Monday, February 3rd 2025

Intel Core Ultra 255H "Arrow Lake-H" Delivers 32% Single-Core Performance Improvement Over "Meteor Lake" Predecessor

Intel's Core Ultra 7 255H "Arrow Lake" processor has demonstrated impressive performance improvements in recent PassMark benchmarks, achieving a 32% higher single-core score compared to its "Meteor Lake" predecessor. The Arrow Lake-H chip recorded 4,631 points in single-threaded tests, significantly outpacing the Core Ultra 7 155H's 3,500 points while delivering a 15% overall improvement in CPU Mark ratings. The performance leap comes from Intel's architectural overhaul, implementing "Lion Cove" performance cores alongside "Skymont" efficiency cores on TSMC's N3B process node. This combination enables the 255H to achieve higher boost frequencies while maintaining the same core configuration as its predecessor—six P-cores, eight E-cores, and two Low Power Efficiency (LPE) cores.

Notable in this iteration is the absence of Hyper-Threading, resulting in 16 threads compared to the 155H's 22 threads. Arrow Lake-H maintains Intel's heterogeneous structure, incorporating up to eight Xe-LPG+ graphics cores derived from the Alchemist architecture. The neural processing unit (NPU) capabilities remain consistent with Meteor Lake, delivering 13 TOPS of INT8 performance. This positions the chip below Lunar Lake's 45 TOPS. Despite performance improvements, market success will largely depend on system integrators' ability to deliver compelling devices at competitive price points, particularly as AMD's Strix Point platforms maintain strong positioning in the $1,000 range. The battle of laptop chip supremacy is poised to be a good one in the coming quarters, especially as more Arm-based entries will force both Intel and AMD to compete harder.
Sources: x86deadandback on X, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

5 Comments on Intel Core Ultra 255H "Arrow Lake-H" Delivers 32% Single-Core Performance Improvement Over "Meteor Lake" Predecessor

#1
FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
Supposedly. Arc 140T is going to be a big step up in performance compared to ARC 140V in meteor lake
Posted on Reply
#2
Nostras
Very impressive single-core gains. Multi-core for me is heavily in the "more than good enough" zone so this is something to be excited at for sure.
FreedomEclipseSupposedly. Arc 140T is going to be a big step up in performance compared to ARC 140V in meteor lake
Uhh, 140V is Lunar Lake. Meteor lake is Arc 8XE. If you meant Meteor Lake I sure do hope so considering the 140V is a major step up over the 8XE.
If you really meant the 140V I'd be really surprised as that means we get a 890M competitor, got a source for that? I'd like to know more.
Posted on Reply
#3
FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
NostrasVery impressive single-core gains. Multi-core for me is heavily in the "more than good enough" zone so this is something to be excited at for sure.


Uhh, 140V is Lunar Lake. Meteor lake is Arc 8XE. If you meant Meteor Lake I sure do hope so considering the 140V is a major step up over the 8XE.
If you really meant the 140V I'd be really surprised as that means we get a 890M competitor, got a source for that? I'd like to know more.
Sorry. Yes you were right.

www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Arc-140T-graphics-delivers-60-percent-performance-boost-over-Lunar-Lake-variant.905446.0.html

www.techspot.com/news/105244-intel-mysterious-arc-140t-gpu-teases-massive-performance.html

www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/mysterious-intel-arc-140t-graphics-engine-significantly-outpaces-xe2-lunar-lake-igpu
Posted on Reply
#4
Tek-Check
FreedomEclipseSorry. Yes you were right.
It's almost the same iGPU as on Meteor Lake, with addition of XMX engines.

Also, the score looks impressive this time around because we all remember how unimpressive Meteor Lake generation was.
Posted on Reply
#5
_roman_
Well 32% according to whom? Intel? Fake Benchmarks?

Real life is the best benchmark. I'm sure those 32% will not even reach 13%. If not now, than later with the fixes for the errors in design and silicon for DRAM and CPU issues.

I configured a few hours ago another kernel. A hole page only for cpu migitations. There are other options hidden in submenus for DRAM issues.
Posted on Reply
Feb 3rd, 2025 07:58 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts