Friday, February 23rd 2024
Intel CEO Discloses TSMC Production Details: N3 for Arrow Lake & N3B for Lunar Lake
Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger engaged with press/media representatives following the conclusion of his IFS Direct Connect 2024 keynote speech—when asked about Team Blue's ongoing relationship with TSMC, he confirmed that their manufacturing agreement has advanced from "5 nm to 3 nm." According to a China Times news article: "Gelsinger also confirmed the expansion of orders to TSMC, confirming that TSMC will hold orders for Intel's Arrow and Lunar Lake CPU, GPU, and NPU chips this year, and will produce them using the N3B process, officially ushering in the Intel notebook platform that the outside world has been waiting for many years." Past leaks have indicated that Intel's Arrow Lake processor family will have CPU tiles based on their in-house 20A process, while TSMC takes care of the GPU tile aspect with their 3 nm N3 process node.
That generation is expected to launch later this year—the now "officially confirmed" upgrade to 3 nm should produce pleasing performance and efficiency improvements. The current crop of Core Ultra "Meteor Lake" mobile processors has struggled with the latter, especially when compared to rivals. Lunar Lake is marked down for a 2025 launch window, so some aspects of its internal workings remain a mystery—Gelsinger has confirmed that TSMC's N3B is in the picture, but no official source has disclosed their in-house manufacturing choice(s) for LNL chips. Wccftech believes that Lunar Lake will: "utilize the same P-Core (Lion Cove) and brand-new E-Core (Skymont) core architecture which are expected to be fabricated on the 20A node. But that might also be limited to the CPU tile. The GPU tile will be a significant upgrade over the Meteor Lake and Arrow Lake CPUs since Lunar Lake ditches Alchemist and goes for the next-gen graphics architecture codenamed "Battlemage" (AKA Xe2-LPG)." Late January whispers pointed to Intel and TSMC partnering up on a 2 nanometer process for the "Nova Lake" processor generation—perhaps a very distant prospect (2026).
Sources:
China Times, DigiTimes Taiwan, Wccftech
That generation is expected to launch later this year—the now "officially confirmed" upgrade to 3 nm should produce pleasing performance and efficiency improvements. The current crop of Core Ultra "Meteor Lake" mobile processors has struggled with the latter, especially when compared to rivals. Lunar Lake is marked down for a 2025 launch window, so some aspects of its internal workings remain a mystery—Gelsinger has confirmed that TSMC's N3B is in the picture, but no official source has disclosed their in-house manufacturing choice(s) for LNL chips. Wccftech believes that Lunar Lake will: "utilize the same P-Core (Lion Cove) and brand-new E-Core (Skymont) core architecture which are expected to be fabricated on the 20A node. But that might also be limited to the CPU tile. The GPU tile will be a significant upgrade over the Meteor Lake and Arrow Lake CPUs since Lunar Lake ditches Alchemist and goes for the next-gen graphics architecture codenamed "Battlemage" (AKA Xe2-LPG)." Late January whispers pointed to Intel and TSMC partnering up on a 2 nanometer process for the "Nova Lake" processor generation—perhaps a very distant prospect (2026).
25 Comments on Intel CEO Discloses TSMC Production Details: N3 for Arrow Lake & N3B for Lunar Lake
Those naives are only Apple and Nvidia/Intel. No one else. Not before 2027.
Not only that, but these deals are made well in advance. It's not like they decided yesterday to buy some fab time at TSMC...
...I guess it is the vogue to FUD it up when it comes to Intel.
How is battle mage coming along and when can we see arrow lake
They are selling to intel and other giant in the industry.
Also, yes it's possible there is a letter behind the b and the interviewer didn't hear it because it was N3BE or what ever
Apple and Nvidia can afford it, with ease. Intel can too, it seems.
AMD will be forced to use cheaper nodes and therefore will probably fall behind going forward.
A big part of Zen's succes was because AMD had a node advantage (Ryzen 3000 and forward). Which they now loose. They were fighting Intel 14nm with TSMC 7nm. Intel had no problems competiting with Ryzen 1000 and 2000 series.
Ryzen 1000 and 2000 series were mediocre at best, made at GloFo, bad clockspeeds, IPC and single thread performance. First when AMD moved to TSMC 7nm, Zen became great and prices went up alot too. They keep rising too. TSMC wants a bigger and bigger cut.