Tuesday, February 25th 2025

AMD Mentions Sub-$700 Pricing for Radeon RX 9070 GPU Series, Looks Like NV Minus $50 Again

Late last week, AMD posted a helpful reminder; a special RDNA 4 Friday (February 28) event is on the calendar. Additionally, they quietly confirmed that the upcoming launch of Radeon RX 9070 series graphics cards will not include reference/MBA models. Team Red enthusiasts and other interested parties are anticipating an official unveiling of performance data, technical specifications, and decisive pricing. Recent leaks have produced speculative figures for various board partner options, but industry whispers suggest that AMD's guide MSRP has fluctuated over the past couple of weeks. An almost definitive answer has arrived online, courtesy of another VideoCardz investigative piece.

The article does not class the latest pre-release disclosure as a true "leak," VideoCardz believes that their sharing of AMD press briefing slides serves as an intriguing teaser. The report dismisses yet another case of pre-launch retail spillage: "there are many rumors about relatively high prices for the RX 9070 series. For instance, a Reddit thread allegedly shows prices from Best Buy's internal system, with prices starting at $739 (see screenshot below)... From what we have been told and shared during the media briefing, AMD showed one slide that may confirm where the prices will be. The Radeon RX 9070 series is focusing on a sub-$700 price point, and AMD wants their cards to be 'more accessible.' AMD says that 85% of gamers buy cards below $700, and this is what the RDNA 4 series will focus on." Another leaked presentation slide indicates that Team Red is targeting higher resolutions (1440p and 4K), better performance; especially with "ray tracing games," as well as "easy upgrades." The last point emphasizes drop-in 8-pin power connector options. ASRock and Sapphire appear to be breaking away from this traditional connection mold with their upcoming premium-tier designs, but the majority of AIB cards are expected to stick with a tried and trusted solution.
Sources: VideoCardz, Radeon Subreddit
Add your own comment

181 Comments on AMD Mentions Sub-$700 Pricing for Radeon RX 9070 GPU Series, Looks Like NV Minus $50 Again

#76
sephiroth117
"-50", lmao people still thinking that RTX 50 series sell at msrp...

Wait for the presentation and reviews, leaks are often accurate, but we don't know the final price, we don't know the final performance figure, early drivers and optimization can depict a wrong picture of the performance profile (and it has been the case a lot of times in the past)


If it's powerful, if it's ACTUALLY selling at msrp, if stocks are better than nvidia, than chances are it will sell out pretty quickly

Now, I am someone who has an Nvidia GPU, I know AMD will mess it up but not to the extent I read here lol
Posted on Reply
#77
Dahita
Hecate91Either way Nvidia is holding consumer stock back to keep pricing high, they made MSRP claims and didn't stick to it, and the tech media is going along with fake MSRP's.
Wrong.

There is no stock, as explained, they just produce less to make room for A100 and H100 chips. They don't care about keeping pricing high because gamers now represent barely 10% of their revenue. They are much less profitable than AI.

The selling price of RTX 50X0 is not higher than MSRP because of Nvidia either. The price is inflated at the AIB and the retailer's level.
Posted on Reply
#78
Bomby569
Hecate91True, but AMD being a business doesn't have to hand out GPU's for free either, Nvidia pushing prices up is the reason the market is a mess.

And you can thank Nvidia for pushing pricing up that high over the past 10 years.

Either way Nvidia is holding consumer stock back to keep pricing high, they made MSRP claims and didn't stick to it, and the tech media is going along with fake MSRP's.
what kind of weird logic is this? Nvidia takes all the blame, when AMD has an inferior product and just takes 50usd off their pricing. And worst they actively wait to see how much Nvidia charges to do their pricing.
Sure it's all on Nvidia :roll:
Posted on Reply
#80
Rover4444
Hecate91True, but AMD being a business doesn't have to hand out GPU's for free either, Nvidia pushing prices up is the reason the market is a mess.
Feel like them not "handing out GPU's for free" (AKA selling at a reasonable price from the start) is one of the reasons their marketshare is so poor now, personally.
Posted on Reply
#81
Caring1
So many cry babies expecting AMD to basically give away GPUs for nothing. :banghead:
Posted on Reply
#82
Fluffmeister
Damn, I just miss the good old days when AMD fans were livid at a $699 GTX 1080 Ti.
Posted on Reply
#83
Caring1
Recus2016: 84% buy $100-$300 GPU
2025: 85% buy $700 GPU

Ever heard of inflation. :banghead: :slap:
Posted on Reply
#84
Rover4444
Caring1So many cry babies expecting AMD to basically give away GPUs for nothing. :banghead:
Caring1Ever heard of inflation. :banghead: :slap:
Bait used to be believable. :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#85
unruheherd
Oof. I am statistically a wealthy European household but there's simply no way im going to pay more than 300 euro for a GPU. As an adult there's less time to game and I don't care about getting a 700 Euro card if I'm drowning in work for the next 6 months. Guess I'll stick with my 3060 ti forever

I can't understand why AMD held back review and the release apparently by weeks if they are simply going to repeat the Nvidia -50 strategy *again* which hasn't worked in their favor in the past.
Posted on Reply
#86
Dawora
Caring1So many cry babies expecting AMD to basically give away GPUs for nothing. :banghead:
Ppls just want to get everything dirt cheap, lot of whining about prices.

i dont care if 9070XT cost 500 or 800, i buy one if i want that kind of performance, same goes whit Nvidia Gpus and prices.
Also all GPU are optional,we can life whitout them

If whiners dont have money, they can buy used GPU,like Gtx970 30$ or something :)
Posted on Reply
#87
Hecate91
DahitaThey don't care about keeping pricing high because gamers now represent barely 10% of their revenue. They are much less profitable than AI.
That much is obvious since Nvidia combined their gaming revenue into gaming & AI, so Jensen can claim they have record profit on gaming cards
DahitaThe selling price of RTX 50X0 is not higher than MSRP because of Nvidia either. The price is inflated at the AIB and the retailer's level.
I keep seeing it but have yet to see proof of the mark ups all being at the AIB and retailer level.
However the AIBs have to make some profit, we seen what happened to EVGA went they lost money on the 30 series, retailers are going take advantage of low stock as well.
Bomby569what kind of weird logic is this? Nvidia takes all the blame, when AMD has an inferior product and just takes 50usd off their pricing. And worst they actively wait to see how much Nvidia charges to do their pricing.
Sure it's all on Nvidia :roll:
What kind of logic is putting all the blame on AMD? I always see people blaming the competition for what Nvidia is charging, but then they go ahead and buy Nvidia anyway.
And yes AMD being the competition will wait and see what the market leader charges, it's why Nvidia having a near monopoly is bad and no different than the near monopoly Intel used to have with CPU's.
DaworaCloser to 5080 Lol haha ,dont try to start a hype train..

9070XT is 2% slower than 4080
A 9070XT 2% slower still puts it around 5070Ti level.
Posted on Reply
#88
Dawora
unruheherdOof. I am statistically a wealthy European household but there's simply no way im going to pay more than 300 euro for a GPU. As an adult there's less time to game and I don't care about getting a 700 Euro card if I'm drowning in work for the next 6 months. Guess I'll stick with my 3060 ti forever

I can't understand why AMD held back review and the release apparently by weeks if they are simply going to repeat the Nvidia -50 strategy *again* which hasn't worked in their favor in the past.
Yes Gpus is totaly optional, no need to buy anything..

i usualy pay 400$ because i sold old one 400$ discount afther 2y of usage
Posted on Reply
#89
Arkz
$700 probably means £700. And if it launches for £700 then just lol. I've seen the 7900 XTX for £613 new.
Posted on Reply
#90
Dawora
Hecate91A 9070XT 2% slower still puts it around 5070Ti level.
But not 5080
Posted on Reply
#91
Rover4444
Hecate91That much is obvious since Nvidia combined their gaming revenue into gaming & AI, so Jensen can claim they have record profit on gaming cards

I keep seeing it but have yet to see proof of the mark ups all being at the AIB and retailer level.
However the AIBs have to make some profit, we seen what happened to EVGA went they lost money on the 30 series, retailers are going take advantage of low stock as well.

What kind of logic is putting all the blame on AMD? I always see people blaming the competition for what Nvidia is charging, but then they go ahead and buy Nvidia anyway.
And yes AMD being the competition will wait and see what the market leader charges, it's why Nvidia having a near monopoly is bad and no different than the near monopoly Intel used to have with CPU's.

A 9070XT 2% slower still puts it around 5070Ti level.
From what I've seen, Blackwell overclocks like crazy, too. Feel like NVIDIA's intentionally leaving a lot of performance on the table.

AMD doing a Ryzen with their GPUs is how they change things, not chasing prices. They can do it at any time, they just knowingly push prices up along with NVIDIA. If it were five years ago it'd be one thing, but at this point I think they know what they're doing if these prices are true. I'd even argue they're equally to blame.
Posted on Reply
#92
Dawora
Arkz$700 probably means £700. And if it launches for £700 then just lol. I've seen the 7900 XTX for £613 new.
+20% vat = 840 + AiB extra for better models
Posted on Reply
#93
Arkz
Dawora+20% vat = 840 + AiB extra for better models
I'm already including tax saying $700 is £700. Since $700 is actually £552.
Posted on Reply
#94
Dahita
Hecate91That much is obvious since Nvidia combined their gaming revenue into gaming & AI, so Jensen can claim they have record profit on gaming cards
There's no mystery here, it's all public.



Nvidia is not holding any stock for gamers to raise prices. They don't have any because in the last 4 years, they went from gamer-centric to AI centric. That's why we have no real improvement from the RTX 40x0 to the RTX 50X0 generation, and that's why prices are mechanically rising in spite of MSRP. It's because of production shortage. They no longer care about the gamer's market, and are only releasing something to keep us around.
Posted on Reply
#95
CyberPomPom
DaworaBut not 5080
The original post mentioned a ~10% OC over the standard 9070XT, it would get quite close I reckon.
I do believe AMD should just release a stupid OC variant to compete with the 5080 and call it a day in the higher end of the market. Let AIB get creative (and expensive) with it and still offer price sensitive GPU for the main market.
Posted on Reply
#96
medi01
Bomby569another fun fact: 90% of gamers
84% of gamers buy pre-builds.
Pre-builds is a strongarming galore for Intel and nVidia.

AMD got to 30%+ share in CPUs largely due to Intel's shortages.
Intel is GAINING MARKET SHARE at the moment.
It is not about AMD having great products.

Steam shows 16.5% of the market using AMD GPUs, while 75% are on Nv. That is basically 20% vs 80% split and again it's not something that would change without moving OEMs.


The "console" kind of pre-buuilds are nearly 100% AMD.
Posted on Reply
#97
AusWolf
I don't know why the title is reinforcing the nv minus $50 meme based on a rumour, especially 3 days before we get official info. I think it's poor.
Posted on Reply
#98
Denver
AusWolfI don't know why the title is reinforcing the nv minus $50 meme based on a rumour, especially 3 days before we get official info. I think it's poor.
Controversy generates more engagement than positive stuff. Posting something like "The RX 9070 XT is expected to cost 40% less than the current market price of the competing 5070 Ti" would have the same impact, but taking jabs at AMD is already standard practice. :p

Moreover, it's best to wait for reviews, even if the leaks seem reliable. There's no harm in keeping expectations in check. Plus, By then Jensen should have found the missing ROPs. :cool:
Posted on Reply
#100
Zareek
Tek-CheckDo you want AMD to have the same fake MSRP at 550 as Nvidia has at 750?
Is that really what you want to see?
Stop with the real MSRP BS. Ngreedia's MSRP is real Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price. SUGGESTED!!! The retailer can price them at whatever they want to unless they have some sort of contractual agreement that says otherwise. The real issue with the 50 series is availability. Ngreedia launched early and they are prioritizing their TSMC wafer allocation for AI. Pure and simple, the market for the 50 series is stronger than the production numbers for it. I doubt even Ngreedia is doing that on purpose, it's not like the retailers are paying them more for overpricing the cards.

Regardless, it is not a valid reason for AMD overpricing these cards. If this pricing is real, we can all but guarantee AMD discrete graphics will lose even more market share this year. The only chance they don't is that Ngreedia never meets demand for the 50 series so these overpriced cards seem like a deal. Maybe that is what they are banking on.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 26th, 2025 14:25 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts