Monday, June 28th 2021

Three Major Arm Licensees Endorse the NVIDIA Takeover

NVIDIA's $40 billion takeover of Arm Holdings plc from SoftBank, got a shot in the arm, as three major licensees of the IP came out in support of the bid. These include Broadcom, MediaTek, and Marvell Technology Group. This development is key for NVIDIA to fight the perception built up by a rival faction, that the democratized nature of the Arm IP would get lost if a chipmaker like NVIDIA owns it. This rival faction is primarily led by Qualcomm.

It's interesting to note the individual backers of the NVIDIA takeover. There is nothing but love between Broadcom and Qualcomm, especially after the former's failed bid to acquire the latter. MediaTek is a major smartphone and IoT SoC maker, dominating the low-cost and mainstream smartphone segments. Marvell is big in datacenter and storage IP. Each of the three are results of huge IP consolidation over the past decade.
The rival faction appears to be led predominantly by players who feel insecure by NVIDIA holding the Arm IP, as they probably fear the company would withhold cutting-edge development to itself, affecting the competitiveness of new-gen products of these companies. These companies are Qualcomm, possibly Apple (which just made a power move ditching Intel x64 for homebrew Arm chips); Samsung, which makes in-house Exynos SoCs for its Galaxy smartphones, and extensively uses Arm in its storage products; and others. Microsoft is among the big firms that voiced apprehensions over the NVIDIA bid.

Japan's SoftBank is eager to get rid of Arm from its holdings, and has even gone as far as to seek a $7.5 billion loan for itself that uses proceeds from the Arm sale as security.
Source: Bloomberg
Add your own comment

48 Comments on Three Major Arm Licensees Endorse the NVIDIA Takeover

#26
TheoneandonlyMrK
mtcn77The guy finished EE and designed his own software as his first investment. Can you be less under appreciative of what a genius Jeff Bezos is?
No that would be me but I'll not demonstrate how un appreciative I am for fear of thread banning.
One man's genius is another man's idiot.
Posted on Reply
#27
Richards
This is good.. nvidia needs arm to breakup the intel amd server monopoly
Posted on Reply
#28
mtcn77
Like it has some foothold.
Posted on Reply
#29
dont whant to set it"'
Trust issues when it comes to that "fishy smelling" green(nV) troll. Or , as the folksaying goes , some like this :"fish goes bad, it's from the head that it begins to".
Posted on Reply
#30
TheoneandonlyMrK
RichardsThis is good.. nvidia needs arm to breakup the intel amd server monopoly
You realise a monopoly is one company dominating?!, Sooo your wrong there and wrong in general , Arm platforms running Windows are out already in servers and for consumers Without Nvidia doing anything.

So no fff Nvidia, there is not one company they bought, that they didn't disappear into obscurity.
Posted on Reply
#32
z1n0x
RJARRRPCGPFuture PLC bought Anandtech.
3 years ago, also what does it have to do with this thread?
Posted on Reply
#33
Minus Infinity
Dick move from those companies. Nvidia acquiring ARM will be a disaster and needs to be blocked ASAP.
Posted on Reply
#34
Richards
TheoneandonlyMrKYou realise a monopoly is one company dominating?!, Sooo your wrong there and wrong in general , Arm platforms running Windows are out already in servers and for consumers Without Nvidia doing anything.

So no fff Nvidia, there is not one company they bought, that they didn't disappear into obscurity.
Thank god you d'not have to decide
Posted on Reply
#35
watzupken
I hope these companies are not supporting Nvidia's acquisition of ARM due to some "promised benefits/ preferential treatment expectations" from Nvidia. Generally, Nvidia's reputation is that they don't play nice regardless if you are friend or foe.
Posted on Reply
#37
maxfly
Why softbank is in such a big ass hurry to dump arm to begin with makes no sense. Do they honestly think selling now is peak profitability?
Posted on Reply
#38
TheoneandonlyMrK
RichardsThank god you d'not have to decide
Like wise to you, monopoly.
Posted on Reply
#39
R0H1T
maxflyWhy softbank is in such a big ass hurry to dump arm to begin with makes no sense.
One word ~ WeWork
The New York Times called the company's failed effort to go public and related turmoil, "an implosion unlike any other in the history of start-ups,"
From everyone's favorite, Wiki :twitch:
On November 6, 2019, SoftBank Group reported a $9.2 billion in write-downs on its investments in WeWork. This amount is approximately 90% of the $10.3 billion SoftBank invested in WeWork over the past few years.
Remember for every startup "success" story there's probably 10x as many failures out there!
Softbank chew way more than what they could digest & then Covid stuck, I can't even imagine the losses due to that :slap:
Posted on Reply
#40
mtcn77
R0H1TOne word ~ WeWork

From everyone's favorite, Wiki :twitch:

Remember for every startup "success" story there's probably 10x as many failures out there!
Softbank chew way more than what they could digest & then Covid stuck, I can't even imagine the losses due to that :slap:
WeWork was SoftBank's Theranos.
Theranos, the blood-testing startup once valued at $9 billion, has fallen far from grace.
Posted on Reply
#41
R0H1T
Yes, but a slight ~35 billion dollar difference here :laugh:
WeWork formally withdrew its S-1 filing and announced the postponing of its IPO. At that time, the reported public valuation of the company was around $10 billion, a reduction from the $47 billion valuation it achieved in January and less than the $12.8 billion it had raised since 2010
I bet someone made a lot of bucks for that "valuation" of sorts :toast:
Posted on Reply
#42
mtcn77
R0H1TYes, but a slight ~35 billion dollar difference here :laugh:
I bet someone made a lot of bucks for that "valuation" of sorts :toast:
I see $12.8B>$9.2B>$0 assets down the drain, so not so much different.
Posted on Reply
#43
Richards
TheoneandonlyMrKLike wise to you, monopoly.
Amd fan are you ?
watzupkenI hope these companies are not supporting Nvidia's acquisition of ARM due to some "promised benefits/ preferential treatment expectations" from Nvidia. Generally, Nvidia's reputation is that they don't play nice regardless if you are friend or foe.
Have nvidia ever paid oem to not put amd products like intel ? D'not compare nvidia to the true monopolist like intel and qualcom
Posted on Reply
#44
TheoneandonlyMrK
RichardsAmd fan are you ?


Have nvidia ever paid oem to not put amd products like intel ? D'not compare nvidia to the true monopolist like intel and qualcom
Have you heard yourself,. Comedy.

I'm an ARM fan in this debate Ty, no need to ask your allegiance.
Posted on Reply
#45
z1n0x
RichardsHave nvidia ever paid oem to not put amd products like intel ? D'not compare nvidia to the true monopolist like intel and qualcom
The Origin PC tier 0 scandal, Geforce Partner Program.
Posted on Reply
#46
Richards
TheoneandonlyMrKHave you heard yourself,. Comedy.

I'm an ARM fan in this debate Ty, no need to ask your allegiance.
Guess you one scared to admit
z1n0xThe Origin PC tier 0 scandal, Geforce Partner Program.
Weak argument
Posted on Reply
#47
z1n0x
RichardsWeak argument
You don't like facts, aren't you? Do you care to disclose your affiliations? Employee, shareholder or fanboy in denial?
Posted on Reply
#48
maxfly
What exactly are you arguing about? Does it have anything to do with Nvidia s acquisition of arm and the three companies that are backing Nvidia? No?
You may want to take it to pms before you get the thread locked.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 2nd, 2025 22:41 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts