Wednesday, February 14th 2024

ASML High-NA EUV Twinscan EXE Machines Cost $380 Million, 10-20 Units Already Booked

ASML has revealed that its cutting-edge High-NA extreme ultraviolet (EUV) chipmaking tools, called High-NA Twinscan EXE, will cost around $380 million each—over twice as much as its existing Low-NA EUV lithography systems that cost about $183 million. The company has taken 10-20 initial orders from the likes of Intel and SK Hynix and plans to manufacture 20 High-NA systems annually by 2028 to meet demand. The High-NA EUV technology represents a major breakthrough, enabling an improved 8 nm imprint resolution compared to 13 nm with current Low-NA EUV tools. This allows chipmakers to produce transistors that are nearly 1.7 times smaller, translating to a threefold increase in transistor density on chips. Attaining this level of precision is critical for manufacturing sub-3 nm chips, an industry goal for 2025-2026. It also eliminates the need for complex double patterning techniques required presently.

However, superior performance comes at a cost - literally and figuratively. The hefty $380 million price tag for each High-NA system introduces financial challenges for chipmakers. Additionally, the larger High-NA tools require completely reconfiguring chip fabrication facilities. Their halved imaging field also necessitates rethinking chip designs. As a result, adoption timelines differ across companies - Intel intends to deploy High-NA EUV at an advanced 1.8 nm (18A) node, while TSMC is taking a more conservative approach, potentially implementing it only in 2030 and not rushing the use of these lithography machines, as the company's nodes are already developing well and on time. Interestingly, the installation process of ASML's High-NA Twinscan EXE 150,000-kilogram system required 250 crates, 250 engineers, and six months to complete. So, production is as equally complex as the installation and operation of this delicate machinery.
Sources: Taipei Times, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

13 Comments on ASML High-NA EUV Twinscan EXE Machines Cost $380 Million, 10-20 Units Already Booked

#1
atomek
TSMC have they own lithography machines?
Posted on Reply
#2
W1zzard
atomekTSMC have they own lithography machines?
They buy them from ASML, like everyone else
Posted on Reply
#3
lewis007
Without China to buy this machine its DOA.
Posted on Reply
#4
Zaqq
lewis007Without China to buy this machine its DOA.
Why even bother to buy the machines when you can buy people to "develop" their "own technology"... China is playing the long game.
Posted on Reply
#5
marios15
Damn, we went from 193nm lasers to 13nm and now to 8nm

These are going to be some very clean cuts

Should we expect 7GHz?
Posted on Reply
#6
Dirt Chip
Is this some kind of a record for a single civilian product?
Posted on Reply
#7
user556
W1zzardThey buy them from ASML, like everyone else
There are others. Nikon and Canon both produced similar equipment pre-EUV. But, yeah, ASML is alone in the EUV realm because, according to Wikipedia, Nikon and Canon were both denied the licence to the basic research on EUV.
Posted on Reply
#8
AleksandarK
News Editor
user556There are others. Nikon and Canon both produced similar equipment pre-EUV. But, yeah, ASML is alone in the EUV realm because, according to Wikipedia, Nikon and Canon were both denied the licence to the basic research on EUV.
www.techpowerup.com/318452/canon-wants-to-challenge-asml-with-a-cheaper-5-nm-nanoimprint-lithography-machine
Canon also wants a piece of the pie, but using a bit different approach. Hopefully someone picks up on it.
Posted on Reply
#9
semantics
user556There are others. Nikon and Canon both produced similar equipment pre-EUV. But, yeah, ASML is alone in the EUV realm because, according to Wikipedia, Nikon and Canon were both denied the licence to the basic research on EUV.
Irrc
The US heavily invested into EUV and blocked Japanese companies out of all the government money and research. US was the world leader in lithography machines until Japanese lithography machines started winning outright. Japan leaned to proximity x-ray for the next big process. Japan later pivoted to EUV but it was too little too late. ASML benefited from this being allowed to participate in the EUV LLC and eventually buy SVG, buying their way into the US's research and dying lithography industry. ASML did pull off being able to completely commercialize it but they benefited from being able to dip into US and EU money. This is also why the US retains some control on ASML's EUV machines.
Posted on Reply
#11
AnotherReader
user556I don't think I'd call it heavily invested when there is no US companies building such machines. And doesn't look like there has been for a long time - www.nytimes.com/1993/06/06/business/us-gives-up-on-a-chip-making-tool-but-does-it-matter.html

Huh, and looks like SVG was a late comer and maybe never really built much anyway - www.nytimes.com/1990/02/13/business/low-tech-company-in-high-tech-gamble.html
The foundational research for EUV was done in the USA and the USA blocked Nikon and Canon from joining that effort. For a long time, the Japanese were the leaders in lithography.
Posted on Reply
#12
SOAREVERSOR
lewis007Without China to buy this machine its DOA.
This is horseshit. Japan, the EU, Taiwan, and the US can employ them. Most of these machines are made in small numbers in a set amount of countries. China doesn't factor into this.
Posted on Reply
#13
user556
AnotherReaderThe foundational research for EUV was done in the USA and the USA blocked Nikon and Canon from joining that effort. For a long time, the Japanese were the leaders in lithography.
That doesn't make it "heavily invested" though.

EDIT: Hehe, reading that EE Times article suggests the agreed commitments weren't upheld in the end. AFAIK, the production of equipment and primary components are all EU based. Certainly the equipment hasn't been assembled in USA like promised.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 20th, 2024 02:32 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts