Thursday, December 2nd 2021

FTC Sues to Block $40 Billion Semiconductor NVIDIA and Arm Chip Merger

The Federal Trade Commission today sued to block U.S. chip supplier Nvidia Corp.'s $40 billion acquisition of U.K. chip design provider Arm Ltd. Semiconductor chips power the computers and technologies that are essential to our modern economy and society. The proposed vertical deal would give one of the largest chip companies control over the computing technology and designs that rival firms rely on to develop their own competing chips. The FTC's complaint alleges that the combined firm would have the means and incentive to stifle innovative next-generation technologies, including those used to run datacenters and driver-assistance systems in cars.

"The FTC is suing to block the largest semiconductor chip merger in history to prevent a chip conglomerate from stifling the innovation pipeline for next-generation technologies," said FTC Bureau of Competition Director Holly Vedova. "Tomorrow's technologies depend on preserving today's competitive, cutting-edge chip markets. This proposed deal would distort Arm's incentives in chip markets and allow the combined firm to unfairly undermine Nvidia's rivals. The FTC's lawsuit should send a strong signal that we will act aggressively to protect our critical infrastructure markets from illegal vertical mergers that have far-reaching and damaging effects on future innovations."
Arm, which is owned by Tokyo-based Softbank Group Corp., does not supply or market finished computer chips or devices. It creates and licenses microprocessor designs and architectures, referred to as Arm Processor Technology in the complaint, to other technology companies, including Nvidia. These companies, in turn, rely on Arm Processor Technology to make computer chips that power a wide range of modern computing devices, from smartphones to tablets to driver-assistance systems to computers in large datacenters. Arm also provides important related support and services. Arm licenses its Processor Technology using an industry-described neutral, open licensing approach and is often dubbed the "Switzerland" of the semiconductor industry, according to the complaint.

California-based Nvidia is one of the world's largest and most valuable computing companies, according to the complaint. Nvidia develops and markets computer chips and devices and is best known as the dominant supplier of standalone graphics processing units, or GPUs, for personal computers and datacenters, which are used widely for artificial intelligence processing and graphics processing. Nvidia also develops and markets products for advanced networking, datacenter central processing units, and computer-assisted driving. In these areas, both Nvidia and important competitors to Nvidia rely on Arm's technology to develop their own competing products.

Because Arm's technology is a critical input that enables competition between Nvidia and its competitors in several markets, the complaint alleges that the proposed merger would give Nvidia the ability and incentive to use its control of this technology to undermine its competitors, reducing competition and ultimately resulting in reduced product quality, reduced innovation, higher prices, and less choice, harming the millions of Americans who benefit from Arm-based products, the complaint alleges.

According to the complaint, the acquisition will harm competition in three worldwide markets in which Nvidia competes using Arm-based products:
  • High-Level Advanced Driver Assistance Systems for passenger cars. These systems offer computer-assisted driving functions, such as automated lane changing, lane keeping, highway entrance and exit, and collision prevention;
  • DPU SmartNICs, which are advanced networking products used to increase the security and efficiency of datacenter servers; and
  • Arm-Based CPUs for Cloud Computing Service Providers. These new and emerging products leverage Arm's technology to meet the performance, power efficiency, and customizability needs of modern datacenters that provide cloud computing services. "Cloud computing" refers to the increasingly popular computing business model in which large datacenter operators provide computing services remotely and/or directly offer computing resources for rent, as well as provide other support services to customers who can then run applications, host websites, or perform other computing tasks on the remote servers—i.e., "the cloud."
The complaint also alleges that the acquisition will harm competition by giving Nvidia access to the competitively sensitive information of Arm's licensees, some of whom are Nvidia's rivals, and that it is likely to decrease the incentive for Arm to pursue innovations that are perceived to conflict with Nvidia's business interests.

Today, Arm's licensees - including Nvidia's rivals - routinely share competitively sensitive information with Arm. Licensees rely on Arm for support in developing, designing, testing, debugging, troubleshooting, maintaining, and improving their products, according to the complaint. Arm licensees share their competitively sensitive information with Arm because Arm is a neutral partner, not a rival chipmaker. The acquisition is likely to result in a critical loss of trust in Arm and its ecosystem, the complaint alleges.

The acquisition is also likely to harm innovation competition by eliminating innovations that Arm would have pursued but for a conflict with Nvidia's interests. The merged firm would have less incentive to develop or enable otherwise beneficial new features or innovations if Nvidia determines they are likely to harm Nvidia, the complaint alleges.

The complaint names Nvidia Corp., Arm Ltd., and Arm owner Softbank Group Corp. The Commission vote to issue the administrative complaint was 4-0. The administrative trial is scheduled to begin on August 9, 2022.

Throughout the investigation, Commission staff has cooperated closely with staff of the competition agencies in the European Union, United Kingdom, Japan, and South Korea.

NOTE: The Commission issues a complaint when it has "reason to believe" that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. For the latest news and resources, follow the FTC on social media, subscribe to press releases and read our blog.
Source: FTC
Add your own comment

62 Comments on FTC Sues to Block $40 Billion Semiconductor NVIDIA and Arm Chip Merger

#2
z1n0x
The only suprising thing is, it took this long for it to get blocked. No one in their right mind would agree to this acquisition. We know Nvidia quite well.
Posted on Reply
#3
robert3892
Rather than sue couldn't the request simply have been blocked? International approval is required for this type of merger.
Posted on Reply
#4
W1zzard
and NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
Posted on Reply
#5
robert3892
W1zzardand NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
NVIDIA has plenty of revenue steam going forward
Posted on Reply
#6
mtcn77
I would actually sue Softbank harder for making this almost a reality. No one is exempt from consequences if you are blowing billions on Weworks and expecting the industry to cover your losses. If you blow one deal, you don't get to deal and subject to litigation. End of story.
Posted on Reply
#7
windwhirl
robert3892Rather than sue couldn't the request simply have been blocked? International approval is required for this type of merger.
If they could just block the deal, they would have done so. The Comission voted 4-0 to issue an administrative complaint, so they're very interested in making sure this deal doesn't go through.
mtcn77I would actually sue Softbank harder for making this almost a reality.
That's just silly. ARM is a property of Softbank, they can sell or keep it, according to the laws. It's not their problem if this deal goes through and Nvidia decides to be anti-competitive later on in regards to ARM.
Posted on Reply
#8
mtcn77
They blew as much money on weworks as theranos.
Posted on Reply
#9
windwhirl
mtcn77They blew as much money on weworks as theranos.
So? Their problem alone.
Posted on Reply
#10
mtcn77
windwhirlIt's not their problem if this deal goes through
See that is why ...
windwhirlSo? Their problem alone.
That is not happening in their pockets. Arm represents a part of the industry and Softbank has the credibility of theranos if you think vaporizing that much on fake businesses is best for the industry.
I think you mistake business and industry. They are company businesses, but they are part of the industry. No one gives them the right to trigger bubbles.
Posted on Reply
#11
windwhirl
W1zzardand NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
Probably because of the time the news was published



Kinda close to the closing time for the markets.

Plus it's not exactly news that the deal is getting a lot of hold ups everywhere. The FTC joining the group, although with a seemingly harsher stance, isn't a lot of change from the current deal situation.
mtcn77See that is why ...

That is not happening in their pockets. Arm represents a part of the industry and Softbank has the credibility of theranos if you think vaporizing that much on fake businesses is best for the industry.
I think you mistake business and industry. They are company businesses, but they are part of the industry. No one gives them the right to trigger bubbles.
No one has the right to block Softbank's right to sell ARM just because bubbles (and what bubbles?), specially when the deal has to go through, what, five regulators at least, and has been taking like two years now just to get it approved or denied?
Posted on Reply
#12
bonehead123
dead, done, dead/////

As we all know, normally, once a lawsuit of this type is filed, it can take a buttload of years for anything to happen, good, bad, or otherwise :(

Meanwhile, ngreedia will be spending massive amounts of moolah to try to find a resolution/remedy etc, money they could have spent developing the next gen of gpu's and/or other devices..
Posted on Reply
#13
mtcn77
windwhirlProbably because of the time the news was published



Kinda close to the closing time for the markets.

Plus it's not exactly news that the deal is getting a lot of hold ups everywhere. The FTC joining the group, although with a seemingly harsher stance, isn't a lot of change from the current deal situation.



No one has the right to block Softbank's right to sell ARM just because bubbles (and what bubbles?), specially when the deal has to go through, what, five regulators at least, and has been taking like two years now just to get it approved or denied?
Theranos took 15 years to be dissolved. Your point? The question is, who can operate in direct contradiction with the industry. You cannot liquidate other people's assets. That is what weworks was and I don't think any company saving that has anything further to say about why arm is getting thrown under the bus.
Who is blaming arm as insolvent and liable to take over because its parent company flushed all its liquidity down the drain to keep doors open in a failed business?
It is only lust and greed that you are trying to defend. Softbank doesn't own Arm just as theranos is a corporate fraud.
Posted on Reply
#14
thesmokingman
W1zzardand NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
I don't think anyone thinks merger will be approved hence it's not affecting SP.
Posted on Reply
#15
Space Lynx
Astronaut
I plan on buying Intel cpu and Intel arc gpu next year, so I hope Nvidia enjoys their leather jacket collection and doesn't let the door hit them on the way out
Posted on Reply
#16
awesomesauce
So ARM can only be sold to another bank?

every compagnie now make their “own” chip

Also Waiting the response of softbank if They still want to try to sold ARM again
Posted on Reply
#17
DeathtoGnomes
bonehead123dead, done, dead/////

As we all know, normally, once a lawsuit of this type is filed, it can take a buttload of years for anything to happen, good, bad, or otherwise :(

Meanwhile, ngreedia will be spending massive amounts of moolah to try to find a resolution/remedy etc, money they could have spent developing the next gen of gpu's and/or other devices..
meanwhile, the sale is stalled.
Posted on Reply
#18
mtcn77
awesomesauceSo ARM can only be sold to another bank?

every compagnie now make there “own” chip

Also Waiting the response of softbank if They still want to try to sold ARM again
This is the right attitude. Anybody losing that much money is not fit for subsidiaries of that kind. You might doubt me, but softbank does not have the credibility to ruin another investment to keep up with more wrongdoing. It is their part they have to play. They lost 9.5B, they need to raise that much before they continue hold the title to their subsidiaries. Arm is not in the same league of weworks. Whomever deals that kind of fraud money has no business to do with arm.
Posted on Reply
#19
Ravenas
W1zzardand NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
Most analyst interviews over the past 2 weeks have already accounted for this… UK may strike before FTC suit concludes.

I do agree with the FTC on this.
Posted on Reply
#20
Fourstaff
mtcn77This is the right attitude. Anybody losing that much money is not fit for subsidiaries of that kind. You might doubt me, but softbank does not have the credibility to ruin another investment to keep up with more wrongdoing. It is their part they have to play. They lost 9.5B, they need to raise that much before they continue hold the title to their subsidiaries. Arm is not in the same league of weworks. Whomever deals that kind of fraud money has no business to do with arm.
9.5bln is pocket change to Softbank though, their AUM is north of 150bln: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoftBank_Vision_Fund. in comparison, their 150bln is peanuts compared to the market cap of Microsoft at 2.5 tln.
W1zzardand NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
Not sure of market expect the acquisition to get through anyway, or they have priced in the acquisition failure :wtf:
Posted on Reply
#21
Minus Infinity
Finally some great and positive news. Should never have gotten this far and dragged on so long. So sick of tech acquisitions that bring zeo benefits to any one but a few already obscenely wealthy board members. This would be a disaster for competition in the CPU space.
Posted on Reply
#22
maxfly
Steeerike 3! Yer outta there!!
China
Great Britain
America
So much for leather jacket boys aspirations of becoming the the next Musk or Bezos. I wonder whats burning in the kitchen tonight? :D
Finally a companies putrid track record speaks louder than its fat bank account.

Now the question becomes, is their a buyer out their that has the capability to turn ARM into a profitable enterprise. While avoiding the same FTC anti competitive issue? Perhaps they will have to partner up with a smaller company that has the technological means?
Posted on Reply
#23
Flanker
looks like the whole world hates this acquisition lol
Posted on Reply
#24
Totally
W1zzardand NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
Give it a couple days, tech stocks only react quickly when social media is involved, other things take a day or 2. It'll most like open low tomorrow morning.
Posted on Reply
#25
watzupken
W1zzardand NVIDIA stock didn't move down a bit today
I think people have kind of factor in the potential of the ARM acquisition failure. But given how strong Nvidia's revenue and profit have been over the years, there is little point for concern. Until it is concluded that the acquisition will not go through, it is unlikely to see share prices dropping. In fact, even if there is a drop, it is just going to be temporary.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 05:08 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts