Monday, January 6th 2025

AMD Debuts Radeon RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 Powered by RDNA 4, and FSR 4

AMD at the 2025 International CES announced the Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9070 desktop performance-segment graphics cards. These will be the face of AMD's next generation of gaming graphics products, and will be powered by the new RDNA 4 graphics architecture. AMD hopes to launch both cards within Q1 2025. AMD changed the nomenclature of its gaming GPUs mainly because it has made a tactical retreat from the enthusiast graphics segment, its fastest products will compete in the performance segment. From the way AMD arranged the Radeon RX 9070 series and 9060 series product stack against the backdrop of the Radeon RX 7000 series, the GeForce RTX 4000 series, and the anticipated GeForce RTX 5000 series, the RX 9070 XT will offer performance roughly similar to the Radeon RX 7900 XT in raster, with the RX 9070 being slightly faster than the RX 7800 XT. The RX 9060 XT will beat the RX 7700 XT, while the RX 9060 beats the RX 7600 XT.

With RDNA 4, AMD claims generational SIMD performance increase on the RDNA 4 compute units. The 2nd Gen AI accelerators will boast of generational performance increase, and AMD will debut a locally-accelerated generative AI application down the line, called the AMD Adrenalin AI, which can generate images, summarize documents, and perform some linguistic/grammar tasks (rewriting), and serve as a chatbot for answering AMD-related queries. This is basically AMD's answer to NVIDIA Chat RTX. AMD's 3rd Gen Ray accelerator is expected to reduce the performance cost of ray tracing, by putting more of the ray tracing workload through dedicated hardware, offloading the SIMD engine. Lastly, AMD is expected to significantly upgrade the media acceleration and display I/O of its GPUs.
AMD also announced FidelityFX Super Resolution 4 (FSR 4), which has been developed for RDNA 4 (not sure if it will work on older generations of Radeon). It introduces a new machine learning (ML) based upscaling component to handle Super Resolution. This will be paired with Frame Generation, and an updated Anti-Lag 2, to make up the FSR 4 feature-set. Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 is confirmed to be one of the first titles to utilize FSR 4.
Nearly all AMD add-in board partners (AIBs) are ready with Radeon 9070 series graphics cards, including Acer, ASRock, ASUS, GIGABYTE, Sapphire, PowerColor, XFX, Vastarmor, and Yeston. MSI seems to have discontinued being an AMD AIB.

We also got our first peek at what the "Navi 48" GPU powering the Radeon RX 9070 series looks like—it features an unusual rectangular die with a 2:1 aspect ratio, which seems to lend plausibility to the popular theory that the "Navi 48" is two "Navi 44" dies joined at the hip with full cache-coherency. The GPU is rumored to feature a 256-bit GDDR6 memory interface, and 64 compute units (4,096 stream processors). The "Navi 44," on the other hand, is exactly half of this (128-bit GDDR6, 32 CU). AMD is building the "Navi 48" and "Navi 44" on the TSMC N4P (4 nm EUV) foundry node, on which it is building pretty much its entire current-generation, from mobile processors, to CPU chiplets.
Add your own comment

318 Comments on AMD Debuts Radeon RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 Powered by RDNA 4, and FSR 4

#26
oxrufiioxo
RedelZaVednoIt's 2025 and 7900XT is selling for 670€ atm and it has more vram. $599 MSRP would be DOA.
But that is exactly what they did with the 7000 series released them against cheaper and better Price to performance 6000 series cards.
SteevoIs that how you expect Nvidia and Intel to price their cards?

If it has 7900XT render performance and 4080 RT performance for $799 it should sell like hotcakes. I keep seeing people with this class of hardware crying about their not being a enthusiast level card, I don't consider my 7900XTX enthusiast, AMD hasn't made a high end competitor for two generations already and the sales of actual graphics hardware is consolidating into 9060/7900GRE/4070/4060 area unless you are talking about integrated and if they really come through on that front they just nailed it.
While I do think 800 is unlikely... 5-600 usd seems plausible if the 5070 is 600-700 usd... 5070 only needs to be 15-20% faster than the 4070 super to be ballpark 7900XT raster and it's already faster in RT.
Posted on Reply
#27
Soul_
No price, no presentation. They are waiting for nvidia and then price it based on it. So this is going to be another badly priced gen for AMD then.
Posted on Reply
#28
RedelZaVedno
rlifeh
RDNA4 probably sucks, that's why Lisa didn't bother coming on stage.
Posted on Reply
#29
Krit
RedelZaVednoIt's 2025 and 7900XT is selling for 670€ atm and it has more vram. Priced at $599 MSRP, 9070XT would be DOA. AMD is sadly not Nvidia.
499$-549$ no more.
Posted on Reply
#30
RedelZaVedno
Soul_No price, no presentation. They are waiting for nvidia and then price it based on it. So this is going to be another badly priced gen for AMD then.
Yeah, 50 bucks less than 5070 if it's on pair with it, or 50 bucks less than 5070 TI if it competes with TI. Nothing that would make 9070XT worth buying over Ngredia I'm afraid :banghead:
Posted on Reply
#31
phubar
SteevoIs that how you expect Nvidia and Intel to price their cards?
If AMD wants market share they have to price accordingly at this point.
SteevoIf it has 7900XT render performance and 4080 RT performance for $799 it should sell like hotcakes.
RT perf won't be that good. And at $800 vs 5070 or 5060 it'll sell like crap. 7900xt already sells poorly vs 4070/Ti at $650-700 right now. Maybe 4070Ti levels of performance has been rumored with fair consistency. This would be a nice step up over the 7900xt's RT performance but nothing game changing.

If FSR4 works well and gets wider support that would be a bigger deal IMO.
SteevoI don't consider my 7900XTX enthusiast,
LOL wut?? A 7900xtx performs like a 4080 on pure raster. Its on RT it lags (performs like a 3090/Ti there). That is definitely a high end competitor. Biggest issue with it IMO in the market is that NV's DLSS has wide spread and better support at this point.
Posted on Reply
#32
Scotter008
Where does this information come from? Any actual images showcasing this? Would be extremely interesting if true.
We also got our first peek at what the "Navi 48" GPU powering the Radeon RX 9070 series looks like—it features an unusual rectangular die with a 2:1 aspect ratio, which seems to lend plausibility to the popular theory that the "Navi 48" is two "Navi 44" dies joined at the hip with full cache-coherency.
Posted on Reply
#33
oxrufiioxo
Soul_No price, no presentation. They are waiting for nvidia and then price it based on it. So this is going to be another badly priced gen for AMD then.
It's 2025 man it's not about who is the best priced anymore it's all about who is the least terribly priced for what it offers.....

Posted on Reply
#36
AusWolf
3valatzyIt will have small versions:



The only small version here is the 9070 non-XT MBA. Although, this isn't an exhaustive list, so I'm still hoping.
Posted on Reply
#37
tussinman
"RX 9070 being slightly faster than the RX 7800 XT. The RX 9060 XT will beat the RX 7700 XT, while the RX 9060 beats the RX 7600 XT"

9070 could be okay at $400 but $450-500 might be pushing it.

9060XT if they keep the $330ish price would be a way better value than the 7600XT

9060 beating the 7600XT is a given since the 7600XT was a joke (it was slower than the 6700 non XT and 3060Ti).
Posted on Reply
#38
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
SteevoIs that how you expect Nvidia and Intel to price their cards?

If it has 7900XT render performance and 4080 RT performance for $799 it should sell like hotcakes. I keep seeing people with this class of hardware crying about their not being a enthusiast level card, I don't consider my 7900XTX enthusiast, AMD hasn't made a high end competitor for two generations already and the sales of actual graphics hardware is consolidating into 9060/7900GRE/4070/4060 area unless you are talking about integrated and if they really come through on that front they just nailed it.
100% of the performance for 100% of the price for next gen leap sounds like good corporate logic.
Posted on Reply
#39
oxrufiioxo


First thing that popped in my head......
Posted on Reply
#40
NoneRain
They didn't even talk about it in the keynode... damn
Posted on Reply
#41
remekra
It seems RTG exists now only to provide GPU part to their APU. 1600$ RTX 5080 coming soon in few hours.
As a 7900XTX owner it's a damn shame.
Even more so if FSR4 is only for RDNA4. Guess those "AI Accelerators" in RDNA3 are for nothing gaming wise.

Edit
Sorry it also exist for Instinct Enterprise GPUs
Posted on Reply
#42
BlaezaLite
phubarLOL wut?? A 7900xtx performs like a 4080 on pure raster. Its on RT it lags (performs like a 3090/Ti there). That is definitely a high end competitor. Biggest issue with it IMO in the market is that NV's DLSS has wide spread and better support at this point.
It's faster according to TPU GPU database. Was looking at 4080's after the debacle lol
Posted on Reply
#43
Daven
Well RDNA4 is obviously not ready yet. That’s about all one can read into any of this.
Posted on Reply
#44
k0vasz
seems solid cards, but these will be on-par with the low-end RTX50xx cards only. and judging by the recent pricing, these will be just a tad cheaper than the matching nvidia counterparts

the real interesting cards will be coming with UDNA... but that's still at least a year away
Posted on Reply
#45
Soul_
The biggest point I found interesting is, lack of confidence and lack of importance to consumer GPU division.
Posted on Reply
#46
3valatzy
NoneRainThey didn't even talk about it in the keynode... damn
Well, I think it's a good approach actually.
To allow Gamers Nexus and the like to do the marketing instead of themselves.
Might get more positive reviews later...
DavenWell RDNA4 is obviously not ready yet. That’s about all one can read into any of this.
I am afraid it will never be ready for what AMD expects from it. A low-end chip to jump over itself and behave like a CheatForce RTX 4080. Not going to happen.
The only thing which can save AMD now is to use Navi 48 as a revolution in the low-end, where actually the masses of average joes happily lurk around...
Soul_The biggest point I found interesting is, lack of confidence and lack of importance to consumer GPU division.
Posted on Reply
#47
Onasi
This announcement is pointless without concrete info on availability and pricing. They essentially just confirmed that the card that we knew was coming indeed will be coming and have performance levels that already were expected and discussed to death for month. Classic AMD marketing self-inflicted wound. Jesus fucking Christ.
Posted on Reply
#48
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
RedelZaVednoIt's 2025 and 7900XT is selling for 670€ atm and it has more vram. Priced at $599 MSRP, 9070XT would be DOA. AMD is sadly not Nvidia.
Yeah, 670 EUR (or $700) are sale prices unfortunately (which I like of course), but AMD still officially had the MSRP for it around $750 until now:


I'm not sure why you think $600 would be considered DOA since the direct performance rival of the RX 7900 XT (the RTX 4070 Ti Super) is pushing $800. $600 would be a competitive price.
Posted on Reply
#49
Bomby569
and this is why they will fail miserably as always, nvidia it's all yours
Posted on Reply
#50
Kaleid
Let's not call things low end, most gamers on Steam are still on 1080p. If people had 7800xt levels of performance as a norm games would be optimized to look a lot better.

It's absurd for Nvidia to try to normalize massive price increases, this must be resisted
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 8th, 2025 21:03 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts