Monday, November 4th 2024

NVIDIA CPUs (not GPUs) Coming in 2025

According to DigiTimes, NVIDIA is reportedly targeting the high-end segment for its first consumer CPU attempt. Slated to arrive in 2025, NVIDIA is partnering with MediaTek to break into the AI PC market, currently being popularized by Qualcomm, Intel, and AMD. With Microsoft and Qualcomm laying the foundation for Windows-on-Arm (WoA) development, NVIDIA plans to join and leverage its massive ecosystem of partners to design and deliver regular applications and games for its Arm-based processors. At the same time, NVIDIA is also scheduled to launch "Blackwell" GPUs for consumers, which could end up in these AI PCs with an Arm CPU at its core.

NVIDIA's partner, MediaTek, has recently launched a big core SoC for mobile called Dimensity 9400. NVIDIA could use something like that as a base for its SoC and add its Blackwell IP to the mix. This would be similar to what Apple is doing with its Apple Silicon and the recent M4 Max chip, which is apparently the fastest CPU in single-threaded and multithreaded workloads, as per recent Geekbench recordings. For NVIDIA, the company already has a team of CPU designers that delivered its Grace CPU to enterprise/server customers. Using off-the-shelf Arm Neoverse IP, the company's customers are acquiring systems with Grace CPUs as fast as they are produced. This puts a lot of hope into NVIDIA's upcoming AI PC, which could offer a selling point no other WoA device currently provides, and that is tried and tested gaming-grade GPU with AI accelerators.
Sources: DigiTimes, via NotebookCheck
Add your own comment

33 Comments on NVIDIA CPUs (not GPUs) Coming in 2025

#27
kapone32
It is obvious that Nvidia wants a piece of the Handheld market. If this is successful they seriously need to work on their software. Intel had the money to almost catch them for RT and AMD have a commanding lead in the Space. Cemented by the Claw. In this ultimate driver narrative you cannot recommend the Claw for Gaming even if it is only 10-12% behind because the narrative does the same thing with the 4090 vs 7900XTX argument even though one card is 3 times the other but the Claw is the same price as the Ally so. They will probably use 3nm from TSMC too but just because you have TSMC hardware does not mean that you don't need to make sure the code is up to snuff to pull the performance out. Just yesterday I had to turn Hyper RX on for City Skylines 2 as my population went above 700,000 so the CPU was pegging at 85+% usage the whole time. The temps even went past 70 C on the CPU so PC Games are really starting to take advantage of all of those cores. That is not even a console based Game either.
Posted on Reply
#28
nageme
ChomiqGotta milk that AI cow.
What, you mean you don't want an AI CPU in your AI PC, featuring an AI GPU, AI RAM, AI SSD, AI HDD, AI PSU, AI case with AI RGB AI LEDs, AI keyboard, AI mouse and AI headphones?
How will your run AI FreeCell on your AI OS? Don't tell me you're satisfied with just Blockchain FreeCell.
Posted on Reply
#29
wheresmycar
Is this what influenced Intel and AMD to further collaborate on x86?
Posted on Reply
#30
watzupken
tpuuser256I had a gut feeling this was going to happen.
When Apple succeeded in proving that ARM chips are capable of competing with x86 chips, it pretty much opened that door for more chip designers to do the same for Windows devices. Enter Qualcomm this year, and it again proves it is competitive, especially in the laptop/ mobile segment, which in itself is far more lucrative than desktops due to higher margins and volumes. So with Nvidia entering this space, this is Intel and AMD's worst nightmare happening. Qualcomm SD Elite is powerful, but hampered by not so good graphics and compatibility issues. By the time Nvidia joins the party, I would expect some of these compatibility early adoption issue to go away. And they are no newbie in the GPU space. So if AMD is still slowly spinning RDNA 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 or so, they are going to be in trouble in the next 2 years or so.
Posted on Reply
#31
Nhonho
I don't understand why Nvidia doesn't start its journey in the CPU market, from the beginning, with RISC-V CPUs.

Starting right away with RISC-V, there would be a vast amount of apps created by software developers that would run natively on their RISC-V CPUs.

If Nvidia launches ARM CPUs now and if in about 5 years they decide to launch RISC-V CPUs, the same old mess that we already know about will happen in hardware or software (or in both) to old ARM apps run on their future RISC-V CPUs.

The guy in this video, who knows a lot about CPU development, said that the RISC-V architecture is the best:
(watch from 28:50)
Posted on Reply
#32
Visible Noise
kapone32It is obvious that Nvidia wants a piece of the Handheld market.
Nvidia owns the handheld market - it’s called the Nintendo Switch.
Posted on Reply
#33
HHHAOR
It would be nice if the switch2 could use this chip.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 5th, 2024 03:18 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts