Tuesday, March 5th 2024
Samsung Foundry Renames 3 nm Process to 2 nm Amid Competition with Intel
In a move that could intensify competition with Intel in the cutting-edge chip manufacturing space, Samsung Foundry has reportedly decided to rebrand its second-generation 3 nm-class fabrication technology, previously known as SF3, to a 2 nm-class manufacturing process called SF2. According to reports from ZDNet, the renaming of Samsung's SF3 to SF2 is likely an attempt by the South Korean tech giant to simplify its process nomenclature and better compete against Intel Foundry, at least visually. Intel is set to roll out its Intel 20A production node, a 2 nm-class technology, later this year. The reports suggest that Samsung has already notified its customers about the changes in its roadmap and the renaming of SF3 to SF2. Significantly, the company has reportedly gone as far as re-signing contracts with customers initially intended to use the SF3 production node.
"We were informed by Samsung Electronics that the 2nd generation 3 nm [name] is being changed to 2 nm," an unnamed source noted to ZDNet. "We had contracted Samsung Foundry for the 2nd generation 3 nm production last year, but we recently revised the contract to change the name to 2 nm." Despite the name change, Samsung's SF3, now called SF2, has not undergone any actual process technology alterations. This suggests that the renaming is primarily a marketing move, as using a different process technology would require customers to rework their chip designs entirely. Samsung intends to start manufacturing chips based on the newly named SF2 process in the second half of 2024. The SF2 technology, which employs gate-all-around (GAA) transistors that Samsung brands as Multi-Bridge-Channel Field Effect Transistors (MBCFET), does not feature a backside power delivery network (BSPDN), a significant advantage of Intel's 20A process. Samsung Foundry has not officially confirmed the renaming.
Sources:
ZDNet, via Tom's Hardware
"We were informed by Samsung Electronics that the 2nd generation 3 nm [name] is being changed to 2 nm," an unnamed source noted to ZDNet. "We had contracted Samsung Foundry for the 2nd generation 3 nm production last year, but we recently revised the contract to change the name to 2 nm." Despite the name change, Samsung's SF3, now called SF2, has not undergone any actual process technology alterations. This suggests that the renaming is primarily a marketing move, as using a different process technology would require customers to rework their chip designs entirely. Samsung intends to start manufacturing chips based on the newly named SF2 process in the second half of 2024. The SF2 technology, which employs gate-all-around (GAA) transistors that Samsung brands as Multi-Bridge-Channel Field Effect Transistors (MBCFET), does not feature a backside power delivery network (BSPDN), a significant advantage of Intel's 20A process. Samsung Foundry has not officially confirmed the renaming.
34 Comments on Samsung Foundry Renames 3 nm Process to 2 nm Amid Competition with Intel
That's a hold my beer category for them :laugh:
Part 1
Part 2
I don't mind them changing the name if they actually make an impact on density, like with their 3rd gen 7LPP the minimum cell density increased about 10%, but changing the names just so the number on the paper matches the competitor's number on their paper is a race to the bottom. Now you may as well just claim that your new process is at the atomic scale and uses planck-scale superconducting carbon nanotube wires extracted from the essence of unicorn horn.
I mean, if you're old enough, you're familiar with this acronym and the amount of exaggeration associated with it. It was (well, still is) worse than any imaginary nanometers.
Because I'm totally 6ft 10in
for marketing purposes :laugh:
(Yes, I suck at naming things)
www.techpowerup.com/319704/intel-10a-1-nm-class-node-to-enter-mass-production-in-2027?cp=1
I can’t wait for Intel to change its node names again for marketing purposes so many commenters in that thread will have to admit that units of measurements have nothing to do with it.
Lolololol!