Tuesday, March 25th 2025

AMD-built Radeon RX 9070 non-XT Tested Out by Chiphell Member
Around late January, out-of-date AMD marketing material teased the existence of a Radeon RX 9070 series reference card design. Almost a month later, PC hardware news outlets picked up on an official signal about Team Red's launch lineup consisting entirely of board partner-produced options. First-party enthusiasts were disappointed by the apparent total lack of "Made by AMD" (MBA) solutions, but some unusual specimens appeared online roughly two weeks post-RDNA 4's launch. Reports pointed to triple-fan Radeon RX 9070 XT and dual-fan RX 9070 MBA cards being exchanged for cash via Chinese black market channels. Photographed examples seemed to sport a somewhat muted black shroud design—not quite as exciting when compared to AMD's marketed/rendered brushed metal effect promo units.
Members of the Chiphell forum have spent months leaking many aspects of Team Red's foray into a new generation of graphics architecture—going back to the days of old nomenclature: Radeon RX 8800 XT. Yesterday, one participant revealed their fresh purchase of a Radeon RX 9070 non-XT MBA card. They sold their old GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12 GB graphics card, in favor of Navi 48 GPU-based OEM hardware. The post focused mainly on photo uploads and screenshots, but a brief description stated: "purchased at original price (TPU note: presumably 4499 RMB), room temperature is 16 degrees Celsius. Dual fans on the front. The back panel has an AMD logo, but it's a sticker." As theorized by VideoCardz, AMD likely produced a limited number of pre-release "public" MBA cards. The publication reckons that partner companies have received a smattering of samples for evaluation or software development purposes. The presence of an old school Radeon logo (pre-RDNA era) is a head scratcher, given the unit's supposed first-party origin.VideoCardz kindly interpreted the Chiphell post into a fully-descriptive form: "the card was tested in Furmark, 3DMark TimeSpy, and Steel Nomad, which concluded that the card was performing just as expected from the Radeon RX 9070. Apparently, the card is also correctly recognized as the RX 9070 16 GB, so it was definitely not an early engineering sample but a final version. The cooler keeps the GPU at 67°C after 8 minutes of testing, while the hotspot temperature seems to be around 84°C. There's no mention of how loud it is nor how it compares to other cards, but the average temperature seems to be within what one would expect from such a simple design."
Sources:
Chiphell Forum, VideoCardz
Members of the Chiphell forum have spent months leaking many aspects of Team Red's foray into a new generation of graphics architecture—going back to the days of old nomenclature: Radeon RX 8800 XT. Yesterday, one participant revealed their fresh purchase of a Radeon RX 9070 non-XT MBA card. They sold their old GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12 GB graphics card, in favor of Navi 48 GPU-based OEM hardware. The post focused mainly on photo uploads and screenshots, but a brief description stated: "purchased at original price (TPU note: presumably 4499 RMB), room temperature is 16 degrees Celsius. Dual fans on the front. The back panel has an AMD logo, but it's a sticker." As theorized by VideoCardz, AMD likely produced a limited number of pre-release "public" MBA cards. The publication reckons that partner companies have received a smattering of samples for evaluation or software development purposes. The presence of an old school Radeon logo (pre-RDNA era) is a head scratcher, given the unit's supposed first-party origin.VideoCardz kindly interpreted the Chiphell post into a fully-descriptive form: "the card was tested in Furmark, 3DMark TimeSpy, and Steel Nomad, which concluded that the card was performing just as expected from the Radeon RX 9070. Apparently, the card is also correctly recognized as the RX 9070 16 GB, so it was definitely not an early engineering sample but a final version. The cooler keeps the GPU at 67°C after 8 minutes of testing, while the hotspot temperature seems to be around 84°C. There's no mention of how loud it is nor how it compares to other cards, but the average temperature seems to be within what one would expect from such a simple design."
17 Comments on AMD-built Radeon RX 9070 non-XT Tested Out by Chiphell Member
Well, if they make a 9080.. hopefully they can not cut so many corners, and build a card that the masses will enjoy. I will not knowingly buy hardware that spends its time a few C away from death lol.
I am guessing.. like when the boss is away, but there are cameras everywhere.. people are watching lol.
Regardless, you will likely not be a fan of '9080', should it exist (probably ~90c).
I find it a fascinating idea myself (to run a tiny chip w/ as much power as possible and can realistically be cooled), but to each their own.
I think temp, as well as power consumption will be the argument against it should AMD make such a card (say with 32GB) and can actually do 1440pRT and/or 4k up-scaling (from 1080p, if not 1440p) alright.
But let's be real, they wouldn't make it if it couldn't run that way. Many people have had weird instances of running Radeons (with bad mounts/whatever) and they simply throttle at 110c.
OTOH, nVIDIA cards melt and start on fire (I know this from personal experience; and mine wasn't even that hot/pulling a large load when it did).
So, you know, a thing to think about. Worries in your head versus actual reality of operation.
Also, what if doing something like that allowed such a card (along w/ using GDDR6 etc) to be very cheap (as-in compete in price w/ 5070Ti)? I think it's an interesting conversation.
It could realistically replace the 7900xtx, while selling for a price people would actually pay for it (perhaps a similar/lower price than 7900xtx ever was). Maybe ~$700-800?
Without a doubt the max capabilities of B203 and N48 *appear* to line up very close to one-another (although we haven't seen the capabilities of 24gbps GDDR6), and 32GB is more than 24GB.
It would be very interesting indeed, imo, regardless if some models get a little toasty.
I still don't want it (as I want something slightly faster than a 4090; 100TF+; neither N48 or B203 will pull that off), but I bet it will be an interesting option to many...especially if it's in reality very close to a PS6/NXB.
Which I would imagine it HAS to be. I don't know why you make that card unless it is possible at the top of it's range to be that. I could imagine them using it for a Dev kit (until a 3nm shrink/actual PS/XB silicon).
Who knows...maybe they already are. Stranger things have happened.
Even against a relatively small 9070/XT Die at 360mm2 they can make 5x8core CCDs that they can sell as 5x9700X or 5x9800X3D or 2.5x9950X/3D.
Gaming GPUs are the least profitable products today in the eyes of the shareholders of such companies (AMD, Intel, nVidia).
I surely don’t like it but it’s a fact.