Thursday, December 19th 2024

Microsoft Acquired Nearly 500,000 NVIDIA "Hopper" GPUs This Year

Microsoft is heavily investing in enabling its company and cloud infrastructure to support the massive AI expansion. The Redmond giant has acquired nearly half a million of the NVIDIA "Hopper" family of GPUs to support this effort. According to market research company Omdia, Microsoft was the biggest hyperscaler, with data center CapEx and GPU expenditure reaching a record high. The company acquired precisely 485,000 NVIDIA "Hopper" GPUs, including H100, H200, and H20, resulting in more than $30 billion spent on servers alone. To put things into perspective, this is about double that of the next-biggest GPU purchaser, Chinese ByteDance, who acquired about 230,000 sanction-abiding H800 GPUs and regular H100s sources from third parties.

Regarding US-based companies, the only ones that have come close to the GPU acquisition rate are Meta, Tesla/xAI, Amazon, and Google. They have acquired around 200,000 GPUs on average while significantly boosting their in-house chip design efforts. "NVIDIA GPUs claimed a tremendously high share of the server capex," Vlad Galabov, director of cloud and data center research at Omdia, noted, adding, "We're close to the peak." Hyperscalers like Amazon, Google, and Meta have been working on their custom solutions for AI training and inference. For example, Google has its TPU, Amazon has its Trainium and Inferentia chips, and Meta has its MTIA. Hyperscalers are eager to develop their in-house solutions, but NVIDIA's grip on the software stack paired with timely product updates seems hard to break. The latest "Blackwell" chips are projected to get even bigger orders, so only the sky (and the local power plant) is the limit.
Source: Financial Times (Report and Charts)
Add your own comment

27 Comments on Microsoft Acquired Nearly 500,000 NVIDIA "Hopper" GPUs This Year

#26
mb194dc
SOAREVERSORIt's just as mad as when people said a computer in everyhome was madness or the cloud was madness. AI and not doing any processing locally is the future.
Yet Microsoft (and Qualcomm) are also pushing "AI" enabled computers for home use, not that many seem to be selling. Probably because people buying them are going WTF is this.

For me it's just another mass hysteria bubble. I guess they've been "conned" in to thinking they're buying in to "AGI", when LLMs are nowhere near that, get things wrong consistently, hallucinations, because they fundamentally aren't intelligent in any way at all. Wouldn't even surprise me if eventually they're not allowed to call these systems "AI", because it's blatant false advertising, Machine Learning ok.

I wouldn't rule out some use case coming along for all this hardware eventually, but equally it wouldn't surprise me if all of it ends up being given away or in landfill because there's nothing on the front end to pay and keep the datacentres running.

Similar to blockchain, even 15 years later, all it's being used for is speculation, create a "coin", pump and dump it., only difference with Bitcoin is it was the first one. There's no productive utility to the technology at all.
Posted on Reply
#27
TechBuyingHavoc
mb194dcFor me it's just another mass hysteria bubble. I guess they've been "conned" in to thinking they're buying in to "AGI", when LLMs are nowhere near that, get things wrong consistently, hallucinations, because they fundamentally aren't intelligent in any way at all. Wouldn't even surprise me if eventually they're not allowed to call these systems "AI", because it's blatant false advertising, Machine Learning ok.
It is telling to me that everyone uses the chat LLMs for stuff that doesn't really matter or that has a high level of BS and artifice. Think of areas like performance reviews, interview questions, corporate emails, informal complaints, etc, etc.

No one is using chat LLMs for the stuff that actually matters to people, where the content of the message is critical, where there is no play-acting or artificial posing layered on top of the message. Think of areas like romantic conversations, chatting with friends and family, personal messages to loved ones, etc, etc.

That is enough to tell me that LLMs do have a use in society, mainly for reducing the time spent on menial tasks or pointless communication but no role in what actually matters. It would be better if we just cut out all the stuff in society that "AI" is currently helping us to manage and save all that time and effort on what actually matters (which we rightfully are not using AI to manage).

This is very far away from all the AGI hype that is being pumped out like propaganda out there.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 19th, 2025 01:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts