Sunday, January 14th 2024
GeForce RTX 40 SUPER Custom Model Pricing Leaks Out
NVIDIA revealed basic price guides for GeForce RTX-40 SUPER graphics cards at the recently concluded CES 2024 trade show, but their board partners largely stayed coy about figures for customized options (review embargoes will be lifted soon). ZOTAC broke the mold later on in the week, with press material updated to reflect that non-overclocked models will adhere to Team Green's basic MSRP. However, premium charges for overclocked SUPER Twin Edge OC, AMP HOLO, Trinity OC and AMP Extreme AIRO cards remain a mystery. VideoCardz decided to conduct some weekend detective work, and fiddled around on Newegg and Best Buy online stores—although the focus shifted to other brands/manufacturers.
Workaround methods were implemented in order to prematurely extract card prices, before NVIDIA's staggered schedule of reveals for customized versions of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and RTX 4080 SUPER GPUs (throughout January). The leaked results show that GIGABYTE and PNY have custom overclocked GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER models targeting base MSRP at $599, while MSI has several options exceeding that base level—ranging from $10 to $50 premiums. GIGABYTE's GAMING OC card also tops the table at $649. Jumping up to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER tier, we see a GIGABYTE Gaming OC model sitting at $849.99 and an MSI VENTUS 3X OC going for $899.99. The sole custom GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER within the VideoCardz article appears to be an MSI VENTUS 3X OC; we are witnessing a $100 extra tacked on for this design.VideoCardz has kindly compiled their findings into list form:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12 GB MSRP: $599
Source:
VideoCardz
Workaround methods were implemented in order to prematurely extract card prices, before NVIDIA's staggered schedule of reveals for customized versions of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and RTX 4080 SUPER GPUs (throughout January). The leaked results show that GIGABYTE and PNY have custom overclocked GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER models targeting base MSRP at $599, while MSI has several options exceeding that base level—ranging from $10 to $50 premiums. GIGABYTE's GAMING OC card also tops the table at $649. Jumping up to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER tier, we see a GIGABYTE Gaming OC model sitting at $849.99 and an MSI VENTUS 3X OC going for $899.99. The sole custom GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER within the VideoCardz article appears to be an MSI VENTUS 3X OC; we are witnessing a $100 extra tacked on for this design.VideoCardz has kindly compiled their findings into list form:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12 GB MSRP: $599
- NVIDIA Founders Edition: $599.99
- GIGABYTE WindForce OC: $599.99
- PNY VERTO OC: $599.99
- ZOTAC Twin Edge: $599.99
- MSI VENTUS 2X OC: $609.99
- MSI VENTUS 2X OC WHITE: $619.99
- MSI VENTUS 3X OC: $629.99
- MSI Gaming X Slim: $649.99
- GIGABYTE GAMING OC: $649.99
- GIGABYTE Gaming OC: $849.99
- MSI VENTUS 3X OC: $899.99
- NVIDIA Founders Edition: $999.99
- MSI VENTUS 3X OC: $1099.99
86 Comments on GeForce RTX 40 SUPER Custom Model Pricing Leaks Out
4090 sold 3 times better than 6800XT from 2020, which have been dirt cheap on many occations
I know 3 people IRL that only play games using a 4090, for many people, the price is not that crazy for what you actually get. 4090 is the only true 4K/UHD+ capable GPU today.
A 4090 is something only people who think a few grand is pocket change are buying. Most gamers aren't buying expensive nvidia cards, the super cards seem to be nvidia wanting to sell more of the 4070Ti and 4080 as those weren't a good value.
The steam hardware survey is not the most precise of surveys, maybe I would trust it if it were polling every steam user, and I'm sure Steam is polling a lot of gaming cafes which use Nvidia cards. The lower tiers aren't interesting at all, and are overpriced like the 4060 and 4060Ti for example which should've been the 4050 and 4050Ti because of bandwidth and VRAM.
The top GPU's in the steam hardware survey as of December 2023 are the RTX 3060 and GTX 1650, cards selling for less than $300. Your claims go against what reputable tech reviewers like Gamers Nexus have said. EVGA stopped making GPUs because the margins in designing a cooler,board, marketing, and the top notch support EVGA had just isn't profitable anymore.
Nvidia can just come up with a card design and undercut what AIB can sell theirs for and still make their massive profit margins. Nvidia being anti-competitive with their own AIB's, the crappy 12VHPWR connector, and cracking PCB's on the 4080 and 4090 because the coolers AIB's have to use are too massive and it isn't a surprise that EVGA left the GPU market.
You must be working for Nvidia if you believe they didn't push EVGA out of the graphics card market.
7900XT, 7800XT, 7700XT is not even on the top 100 list.
Are these relevant then? :laugh:
AMDs most popular dGPU is RX580 from 2017 at 0.93% - at spot 29
Nvidia owns the top 10 and have done for years. Top 10 stands for 35% of GPUs listed and Nvidia pretty much dominate top 20 and top 30 as well. Around 75% GPU marketshare and this is even with iGPUs thrown into the mix. If you remove iGPU from both Intel and AMD, Nvidia probably sits at 85-90% dGPU marketshare on Steam.
But sure, you can keep acting like AMD is going well in the dGPU sector, not that I care much. I know the numbers behind since I work in the B2B business in Europe. Nvidia ships tons of dGPUs compared to AMD. AMD mostly ships CPUs, which is also what they do best.
Lets hope AMD can regain marketshare with Radeon 8000 series and deliver something great in the enterprise and AI market as well. This is where the big money are.
But lets not forget that AMD is mainly making CPUs and APUs. This is their prime business. Not GPUs, even tho AMD GPU users likes to think that.
Given Intel's incredibly long list of consecutive failures, I tend to have serious doubts about its ability to compete with TSMC, it doesn't even make sense in fact if TSMC employees work harder.
To be honest, my hope is that Samsung will get a decent enough process to gain the attention of AMD and Nvidia, and win contracts to manufacture mid-end GPUs and below, perhaps with the pressure that demand for AI chips is putting on. at TSMC this scenario will appear soon.
Intel pretty much followed their 4 fabs in 5 years roadmap so far. Pat Gelsinger is turning Intel around as fast as possible. Intel regaining CPU marketshare and did for long.
If Intel is able to launch 20A this year, then they only need 18A in 2025 and TSMC will be behind, because they struggle hard with reaching 2nm and will be stuck at 3nm till 2025 probably. My 4090 can very easily get 60 fps in pretty much any game with raster. In 99% of games breaking 100 fps is easy as well, on maximum settings without RT/PT.
A console is just a locked down piece of hardware using a locked ecosystem that will milk you dry over time. I own a PS5. Nothing impressive about the hardware and you are paying big time for multiplayer, cloud saves, games (sony and ms needs a big cut which adds to the price) and accessories. Most heavy users will probably also need to buy a new console at some point because its dying.
A console will never be a PC. I can play 10.000+ games on PC, mod games, get free games, mod games to my liking, free multiplayer and I could go on.
AMD is not the winner in the console market anyway. Microsoft and Sony are.
I bet Nvidia earned alot more on Switch than AMD earned on PS5 and XSX and Switch 2 is coming soon, featuring Nvidia chip again, with DLSS support this time.