Wednesday, September 21st 2022

EVGA Announces Cancelation of NVIDIA Next-gen Graphics Cards Plans, Officially Terminates NVIDIA Partnership

Towards the latter half of August, multiple EVGA employees involved in technical marketing and engineering had let us know privately that they were leaving the company for other ventures. When pushed further, several hinted towards some decisions being made by EVGA's management, including CEO Andrew Han, that would jeopardize their future. Some even went far enough to say they would share more in a few weeks time about how they felt exactly about their time there, the various issues that kept them from doing their best, and also that at least a couple of ex-employees were let go. TechPowerUp was doing due diligence in collecting the facts while keeping emotions aside from contacts who were understandably not in the best of moods, and one thing common across the board was there was something major coming up dealing with the EVGA GPU product line.

Today EVGA decided to throw a massive curve ball by formally announcing the company is canceling its plans to carry the next generation of graphics cards. Given EVGA's revenue sheets point to nearly 80% contribution from being an NVIDIA add-in card partner, this effectively also means an end to a long partnership with NVIDIA. The company's CEO confirmed as much to a few media channels citing poor margins and a challenging, stressful relationship that was no longer fruitful. There are no plans for EVGA to partner with AMD or Intel at this time when it comes to graphics cards and the company stressed they will continue to sell and support current-gen GPUs having retained enough units for RMA purposes too.
Jon Peddie Research also speculates EVGA is going to shift its priorities towards power supplies and motherboards instead that allow for higher margins and a more uniform, predictable sales pattern. Time will tell how EVGA, and indeed NVIDIA too who now has to re-distribute its GPU allocation among other partners and retail solutions, will come out of this split. It certainly does not seem to be an amicable one and we do not expect the partnership to resume anytime soon. This also affects companies who were no doubt planning on accessories for EVGA-branded GPUs, such as custom watercooling blocks from the usual suspects such as EKWB, Alphacool, and Bitspower.
What About Existing Customers
All existing owners of EVGA graphics cards will remain fully covered by warranties, including full replacements if needed. The company has withheld inventory of EVGA graphics cards from retailers (and will probably recall some perfectly-functional cards), so it has buffer stock to serve existing customers in need of total replacements or RMA.

What EVGA's Future Looks Like
EVGA CEO Andrew Han stated that the company has no plans as of now to partner with another GPU manufacturer like AMD or Intel, and the exit from the graphics card business will trigger an "imminent downsizing" of the company (to shed employees associated with the graphics card business). This could also be a subtle hint to AMD and Intel that if they're looking to work with EVGA, they should express interest right now.

Graphics cards made up over three-quarters of EVGA's revenue, and so we're not sure what the company could do next. If one were to speculate, the company could increase its presence in the prebuilt notebook and gaming peripherals businesses, and probably even ride the growth-cycle in the power-supply market with ATX 3.0 and PCIe Gen 5. Next-generation high-end graphics cards are expected to trigger upgrades among those with PSUs 4 years or older, as older PSUs, particularly mainstream ones, will find it hard to deal with the power excursions (spikes) of high-end PCIe Gen 5 graphics cards. The company could also retain its PCB engineering team to further develop its motherboard business. But all these are just speculation. Unless EVGA significantly invests in its other businesses, it's done.

How does this affect NVIDIA in the North American market?
EVGA was particularly popular in the North American market, among DIY PC enthusiasts. Other NVIDIA partners such as ASUS, could attempt to fill its void, but the distinct industrial design of EVGA will be lost, as would features such as iCX; and EVGA-exclusive customer programs such as trade-in upgrades. NVIDIA may also attempt to bring in new partners to the North American market to fill EVGA's void, such as GALAX (Galaxy), or Colorful, which are both major graphics card OEMs in the Chinese market. It will now fall on them to match the design and quality standards EVGA established. EVGA's exit will have minimal impact on NVIDIA's bottom-line, as those in the market for a GeForce graphics card will ultimately buy one from whichever brand.

NVIDIA's first reaction to this development is as follows:
"We've had a great partnership with EVGA over the years and will continue to support them on our current generation of products. We wish Andrew and our friends at EVGA all the best."
EVGA's full statement is as follows:
EVGA CEO Andrew HanEVGA has terminated its relationship with NVIDIA. EVGA will no longer be manufacturing video cards of any type, citing a souring relationship with NVIDIA as the cause (among other reasons that were minimized). EVGA will not be exploring relationships with AMD or Intel at this time, and the company will be downsizing imminently as it exits the video card market. Customers will still be covered by EVGA policies, but EVGA will no longer make RTX or other video cards. The company already made, 20 EVT samples of EVGA RTX 4090 FTW3 cards, but will not be moving to production and has killed all active projects pertaining to cards, including KINGPIN cards.
According to JPR, EVGA was the best-selling NVIDIA AIB in the US market, with a market-share of nearly 40%. NVIDIA would have lead its board partners to take its place.

Update Sep 21st: KINGPIN, a long time associate of EVGA, behind some of their fastest boutique graphics cards and motherboards, posted a note of gratitude for all the fans of EVGA + KINGPIN, and stated that KINGPIN Hardware may continue in some form.
I'm thankful for all the industry friends, old colleagues, etc. that reached out. It means a lot and I appreciate it. The news isn't received well ofc, and I'm mostly sorry for the fans and people that are passionate for our brand and everything that we have done here over the years at EVGA. If the KP hardware is meant to continue on in one way or another, I'm sure that it will :). The EVGA and PC hardware enthusiast community have been great to me and my teams here over the years, THANK YOU.
Update Sep 21st: Jensen Huang responded to a question about his thoughts on EVGA in a Q&A session today:
Jensen HuangYou know, Andrew (EVGA CEO) wanted to wind down the business, and he's wanted to do that for a couple of years. Andrew and EVGA were, are great partners and we're great partners, and I'm sad to see them leave the market. But, he's got other plans and he's been thinking about it for several years, so I guess that's about it. The market has a lot of great players and it will be served well after EVGA, but I'll always miss them, they were an important part of our history, Andrew is a great friend. I think that it was just time for him to go do something else."
Sources: Jon Peddie Research, Gamers Nexus, EVGA, Tae Kim (Twitter)
Add your own comment

536 Comments on EVGA Announces Cancelation of NVIDIA Next-gen Graphics Cards Plans, Officially Terminates NVIDIA Partnership

#101
Zubasa
phanbueyit looks like nvidia is adopting the very same model 3dfx had when they beat them through using board partners...

I think it's quite a stupid move.
The difference is nVidia can afford to do as they please, pretty much.
In the end of the day people just goes and buys other brands of Geforce cards, no lost to Jensen.
Posted on Reply
#102
thesmokingman
ZubasaThe difference is nVidia can afford to do as they please, pretty much.
In the end of the day people just goes and buys other brands of Geforce cards, no lost to Jensen.
That's the kind of thinking that led to this lmao.
Posted on Reply
#103
R0H1T
ZubasaThe difference is nVidia can afford to do as they please, pretty much.
In the end of the day people just goes and buys other brands of Geforce cards, no lost to Jensen.
Here's the thing ~ they can't, this is assuming Intel continues with their GPU sojourn. Intel, AMD both have DC offerings that can match/beat Nivida in some tasks & Grace is a big unknown right now. The way things stand right now, with the growth of Intel & especially AMD's DC GPU business, Nvidia is highly vulnerable! You've seen this with their stock price & revenues. It can get real ugly real fast for Nvidia ~ JHH should remember that, especially given how Nvidia treats its customers & partners!
Posted on Reply
#104
maxfly
Such a sad, sad day.
I personally wrote ngreedia cards off completely after all of the shit leather jacket boy pulled over the last several years. But to see EVGA end their GPU run? It's hard to believe.
Posted on Reply
#105
thesmokingman
R0H1THere's the thing ~ they can't, this is assuming Intel continues with their GPU sojourn. Intel, AMD both have DC offerings that can match/beat Nivida in some tasks & Grace is a big unknown right now. The way things stand right now, with the growth of Intel & especially AMD's DC GPU business, Nvidia is highly vulnerable! You've seen this with their stock price & revenues. It can get real ugly real fast for Nvidia ~ JHH should remember that, especially given how Nvidia treats its customers & partners!
Yeap, NV is in serious straits. Their revenue just took a massive hit ala with the bitcoin pullback. And now with Ether's new build, gpu mining is going to take a big hit moving forward. And now with one of their if biggest OEM's just flatly drops them. This is such a huge blemish. Wait to Wallstreet catches whiff of this. And then there's the matter of missing projections by gargantuan proportions, a miss of $1.4B.

I hope NV doesn't catch what Intel's got. Also, let's not forget who is who here...

arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/05/sec-fines-nvidia-5-5m-for-misleading-investors-about-gpu-sales-to-crypto-miners/
Posted on Reply
#106
Patriot
HxxDoes a vendor know /care who they’re selling to? Money is money no matter from who and all vendors can do is place some hurdles but miners could easily overcome those
I would imagine product registration vs sales might give an indication but that's rough. Nvidia has a much better idea. Sales vs driver downloads. Having worked for an Nvidia partner in the past... Nvidia lies, steals, and treats all partners as expendable.
Posted on Reply
#107
The Von Matrices
Chrispy_80% of their REVENUE made one third of their profit.

Do the math; That's pretty damning against Nvidia.
I would have pointed this out if you hadn't.

Too may people are used to the Silicon Valley business model where a company tries to get as many customers (and revenue) as quickly as possible, losing tons of money, with the hopes of finding some magical way in the future to turn that into a profit. That's not a business; that's a charity.

It takes courage to kill a business that has lots of revenue but isn't making a profit. It's the right business move.
Posted on Reply
#108
RandallFlagg
thesmokingmanYeap, NV is in serious straits. Their revenue just took a massive hit ala with the bitcoin pullback. And now with Ether's new build, gpu mining is going to take a big hit moving forward. And now with one of their if biggest OEM's just flatly drops them. This is such a huge blemish. Wait to Wallstreet catches whiff of this. And then there's the matter of missing projections by gargantuan proportions, a miss of $1.4B.

I hope NV doesn't catch what Intel's got. Also, let's not forget who is who here...

arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/05/sec-fines-nvidia-5-5m-for-misleading-investors-about-gpu-sales-to-crypto-miners/
Well, that $5M to the SEC is nothing.

They didn't admit fault, but if one shareholder wins in court, Nvidia could quickly become a zombie corp. I have always preferred their hardware, but no pity from me. Failure to disclose their exposure to crypto on SEC filings, misleading investors, yeah Jensen might be jumping out of a tall building soon if it unravels that way.

A corp can kill 1000 people with a defective product and the execs walk off, but fail to disclose things on your SEC filings and an exec can be personally held liable for it in civil court (failure of fiducial responsibility). Sorta like Al Capone getting nabbed by the IRS.

Edit: But, lets be real. Nvidia is still a massively profitable company, even with the recent decline in earnings (they made 620M profit in that 'horrible' quarter).
Posted on Reply
#109
evernessince
I've been purchasing EVGA cards for a long time now. Not sure there is any other AIB that's up to their level customer service wise.

If Nvidia wants to kick out it's partners I'm not sure I want a part of that. Their RMA experience is truly awful, somehow makes Gigabyte look godly. I won't touch anything warrantied directly by Nvidia, at least on the consumer side.
Posted on Reply
#110
thesmokingman
RandallFlaggWell, that $5M to the SEC is nothing.

They didn't admit fault, but if one shareholder wins in court, Nvidia could quickly become a zombie corp. I have always preferred their hardware, but no pity from me. Failure to disclose their exposure to crypto on SEC filings, misleading investors, yeah Jensen might be jumping out of a tall building soon if it unravels that way.

A corp can kill 1000 people with a defective product and the execs walk off, but fail to disclose things on your SEC filings and an exec can be personally held liable for it in civil court (failure of fiducial responsibility). Sorta like Al Capone getting nabbed by the IRS.

Edit: But, lets be real. Nvidia is still a massively profitable company, even with the recent decline in earnings (they made 620M profit in that 'horrible' quarter).
The fines to tech companies is peanuts to them. This is widely known, and was talked about a LOT in Zatcko's testimony in Congress. They be looking to put multipliers on their tech fines it seems. I don't want to get into what-ifs with other possible actions. They are still a profitable company no doubt, but a $1.4B miss is ocean sized fail. They've lost a major partner, the sun may be setting on gpu mining as we knew it, so they will be hard pressed to compensate for that massive whole. Also, they are losing their grasp on machine learning, first it was Tesla dropping them, now...

All these headwinds are going to have to be dealt with... but I think Jensen can keep his shit together and now lose it like Intel.

www.teslarati.com/cruise-follows-teslas-lead-chip-automnomous-driving/
Posted on Reply
#111
RandallFlagg
thesmokingmanThe fines to tech companies is peanuts to them. This is widely known, and was talked about a LOT in Zatcko's testimony in Congress. They be looking to put multipliers on their tech fines it seems. I don't want to get into what-ifs with other possible actions. They are still a profitable company no doubt, but a $1.4B miss is ocean sized fail. They've lost a major partner, the sun may be setting on gpu mining as we knew it, so they will be hard pressed to compensate for that massive whole. Also, they are losing their grasp on machine learning, first it was Tesla dropping them, now...

All these headwinds are going to have to be dealt with... but I think Jensen can keep his shit together and now lose it like Intel.

www.teslarati.com/cruise-follows-teslas-lead-chip-automnomous-driving/
That's actually a trend now (Tesla making its own AI chip). Apple was way ahead of the curve on this with the iPhone SoCs, but it's spreading. Amazon with its Graviton is another example. Meta is partnering with Qualcomm to have them design custom chips for its VR devices. This is why it's important for Intel to get its IDM foundry services going.
Posted on Reply
#112
MarsM4N
Just watching JayzTwoCents video and he mentioned that it was only him (Jay from "JayzTwoCents"), Steve ("GamersNexus") & John Petty ("John Petty Research") in the secret EVGA meeting.

I do understand the first 2 picks for publicity, but who is John Petty? Looks like he's currenty working for Unity Technologies as an graphics engineer. What's the deal with him? :confused:
Posted on Reply
#113
bubbleawsome
I know they won’t, but if they would switch to AMD GPUs i would make the same switch.
Posted on Reply
#114
AnotherReader
MarsM4NJust watching JayzTwoCents video and he mentioned that it was only him (Jay from "JayzTwoCents"), Steve ("GamersNexus") & John Petty ("John Petty Research") in the secret EVGA meeting.

I do understand the first 2 picks for publicity, but who is John Petty? Looks like he's currenty working for Unity Technologies as an graphics engineer. What's the deal with him? :confused:
This is why articles >> videos. It's Jon Peddie of Jon Peddie Research.
Posted on Reply
#115
MarsM4N
AnotherReaderThis is why articles >> videos. It's Jon Peddie of Jon Peddie Research.
Alright, Jon Peddie Research. Now it makes more sense, lol. :laugh:


Linus made a video, too. Guess it just keeps comming the next days.


Dam, Linus is roasting Nvidia hard! He even opens up about their dirty games. o_O That's for sure a hard day for Nvidia fanboys. Lot's of "green dirt" comming out.
Posted on Reply
#116
trparky
RandallFlaggNot yet ofc, but in 6-12 months we'll have a 'tiled' tGPU in Meteor Lake and AMD is already adding iGPU to its desktop chips with Zen 4. DDR5 will also help alleviate memory bandwidth issues that plague current iGPUs, especially as DDR5 gets faster over the next year or two.

The long predicted end for the discrete GPU market may be near.
Especially if AMD comes out with APUs with RDNA3 onboard.
Berfs1I doubt it will ever end. There are always some scenarios that require discrete GPUs, and with software always advancing, we won't reach a time where iGPU is powerful enough to run the latest software. iGPUs are meant to be rather basic in performance but have all the capabilities such as encoders, decoders, etc.
There's a difference between an Intel iGPU and what AMD often includes on their APUs which if they were to include RDNA3, yeah... I could see the end of dGPUs for a majority of the market.
Posted on Reply
#117
Dr. Dro
Voodoo RufusI've bought EVGA cards for 15 years now. Steady customer and their reliability and customer service has been top notch.

I'm guessing they may go AMD when the dust settles down a bit.
An EVGA RX 7900 XT KPE is a GPU I can only dream about :eek:

It's gotta happen, I really really hope AMD steps up! Intel should also seek to distribute Arc GPUs through EVGA as a budget offering, both would be a smash hit
Posted on Reply
#118
trparky
Dr. DroIt's gotta happen, I really really hope AMD steps up! Intel should also seek to distribute Arc GPUs through EVGA as a budget offering, both would be a smash hit
Why all this talk about Intel ARC? It's basically dead. Buried six feet under. It's such an absolute failure.
Posted on Reply
#119
SLObinger
EVGA has a plan and I think Andrew Han's statement was carefully worded.

Perhaps this is a bold strategic move by EVGA to exit its exclusive and suffocating sourcing agreement with NVIDIA that requires it to exit the video card market completely prior to taking up another GPU partnership.Terms like this are commonplace in exclusively agreements and naturally EVGA would need to publicly swear off any intentions of an AMD or Intel relationship and actually exit the market for a while anyway.

So maybe EVGA is out of the GPU business for one cycle and they keep the lights on through strong PSU sales driven by the new ATX standard and Nvidia's massive 4000 series power requirements and then after a year or two actually emerge as the dominate GPU board partner for AMD, Intel or both.
Posted on Reply
#120
Dr. Dro
trparkyWhy all this talk about Intel ARC? It's basically dead. Buried six feet under.
I for one ask why such lack of goodwill towards the new player in the GPU space. Anyone that genuinely believed that the first generation of Intel GPUs would be performant and bug-free was deluding themselves from the start. Things will improve, and I hope Intel persists.

The ultimate proof that NVIDIA got too powerful and too big for its own good is in their biggest partner basically saying: "no more, I quit, get your distribution terms and stuff em where the sun don't shine!" :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#121
AusWolf
I just woke up and this is the first news to greet me. What a shock!

Considering that "Graphics cards made up over three-quarters of EVGA's revenue", this decision is either extremely illogical, or it's telling something about what partnership with Nvidia looks and feels like.
Posted on Reply
#122
trparky
But according to one YouTuber who claims to have insider knowledge from people inside the halls of Intel, Gelsinger has all but put the silver bullet into the chest of Intel ARC.
Posted on Reply
#123
Dr. Dro
AusWolfI just woke up and this is the first news to greet me. What a shock!

Considering that "Graphics cards made up over three-quarters of EVGA's revenue", this decision is either extremely illogical, or it's telling something about what partnership with Nvidia looks and feels like.
It's the latter. I would expect exclusivity agreements to be nightmarish by nature, but given what EVGA's CEO tells us, apparently it's an easier decision to do this than to sign up for yet another round. They were losing a LOT of money in their high end GPU sales, and even the mass volume market's income was low and barely enough to break even, so things were looking pretty grim.
trparkyBut according to one YouTuber who claims to have insider knowledge from people inside the halls of Intel, Gelsinger has all but put the silver bullet into the chest of Intel ARC.
MLID is a fool and no one should take him seriously. I used to hang out in an AMD fan discord where a member straight up fabricated the SKU list for Zen 2 CPUs and he posted it verbatim back in the day. It was hilarious. Treat anything that comes out of rumor mill channels as rumors and with massive doses of salt.
Posted on Reply
#124
AusWolf
Dr. DroMLID is a fool and no one should take him seriously. I used to hang out in an AMD fan discord where a member straight up fabricated the SKU list for Zen 2 CPUs and he posted it verbatim back in the day. It was hilarious. Treat anything that comes out of rumor mill channels as rumors and with massive doses of salt.
Or even better: don't read/watch rumours at all.
Dr. DroIt's the latter. I would expect exclusivity agreements to be nightmarish by nature, but given what EVGA's CEO tells us, apparently it's an easier decision to do this than to sign up for yet another round. They were losing a LOT of money in their high end GPU sales, and even the mass volume market's income was low and barely enough to break even, so things were looking pretty grim.
Nvidia is being hated by more and more people for their shady business practices. When it's all confirmed by their partners leaving them, they'll have to see that something has to change (I know it won't).
Posted on Reply
#125
Fouquin
trparkyBut according to one YouTuber
And the rest of your argument is now invalid. Thanks for playing.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 09:06 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts