Thursday, April 11th 2024

Meta Announces New MTIA AI Accelerator with Improved Performance to Ease NVIDIA's Grip

Meta has announced the next generation of its Meta Training and Inference Accelerator (MTIA) chip, which is designed to train and infer AI models at scale. The newest MTIA chip is a second-generation design of Meta's custom silicon for AI, and it is being built on TSMC's 5 nm technology. Running at the frequency of 1.35 GHz, the new chip is getting a boost to 90 Watts of TDP per package compared to just 25 Watts for the first-generation design. Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS) processing is where the chip shines, and it includes matrix multiplication and vector/SIMD processing. At GEMM matrix processing, each chip can process 708 TeraFLOPS at INT8 (presumably meant FP8 in the spec) with sparsity, 354 TeraFLOPS without, 354 TeraFLOPS at FP16/BF16 with sparsity, and 177 TeraFLOPS without.

Classical vector and processing is a bit slower at 11.06 TeraFLOPS at INT8 (FP8), 5.53 TeraFLOPS at FP16/BF16, and 2.76 TFLOPS single-precision FP32. The MTIA chip is specifically designed to run AI training and inference on Meta's PyTorch AI framework, with an open-source Triton backend that produces compiler code for optimal performance. Meta uses this for all its Llama models, and with Llama3 just around the corner, it could be trained on these chips. To package it into a system, Meta puts two of these chips onto a board and pairs them with 128 GB of LPDDR5 memory. The board is connected via PCIe Gen 5 to a system where 12 boards are stacked densely. This process is repeated six times in a single rack for 72 boards and 144 chips in a single rack for a total of 101.95 PetaFLOPS, assuming linear scaling at INT8 (FP8) precision. Of course, linear scaling is not quite possible in scale-out systems, which could bring it down to under 100 PetaFLOPS per rack.
Below, you can see images of the chip floorplan, specifications compared to the prior version, as well as the system.

Source: Meta
Add your own comment

19 Comments on Meta Announces New MTIA AI Accelerator with Improved Performance to Ease NVIDIA's Grip

#1
Wirko
Thanks for correcting Meta's "TFLOPS/s" from their AI-generated specifications list to TFLOPS.
Posted on Reply
#2
AleksandarK
News Editor
WirkoThanks for correcting Meta's "TFLOPS/s" from their AI-generated specifications list to TFLOPS.
Yeah I noticed that as well. The S literally stands for Second so not sure why do it again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Posted on Reply
#3
Daven
AleksandarKYeah I noticed that as well. The S literally stands for Second so not sure why do it again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marketing team ‘gone wild’ I guess.
Posted on Reply
#4
not_my_real_name
AleksandarKYeah I noticed that as well. The S literally stands for Second so not sure why do it again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
AI acceleration, you know...
Posted on Reply
#5
Daven
not_my_real_nameAI acceleration, you know...
Lol, I get it, nice joke. Meters per second per second and all that.
Posted on Reply
#6
Owen1982
Anyone notice from spec sheet: nearly 4x power for 'only' 2x performance of 1st Gen?

Edit: Was looking at the Instances flops, maybe that is a bad comparison ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Posted on Reply
#7
Wirko
DavenLol, I get it, nice joke. Meters per second per second and all that.
But if they are actually right... then we better run... and run fast!
Posted on Reply
#8
konga
Owen1982Anyone notice from spec sheet: nearly 4x power for 'only' 2x performance of 1st Gen?

Edit: Was looking at the Instances flops, maybe that is a bad comparison ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don't know much about AI compute specs, but it's definitely over 3x faster in several metrics in their spec sheet. This is a card designed primarily for their own use, so it only really needs to be faster in the ways that matter to them, anyway.
Posted on Reply
#9
Steevo
I too RPMs at that.
Posted on Reply
#10
ThrashZone
Hi,
More worrying is Meta's grip a known bad actor hehe
Posted on Reply
#11
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
ThrashZoneHi,
More worrying is Meta's grip a known bad actor hehe
They're a bad actor for all sides - that makes them chaotic evil, I believe.

And with a bit of PR, they think they can swipe away Nvidia's marketshare? Don't think it works that way.
Posted on Reply
#12
Wirko
kongaThis is a card designed primarily for their own use, so it only really needs to be faster in the ways that matter to them, anyway.
They have published detailed specs, it looks like they are going to sell the card to others too.
Posted on Reply
#13
Onasi
the54thvoidAnd with a bit of PR, they think they can swipe away Nvidia's marketshare? Don't think it works that way.
It’s Meta, the company who apparently thought that saying “metaverse” enough times and even rebranding themselves as it would inevitably lead to said stupid idea becoming a reality and making them bank. They are Chaotic Evil alright, also in the sense that any rational thought had left the building a while ago.
Posted on Reply
#14
Wirko
ThrashZoneHi,
More worrying is Meta's grip a known bad actor hehe
At least they've released some interesting stuff as open source - maybe they'll release the software ecosystem for this chip.
Posted on Reply
#15
persondb
WirkoThanks for correcting Meta's "TFLOPS/s" from their AI-generated specifications list to TFLOPS.
It's even funnier because they put it as
Classical vector and processing is a bit slower at 11.06 TeraFLOPS at INT8 (...)
INT8 isn't 'FLOPS' as FLOPS' are 'FLoating point OPerations per Second'
There is no floating point in int8...
Posted on Reply
#16
AleksandarK
News Editor
persondbIt's even funnier because they put it as


INT8 isn't 'FLOPS' as FLOPS' are 'FLoating point OPerations per Second'
There is no floating point in int8...
Which is true. I assume they meant FP8, which is the hot new low-precision format everyone is pushing.
Posted on Reply
#17
ToTTenTranz
Unless Meta is going to be selling these as AIB products, it's not really going to ease Nvidia's grip.

Nvidia has plenty of competition in cloud services regardless of the hardware. What the market is lacking is competition in hardware that can be bought to run in the clients' installations.
Posted on Reply
#18
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
ToTTenTranzUnless Meta is going to be selling these as AIB products, it's not really going to ease Nvidia's grip.
It’s eases the grip Nvidia has on them.
Posted on Reply
#19
Minus Infinity
Honestly if it came to a choice, I would choose Nvidia over Meta any day of the week. Fcukerberg is one of the three biggest scum on the planet. Huang an amateur compared to this clown. I put Meta and Google in the same category. Nvidia is next tier down.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 17th, 2024 15:14 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts