Sunday, January 28th 2024

Intel "Panther Lake" Targets Substantial AI Performance Leap in 2025

Pat Gelsinger, CEO of Intel Corporation, has outlined future performance expectations for the company's Core range of processors. In a recent fourth quarter 2023 earnings call he declared: "The Core Ultra platform delivers leadership AI performance today with our next-generation platforms launching later this year, Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake tripling our AI performance. In 2025 with Panther Lake, we will grow AI performance up to an additional 2x." Team Blue's Intel Core Ultra "Meteor Lake" mobile processors arrived right at the tail end of last year, as a somewhat delayed answer to AMD's Ryzen 7040 "Phoenix" APU series—both leveraging their own AI-crunching NPU technologies. Gelsinger believes that the launch of Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake Core product lines will bring significant (3x) AI processing improvements over Meteor Lake. He seemed to confident in a delay-free release schedule for the new year and beyond: "We are first in the industry to have incorporated both gate-all-around and backside power delivery in a single process node, the latter unexpected two years ahead of our competition. Arrow Lake, our lead Intel 20A vehicle will launch this year."

He proceeded to gush about their next node advancement: "Intel 18A is expected to achieve manufacturing readiness in second half 2024, completing our five nodes in four year journey and bringing us back to process leadership. I am pleased to say that Clearwater Forest, our first Intel 18A part for servers has already gone into fab and Panther Lake for clients will be heading into Fab shortly." Industry experts posit that Core "Panther Lake" parts could borrow elements from the next generation Xeon "Clearwater Forest" efficiency-focused family—possibly the latter's "Darkmont" E-cores, to accompany "Cougar Cove" P-cores. The Intel CEO is quite excited about the manufacturing outlay for 2025: "I'll just say, hey, we look at this every single day and we're scrutinizing carefully our progress on 18A. And obviously the great news that we just described those Clearwater Forest taping out, that gives us a lot of confidence that 18A is healthy. That's a major product for us. Panther Lake following that shortly."
Sources: Intel Financial Report, Tom's Hardware, Wccftech, VideoCardz, Seeking Alpha
Add your own comment

56 Comments on Intel "Panther Lake" Targets Substantial AI Performance Leap in 2025

#51
trparky
NoyandThe difference is that Lisa mostly talks in conferences, when Pat talks everywhere.
That speaks to the desperation that Intel has found themselves in.

They're no longer king of the hill and Pat can't stand that. Meanwhile, Lisa Su doesn't have to brag; the hardware itself speaks for AMD's prowess.
Posted on Reply
#52
Wirko
lexluthermiesterWhile true, comparing tasks of a similar nature can easily be compared. Additionally, there are a number of benchmark utilities that are compiled for both platforms and many OSes.
I was just bothered by the mention of IPC. Maybe I'm just nitpicky (is that a word?) and should accept that IPC is sometimes used in its more-than-broadest sense without causing too much confusion.
Posted on Reply
#53
lexluthermiester
WirkoI was just bothered by the mention of IPC. Maybe I'm just nitpicky (is that a word?) and should accept that IPC is sometimes used in its more-than-broadest sense without causing too much confusion.
Yup, nitpicky is a word. RISC vs CISC IPC is an undying debate. Each has it's advantages, each has it's drawbacks. Comparing the two to each other is never a perfectly straight forward task and likely never will be. However, arriving at a conclusion based on a task by task analysis can give enough information to arrive at a finding which has merit. It's never perfect, but close enough. And in reality, Apple's Mseries SOCs are very solid and well performing. Make no mistake though, they can never replace CISC out-right without becoming CISC to some degree.
trparkyThat speaks to the desperation that Intel has found themselves in.
Desperation is not the right word. Intel has to adapt to the ever evolving reality that ARM is as prevalent as CISC once was.
trparkyMeanwhile, Lisa Su doesn't have to brag; the hardware itself speaks for AMD's prowess.
And here's the other thing Intel has to adapt to and yet AMD is in the same situation Vs ARM.
trparkyThey're no longer king of the hill and Pat can't stand that.
That is an over-reaction, though likely in the ballpark. No one who is King of their particular hill wants to loose it..
Posted on Reply
#54
trparky
lexluthermiesterYup, nitpicky is a word. RISC vs CISC IPC is an undying debate. Each has it's advantages, each has it's drawbacks. Comparing the two to each other is never a perfectly straight forward task and likely never will be. However, arriving at a conclusion based on a task by task analysis can give enough information to arrive at a finding which has merit. It's never perfect, but close enough. And in reality, Apple's Mseries SOCs are very solid and well performing. Make no mistake though, they can never replace CISC out-right without becoming CISC to some degree.
But what about the fact that modern day CISC-based chips aren't really CISC under the hood? They have instruction decoders that break down the CISC instructions to RISC instructions.
lexluthermiesterAnd here's the other thing Intel has to adapt to and yet AMD is in the same situation Vs ARM.
AMD has ARM chips in the works, the only big name chip producer that doesn't is Intel.
Posted on Reply
#55
lexluthermiester
trparkyBut what about the fact that modern day CISC-based chips aren't really CISC under the hood? They have instruction decoders that break down the CISC instructions to RISC instructions.
Some, sure. Not nearly all. Let's not muddle the discussion.
trparkyAMD has ARM chips in the works
Saying "in the works" is a misleading statement. It's being explored at AMD R&D, but they have no actual products in the product stack.
trparkythe only big name chip producer that doesn't is Intel.
That's not true either. Intel is exploring ARM and RISCV both.
Posted on Reply
#56
qcmadness
lexluthermiesterYup, nitpicky is a word. RISC vs CISC IPC is an undying debate. Each has it's advantages, each has it's drawbacks. Comparing the two to each other is never a perfectly straight forward task and likely never will be. However, arriving at a conclusion based on a task by task analysis can give enough information to arrive at a finding which has merit. It's never perfect, but close enough. And in reality, Apple's Mseries SOCs are very solid and well performing. Make no mistake though, they can never replace CISC out-right without becoming CISC to some degree.


Desperation is not the right word. Intel has to adapt to the ever evolving reality that ARM is as prevalent as CISC once was.

And here's the other thing Intel has to adapt to and yet AMD is in the same situation Vs ARM.

That is an over-reaction, though likely in the ballpark. No one who is King of their particular hill wants to loose it..
For example, Zen 4c / Zen 5c is how AMD fences off ARM in server
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 24th, 2024 10:31 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts