Reply
#31
Space Lynx
Astronaut
csendesmarkJedi Outcast and Jedi Academy are legendary
I agree with this, but Jedi Survivor that came out before OUtlaws had one of the best boss battles I have ever experienced, it literally had me standing up screaming it was so damn good. I was playing on hard difficulty and just nailing it, was frenzy action at it's finest, but mind trippy at the same time.
Posted on Reply
#32
Bwaze
"The Substack post quotes Ubisoft insiders who claim that the game developer and "other companies" want Valve to disable or restrict the APIs used by tools like SteamDB and Steam Charts as a direct response to the disappointing performance of Star Wars Outlaws. "

The whole entertainment industry is trying very hard to control the narrative, reviews etc.

Movie and TV industry on streaming largely doesn't publish their viewership numbers, at least not in a way they could be verified. And the independent viewership estimates are now frowned upon and questioned. The same is with review sites like imdb and Rotten Tomatoes, whatever the reasons for editing or deletions of negative reviews are.

So I think gaming industry won't be the exception here, and publishers will sooner or later achieve their goal of controlling the information on how successful something is or isn't.
Posted on Reply
#33
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Bwaze"The Substack post quotes Ubisoft insiders who claim that the game developer and "other companies" want Valve to disable or restrict the APIs used by tools like SteamDB and Steam Charts as a direct response to the disappointing performance of Star Wars Outlaws. "

The whole entertainment industry is trying very hard to control the narrative, reviews etc. movie and TV industry on streaming largely doesn't publish their viewership numbers, at least not in a way they could be verified. And the independent viewership estimates are now frowned upon and questioned. The same is with review sites like imdb and Rotten Tomatoes, whatever the reasons for editing or deletions of negative reviews are.

So I think gaming industry won't be the exception here, and publishers will sooner or later achieve their goal of controlling the information on how successful something is or isn't.
The only thing I wish Steam would do differently is unite everyone again, bring epic games, all the other launchers into a meeting, say steam will drop everything from 30% fees to 15% fees for 12 year contract, in exchange, they close their launchers and bring all the games over and make it easy transition for gamers to get those games on steam -



UNITE THE CLANS!
Posted on Reply
#34
Gigaherz
Space Lynxsay steam will drop everything from 30% fees to 15% fees for 12 year contract, in exchange, they close their launchers and bring all the games over and make it easy transition for gamers to get those games on
And what is the benefit for say... Epic in that ?

"Yo Buddy close your business, so I can sell your inventory at my store to your former customer base"
Posted on Reply
#35
Space Lynx
Astronaut
GigaherzAnd what is the benefit for say... Epic in that ?

"Yo Buddy close your business, so I can sell your inventory at my store to your former customer base"
more sales, because steam as a store is an actual behemoth and has customer loyalty like never before seen in the history of marketing/business

edit: on second thought, it's probably a good idea if this never happens though because it might make Steam a monopoly, so yeah that would not be good as government would try to break it up, as government is trying to make google sell chrome right now
Posted on Reply
#36
Gigaherz
Space Lynxhas customer loyalty like never before seen in the history of marketing/business
Sure buddy...

Yes gog will certainly give up its no-drm principles just so their already available at steam games get "higher" sales. And Epic for sure will give up their entire revenue and Market power + experience with the unreal asset platform so that they can have the 8 games they made in the last 10 years on steam. Opposed to having exclusive deals with hundres of developers...

This doesnt even hypothetically make sense
Posted on Reply
#37
persondb
Cpt.JankThe claims also mention that Ubisoft seeks to control the narrative of its games and potentially present a rosier image to its investors
This has a name. It's called fraud.

I kinda doubt that Ubisoft actually wants to commit fraud.
Posted on Reply
#38
Space Lynx
Astronaut
GigaherzSure buddy...

Yes gog will certainly give up its no-drm principles just so their already available at steam games get "higher" sales. And Epic for sure will give up their entire revenue and Market power + experience with the unreal asset platform so that they can have the 8 games they made in the last 10 years on steam. Opposed to having exclusive deals with hundres of developers...

This doesnt even hypothetically make sense
it might make sense someday, when their fortnite money runs out, but we do live in idiocracy now and people spend money on outfits in games, so eh... maybe I am wrong indeed

and I wouldn't include GoG in this, I do understand their principle is different from all the others
Posted on Reply
#39
Bwaze
persondbThis has a name. It's called fraud.

I kinda doubt that Ubisoft actually wants to commit fraud.
Nah, it's called advertising. Does it bend the numbers and actually go against the reality? Sure, but that's what it is made for!

The whole entertainment industry is doing it. Amazon has the most expensive TV show on earth, allegedly, with most viewers ever, allegedly. Independent viewership estimates put "The Boys" in front of "Rings of Power", with tenth of it's budget. And what did Amazon say? "Our internal numbers don't reflect that". And suddenly there were bunch of articles on how Nielsen Ratings and other independent viewership estimates are dinosaurs from the cable TV times and unfit to measure modern viewers.
Posted on Reply
#40
Space Lynx
Astronaut
persondbThis has a name. It's called fraud.

I kinda doubt that Ubisoft actually wants to commit fraud.
I am not sure laws exist for companies or rich people in America anymore anyway, and they know it.
Posted on Reply
#41
Totally
Jermelescu

A tale as old as time.
Yep 'If your enemy is making a mistake do not correct them" -- Sun Tzu
persondbThis has a name. It's called fraud.

I kinda doubt that Ubisoft actually wants to commit fraud.
Not really as long as they aren't blatantly lying it isn't necessarily fraud. The data being readily available just limits how much the can bend the truth.
Posted on Reply
#42
neatfeatguy
Too bad Disney tossed Star Wars 1313 to the side when they acquired the IP. I thought that one looked promising.
Posted on Reply
#43
LittleBro
Greedy microtransaction king known by name Ubisoft has been undergoing some quality problems for last couple of years. Not all people are sheep, dear Ubisoft. Some even think about what they pay for. I still can't forgive them for Far Cry 6 or Ghost Recon Breakpoint. After great predecessors they managed to f**k up the series for good. Serves them right. Never buying anything from Ubisoft again.
Space LynxThe only thing I wish Steam would do differently is unite everyone again, bring epic games, all the other launchers into a meeting, say steam will drop everything from 30% fees to 15% fees for 12 year contract, in exchange, they close their launchers and bring all the games over and make it easy transition for gamers to get those games on steam -
It's not about bringing Epic games back. It's Epic who decided to part ways, not Steam. And with free games and lower fees it still can't really compete with Steam. Even though I'd surely be happy to pay less for games (pay less fees to Valve when purchasing game on Steam) I'm actually perfectly fine with 30% fees. What many people don't understand is what is beyond Steam. Steam has huuuuuuuge CDN. And they have been actually keeping quality around the same level for years. When you look at other launchers ... Ubisoft launcher or similar ... it can't really compete with steam, I mean just look at it. It's so ... slow, glitchy, not intuitive.

Do you recall time when every game developer cried at Steam and wanted to create their own platform (launcher)? EA moved out of Steam, Ubisoft, Bethesda, Blizzard, Epic did. They even stopped selling their games through Steam. After some time they reconsidered and started selling games on Steam again. They finally realized cost of platform popularity and CDN importance. Well, It's nice to have more places where your goods get sold, right?

Btw, does any other launcher than Steam have voice chat implemented that can work for hours? I don't give a damn about having voice chat in games, I want to have it on OS level and don't want to install additional stuff (Team Speak, Ventrilo, ...).

Kudos to Valve for supporting Linux and teaming up with Archlinux developers!
Unfortunately, when it comes to games, GabeN can't count to three ... :-(
Posted on Reply
#44
GodisanAtheist
Jermelescu

A tale as old as time.
- That's called "offering something no one else can" and is fundamental to the breakout success of a business.
Posted on Reply
#45
kapone32
Ubisoft is so out of touch. That stupid MBA business philosophy is not congruent with PC Gaming. We don't want less as Gamers.
neatfeatguyToo bad Disney tossed Star Wars 1313 to the side when they acquired the IP. I thought that one looked promising.
Marvel Super Heroes was also very sad.
Posted on Reply
#46
persondb
TotallyNot really as long as they aren't blatantly lying it isn't necessarily fraud. The data being readily available just limits how much the can bend the truth.
Misleading can be defrauding, specially when the only information is coming out of your company.

If there is information elsewhere and your company presents a rosier picture then it's up to the investor due diligence to see through it. If the only information is only through your company then you can't mislead people.

It's not necessary to outright lie.
Posted on Reply
#47
lexluthermiester
Cpt.JankIf Ubisoft has its way, the gaming industry would lose even more transparency, since tools like SteamDB are often used by game journalists to evaluate the popularity and commercial success of games.
And this is because they don't want the public to know just how terrible they are. What a garbage company..
Posted on Reply
#48
like.a.cactus
I'm more willing to lose ubisoft and EA over SteamDB tbh.

I love Ubisoft games, but I don't love Ubisoft. Every game that I love is something they purchased (and ruined) from another Dev. And not something they created by themselves.

Or maybe something they created so many years ago, is not the same company anymore.
Posted on Reply
#49
Darmok N Jalad
What I would love to see is being able to buy a game on someone else’s platform and not have to create an EA or Ubisoft account just to play it. I was super annoyed when I bought my daughter a Just Dance game on Switch and had to create a Ubi account. That’s some next level BS for a single player game. I’m sure they just want to sell more copies and call it “crossplay.”
Posted on Reply
#50
trsttte
Space Lynxmaybe they could make a good game to get higher numbers...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 19th, 2025 03:06 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts