Tuesday, March 5th 2024

Samsung Foundry Renames 3 nm Process to 2 nm Amid Competition with Intel

In a move that could intensify competition with Intel in the cutting-edge chip manufacturing space, Samsung Foundry has reportedly decided to rebrand its second-generation 3 nm-class fabrication technology, previously known as SF3, to a 2 nm-class manufacturing process called SF2. According to reports from ZDNet, the renaming of Samsung's SF3 to SF2 is likely an attempt by the South Korean tech giant to simplify its process nomenclature and better compete against Intel Foundry, at least visually. Intel is set to roll out its Intel 20A production node, a 2 nm-class technology, later this year. The reports suggest that Samsung has already notified its customers about the changes in its roadmap and the renaming of SF3 to SF2. Significantly, the company has reportedly gone as far as re-signing contracts with customers initially intended to use the SF3 production node.

"We were informed by Samsung Electronics that the 2nd generation 3 nm [name] is being changed to 2 nm," an unnamed source noted to ZDNet. "We had contracted Samsung Foundry for the 2nd generation 3 nm production last year, but we recently revised the contract to change the name to 2 nm." Despite the name change, Samsung's SF3, now called SF2, has not undergone any actual process technology alterations. This suggests that the renaming is primarily a marketing move, as using a different process technology would require customers to rework their chip designs entirely. Samsung intends to start manufacturing chips based on the newly named SF2 process in the second half of 2024. The SF2 technology, which employs gate-all-around (GAA) transistors that Samsung brands as Multi-Bridge-Channel Field Effect Transistors (MBCFET), does not feature a backside power delivery network (BSPDN), a significant advantage of Intel's 20A process. Samsung Foundry has not officially confirmed the renaming.
Sources: ZDNet, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Samsung Foundry Renames 3 nm Process to 2 nm Amid Competition with Intel

#26
dyonoctis
DavenThe thread for this article did not age well.

www.techpowerup.com/319704/intel-10a-1-nm-class-node-to-enter-mass-production-in-2027?cp=1

I can’t wait for Intel to change its node names again for marketing purposes so many commenters in that thread will have to admit that units of measurements have nothing to do with it.

Lolololol!
…But Intel made it clear that the new naming scheme was only to align themselves with TSMC. IIRC Pat himself said that TSMC is the current benchmark. Where did those people got that story about Intel naming being accurate as a unit of measurement on the silicon ?
Posted on Reply
#27
Minus Infinity
FoulOnWhiteSamsung rep "sure cough it's cough 2nm"
Just playing the Intel 20A game. They are all shameful. No global standards no truth in advertising, it's the wild west in chip world.
Posted on Reply
#28
trsttte
Double-ClickPffft they think they can compete in the name game with Intel?
That's a hold my beer category for them :laugh:
To be fair Intel tried to come up with more accurate measures in the past (back when they were leading), no one cared and they were "forced" to join the bullshit after falling behind in marketing terms - which together with the cpu design part also struggling was a big problem.
Posted on Reply
#29
outpt
john_Well, I guess marketing justifies ridiculousness....
Someone needs a job
Posted on Reply
#30
Prima.Vera
As SemiAccurate linked in the first sentence, there are credible rumors that Intel is going to rename their upcoming 7nm process to 5nm in order to align with the current norms of the foundries. This is a monumentally bad idea. No, we will just say it is just flat out stupid and Intel will lose even more credibility without the hope of gain even if they can point to everyone else and say, “We are just doing what they did to avoid consumer confusion”. There are probably even studies to say how this will help their products on the store shelves, but the end result will be the opposite.

Why? You are fighting with a group that doesn’t care about the rules. If you rename your 7 to 5 to line up with their 5, they can just rename their 5 to 3. Why not, it isn’t based on reality any more. Each foundry PDK update can move the names up to what should be a real full node shrink. Do you think Samsung’s marketing team will lose any sleep over calling their 5+nm node 3nm to make it look like they are ahead of Intel? Intel is chasing a moving target and the competition is faster and in some cases far less ethical, they will lose every time.
Scumbag Samsung and TMSC...

source
Posted on Reply
#31
N/A
Why do that. Was it ever on par with N3 and intel 4 even. Perhaps there are similarities and N2 is 16% denser and sram barely
Posted on Reply
#32
stimpy88
When you can't compete, and your company has no morals, just trick your customers into thinking you have something you don't. In the meantime, Samsung copies all the designs you send to them. Lovely!
Posted on Reply
#33
Vayra86
AusWolfAnd I'll rename my idleness to hard work.
Wait, you didn't do this yet?

Marketing works both ways bud. Get with the program
Its my way of raising the middle finger to corporate, one of the many actually
stimpy88When you can't compete, and your company has no morals, just trick your customers into thinking you have something you don't. In the meantime, Samsung copies all the designs you send to them. Lovely!
ARghehmIcroLEDHmhmhm

Sorry, something stuck in my throat there
trsttteTo be fair Intel tried to come up with more accurate measures in the past (back when they were leading)
Hammer + nail right there :)
Posted on Reply
#34
AusWolf
Vayra86Wait, you didn't do this yet?

Marketing works both ways bud. Get with the program
Its my way of raising the middle finger to corporate, one of the many actually
You don't have to raise any finger (the middle one included) in a world where corporations openly admit that they don't want any real work done, just the illusion of it by paying their employees by the hour. ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 17th, 2024 19:21 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts