Friday, August 2nd 2024

Intel "Meteor Lake" CPUs Face Yield Issues, Company Running "Hot Lots" to Satisfy Demand

In a conversation with Intel's CEO Pat Gelsinger, industry analyst Patrick Moorhead revealed that Intel's Meteor Lake CPU platform suffers from some production issues. More specifically, Intel has been facing some yield and/or back-end production issues with its Meteor Lake platform, resulting in a negative impact on Intel's margins when producing the chip. The market is showing great demand for these chips, and Intel has been forced to run productions of "hot lots"-- batch production of silicon with the highest priority that gets moved to the front of the production line so they can get packaged as fast as possible. While this is a good sign that the demand is there, running hot lots increases production costs overall as some other wafers have to go back so Meteor Lake can pass.

The yield issues associated with Meteor Lake could be stemming from the only tile made by Intel in the MTL package: the compute tile made on the Intel 4 process. Intel 4 process is specific to Meteor Lake. No other Intel product uses it, not even the Xeon 6, which uses Intel 3, or any of the upcoming CPUs like Arrow Lake, which uses the Intel 20A node. So, Intel is doing multiple nodes for multiple generations of processors, further driving up costs as typical high-volume production with a single node for multiple processors yields lower costs. Additionally, the company is left with lots of "wafers to burn" with Intel 4 node, so even with Meteor Lake having yield issues, the production is ultimately fine, while the operating costs and margins take a hit.
Sources: Patrick Moorhead on X, via AnandTech
Add your own comment

5 Comments on Intel "Meteor Lake" CPUs Face Yield Issues, Company Running "Hot Lots" to Satisfy Demand

#1
kondamin
I thought arrowlake was intel 3
Posted on Reply
#2
Ferrum Master
Stock tanked so much...

Gelsinger should pack his stuff... quit the clown parade.

My condolences to US Tax payers.
Posted on Reply
#3
kondamin
Ferrum MasterStock tanked so much...

Gelsinger should pack his stuff... quit the clown parade.

My condolences to US Tax payers.
He’s only been ceo for 3 years, to me it looks like intel is flipping a new leaf progressing trough the nodes at a decent pace So he’s delivering on the chipsact thing.

Considering the amount of time chip development goes trough I doubt raptor lake had much of his influence as it was released a couple of months after he became ceo.
Posted on Reply
#4
Ferrum Master
kondaminHe’s only been ceo for 3 years, to me it looks like intel is flipping a new leaf progressing trough the nodes at a decent pace So he’s delivering on the chipsact thing.

Considering the amount of time chip development goes trough I doubt raptor lake had much of his influence as it was released a couple of months after he became ceo.
But AMD is in his rear view mirror.

3 years is enough to see the "fruits" of work. In this particular case he should have insisted on axing many many things and quit bleeding money.
Posted on Reply
#5
LittleBro
Ferrum MasterStock tanked so much...

Gelsinger should pack his stuff... quit the clown parade.

My condolences to US Tax payers.
IMHO, Ol' Gelsy must be getting pretty awkward feedback from the board. Looks like there is no one with big enough balls to replace him in such a disastrous moments.
Posted on Reply
Aug 2nd, 2024 07:23 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts