Saturday, January 20th 2024
SSD Overclocking? It can be Done, with Serious Performance Gains
The PC master race has yielded many interesting activities for enthusiasts alike, with perhaps the pinnacle of activities being overclocking. Usually, subjects for overclocking include CPUs, GPUs, and RAM, with other components not actually being capable of overclocking. However, the enthusiast force never seems to settle, and today, we have proof of overclocking an off-the-shelf 2.5-inch SATA III NAND Flash SSD thanks to Gabriel Ferraz, a Computer Engineering graduate, and TechPowerUp's SSD database maintainer. He uses the RZX Pro 256 GB SSD in the video, a generic NAND Flash drive. The RZX Pro uses the Silicon Motion SM2259XT2 single-core, 32-bit ARC CPU running up to 550 MHz. It has two channels at 400 MHz, each with eight chip enable interconnects, allowing up to 16 NAND Flash dies to operate. The SSD doesn't feature a DRAM cache or support a host memory buffer. It has only one NAND Flash memory chip from Kioxia, uses BiCS FLASH 4 architecture, has 96 layers, and has 256 GB capacity.
While this NAND Flash die is rated for up to 400 MHz or 800 MT/s, it only ran at less than half the speed at 193.75 MHz or 387.5 MT/s at default settings. Gabriel acquired a SATA III to USB 3.0 adapter with a JMS578 bridge chip to perform the overclock. This adapter allows hot swapping of SSDs without the need to turn off the PC. He shorted two terminals in the drive's PCB to get the SSD to operate without its default safe mode. Mass Production Tools (MPTools), which OEMs use to flash SSDs, were used to change the firmware settings. Each NAND Flash architecture has its own special version of MPTools. The software directly shows control of the Flash clock, CPU clock, and output driving. However, additional tweaks like Flash IO driving with subdivisions need modifications. Control and Flash On-Die Termination (ODT) and Schmitt window trigger (referring to the Schmitt trigger comparator circuit) also needed a few modifications to make it work.The overclock results were an increase of 17.6% for the Silicon Motion controller, up to 500 MHz from the original 400 MHz, and 106% with 400 MHz clock for the NAND Flash, which only operated at 193 MHz stock. The performance results? While it varies from benchmark to benchmark, the latency has dropped. Only a slight improvement has been made in reading speeds, while writing has seen a more significant impact. Bandwidth has been increased, so the benchmarks naturally responded well. The biggest problem is the increased operating temperature. Temps were stable at 40C in stock settings, while the overclock pushed it to 45C. Over the long run, this decreases the lifetime of the drive. Overclocking the SSD also voids all manufacturer-implied warranties and reduces the expected number of read/write operations.Below, you can see a few benchmarks by Gabriel Ferraz, while the rest are available in the YouTube video here.
Source:
Gabriel Ferraz (YouTube)
While this NAND Flash die is rated for up to 400 MHz or 800 MT/s, it only ran at less than half the speed at 193.75 MHz or 387.5 MT/s at default settings. Gabriel acquired a SATA III to USB 3.0 adapter with a JMS578 bridge chip to perform the overclock. This adapter allows hot swapping of SSDs without the need to turn off the PC. He shorted two terminals in the drive's PCB to get the SSD to operate without its default safe mode. Mass Production Tools (MPTools), which OEMs use to flash SSDs, were used to change the firmware settings. Each NAND Flash architecture has its own special version of MPTools. The software directly shows control of the Flash clock, CPU clock, and output driving. However, additional tweaks like Flash IO driving with subdivisions need modifications. Control and Flash On-Die Termination (ODT) and Schmitt window trigger (referring to the Schmitt trigger comparator circuit) also needed a few modifications to make it work.The overclock results were an increase of 17.6% for the Silicon Motion controller, up to 500 MHz from the original 400 MHz, and 106% with 400 MHz clock for the NAND Flash, which only operated at 193 MHz stock. The performance results? While it varies from benchmark to benchmark, the latency has dropped. Only a slight improvement has been made in reading speeds, while writing has seen a more significant impact. Bandwidth has been increased, so the benchmarks naturally responded well. The biggest problem is the increased operating temperature. Temps were stable at 40C in stock settings, while the overclock pushed it to 45C. Over the long run, this decreases the lifetime of the drive. Overclocking the SSD also voids all manufacturer-implied warranties and reduces the expected number of read/write operations.Below, you can see a few benchmarks by Gabriel Ferraz, while the rest are available in the YouTube video here.
41 Comments on SSD Overclocking? It can be Done, with Serious Performance Gains
Then again, this can be said about pretty much every type of overclocking these days. The effort and time involved isn’t worth the result.
I'm surprised it took so long for people to notice this.
Overclocking other types of electronics is doable because we're generally talking about transistors or other very durable components. NAND flash cells are NOT durable. They are in fact relatively very delicate. So overclocking them? Seems a bit dubious to me. Granted, the article and whatnot above talks about the NAND controller as much as the NAND itself, but still.
They are not getting cheaper... >_>
Now to complete the half-meme of OC'ing an SSD, one should slap on the new hybrid AIO SSD cooler from MSI to deal with with increased heat and send it (somehow).
Sure isn't that called mem cache :cool:
First of all. I store important Files on these things. So less reliable is a no go for me.
Secondly with nvme ssd all ready maxing out PCIe gen 4 and if not all ready gen 5, very close to it and with the heat modern nvme ssd can make and the speeds they all ready make. Is oc really needed. For me the answer is no.
My Samsung 980 pro is plenty fast. Even for satan ssd, i can se it makes sense either as a decent Sara ssd all ready maxing out sata 3 speed.
So i will for sure keep my ssd at Stock speeds for reliability, heat and lifespan. I dont need a failing ssd and lost Files. With that said, i have never had a failing ssd since i got my first ssd back in 2011
Off causes for the fun and bragging rights, with an pc ssd. You can say litterly everything is overclock in your pc... Even your storage.
Caching isn't always reliable, for those that want to suggest it. Even with UPS, you can still have random software/firmware/hardware crashes/reboots and lose the caches. Your os is hosed and needs a rebuild or restore from backup.
Intel was 10 years ago experimenting with such software:
However never released it, due to the complications of SSD overclocking in general.
Dead chips, dataloss, other weird stuff. Imagine the RMA submissions.
It's not just the controller speed that matters but also the speed of the controller - NAND interface and how many NAND channels are available.
Also going to higher clock rates, you have to worry about signal integrity and potentially needing a different pcb substrate.
In addition to those things, you will also need power circuitry that can handle that extra power load without being stressed/overheating.
You're generally limited to between 5-10Watts of power from the host. There's a bunch of other things too, so let's go with no without significant re-engineering.
Even 10% increase for such drives would be huge.
I'll just stick with o/c'ing my cpu's & gpu's, at least that doesn't require a bunch of other parts & softwarez to do :roll: